Recent orders
AgeCare Case study
AgeCare Case study
Name
Course
Professor
Date
Section A – Analysis using Rich Pictures
This section is a representation of information from the entire case study and use examples from the case study.
Draw a rich picture for the complete AgeCare environment.
3209925295275 Service centers
Service centers
57150295275 AgeCare
AgeCare
Symbol Key
3209925421005Projects
Projects
57150421005 Government, Businesses and charity organization
Government, Businesses and charity organization
320992581915Workers and Volunteers
Workers and Volunteers
5715081915Individual donors
Individual donors
57150321945Management
Management
3209925274320Clients
Clients
Description and justification of the process I followed to arrive at my final picture
A2.1 Identification of the key actors in the environment
The rich picture is based on the key factors identified from the cases study. I base the identification of the main factors on CATOWE system of analyzing organization. CATOWE stands for. In examining an organization the CATOWE system is significant for expressing a problem by demystifying all the situational and permanent factors involved. In this regard I consider CATOWE a description of the human activities and situation involve tin the AgeCare environment. CATOWE is an acronym standing for Customer, Actor, Transformation, World view and Environment. This is a body of five factors that make up of an organization such as AgeCare. The elements identified using CATOWE are listed bellow
Customer
The customers are the beneficiaries of the activities of the organization. The main beneficiaries are the elderly people whose needs are the main inspiration for the existence. Supermarket the support the program could also pass for customer since the elderly people supported by the program purchase their good thus boosting their revenue.
Actors
Actors are the individual behind the running of the program. Indentify actors was as easy as indentifying the customers. The actors in this program the employees, both permanent employees and the volunteers who offer service at their convenience. The other actors are the fanciers such social service and supermarkets which fund the activities such as paying for the good bough by the elderly, fueling their vehicle and financing management operations among others.
Transformation
Transformation on the other hand is a process of change. The transformation in Agacare environment is a change in its operation model. The management of the organization is inefficient, poor record keeping, poor accountability, lack of proper coordination between departments, disagreements and the need to embrace information technology.
World View
AgeCare is based on a world view that there is need to provide the elderly people with the necessary or basic service to enable them to have a fulfilling life.
Environment
The AgeCare environment is characterized by numerous projects targeting various aspects of the aged in the society. The environment is customers who are the elderly people served by the projects, and actors who are the people involved in the financing and implementation of the projects.
A2.2 What led you to choose the key issues and areas of conflict affecting the environment that you have included in your diagram?
The choice of the key issues and areas of conflict affecting the AgeCare environment included in the diagram we chosen because of their central role in the presenting a summary of what AgeCare is all about. My aim was to symbolically present what AgeCare stands for, its activities and the people and organizations involved the activities of AgeCare. The diagram further represents the served in a symbolic manner. The choice was base on my belief that picture can be used as symbols to represent or develop a concrete meaning for perceive realities. To understand my perspective one must first agree that picture are symbols of reality and what take place in every organization is symbolic. All situation, factors and process are having indisputable symbolic values. The perception of these values is like reading a script of information concerning the organization.
Base on these views, I made the selection of the issues depicted in the picture to give observers a summery description of the relationships between player, actors, customers and processes in the AgeCare environment. Observers can gain knowledge on the organization structure of AgeCare by simply studying the picture.
A2.3.The main focus of the environment shown in your picture
In general, the main focus of the environment shown in the picture is the stakeholder and organization component of the AgeCare environment. To a specific level, the picture depicts the organization processes initiated by the stakeholders through the organization structure of the firm. An organization exists due to its strake holder and their activities. The stakeholders therefore, make an organization what it is by being responsible for it performance and dictating its services. This picture show AgeCare stakeholders, their organization structure, interactions and processes involved in delivering the service the organization was designed to deliver.
A2.4Where does the control of systems, data and processing lie in the environment as shown in your picture?
Control systems, data and processing lie in almost every aspect of the environment shown in the picture. Every process involved in value delivery by the organization. However, most of the control lies in the management which can be considered senior of executive management.
The senior management in the organization is the source of all the activities conducted by the organization. The executives initiate the activities and projects the organization undertakes. They design these programs and allocate resources for the realization of the programs goals. It is the executive officers that hire all employees including volunteers.
The executive office also monitors the activities of the sub center that are dispersed in other regions in the south of England. It coordinates the finances and labor allocated to his centers. It hold the centers accountable for the resources the receive form the executive office.
