Exxons acquisition of Mobil

Name

Instructor

Course

Date

Exxon’s acquisition of Mobil

Company Overview

ExxonMobil is one of the leading companies in the oil and petroleum industry globally. Although ExxonMobil started operating as a regional oil and petroleum company in Texa, U.S., the company has grown to a global company that, which is the largest publicly traded petrochemical and petroleum international company. The company has been in operation for more than 125 years, an operation that started with regional kerosene dealers. ExxonMobil is currently a multinational company that operates in nearly all the five continents. Exxon Mobil Corp. is a multinational gas and oil company of American origin that has its headquarter in Irving, Texas, U.S. ExxonMobil was founded in 1999 following the mergers of the two companies; Exxon and Mobil, hence, a descendant of HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_D._Rockefeller” o “John D. Rockefeller” Rockefeller’s  HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Oil” o “Standard Oil” Standard Oil Co. The company is commonly affiliated with a Canadian oil company – Imperial Oil Co. By revenue, ExxonMobil is ranked third globally, and second by market capitalization. In 2013 Forbes Global 2000 listing, ExxonMobil was ranked fifth. In term of the human resource capacity, ExxonMobil has employed over 13,000 staff globally, making it one of the leading global employers. In terms of refining of the petroleum products, ExxonMobil is the largest company globally, a title that has been enjoyed with the Standard Oil, the parent company of ExxonMobil, since 1870s. ExxonMobil has over 37 oil refineries that are spread in the 21 countries that it operates in globally. The company produces over 6.3 million barrels of oil estimated to be 1,000,000,000 liters. With respect to the daily production capacity, ExxonMobil is the world’s leading oil, gas, and petroleum products with a capacity of 3.921 million oil barrels, thus accounting for about three percent of the world’s production units. ExxonMobil also accounts for about one percent of gas and oil reserves.

Products and Services

ExxonMobil is best known for its brands such as Exxon, Esso, and Mobil that are very popular among the company’s clients. ExxonMobil specializes in the production of modern transport products, lubricants, and gas products. ExxonMobil is characterized by three segments: chemicals, upstream, and downstream that specializes in the production of consumer, industrial, aviation, commercial, base-stocks, and marine lubricants. It is the upstream segment of the company that deals in gas and oil products that generates major revenues and earnings to the company. The downstream segment, on the other hand, is responsible for logistics, marketing operations, and refining. Chemicals segment of ExxonMobil Co. is charged with the responsibility of manufacturing and marketing of petrochemical products such as aromatics, polypropylene plastics, olefins, and polyethylene. ExxonMobil (XOM), therefore, offers range of worldwide recognized brands that are popular among customers for their innovation, efficiency, and innovation. The introduction of signum technology in the production and manufacturing process has enable the company to better understand and match the needs of its customers, hence producing lubricant products that are customer tailored. It is this technological integration and application that has made ExxonMobil gain a competitive advantage over its competitors in the industry.

INCLUDEPICTURE “http://marketrealist.com/wp-content/uploads/cache/2013/09/2013_09_13-XOM-2Q13-Earnings-by-Segment/-1579490588.jpg” * MERGEFORMATINET

Company’s Criticism

The company has not been without issues and criticism, with the laxity of the management in speeding up the 1989 cleanup exercise following the Exxon Valdez’s oil spillage in Alaska. This oil spill causes major environmental damage. ExxonMobil has also faced criticism for financially supporting organizations and foundations that are particularly skeptical on the contribution of burning fossil fuels to global warming. Besides, ExxonMobil has been accused by foreign diplomats for weakening the American foreign policies and violation of human rights.

Exxon before Acquisition

Before acquisition Exxon was financial situation was slowly declining with numerous market instability. The merging of the two company aimed at expanding the controlling the market especially noting that the two company portrayed differing operation cultures. The merger ought to generate globally-based corporations that can contend to all this key market segments with the planet. Within disorders involving deflation, that has viewed the costs on most everything plummet, corporations will be powered in order to mix or maybe form alliances to produce establishments involving level which will make sure your survival for the cost of their opponents.

