Recent orders
How Women Gained the Right
Name
Professor’s name
Course
Date
How Women Gained the Right to Vote
Introduction
The Declaration of Independence stated that men were created equal, and despite its publication, it sowed a seed of the women’s suffrage interest group in the United States. The movement started in 1840 during a conference in London where two women, Elizabeth Stanton and Lucretia Mott, who had met for the first time, were denied participation because they were women. This is despite the fact that they were both delegates of the World Anti-Slavery Congress. This experience brought them close and inspired them to team up and work to guarantee equal rights for women. The movement was decades-long struggle for women to get the voting rights in the United States. It took reformers and activists almost 100 years to prevail in the fight and the journey was full of struggle. On more than one occasion, disagreements in strategy threatened to shut down the movement. On 18th August 1920, the 19th constitutional amendment was finally ratified. The amendment enfranchised African American women and declared that just like their male counterparts, they deserved equal responsibilities and rights of citizenship. As a result, for the first time, they had the right to vote. The purpose of this essay is to discuss how women gained the right to vote and the controversial compromises and actions surrounding their struggle. Specifically, this paper highlights the leaders, organizations, and events that contributed to the cause, including Seneca Falls Convection, Elizabeth Stanton, the arrest of Susan B. Anthony (1872), The National Woman Suffrage Association, the arrest of Susa Anthony, and the National Woman’s Party (NWP).
Elizabeth Stanton (1815-1902)
Elizabeth Stanton was a lecturer, author, and the main philosopher of the women’s suffrage and rights movement. Her main contribution to women’s rights is that she developed the agenda that guided women’s struggle in the 20th century. Born in Johnston, New York, in 1815, Stanton was born to prominent citizens, Daniel Cady and Margaret Livingston. She went through formal education. Her father was a renowned state assemblyman and lawyer. Growing up, she acquired informal legal knowledge by talking to him and listening in on conversations he held with his guests and friends. She married Henry Stanton an abolitionist lecturer and eventually became an activist in the ant-slavery movement. It was during her honeymoon that she attended the first Anti-slavery conference where she met Lucretia Mott who just like herself, was angered by the segregation of women in the convections proceedings. They decided to work together, and eight years later, they convened the first women’s rights conference at Seneca Falls in New York. According to (Harper, 217) Stanton wrote the declaration of sentiments that builded on the Declaration of Independence by simply including the word “women” throughout the document. The document was crucial as it sought to make social and legal changes which would elevate the position of women in society. It also listed 18 grievances ranging from property, lack of control of wages, difficulty obtaining custody following divorce, and the right to vote. Moreover, Stanton gave examples of how men subjected women to oppression by denying them college education, keeping them from taking part in church affairs, making them dependent, asking them to obey rules made without their representation and compelling them to follow a different moral code than that of men. Additionally, Stanton wrote petitions and circulated them in New York calling upon the New York Congress to enact the New York Married Women’s Property Act.
Susan B. Anthony (1820-1906)
Susan Anthony was a champion of labor rights, temperance abolition, and equal pay for equal work. She came to be known as one of the most vocal leaders during the suffrage movement for women. She was a lecturer, suffragist, speaker, and American writer who later served as the National American Women’s Suffrage Association (NAWSA)’s president. Susan was born in Adams, Massachusetts, in 1820 to local cotton mill owners. In the 1840s, Anthony’s kin was actively drawn in in the rights against slavery, popularly known as the abolitionist faction. The family’s Rochester farm was a meeting point for abolitionists including Frederick Douglass, who were famed at the time. At this point, Anthony headed the girls’ sector in Canajoharie Academy. After a few years of holding the position, she made the decision to leave the academy in 1849 and devoted her time towards social problems. She actively took part in the temperance association that intended to completely stopping or limiting the sale and production of alcohol. She was motivated to advocate for women’s rights during the alcohol campaign. She was deprived of an opportunity to speak at the temperance convection because of her gender. At this point, she realized that women in leadership would never be recognized until they acquired the right to vote. She attended the anti-slavery temperance in 1851, where she crossed paths with Elizabeth Stanton and together they established an organization) known as the Women’s New York State Temperance Society in 1852 (Allen, 77). It did not take long for them to start advancing women’s rights. They also established the New York State Woman’s Rights Committee. Notably, Susan drafted petitions that pushed for women’s right to vote and own property. Anthony traveled widely, campaigning for women’s issues on their behalf. Anthony got a role as the agent of the American Anti-Slavery Society in 1856 where she used up many years pushing the agenda until the start of the civil war.
