Recent orders

Case Study – Business Law Course

Attached document shows the scenario being used for the case study (page 1 in RED) as well as the elements that need to be addressed in the paper (page 1 in BLUE).  Page 2 & 3 – teal highlight are the questions we should be answering and then building the format of the paper from that.

Assignment needs to be1-2 pages, double spaced, 12 point font, Times New Roman, 1″ margins all around.  This assignment is due by 11:30PM tonight, so just under 15 hours before it is due.

PDF attachment of full textbook if needed to reference that chapter numbers mentioned in the outline.

  • Posted: 4 years ago
  • Budget: $20

Case Bief: Currie v. Chevron USA, Inc.

Write a case brief on Currie v. Chevron USA, Inc.  using the “IRAC” method

1 page

MLA

Unit V Employment Law

Assume that an unfair labor practice charge was filed against your company by several employees and three prospective employees. See the form linked below indicating the charge, which outlines the scenario below: FORMNLRB-501: Case 4689-3 On July 29, 2016, Delphi Golf, Inc. and the union entered a collective bargaining agreement. 

The majority of the company’s employees covered by the agreement had not designated the union as their collective-bargaining representative. The agreement contains a union-security clause requiring employees who are members in good standing of the union to maintain their membership in good standing and all other employees to become members of the union on or before the 31st day following the effective date of the agreement or the date of their hire. The union instructed Delphi Golf, Inc. not to employ three servers for restaurant positions in the company because the servers were not members of the union. The company is an employer within the meaning of Section 2(2) of the act engaged in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(6) and (7) of the act. Explain in a two-page essay the process and steps your company will have to take to defend this action. Explain the defenses to the action and if the union employees have valid claims. What actions by the employer should have been done differently, if at all? What actions by the union should have been done differently? Who, if anyone, is liable?