NUCLEAR WEAPONS HAVE NOT BEEN DETONATED IN WAR SINCE 1945
Nuclear Weapons
1
NUCLEAR WEAPONS HAVE NOT BEEN DETONATED IN WAR SINCE 1945
by Student‟s Name
Code+ course name
Professor‟s name
University name
City, State
Date
Nuclear Weapons
2
Introduction
Detonation refers to the sudden and violent explosion, including that of a nuclear
weapon. Since the Second World War in the 1940s, there has been no war-related detonation
of a nuclear weapon around the globe. Though this might sound positive, it is a major issue
currently facing the United States National Security due to the fear that such weapons might
be used by terrorists against America. Currently, terrorism is considered one of the major
threats to the United States, and the country has been at the forefront of fighting against all
terrorist acts. In order to prevent such incidences, and its innumerable social, economic, and
environmental effects, this issue should be addressed as urgently as possible and with all
vigour (Kaufman, 2006).
Facing such a threat will undoubtedly go beyond simply tracking down the assailants
or issuing mild warnings to the rogue states that they will be condemned for their actions. It
will require banning all nuclear weapons as the viable instruments of warfare. This is one of
the instances where things are easier said than done because a change of this policy can be
very difficult to implement. This is because the general public, as well as national leaders,
have little experience in the devastating effects of nuclear weapons; they actually ignore the
moral taboos that explain their use. This document mainly focuses on this prickly issue by
assessing the nuclear taboo and nuclear deterrence (Mueller, 2000). Later on, the paper will
outline the importance of using the two methods in explaining nuclear detonation.
Brief Overview of the Nuclear Taboo
According to Tannenwald (2007), the nuclear taboo is the final result of over a decade
of investigations, analysis and writing on the failure of the nuclear weapon use. Nina
Tannenwald is an associate research professor at Watson Institute of International Studies. In
her book, she argues that it is not the realist stress on the self-interest and cost-benefit
evaluations of rationalists that have contributed to the non-use of nuclear weapons since
Nuclear Weapons
3
1945. She successfully integrates the constructivist theory supported with more conventional
explanations, like deterrence, to explain how various ideas related to national identity – a
reasonable use of weapons, the morality in warfare, and norms – have played important roles
in the world. She stresses on how the bottom line of the taboo firstly emerged from mere
beliefs within the entire public that exerted a lot of pressure on political leaders (Elworthy,
2005; Scilla, 2005; Gabrielle, 2005). Ironically, these beliefs were later legally
institutionalised in arms control agreements.
Tannenwald‟s detailed accounts on how nuclear decisions have been made in the US
White House were of massive interest to a wide range of audience. They followed the pattern
that the book arranged in three integrated themes: a historical account of nuclear weapons of
the non-use by the US since 1945, the factors and processes linking the rationales and self-
interest which contributed to the emergence of the nuclear taboo, and the effects of the
evolving nuclear taboo on the foreign policy of the United States.
In her argument, these are the norms that influenced the US warfare decisions in three
main ways. Firstly, the norms define the constraints of acceptable actions that limit the policy
options and strategy. Secondly, these norms are constitutive. This fact has the implication that
they shape identities; for example, the identity of a sovereign nation that outlines the rule and
strategy preferences (Elworthy, 2005; Scilla, 2005; Gabrielle, 2005). Thirdly, the norms can
play the role of shielding complementary practices, like the use of conservative weapons
Leave a Reply
Want to join the discussion?Feel free to contribute!