Seneca Falls Convection
In 1848, a convection was held in Seneca Falls in New York to talk about the issues facing women’s rights at the time. Originally, the convection was called the Woman’s Rights Convection before being called Seneca Falls Convection. The convection advocated for the civil, religious, and social rights of women. A multitude of abolitionists’ activists attended the convection. The majority of them were women, but it also included men. The convection was organized by two reformers, Lucretia Mott and Elizabeth Stanton. The majority of the delegates who had attended the Convection concluded that just like their male counterparts, black women were autonomous beings deserving of their own opinionated identities. Stanton’s (34) declaration of sentiments provided by the delegates notes that “that all men and women are created equal, that their creator endows them with certain inalienable right, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” This pointed to the fact that women should not be denied voting rights and all other rights they deserved. On that day, 11 resolutions were passed unanimously, all of which were meant to push for the privileges and rights of women in that era. The ninth resolution, which centered on women’s voting rights passed narrowly after Stanton’s insistence. The resolution made Seneca Falls victim to ridicule which made many people that backed women’s rights to withdraw support. Nonetheless, the Seneca Falls convection served as a foundation for the women’s suffrage movement that ended with the approval of the nineteenth constitutional amendment in 1920.
The National Woman Suffrage Association
It was the disagreement as to whether to support or reject the fifteenth amendment that gave black men the right to vote that caused a divide between the rights movement for women. The National Woman Suffrage Association (NWSA) was formed in 1869 in New York with the aim of rejecting the fifteenth amendment. Elizabeth Stanton and Susan Anthony developed it. NWSA prioritized securing women’s right to vote. Through reform proposals, the group stirred public debate on various social issues, including divorce and marriage. The association welcomed all women’s suffrage societies in the U.S. to become auxiliaries of the organization. The move worked in their favor, significantly increasing the association’s rank by the time it was reuniting with the American Woman Suffrage Association’s rank organization in 1890 (Waldman, 133). This is because AWSA supported the law at the time. NWSA proponents Susan Anthony and Elizabeth Stanton believed that instead of supporting t. amendments, women’ lobbyist groups should push for the inclusion of women too.
The arrest of Susan B. Anthony
After dedicating more than fifty years to pushing the agenda of women’s suffrage, Susan Anthony was arrested on November 5th for voting in the 1872 presidential election in her hometown in New York. She voted for Republican Ulysses Grant, a presidential incumbent in the election. At that time, women had no right to vote. Anthony had stormed into a voter registration office in Rochester four days before the election and demanded to be listed as a voter. The election official said remarked that they could not list her name. She enquired on what grounds and was told that the New York’s constitution only allowed male citizens the right to vote. She eventually managed to persuade the officer and his two colleagues to accept her registration. Anthony and 14 other women cast their votes in the contested presidential election between Horace Greeley and Ulysses Grant on the material day. After two weeks, Susan Anthony was arrested, indicted and convicted for voting illegally. Ruiz (19) notes that Anthony was tried for two days, a trial she later tremed as “the greatest judicial outrage history has ever recorded.” She was given a fine of $100, which she declined to pay. She said, “I shall never pay a dollar of your unjust penalty.” She never paid the fine. This was over 40 years before the 19th amendment was ratified granting women in the United States the right to vote.
