Recent orders
Disruptive Innovation (Strategic Management)
Paper 1: a discussion of your chosen area
Paper 2: an application of that theory or framework to an organisation of your choice
Paper 3: an evaluation of the application of that theory or framework to your chosen
organisation
Reflection on television shows or films
To Prepare
Review the Learning Resources for this week and think about how TV and film can function as a vehicle for delivering stereotypical messages (e.g., powerful women who sacrificed family for career and lamented their unmarried, childless status).
Reflect on television shows or films you have seen that employ stereotypical portrayals used by producers to condemn or endorse specific lifestyle choices.
Assignment:
Submit 3–5 pages, not including title page or reference page:
Your task is to choose a current (e.g., in the last 12 months) television program or a film and conduct a content analysis that identifies the stereotypical portrayals used by the producers to condemn or endorse specific lifestyle choices.
Choose one of the major characters in the movie or TV program you’ve selected.
Describe their physical appearance; are they made to look attractive?
What role does this person play in the story? Is it stereotypical? Are they effective in that role?
What is this person’s job? Is it stereotypical? Are they successful in their job?
Describe two or three specific actions taken by this person.
What was the outcome of each action? Was it positive or negative?
Do the actions/outcomes reinforce a stereotype?
Is the stereotype positive or negative?
How likeable and/or intelligent is this person?
How desirable is this person’s lifestyle?
What are ways to mitigate the stereotyping portrayal you identified in your content analysis?
Be sure your analysis is informed by social psychology theory and research.
In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or Internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your Assignment. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources.
Learning Resources
Required Readings
Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., Akert, R. M., & Sommers, S. R. (Eds.). (2019). Social psychology (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
• Chapter 13, “Prejudice: Causes, Consequences, and Cures”
Daalmans, S., Kleemans, M., & Sadza, A. (2017). Gender representation on gender-targeted television channels: A comparison of female- and male-targeted tv channels in the Netherlands. Sex Roles, 77(5–6), 366–378. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0727-6
Jang, I. J., & Cordero-Pedrosa, C. (2016). To laugh or not to laugh at racist jokes. Peace Review, 28(4), 474–481.doi:10.1080/10402659.2016.1237116
Larsen, G. (2017). It’s a man’s world: Music groupies and the othering of women in the world of rock. Organization, 24(3), 397–417. doi:10.1177/1350508416689095
Proposing Evidence-Based Change
Professional Context
Health care systems around the world provide useful models for analysis. Familiarity with
different models and approaches to health care enables leaders to identify what works
and what does not, as the basis for proposing a change. As we continue to evaluate the
complex and fragmented system in the United States, it is important for nurse leaders to
become familiar with the programs and systems that provide evidence-based quality care
that is affordable and focused on continual improvement.
This assignment provides an opportunity for you to examine a local or regional health care
issue from a global perspective. By successfully completing this assignment, you will
demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assignment
criteria:
Competency 1: Identify the challenges and opportunities facing health care.
Identify an aspect of a local or regional health care system or program that should be a
focus for change.
Competency 2: Compare the effects of different health care finance models and policy
frameworks on resources and patient outcomes.
Define desirable outcomes, including who will pay for care and factors limiting
achievement of those outcomes.
Analyze two non-U.S. health care systems or programs that offer insight into a proposed
change for a health care system or program in the United States.
Competency 3: Evaluate the positive and negative influences of leaders on health care
processes and outcomes.
Determine the financial and health implications of making—and not making—proposed
changes to a health care system or program.
Competency 4: Develop proactive strategies to change the culture of the organization by
incorporating evidence-based practices.
Explain why specific changes will lead to improved outcomes.
Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
Write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.
Support assertions, arguments, propositions, and conclusions with relevant and credible
evidence.
Scenario
Your organization, in collaboration with key stakeholders from the community, is funding
an initiative to investigate potential improvements in the local or regional health care
system. As a nurse leader attuned to the effects of health care policy and finance on the
provision of affordable, high-quality care, you have been asked to join the task force
conducting the study.
You know that an examination of other countries’ health care systems can provide a solid,
evidence-based foundation for evaluating outcomes and identifying benchmarks.
Consequently, you have decided to undertake a comparative analysis of selected, nonU.S. health care systems and compare them to each other and to the current local or
regional U.S. system to help inform decision making as the task force considers proposed
changes.
Instructions
Complete this assignment in three steps:
Propose a change to one aspect of your local or regional health care system or program
that would improve outcomes.
Conduct a comparative analysis of different health care systems, focusing on that one
aspect of the system you are proposing to change.
Summarize your proposed change and the results of your comparative analysis in a report
to executive leaders.
The summary report requirements outlined below, correspond to the grading criteria in the
scoring guide for Proposing Evidence-Based Change, so be sure to address each point.
Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be
assessed. The Guiding Questions: Proposing Evidence-Based Change document linked
in the Resources provides additional considerations that may be helpful in completing your
assignment. In addition, be sure to note the requirements below for document format
and length and for citing supporting evidence.
Identify an aspect of a local or regional health care system or program that should be a
focus for change.
Define desirable outcomes, including who will pay for care and factors limiting
achievement of those outcomes.
Analyze two non-U.S. health care systems or programs that offer insight into a proposed
change for a health care system or program in the United States.
Choose one of the following options for selecting the two systems or programs:
Option 1: Select two systems at opposite ends of the scale in terms of desirable outcomes
for the issue reflected in your proposed change.
Option 2: Select two systems that both produce positive outcomes but take unique or
innovative approaches to the problem.
Compare the outcomes in each non-U.S. system with each other and with present
outcomes in your local or regional health care system.
Explain why specific changes will lead to improved outcomes.
Determine the financial and health implications associated with the proposed changes.
Address the implications of making the changes.
Address the implications of not making the changes.
Write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.
Support assertions, arguments, propositions, and conclusions with relevant and credible
evidence.
Document Format and Length
Use the Summary Report Template, linked in the Resources. An APA Style Paper Tutorial
is also linked in the Resources to help you in writing and formatting your report. If you
would like to use a different template or document format for your report, obtain prior
approval from your instructor.
Your summary report should be 4–5 pages in length, not including the title page and
references page.
Be sure to apply correct APA formatting to all source citations and references.
Supporting Evidence
Cite 3–5 credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry
publications to support your comparative analysis.
Be sure to delete all directions from the template before submitting your summary report.
In addition, proofread your report to minimize errors that could distract readers and make
it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your analysis.