FERGUSON, MISSOURI CASE STUDY ANALYSIS



FERGUSON, MISSOURI CASE STUDY ANALYSIS

Introduction On August 9, 2014, 18 year old Michael Brown was shot and slaughtered by a cop in Ferguson, MO. An officer who was reacting to an alternate call, got an alternate call around a theft at a comfort store. There are diverse reasons of why the shooting happened that game changing day. A feature by a national adjacent, shows Michael Brown contending with the policemen. The feature shows Brown had a blade in his grasp and he was yelling at the police to shot him. His companion, Dorian Johnson, who was strolling with him said the officer opened flame when the two youngsters declined to move from the center of the road to the walkway. Various reports say he was unarmed and “agreeing” with the officers, when the officer fired.( Holmes, 2000)

Inside that week, a few Ferguson occupants held a candlelight vigil to respect Brown’s memory. They all assembled again on West Florissant Avenue in Ferguson for a tranquil challenge yelling, “No equity, no peace” and were met by cops in uproar rigging, convey rifles and shields. What should be a tranquil challenge, soon turned vicious. There were reports about huge plundering, a Quiktrip comfort store was among the first and hardest hit business. On August eleventh, dissidents walked before the Ferguson police headquarters until the strategic officers came to get them out (Holmes, 2000).

Since the specific arrival of data of the shooting and the obscurity allowed to the officer, starts a fourth day and night of dissents that increases when the police try to scatter individuals utilizing elastic shots and poisonous gas. Police later affirm that Molotov mixed drinks were tossed amid the night. “In the wake of annoying strains over the police shooting of a dark adolescent started to subside, feelings flare by and by as the police distinguish the officer included additionally discharge prove that the exploited person was a suspect in an accommodation store burglary minutes before being shot”.(washington Post) Gov. Jay Nixon requires a highly sensitive situation and forces a midnight-to-5 a.m (Holmes & Smith, 2008). check in time on the St. Louis suburb. Numerous natives contended that a time limitation would just prompt new and wild meetings.

After the midnight time limit happens, a few groups of individuals go up against the police covering up the avenues. The swarm were droning “We are Mike Brown! We have the right to amass gently!” (Holmes & Smith, 2008). As indicated by police, the dissidents threw no less than one container rocket and at the police and at the clear sound of shots, demonstrators scramble to wellbeing. The police blaze smoke canisters and poisonous gas at the swarms, and authorities’ later say it was in light of the shooting. A couple of individuals were captured that day and blamed for neglecting to scatter (Holmes & Smith, 2008).

Conclusion

On Michael Brown’s family ask for, Dr. Michael M. Baden performed a private dissection. He discharges that Brown was shot six times, incorporating twice in the head from the front. One Bullet entered the highest point of his skull, proposing his head was twisted forward when it struck him, and brought about a deadly damage. After almost two weeks of distress, Gov. Jay Nixon requested the Missouri National Guard to withdrawal from Ferguson, flagging that the powers accepted that they had to a great extent restored request. Lawyer General Eric H. Holder Jr. demonstrated that the government exertion was making headway. He says it will require some serious energy for them to create the realities, all the confirmation and see where the case will at last go.

References

Holmes, M. D. (2000). Minority threat and police brutality: Determinants of civil rights criminal complaints in US municipalities. Criminology, 38(2), 343-368.

Holmes, M. D., & Smith, B. W. (2008). Race and police brutality: Roots of an urban dilemma. SUNY Press.