607 Response to Others

607 Response to Others

Author’s Name

Institutional Affiliation

607 Response to Others

I am intrigued by your discussion post because it has provided insightful ideas concerning the strengths and weaknesses of the different vulnerability assessment methodologies covered in the readings. I agree with you that the strongpoints of the Vulnerability Assessment Framework (VAF) are its flexibility, understandability, and scalability. Also, I submit that the primary weakness of this methodology is its focus on assessing interdependencies, which requires using outsourced resources that can introduce confusion in the model outcomes. As regards the RAMCAP methodology, I would like to add one more item to the strengths you have delineated. This additional strength is that this methodology is technically sound and consistent when it comes to identifying, quantifying, analyzing, and communication numerous vulnerabilities and their characteristics.

I concur with you that one of the weaknesses underlying the use of vulnerability assessments is model reliance on qualitative information, which can be inconsistent in risk attribute interpretation. I would add that another weakness of using a vulnerability assessment is that it can miss out on small vulnerabilities because they appear negligible, yet these small vulnerabilities are what attackers seek out and exploit to create instruction codes and sequences. Lastly, I see we share the same sentiments that the RAMCAP is the vulnerability assessment that best befits private sector companies due to its ability to compare entities and assess security resource prioritization. Thank you for such an informative post.