Recent orders
DSM Paper Guidelines and Rubric
DSM Paper Guidelines and Rubric
Students will write a 6-8 page research paper that will critically evaluate the treatment(s) available for a specific disorder, within a specified population.
Include: (a) DSM-5 disorder with relevant diagnostic criteria, (b) prevalence of the disorder in the general population and a discussion of how that disorder is relevant to a particular population of your choosing (this could be individuals of a certain age group, gender, sexual orientation, racial/ethnic background, etc.), and (c) detail of what treatment may look like for individuals with this disorder in the population selected. The paper should be between 6-8 pages, double spaced (not including title page or reference page). The DSM-5 and a minimum of two additional sources used (ideally peer-reviewed journal articles, though textbooks are also acceptable) should be cited. Use the current APA 7th formatting throughout the paper.
Grading Rubric:
Unsatisfactory Fair Good Excellent
Disorder and Diagnostic Criteria – Very few or no diagnostic criteria are identified.- The student does not display an understanding of the relationship between criteria and diagnoses. – Some criteria are included, with few examples.- Diagnostic ideas are present, but not well supported by symptoms or evidence. – The diagnostic criteria are given and supported with some examples. – The student displays a general understanding of how the disorder presents. – Diagnostic criteria are stated and clearly backed with ample examples.- Clear connection is made between specific criteria and overall presentation of individuals with the given disorder
Prevalence & Chosen Population – Prevalence of the disorder in the general population is not identified
– Population is discussed but no correlation is made between the disorder prevalence and the population chosen – Prevalence of the disorder in the general population is identified, but may not be supported by peer-reviewed sources
– Basic description of population is given with some detail clarifying why population was chosen/prevalence of the disorder among the population – Prevalence of the disorder in the general population is identified
– Description of the chosen population and the prevalence of the disorder among that population is given, though no support is given by peer-reviewed sources. – Prevalence of the disorder in the general population is identified
– Thorough description of the chosen population and the prevalence of the disorder among that population is given, with ample support by peer-reviewed sources.
Treatment -Lacking in the description of treatment options and nuance of treatment within the population are discussed-Little to no support or supporting citations are not peer-reviewed.
-Basic description of treatment options are discussed-Information presented may not be supported by peer-reviewed research or fewer than 2 references.
-Adequate description treatment options and nuances of treatment population are discussed-Information presented is fully supported by at least 2 peer-reviewed references
-Complete description of treatment options and nuances of treatment population are discussed-Information presented is fully supported by at least 2 peer-reviewed references
Grammar, Spelling, & Punctuation – Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.- Language uses jargon, slang or conversational tone.- Uses “I” or “me” throughout the paper. – There are some errors throughout the paper in punctuation, spelling, and/or language.- Language is somewhat professional; some conversational tone or “I”/”me” is occasionally used. – Rules of grammar, and punctuation are followed with minor errors. Spelling is correct. – Language is mostly professional- Overall, the paper is comprehensive and easy to read. – Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.- Professional language is used throughout the paper
Format – Paper lacks many elements of correct formatting.- Page requirement is inadequate or excessive- Paper is not in APA format.- Format and/or flow make it difficult to follow the writing. – Paper is about 6-8 pages.- APA format has flaws, however, the general idea of how to format a paper in this structure comes across.- Format and flow neither add to nor subtract from the readability of the paper. – Paper follows designated guidelines.- Paper is 6-8 pages long.- APA format is good, with few errors.- Format and flow are good and deliberate. – Paper meets the 6-8 page requirement.- Paper is in APA format, following all guidelines for structure, format, font, margins, and spacing.-Format and flow between paragraphs enhances readability of paper.
FBI Virtual Case File Case Study
Name
Professor
Course
Date
The FBI Virtual Case File Case Study
Any form of inconsistency among the models results in a model clash.
In the Virtual Case File system, there was a clash between the waterfall model and the product model.
The waterfall model calls for the progressive determination of the adopted system requirements such as its codes and design (Gabrys et al, 46).
On the other hand, product model demands the visualization of operational concepts together with their interrelationships.
The waterfall model has a number of assumptions that are to be considered for its successful implementation.
The first assumption is that the partakers in the project determine all necessities prior to implementation money (Kymmell, 241).
Secondly, the determined requirements must not have costly repercussions.
The partakers in the project must have sufficient knowledge about the architecture to be implemented in order to achieve the determined requirements.
The stakeholders’ expectation must be realized through the actual implementation of the requirements.
The project’s generic nature will not undergo mammoth transformation during its development.