There is also a sphere of control from the financiers who donate most of the funds for various projects. These donors normally insist getting copies of reports indicating how project funds were utilized. Accountability is the main quality that the financiers insist one. Many financiers shy away from funding future programs when they notice discrepancies or fail to get proper accountability.
Section B – Requirements Analysis using Use Case modelling
The Green Drive project has been selected for the pilot project on the introduction of Information Technology systems in the AgeCare organisation. All the information about the Green Drive has been provided in by the AgeCare case stud in Appendix A. In this section I am going to analyse the Greed Drive project using Use Case Modelling. Use cases are scenarios which describe the channels by which an actor achieve a specific goal. In this regard, a use case model will consist of all the actors and use cases involved in realization of a common objective.
Draw a use case diagram for the system clearly identifying the actors involved.
B1.1A primary scenario for each use of the system
Scenario 1
Driver (actor) → System →Authentication → Access → Results (Duty plan, designate route and stops, bus assigned)
Scenario 2
Doris (Actor) → System → Authentication → Access →Results (Time bus returned, problems experienced, amount of fuel refills, receipt number)
Client → System→ Authentication → Access →Results (route of the day, time of collection, time of return)
B1.2A secondary scenario for each use of the system
Driver (actor) → System →Authentication failure→ Access denied →suggestion/redirection
Scenario 2
Doris (Actor) → System → Authentication failure→ Access denied →suggestion/redirection Scenario 3
Client → System→ Authentication failure→ Access denied →suggestion/redirection
Describe and justify the process that you followed to arrive at the final use case diagram. In describing this process, answer the following four questions:
B2.1.Why did you choose the actors you did and why are they key to the system?
I chose the actors in the use case model above because they are the main cause of action and activities engage in to realize the objectives of the project. Total of six actors are in this process. These include Clare Graham, Doris Smith, Drivers, the clients, social services, and supermarket. The contribution by each of the above actors leads to realization of shopping trips for the elderly people on the areas served by the project.
B2.2Choose one scenario. How did you identify the key activities to include in it?
There are several scenarios in the GreenDrive project which consists of several activities. I am going to explore the drivers handling of the bus, which is one of the scenarios involved in the shopping trips. According to the case study the drivers are mostly volunteers and may drive the bus of a whole day or part of the day. A driver reports to work in the morning, picks a key from the office and signs for a bus and takes off driving to the day’s designated route picking the elderly on the way. He then takes the elderly to the supermarkets where they conduct their shopping. After they have conducted their shopping the driver drive’s back through the same route dropping the elderly one by one at their designated alighting stations or points. In case of a problem along the way the driver calls to report what is going on to Doris who responds to emergencies. At the end of his/her shift the driver returns the vehicle to projects premises, returns the key and sign to indicate s/he has returned back the vehicle. On Friday, the last drive refuels the fuel tank using money already allocated by Doris. In this scenario, the driver is the main actor and the activates involve are reporting to duty, picking the key and signing for the vehicle, driving the vehicle, picking the elderly at designated points, taking the elderly to the supermarkets, dropping them off at designated points, reporting any problem encountered on the journey, refueling the vehicle, retuning the vehicle and the key and singing for the return.
B2.3How did you identify alternative uses to produce the secondary scenarios?
In use case modelling, alternative uses emerge as a product of failure in the main cases. The yare a created by alternative paths to the main parts use by the basic use case. For instance, in driver scenario above, if the sequence of activities is unable to take the usual designated course, the new course pursued is an alternative and the resultant use case an alternative case. An example, if a driver who has signed up for a vehicle is unable to return the vehicle leaves it to anther driver for an new shift, and the new driver return and signs for the return of the vehicle and the key, it is a diversion from the normal sequence of activities. Also only the driver who drives on Friday fuel the vehicle therefore, the sequence that involves refueling the bus is an alternative case.
B2.4You will have needed to make some assumptions about the system. In real life what questions would you have asked to get the necessary information? Who would you have asked?
The questions I would have asked to several questions in order to come up with the necessary information for the creation the use cases modeling are and people I would have asked are;
Driver
The drivers undertake the bulk of the activities involved in taking the elderly for shopping to the supermarkets and their questions would target their main line of activities;
What are the activities you under take when you are on duty?
How are your activities coordinated?