Reasons for Merging of Exxon and Mobil

The conspicuous push and urge and for merging of Exxon and Mobil were mainly from the variation in the business ambience. The external oil market was experience stiff condition including the plummeting of the oil prices. This case presented financial difficulties to the involved companies thus merging was one of the most dependable ways to reverse the ever-growing gap in the market in the market. The price tag on oil per barrel had dropped significantly to between $9. 87 and $10 in the London market, Eighty five percent inside US–a drop with on price involved nearly 50 per cent in the last 12 months.

The merger between key essential oil corporations Exxon and Mobil will probably was aimed at generate not merely this world’s largest essential oil company but also the most important company in terms of profit. It is merged revenue with the very first 9 several weeks involving 1998 would’ve been recently $119 billion dollars when compared to the $115 billion dollars generated by the world’s largest company, General Power generators. The offer, valued in more than $75 billion dollars by simply analysts, shows the most significant professional merger of all time. It’s much bigger than the last document, which furthermore happened inside petro-chemical business. Of which nation, in between British Isles Oil as well as the US-based Amoco, was worth $48. 2 billion dollars and made this world’s 3rd largest essential oil maker. This arriving together involving Exxon and Mobil will probably forge some sort of company involving huge dimensions. Exxon-Mobil’s elementary essential oil manufacturing will probably outstrip that involving Nigeria and many various other people with the Group involving Oil Conveying Countries. It is profit will probably be larger than this major domestic item of nevertheless twenty three nations. Will probably be this world’s largest dealer involving petrol, with regarding forty seven, 500 areas worldwide and about 12-monthly benefit involving almost $12 billion dollars.

Pros and Cons of Merger of Exxon-Mobil

Merging possesses its own benefits and drawbacks. A key benefit of the t Exxon Mobil was easy and recognizable by law and did not cost around other designs associated with exchange. The companies (Exxon and Mobil) simply accepted to combine their particular complete businesses. There was no requirement to exchange concept to particular person assets on the received agency towards the getting agency. The merging of the two companies lowered competition considerably thus conveying more fiscal skin scales on the market. This will ultimately kept the business progress with the amalgamation on the competing attributes of equally firms. Merging made it possible for the organization to restructure and fortify the corporation seeing that firms mixed up in purchase reveal ways of reinforce the corporation, hence get rid of weak points inside agency.

The decision-making process following the merger possibly lead to generation of positive results as new form of skill was incorporated in the managerial practices of the amalgamated firms. Exxon-Mobil subsequently spent money on more substantial investment decision to yield more earnings. Further, the merging of the two companies was able to realize more market reveal, hence affects greater self-confidence from their clients because the firm then appeared more reputable. Which effects enhance associated with clients and as well appeals to some other events to get human relationships with the group inside many sorts. Merging of the two companies brought several undoing also. One of many disadvantages was that the merging had to be accredited by means of ballots on the stockholders of firms. Legally, it was a requirement of two-thirds (or even more) on the reveal ballots are important pertaining to authorization. Getting the required ballots was time-consuming and hard. On top of that, the actual cooperation on the focus on firms’ supervision was absolutely essential to get a merging. This particular cooperation most likely was inexpensively obtained. Also, the actual diseconomies associated with range in the event company turn out to be too large leading to raised unit costs. It is will also create clashes associated with traditions involving unique variations of company. So this kind of lowers the potency of the actual integration.

Merging in addition possibly be developing a clash associated with objective involving distinct firms, this means decisions tend to be more hard to make and causing dysfunction inside working on the company. It also effects dissatisfaction amongst present employees seeing that opportunities will probably be minimal and the supervision have to make a decision which often employees to support the career after the purchase has brought spot. However, the process of downsizing, restructuring and personal savings will probably deepen this situation with the benefit program in its entirety by simply lowering the quantity of job employed–the just source of surplus worth and benefit. It’s going to exacerbate this deflationary routine today dominant practically in most industries. As long as this huge world-wide profitable allows and personal success developed by human labour remains concentrated inside grasp with the transnational businesses as well as the professional and personal elites, it’ll necessarily mean more and more challenging problems around the working school. A new impressive paradox possesses blossomed. This “overcapacity” or maybe surplus involving profitable potential in many industries, whether it is essential oil, cars, drugs, foodstuff manufacturing, metal, computers or maybe every other, is only extra on the perspective with the marketplace as well as the removal involving individual benefit. The specific wants involving lots of people haven’t been recently increased (Palepu, Krishna and Paul 78-9).

