Recent orders
Staffing Evaluation (Case study)
For this assignment, you will analyze the case study titled “Staffing Evaluation at Hallmark” on
page 380 of your textbook.
Phillips, J. M., & Gully, S. M. (2015). Strategic staffing (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Pearson.
Read the case study and answer the following questions. Note: you will not answer the questions
following the case study in the textbook, only the questions below. Explain your responses using
what you learned through this unit.
Critically evaluate Hallmark’s staffing index. What are its pros and cons How can Hallmark use technology for tracking applicants and on-boarding its new hires to
include improving efficiency and effectiveness of staffing functions?
How can Hallmark use the system to track:
company turnover,
downsizing, and
retention?
How should these be measured? Be sure to explain the different staffing metrics and how each
is used.
Your completed case study must be a minimum of two pages in length, and you must use at least
your textbook as a reference. Other references may be used if necessary. Any information from a
resource must be cited and referenced in APA format.
Epidemiology: Prevalence of diabetes in Saudi Arabia
It is an epidemiological study bout prevalence of diabetes in Saudi Arabia. Use scholarly sources and internet. Suggest three policies that can be considered by the government to minimize the rising cases. (1,500 words). 4-6 sources are enough. Include your textbook as one of the sources. Follow APA guidelines.
Social, Economic, and Environmental Sustainability Assignment
Social, Economic, and Environmental Sustainability Assignment
BACKGROUND
Here’s the PDF Here’s the PDF – Alternative Formats
There are two downloads for this particular written essay assignment.
The first document is an article that will familiarize everyone with how many firms (larger size generally: but small & medium enterprises can use the standards too) report about their sustainability efforts.
The dimensions that firms focus upon fit into three areas: Social, Economic, and Environmental (SEE). SEE is an acronym I use to remember the dimensions, it’ s not reflective of corporate priorities, which are generally about profit and shareholder wealth.
DOWNLOADS
Download the article here or here Antolin-Lopez Delgado-Ceballos Montiel JCP 2016 _1_.pdf Antolin-Lopez Delgado-Ceballos Montiel JCP 2016 _1_.pdf – Alternative Formats
I have written with Ivan Montiel on and off for 10 years, so I assure you that this is a fairly easy read. The article itself is an APA draft, so the tables will be at the end of the paper.
The second document comes from the GRI database.
This is a document that has solid links to webpages and the firm could be considered “tasty.” You can pick the document up Yum Foods Sustainability Report.pdf Yum Foods Sustainability Report.pdf – Alternative Formats
. The report (you’ll see more reports in the MBA!) demonstrates most of the GRI standards (watch the introduction on the GRI standards https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/). Some standards are reported on in separate reports, some standards are reported in the Annual Report (where the Profit and Loss statements reside). The Yum foods report is pretty darn comprehensive–but don’t eat the report, drive to KFC as needed.
Now, I visited the GRI, which is based in Amsterdam, a couple of years ago–maybe 2017. Some of the firms who claim to report under GRI standards need to report on ONE standard. I know. I was a little taken aback. Enter in large companies in the news like Monsanto.
Many years ago, as a doctoral student, GRI was requiring certification/accreditation of all standards and then gave a grade (C being the most ominous). As I understood things in 2017, GRI wanted to expand to a larger group of firms and try to build awareness.
It’s important to remember that the GRI does NOT accredit. The GRI, similar to USCA (SACSCOC) and the School of Business (AACSB), requires a third-party to be engaged for checking on firms and asking: “does this firm meet GRI standards and how?”
The third document I’d like everyone to download is the Sustainability Report for your firm or for a firm for which you might have an interest. You can download the report from the GRI database, or from the corporate reporting site that most firms maintain. The sustainability report doesn’t HAVE to be in the GRI database–the only requirement is that you find a second sustainability report.
WHAT
By now, you’re thinking, get to the point Dr. Rod! What I’d like everyone to do is create a short paper, 1″ margins, single spacing, double-space between paragraphs, with a maximum of THREE pages, use APA CITATIONS not formatting–we’re deviating from the formatting.
Here are the content requirements:
- Write a short summary of the three dimensions of sustainability from the Antolin-Lopez et al. (2016) article. Use the definitions found in paper and utilize the tables to help support your definitions. The goal is to familiarize students with the three dimensions of sustainability.
- Look at the GRI requirements before diving into the reports. There’s a structure that will help frame the next two documents.
- Then, using the two sustainability reports, describe who the firm considers as stakeholders.
- Link the reports to the three sustainability dimensions of the firm. Be sure to identify, describe and write about, any unique and innovative ideas that are in use and being reported. Be sure to not only list the ways that firms meet the three sustainability definitions, provide a description and any “Gee Whiz” stuff.
WHY
- Students should be able to describe the main sustainability dimensions and be able to apply the dimensions as they relate to firms.
- Students should be able to identify unique and innovative initiatives and describe and consider if the application is helpful.
GRADING
Grading Points will come from the four areas of content requirement.
WIIFM (What’s in it for me-Dr. Rod): I didn’t like the old sustainability assessment and neither did some students. I am re-working the assignment and have not developed a clear picture around the “students should be able to” statements. I need to adjust the assignment based on outcomes from this first round. Always room for improvement.