Which activities do you conduct occasional when on duty?
Do you feel that some activities are unnecessary? If yes which one do you consider unnecessary?
Do you feel the some new activities should be included? If yes which activities would like added?
Clare Graham
What activities do you engage in daily on behalf of GreenDrive?
What difficulties do you encounter with record keeping?
What do you believe are the best solutions to the problems you experience with record keeping?
What are your expectations of the new management information system underway?
Doris
What activities do you engage in daily on behalf of GreedDrive?
What difficulties do you experience in your daily routine?
What record keeping challenges do experience?
What solutions would you suggest to these challenges?
What are your expectations of the new management information system underway?
Supermarkets
What role do you play in Greeddrive project?
What challenges do you encounter in participating in the project?
What solutions would you suggest for these challenges?
What are your expectations of the project?
What are your expectations of the new information system underway?
The elder people
What is services do you derive from the GreenDrive project?
What challenges do you experience from the project?
What service would your want change, improved or included?
What are you expectation of the new management information system underway?
Social service
What role do you play in Greeddrive project?
What challenges do you encounter in participating in the project?
What solutions would you suggest for these challenges?
What are your expectations of the project?
What are your expectations of the new information system underway?
Section C – Critical Analysis
In this section, will discus how the analytical tools, rich picture and use case modelling have yielded useful information about the AgeCare organisation. The tools, both in A and B above have yielded adequate information to determine the minimum requirement to be met by the new system in order to enhance efficiency in the organisations service delivery activates.
C1. How these tools complement each other when carrying out a requirements analysis exercise
No single can be effective in analysing program to determine the inefficiency and look for opportunities for improvement. The result s of each technique would be undermined by the limitation of the technique. Using several techniques to conduct an analysis of the same program or object on the other hand enhance the accuracy of the accuracy of the analysis.
Using rich picture and use case modelling to determine the weaknesses of AgeCare organisation and programs and opportunities for improvement conferred the analysis the advantages of both techniques and reduces the effect of the shortcoming of each of the approach on the final results.
The use of rich picture had several benefits to the analysis. First, the rich picture helped map the entire organisation of the AgeCare environment is a simple symbolic outlook that enables easy conceptualisation of the actors, customers and processes involved in realising the objective of eh organisation.
Second, by mapping the entire stakeholder and the processes that take place in the AgeCare environment, the rich picture helped to draw the relationships and interactions between process and activities in the organisation environment.
Through observation of the outlook of the organisational environment and the understanding of the interaction between processes it is easier for one to determine the system requirement for AgeCare charity organisation.
The shortcoming of the rich picture analyses had little impact on the overall analysis of AgeCare management systems requirements due to the complementary effects of the use case modelling analysis.
The benefits Use case modelling conferred to this analysis can not be overstated. The main benefit I enjoyed while using the use cases modelling approach to understand the current state of AgeCare and its organisational need is the ease of managing complex issues. With use cases, I was able to focus on a single issue at a time. For instance, I would focus on a single actor and his/her line of contribution the entire process of service delivery. I was also able to isolate different use cases and examine then in exclusion of the rest of the other use cases. Use cases are based on a very simple principle that main reason for existence of a system is service to its uses. Based on this notion, I was able to examine how each set of activities lead to service delivery, and how each set interacted with other sets of activities.
Each use case presented a different in which the system is to be used to when it is complete. This gave me an opportunity to understand that those in charge like Clare and Doris will have different uses from the drivers who execute most of the activities, the supermarkets and social services that finance project and the elderly people who are the main beneficiaries or clients. In its entirety as case modelling, the approach helped me understand what can go wrong and understand the need for alternative course of activities. Certainly understanding the possible outcomes of all scenarios before designing the system serves to enhance the development process and reduce the need to make numerous alterations in the future.
Another benefit that I enjoyed while working with use cases was provision of a base for groundwork necessary to identify the requirements, documentation, and user needs; a body of information that can be used to enrich the development of new system.
Last the use cases enhanced the process of envisioning how the desired management information system would look like. With use case it was easier to imagine the design of the outcome before starting to define and design a new system. In this regard I found User cases to be proactive in facilitating development of a management information system for AgeCare, starting with the pilot project of GreenDrive.
In a nutshell, using use case modelling was like using a malty stakeholder approach to solving problems. This is because each use case involves a different actor.