National Woman’s Party
Formerly the Congressional Union for Women Suffrage, The National Woman’ Party (NWP) dates to 1912. It was formed by two young Americans, Lucy Burns and Alice Paul, who were schooled on militant strategies in the suffrage movement in Britain. They were selected to the National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA) Congressional Committee where they brought new militancy in the campaign hence shifting attention away from voting rights at the state level to federal amendment. Although they founded the union in 1913, Burns and Paul remained in the Congressional committee up to December, where after two months, NAWSA cut links with the Congressional Union (Wagner, 181). NWP steadfast lobbying and militant tactics, not to mention the public’s support for detained suffragists, forced the-then president-Woodrow Wilson to support the suffrage endorsement of 1918. In 1919, Congress approved the measure and soon after NWP started pushing for state ratification. Tennessee ratified women’s suffrage as the 36th state shortly after, and in August 1920, the amendment was passed into law. After suffrage was attained, the NWP concentrated on passing amendments for equal rights. All through 20th century, the NWP remained at the forefront of pushing for women’s economic, social, and political equality.
Conclusion
The era of women’s suffrage was a period where women had limited access to social, political, and economic rights. The women’s suffrage movement was born in 1840 after Lucretia Mott and Elizabeth Stanton who, despite being delegates, were denied participation at the World Anti-Slavery Congress at the Seneca Falls convection. Elizabeth Stanton and Susan Anthony played a crucial role in the movement. They dedicated their years to pushing for women’s rights. Anthony was arrested and fined for voting illegally and Stanton wrote the declaration of sentiments that improved the ideologies of the Declaration of Independence.
Works Cited
Allen, Ann Taylor. “Woman Suffrage and Progressive Reform in Louisville, 1908–1920.” Ohio Valley History 20.1 (2020): 54-78.
Harper, Frances Ellen Watkins. “We are all bound up together.” A brighter coming day: A Frances Ellen Watkins Harper reader (1990): 217-218.
Wagner, Sally Roesch. “A Declaration of Sentiment.” NWSA Journal 12.2 (2000): 181-181.
Waldman, Charlotte. “The National Woman Suffrage Association and Fringe Marriage Ideology
Stanton, Elizabeth Cady. “throughout his 1884 novel The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Elizabeth Cady Stanton (1815–1902), one of the founders of the mod-ern women’s movement, promulgated a distinctively feminist version of freethought. A signer of the famous 1848 Declaration of Sentiments at Seneca Falls, New York, she promoted the cause of gender equal.” American Religion, American Politics: An Anthology (2017): 73.Suffragists: Navigating Public Relationships with Victoria Woodhull and Mormon Women.” (2019).
Ruiz Ulloa, Anne. “The origins of women’s rights movement in the United States: the Seneca Falls Convention.” (2020).
How will music integrate into the virtual world
Tarren Mason
ENGL 1102
Prof Smith
24 October 2022
How will music integrate into the virtual world
Music has shown a comprehensive integration of the virtual world. The integration gets based on the use of digital technology through inventions and innovation to facilitate future music development. Therefore, the paper analyzes how music has integrated into the virtual world through literature-reviewed sources.
The study by Negus on the evolution of music from creator to data examines the post-record music industry and the digital conglomerate. The research describes the changing music industry through the identification of the three dynamics which underpin the shift towards the post-record music industry as opposed to the past methodology of musical production. The examination of evolutionary music production begins with redefining the content provider instead of the creative producer. The change extrapolates the historical changes in the music industry from the record pedagogy as a product of the producer’s content delivered to the audience. Through analytical approaches to the current social media video storage, the author creates a comprehensive description of the role of YouTube in the production and conveyance of contemporary and future music (Negus 380). As such, the study focuses on the tension between youtube and the recording artist as a mechanism of disputes existing on the changing perception of the artist and the economic value of the recorded music in the virtual world, and the adoption of the virtual genre in the music industry. The third phase of the research creates a determinative framework through which the debate on the music virtual evolution affects the market in the present and future economic value. The exploration of the virtual value of the musical future enables the research to make a comparative analysis through the debate on the morality and the worth of music. The comparative analysis, therefore, conceptualizes the application of digital recording as a mechanism of acquiring the value as data rather than commercializing the art virtual and the sound expression (Negus 384). As a result, contemporary artists have predicted the application of the digital conglomerate, which will play a significant role in music production and delivery hence showing the virtual change in the music that defines the economic and moral value of future music. Most importantly, benefiting from musical production has shaped and has continued to shape the musical circulation of recording through the emergence of the music dynamics, patterns of conflict, and musical structures. As compared to the research by Serafin, the two studies have created a framework through which music has evolved economically through the changes in production and the perception of the producers and the consumers. The two studies also extrapolate how the changes in technologies have contributed to the economic changes of the producers, giving different approaches to the software application. The differences exist where the research by Serafin majors on the use of software to create changes in the music evolution while the Negus research extrapolates the economic value of music through the changes of the economic perception of music as portrayed by the current and the future use of the music technology.