Finally, the deadlines set for the project must permit ample time for sequential progress.
If any of the aforementioned assumptions proves to be false then the project that adopts this model will grind to a halt.
The Virtual Case File system second, third and fourth assumption of the waterfall model contradicted with the underpinning principle of property model (Kuhn and Hacking 304).
With regard to the second assumption under the waterfall model, the parties in the project determined requirements, which had high-risk consequences.
The SAIC devised a new management system, which would phase out the ACS. This was considered to be a high-risk maneuver since in the event of VCF failing to work there would be no contingency plan.
The other assumption that made the two models clash is the participants’ insufficient understanding of the right architecture for the successful implementation of the requirements.
Majority organizations rely on enterprise architecture acts as a blueprint, which guides vital determination of requirements.
The enterprise architecture gives a description, organizes the IT structure, and proceeds to outline the objectives of the project organization.
However, the problem with the VCF project was that the FBI did not have the enterprise architecture.
Results from numerous reports such as the one conducted by the National Research Council reveal that the FBI department without the blueprint could not make coherent determinations on the project’s requirements.
The final assumption that contributed to the model clash was that the determined requirement was not equivalent to the stakeholders’ expectations.
The FBI, working with the SAIC, approached Congress for more funds to quicken the process of developing the system. Congress accepted the request and in exchange to that act, it expected the system to be ready in December 2003 instead of June 2004.
However, the FBI had not mapped out a strategic course for the achievement of completion within the stipulated deadline.
The project contract was amended to show the new deadlines but the original software contracts were not amended to reflect the formal criteria for the FBI to accept the VCF system (Feenberg and Norm 71).
Works Cited
Feenberg, Andrew, and Norm Friesen. (re) inventing the Internet: Critical Case Studies. Rotterdam: Sense, 2012
Gabrys, Bogdan, Robert J. Howlett, and L C. Jain. Knowledge-based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems: 10th International Conference, Kes 2006, Bournemouth, Uk, October 9-11, 2006: Proceedings. Berlin: Springer, 2006.
Kuhn, Thomas and Hacking Ian. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL [etc.: The University of Chicago Press, 2012.
Kymmell, Willem. Building Information Modeling: Planning and Managing Construction Projects with 4d Cad and Simulations. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008.
DSM criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder ASD
DSM criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder ASD
Name
Institution
Date
Autism Spectrum Disorder is a condition that affects an individual’s brain development and influences how they perceive their surroundings or socialize with others. People suffering from this condition have a challenge interacting with others and expressing themselves efficiently, especially in social settings (Frazier et al., 2012). There are various ways in which a person can be diagnosed to administer the correct treatment. DSM-5 states that, for a child to be diagnosed with this condition, they must have depicted persistent deficits in three major sectors in their lives through interactions and social communication.
A deficit in developing, maintaining, and understanding connections with peers. In this case, they struggle to adjust their behaviors to suit a variety of social contexts (Wiggins et al., 2019). They also lack interest in connecting and making friends with their peers. They find it challenging to share imaginative play or make friends.
Deficits in social-emotional reciprocity. This diagnosis focuses on a child’s inability to hold standard back and forth conversations with their peers, abnormal social approaches, and a reduced willingness to share emotions and interests (Frazier et al., 2012). Additionally, such children fail to initiate or respond to conversations
Repetitive behavior patterns, activities, and interests manifested in hyporeactivity or unusual interests in sensory environmental aspects (Wiggins et al., 2019). These symptoms should present themselves in the early stages of development.
Jeremiah 29:11 states that “For I know the plans I have for you, declares the Lord, plans for welfare and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope” (Jeremiah 29:11). This verse implies that ASD condition, however challenging it may be for the patients, is part of God’s plan. It is an encouragement to children with ASD and their families that everything is God’s plan, and His plan for humankind is always for the greater good. According to the bible, everybody is a child of God regardless of their condition and should be treated equally.
References
Frazier, T. W., Youngstrom, E. A., Speer, L., Embacher, R., Law, P., Constantino, J., … & Eng, C. (2012). Validation of proposed DSM-5 criteria for autism spectrum disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(1), 28-40.
Pitts, C. Jeremiah 29: 11 as a 21st Century Church Paradigm.
Wiggins, L. D., Rice, C. E., Barger, B., Soke, G. N., Lee, L. C., Moody, E., … & Levy, S. E. (2019). DSM-5 criteria for autism spectrum disorder maximizes diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in preschool children. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 54(6), 693-701.