Recent orders

Business Ethics Case Study

Case Study 1:

Please find the below link for case study and answer all the questions with APA format and references 

https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/business-ethics/resources/googles-handling-of-the-echo-chamber-manifesto/

Discussion Questions 

1:Legally, Google’s firing of Damore may or may not be problematic, but is Google’s firing of Damore ethical?

2:Would you have made the same decision if you were Pichai?

3:Is it ethical for an organization to fire someone who expresses beliefs that don’t align with the overall culture?

4:Do efforts towards a more diverse work culture stifle employees from speaking out? What can leaders do to avert this potential outcome?

Case Study 2:

Please find the below link for case study and answer all the questions with APA format and references

https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/business-ethics/resources/wells-fargo-banking-scandal/

General Discussion Questions:

1:What should business leaders take away from this scandal?

2:What could Wells Fargo have done differently to avert this cultural meltdown?

3:Practice of Ethical Leadership Questions:

4:Modeling Character and Values:What values did Stumpf model to Wells Fargo employees?  What impact might that have on the culture of Wells Fargo?

5:Encouraging Ethical Conduct:What behaviors can leaders model in order to encourage ethical behavior in their organization?

6:Designing Ethical Systems:Wells Fargo did have some systems in place, like the ethics hotline, to report unethical behavior, but it didn’t work. 

7:Why do you think that is? What steps can leaders take to design systems that encourage ethical behavior rather than unethical behavior?

Case study 3:

Please find the below link for case study and answer all the questions with APA format and references 

https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/business-ethics/resources/raiding-customer-assets-at-mf-global/

Questions:

1:Did Corzine act appropriately? How would you characterize his behavior legally, ethically, and managerially? What other choices did he have?

2:Did Ms. O’Brien behave appropriately? Realistically, what other choices did she have?

3:Should the actions of either Corzine or O’Brien (or both or neither) be considered criminally negligent? Unethical? Bad judgment? Other?

4:What role should (or might have) the firm’s Ethics and Compliance Officer played in this drama?

Case Study 4:

Please find the below link for case study and answer all the questions with APA format and references 

https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/business-ethics/resources/aggressive-sales-quotas-or-unfair-bus-practice/

Discussion Questions:

1:Describe, specifically, the ethical dilemma that Peter faced.

2:What are virtues Peter needed to act as he did? What do you think motivated him?

3:What were the risks Peter faced in making this decision?

4:What factors do you think assist people in making moral decisions in the face of a great deal of pressure?

Evidence Of Discrimination

Address the following questions and ensure that your responses for each question are clearly delineated. Your combined response for all of the questions should be at least 500 words as outlined in the grading rubric. Be sure to number your responses.

Discussion

Evidence of Discrimination

Douglas J. Farmer, an employment lawyer with Ogletree Deakins, finds it remarkable that there are still so many lawsuits 50 years after Title VII became law. Part of the problem is that defining discrimination is not as clear-cut as, say, showing that an employer has paid someone less than minimum wage.

In Title VII cases, Farmer says, courts look at three kinds of evidence:

  •  How have similarly situated people been treated? Did a minority employee get fired for falsifying a timecard but a white employee didn’t, for instance?
  • Is there a smoking gun, like a manager saying, “Fire the old man”?
  • Do statistics show a pattern of a supervisor or department being biased against a protected group?

For each of the situations presented below, answer the following questions:

1.       Discuss fully and specifically whether each of the situations outlined represent a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, as amended.

2.       Given Attorney Farmer‘s outline of the three kinds of evidence courts consider for Title VII cases,

a.       provide an example of each kind of evidence that the plaintiff (employee) in each situation could provide as evidence of their claims. Explain how such information can help to support the plaintiff’s case.

b.       provide an example of each kind of evidence that the defendant (organization) in each situation could provide as a defense against the plaintiff’s claims. Explain how such information can help to support the defendant’s defense.

3.       Identify two actions that organizational leaders could implement to increase the likelihood of successful defense against violation of Title VII claims. Briefly describe how these actions could be helpful in such a case.

Situations
A.   Angel worked for a school district in Nevada. She attended a meeting with two male workers. One of the men made a sexist joke to the other male that was not directed at Angel. She filed a sexual harassment complaint with the EEOC. Soon after, she was transferred to another position, a move that she had known for some time might occur. She added a charge of retaliation to her complaint.

B.   Jose, who is openly gay, worked for the Hard Rock Hotel in Las Vegas for two years. He contended that his male supervisor and co-workers subjected him to a hostile work environment on a daily basis. He was subject to crude jokes, name-calling, and unwelcome physical touching. He sued the hotel for sexual harassment, noting that the reason for the harassment was his sexual orientation. 

PESTE Analysis Of Telecommunication Industry In Iran And Its Comparison To Canada's

PESTE (Political-Economic-Societal-Technological and Environmental factors) analysis of Telecommunication industry in Iran and its comparison to Canada’s.