The changing role of the teacher has been exhibited by the methodologies of teaching music education through the use of virtual technology, according to the study by Nart. The research compares the traditional approaches to music teaching with the contemporary and future use of technology to facilitate the learning of music by the students. The use of technology has created student-centered approaches as opposed to traditional teacher-centered approaches in teaching and the delivery of music education. Notably, the current and future music teaching and learning show how the teachers are no longer the source of musical knowledge and the channel for sharing eth musical information. However, the teacher’s work remains a guiding role to the students who will access the information and manage the process constructively (Negus 78). Currently, the teacher guiding the students in musical education must use the technological requirement to achieve the curriculum objectives. Compared with the previous research by Pransky (2001), the students are the next generation because they are native speakers of the digital language due to their extreme nature of spending much time on the internet and computers. The continuous use of the iPhone, video games, and television brands to examine the digital transformation of music has enabled teachers to guide the students to the evolutionary musical approaches (Negus 79). The study examines the musical evolution in the visual world using internet sources, publications, and current literature findings to examine the current and future of teaching and learning music in a visualized and technological world. As a result, the findings depicted using software in music education to provide effective and efficient education for teachers and learners. In contrast, the research by Nart bears similarities with the Negus study because of the need to generate contemporary and evolutionary approaches to music production. The evolution describes how music visualization has enabled music producers, teachers, and learners to adopt technological innovation to solve the historical challenges that were exhibited in the industry. Also, differences exist where the Nart study describes the student and teacher in the technological changes of music visualization while the Negus research focuses on the producers and the artists as a mechanism of visualizing the music economy.
The research by Serafin et al. on virtual reality musical instruments describing the state of arts, design principles, and future directions extrapolates the future of music in the virtual world. The explanation majors on the effects of contemporary technology on the development of music and the consumer or the learner’s perception. Currently, humans have exhibited rapid development in technological innovation and inventions in the field of music. The development has created the reality approaches through which the learners and the music producers have adopted the technologies to create a systematic overview and the musical adaptations to the contemporary listening and learning of music. Historically, the artist has used virtual musical instruments for a long duration; hence the study creates an evolutionary relationship between the current, past, and future of music through a paradigm of technological applications (Serafin 23). Notably, the study uses the term virtual to describe the application of software knowledge and applications to simulate the future of the music industry and music performance. The existing musical instruments and their control methods require a captivating interface for comprehensive sound and virtual; image expression. As such, the author depicts that the future of music involves the simulation of the music components delivered by the head mount display. Consequently, the future of music, as depicted by the study, asserts that it will fully be a form of immersive visualization even though the current musical practices have not yet received the attention of conceptualizing the methodology (Serafin 40). Most importantly, the study presents nine design guidelines that evaluate, examine and analyze different case study approaches that consider music production’s present, past, and future through evolutionary visualization. The study compares with the Nart research due to the use of software technology in the present and the future generation to develop music. However, differences exist where the two research where one uses the educational approaches to the students, and the Serafin research examines the industrial use of software to change the visualization and reality.