Financial Analysis Before and After the Acquisition

Management Effectiveness

The Return on Assets (ROA) of Exxon and Mobil was 6.75% and 3.95% respectively before the merger. This was an indication that Exxon had a better asset management policy compared to Mobil since its ROA was almost twice better. However, after the acquisition and merger of the two companies to form ExxonMobil, the ROA ratio increased to 12.04%. This was an indication that the company’s asset management significantly improved with the assets having the capacity to generate revenue more than doubling. From the ROA ratio, it is worth noting that the merger was profitable and beneficial to two companies following the merger. Since the ROA ratio exceed the 5% that is perceived good, ExxonMobil, therefore, is effectively utilizing its assets to generate revenue and profits. Similarly, the company’s return on equity (ROE) increased to 26.33% after the merger of the two companies. Before the merger, Mobil and Exxon had a ROE of 9.01% and 14.57% respectively. The merger, therefore, increased the effectiveness of ExxonMobil to utilize its equities to improve on its profitability index and revenue capacity. The ExxonMobil’s return on investments (ROI) was better than the RIO in for each company before forming the merger as it increased to 33.61 percent from the average rate of 16.00 percent before the mergers. From the management’s point of view with respect effectiveness, there is no doubt that this merger and acquisition was beneficial to the two companies as the effectiveness of the management doubled.

Profitability Performance of the ExxonMobil

The profitability measures indicated the mergers between Exxon and Mobil was positive and more profitable than when the two companies were operating independently. Although the gross profit margin of ExxonMobil Co. was slightly lower than that of Exxon and Mobil at 35.4% from 38.61%, the merger increased the profitability index of the ExxonMobil. The increased in the profitability indices of ExxonMobil was evidenced by the increased in the net profit margin from 5.4% and 3.18% for Exxon and Mobil respectively to over 7.6 percent for ExxonMobil Co. In addition, the EBIT margin for ExxonMobil was better than that of each company before the merger. The financial statement of ExxonMobil revealed that the company’s EBIT was 15.38% after the mergers, a figure that showed an improvement from 12.31% and 11.85% posted by Exxon and Mobil before the merger. The operating profit margin also doubled to 12.1% after the merger. The profitability measures evidenced that the merger was effective and more profitable than when each company was operating independently.

Liquidity Ratios After and Before the Merger

The short-term liquidity position of ExxonMobil was stronger after the merger with the quick ratio of ExxonMobil being 0.79 which was better than 0.57 and 0.48 for Exxon and Mobil before the merger. This was an indication that the merger strengthened the company’s ability to meet its short-term financial obligation when they fall due. The current ratio of ExxonMobil increased to 1.06 from 0.67 and 0.91 for Mobil and Exxon respectively. With the current ratio being more than 1.00, ExxonMobil was, therefore, well placed to meet its most liquid short-term liabilities such as account payable. The current assets expressed as percentage of the total assets was negative before the merger, but significantly increased after the merger to 1.48. From the liquidity position, the merger was profitable and effective as the liquidity position of ExxonMobil improved.

Share Performance

Following the merger of Exxon and Mobil to form ExxonMobil Co, the cash flow per share improved from $2.28 to $3.29, an indication that the cash flow per share for ExxonMobil was better than that of Exxon, but slightly lower than that of Mobil, which had $7.08 cash flow per share. The book value per share after the merger was equally better at $10.21. The merger had no significant contribution to the earnings per share. The EPS before and after the merger did not significantly changed as it stood at $2.56. However, the value of the company, measured by the stock price indicated that the merger improved the company’s market value, as attributed to the rise in the stock prices of the ExxonMobil. In term of share prices, Mobil’s share traded at $75.25 while Exxon’s shares were trading for $72.00 before the merger. After the merger, the ExxonMobil’s share traded for over $95 per share, thus, and increased in the capitalization.