Overall, the review sources have provided the evolution of music through technology to facilitate the changes in the visual perception of music. The study by Nart compares the traditional and teacher-centered approaches to music studies with the contemporary and future student-centered learning of music to show the evolution and software innovation in music teaching and learning. Also, Negus, in his research, depicts how music has technologically evolved to form the visual perception that has encouraged the economic development of the producers. Moreover, the study by Sarafin creates an overview through which an individual can understand the role of software in music evolution and visualization. Therefore, future research should examine how technology has shaped the changes in music production, teaching, and learning.
Works Cited
Nart, Sevan. “Music software in the technology integrated music education.” Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET 15.2 2016: 78–84. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1096456
Negus, Keith. “From creator to data: the post-record music industry and the digital conglomerates.” Media, Culture & Society 41.3 2019: 367–384. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0163443718799395
Serafin, Stefania, et al. “Virtual reality musical instruments: State of the art, design principles, and future directions.” Computer Music Journal 40.3 (2016): 22–40. https://direct.mit.edu/comj/article-abstract/40/3/22/94804
Facts about Happiness
Facts about Happiness
Student’s Name
Institution
Facts about Happiness
People live to seek happiness as it is a sign of functional well-being in the human’s life. Many tries to define what happiness is and what makes people happy but it is contradictory again as it to some extent depends on the individual’s personality. The study of psychology is essential in the research of the stimulators of happiness to which many theorists refer to as a measure of satisfaction. Psychological understanding of the peoples’ perspective, as well as forms and factors that determine their level of happiness, is vital. The public perception regarding factors that bring about happiness includes money, satisfaction, and acceptance of social environment as well as having a focus on nation’s development in contrast to specific materiality. In this paper, the physiological research study regarding happiness will be done in consideration Diener study and Fulmer study as found on the “Sanguine Citizens,” Also, the summary of the article, as well as its evaluation on how this psychological research fits psychology as a discipline, is elaborated into a profound extent.
Who are the happy people in the society? It is the challenging question that persists in every member of society mind. Psychologically happiness plays a significant role in determining and influencing human emotions. In consideration of Diener’s study, there are various variables used to measure the level of happiness which are health, food, income and friendship associations among other vital aspects of peoples’ lives. In their research, the scientists used income as food as the primary domain where the Maasai, Amish and Inughuit communities were compared. The Maasai seemed to be less satisfied in the regards of material resources as well as access to medical care facilities compared to the other modern societies, and they are still happy with life. Therefore, money is not the source of happiness, and it seems not to have much effect on satisfaction with availability of basic needs.
The other instance regards comparison of the psychological conditions of both United States of America and Denmark. The United States tend to be economically wealthier than Denmark, but the people of Denmark are psychologically better off. In consideration of social capital which is the measure of cooperation and public trust, Danes reflected faith in the business sector as well as their government. On the other side, the people of United Stated portrayed corruption and doubt in trusting strangers as well as the government as many mind individual benefits. The Gallup Poll results suggest that materialism does not go into hands with happiness.
South Korea is among the nations who do well economically have high suicide rate as well as exceptional cases of depression and anger. On the other hand, Costa Rica is a country with a less as half of South Korea’s gross domestic income but among the happiest nations in the world. It signifies that happiness does not go hand to hand with materialism but what matters is contentment and acceptance of the social-economic situations. Furthermore, with regards to Fulmer study, the sense of belonging which is signified by culture and personality significantly affects the people’s well-being. For instance, a Christian will not be emotionally satisfied living in a non-religion place where people do not care about religion. However, a person who is brought up in the similar culture and customs might be satisfied and happy living in a non-religion place.
The research findings above regarding the psychological perspective of the happiness are real and applies to everyday life experiences. For instance, many people who are wealthy in the community tend to be stressed up with issues regarding social security as well as well-being. They do not trust anyone as the mind about their properties being robbed as well as putting their lives in danger. Hence, they live in tension while others live freely trying to associate more with others to find opportunities and end up living a happy lifestyle.
As elaborated above, happiness is not about materialism and social capital but is about satisfaction and acceptance of the social-economic sphere where one belongs. Both the Diener’s and Fulmer’s study cases support this, and it is significant as civilians to be not only interested in individual well-being but also be happy with the county’s development and achievements.