Financial Performance of ExxonMobil Co

Financial Data in USD millions HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExxonMobil” l “cite_note-43” [43]

Year-end 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Total revenue 358 955 365 467 390 328 459 579 301 586 383 221

Net income 36 130 39 500 40 610 45 220 19 280 30 460

Total assets 208 335 219 015 242 082 228 052 233 323 Total debt 7 991 8 347 9 566 9 425 9 605

Conclusion and Summary

Both Exxon and Mobil were relatively stable companies characterized by strong financial position and performance. However, following the increasing competitiveness of the industry in the U.S., there was need for the two companies to merger in order to strengthen their positions and market dominance. The merger that officially took place in 1999 marked a new beginning for the two companies. Since Exxon was more stable and stronger than Mobil, the merger agreement concluded that Mobil be absorbed by the Exxon with the two forming ExxonMobil Co. The merger was beneficial and effective both to the shareholders and management. The financial performance of ExxonMobil was much better than each independent company. This was measured by the increased profitability, asset position, and improved liquidity position of ExxonMobil. It is, therefore, worth concluding the mergers between Mobil and Exxon was economical and effective, hence profitable to all parties involved in the process.

Works Cited

Coll, S. Private Empire: ExxonMobil and American power, 2012. Print.

Omeje, Kenneth C. High Stakes and Stakeholders: Oil Conflict and Security in Nigeria. Aldershot [u.a.: Ashgate, 2006. Print.

Palepu, Krishna G, and Paul M. Healy. Business Analysis & Valuation: Using Financial Statements. Mason, OH: Thomson/South-Western, 2008. Print.

Palepu, Krishna G, and Paul M. Healy. Business Analysis & Valuation: Using Financial Statements. Mason, OH: Thomson/South-Western, 2008. Print.

Susan V. Crosson; Belverd E., Jr Needles; Needles, Belverd E.; Powers, Marian. Principles of Accounting. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2013: 209-211.

Appendix: Consolidated Balance Sheet

Assets

Current Assets

Cash And Cash Equivalents 4,913,000   9,923,000   13,068,000  

Short Term Investments –   –   –  

Net Receivables 33,152,000   34,987,000   38,642,000  

Inventory 16,135,000   14,542,000   15,024,000  

Other Current Assets 5,108,000   5,008,000   6,229,000  

Total Current Assets 59,308,000   64,460,000   72,963,000  

Long Term Investments 36,328,000   34,718,000   34,333,000  

Property Plant and Equipment 243,650,000   226,949,000   214,664,000  

Goodwill –   –   –  

Intangible Assets –   –   –  

Accumulated Amortization –   –   –  

Other Assets 7,522,000   7,668,000   9,092,000  

Deferred Long Term Asset Charges –   –   –  

Total Assets 346,808,000   333,795,000   331,052,000  

Liabilities

Current Liabilities

Accounts Payable 55,916,000   60,486,000   69,794,000  

Short/Current Long Term Debt 15,808,000   3,653,000   7,711,000  

Other Current Liabilities –   –   –  

Total Current Liabilities 71,724,000   64,139,000   77,505,000  

Long Term Debt 11,633,000   11,483,000   9,322,000  

Other Liabilities 42,426,000   48,943,000   46,863,000  

Deferred Long Term Liability Charges 40,530,000   37,570,000   36,618,000  

Minority Interest 6,492,000   5,797,000   6,348,000  

Negative Goodwill –   –   –  

Total Liabilities 172,805,000   167,932,000   176,656,000  

Stockholders’ Equity

Misc Stocks Options Warrants –   –   –  

Redeemable Preferred Stock –   –   –  

Preferred Stock –   –   –  

Common Stock 10,077,000   9,653,000   9,512,000  

Retained Earnings 387,432,000   365,727,000   330,939,000  

Treasury Stock (212,781,000) (197,333,000) (176,932,000)

Capital Surplus –   –   –  

Other Stockholder Equity (10,725,000) (12,184,000) (9,123,000)

Total Stockholder Equity 174,003,000   165,863,000   154,396,000  

Net Tangible Assets 174,003,000   165,863,000   154,396,000