However, all is not rosy while using use case modelling analysis approach. In my analysis I encounter various shortcoming of the approach whose negative effects were neutralised by the use of rich pictures. The shortcomings I hand to content with are; the approach only enabled me to focus on the needs and users experience with little regard to usability of the new system, second drawing the relationships among the various use cases was challenging.
C2. Incorporation of different cultural and world views into the model
Culture and world views are very influential in developing a management system such as a management information system. The cultural and world view factors that influence this analyses are enshrined in the nature of management, the management should be conducted centrally on specific duties designated to other bodies such as the centres of specific projects. This management approach is bureaucratic in nature. In the case study centralised management had been encouraged by the financial director Jayne Harrison, but Rodriguez he colleague discourages it. In my analysis, bureaucracy is evident in the rich picture where by it is the management that receives funds, recruits volunteer and employee, initiates projects, finances centers which intern oversee the projects.
Another culture that has been espoused clearly in the study and in the analysis is the culture or organisation and division of labour. Responsibilities are properly share and in the GreenDrive project thus enhancing service delivery. GreenDrive further encourage the culture of proper record keeping and accountability through the way it conducts is activist. Problems experience by drivers are recorded, purchases of fuel are also properly recoded. Doris maintains a spread sheet record that always leaves the finance department smiling.
C 3. Selecting data and information that was important for building the proposed system
I based my selection of the data necessary for construction of a new system on the current realities experienced by the employees and volunteers at AgeCare charity organization an observation of their current processes and complaint the employees have about the system are a clear indication that change us needed. Identification of the shortcoming of the system was very much easy. The case study provides the background information about the organization which paints a clear picture of the conditions at age care. Second, information of what is missing in the organization is generated through interviews with the employees of the organization. The employees air dissatisfaction with the working condition for sometime. This dissatisfaction and other direct communication on what the employees directly pointed to be lacking alongside study provide useful indispensable data on the important component of necessary for the new system. The most critical systems for proper performance of an organization which must be incorporated by the new system are financial information system and records keeping and management system.
I landed on the financial system because of the compelling by the management staff complaints about the organization’s financial system. Jayne Harrison, the AgeCare financial director is on record stating the need for a new financial system. He states, “…we need to sort our finance system first, before we start worrying about the information each of the projects holds” (Case Study). Finances are a critical component of projects and if mange poorly the success of the project can be seriously undermined. For instance Rodriguez, the Center manager at Basingstoke notes that in the prior to the interview the administration had accidently allocate extra £2000 to his center instead of Portsmouth center. This is clearly an indication that the finical systems are terrible. Financial management is left at the hand of individual projects and is this wasteful. The new system should enhance centralized movement of finance to enhance efficiency.
The filing and record keeping system also need to be streamlined to ensure that everything that take place is accurately recorded and filed. AgeCare centers mostly relay on had copy or paper documentation. A few centers like Basingstoke headed by Jose Rodriguez have rudimentary MS Excel database that are used to store information electronically. However, Rodriguez note that staff member normally have a problem filling the spreadsheets and sometime mix up data. Collecting information about projects and centers is also problematic according to Christos Papadimitriou, the Information quality officer a centralized database the can be feed information by members of staff through the internet is necessary to simplify his work. Such a system would also synchronize the way all centers present their data.
Other then the interview with senior employees at the organization the minutes of the Facilitate Workshop Development Meeting of AgeCare management information system directly state what the organization need. From the minute I deduce the main features that are necessary for the new system (which are similar to those espoused through interviews). They are accuracy in data collection, timely data collection, standard format of data collection, production of important process management reports, expandability, accessibility, map resource use, develop a common interface for all centers, provide a diary system, allow importation of existing information, and facilitate information sharing.
In a nutshell, the identification process for the necessary component of the proposed system involved reading and abstracting the case study.
Reference
The AgeCare Case Study
Age of Anxiety in Europe caused by the Great War
Name:
Institution:
Course Name:
Instructor:
Age of Anxiety in Europe caused by the Great War
At a time of war, those involved normally have great expectations on the happenings and results. This is usually based on optimism. However, after the war, there are normally resounding effects on the physical especially mental as well as economic effects that at times do not wear off (5-10). The Great War that took place between 1914 and 1918 was made popular and even termed as blessed from the thoughts of the non violent artists as they thought it would take part quickly and gloriously. This was caused by so much innocence that the writers finally view as unnecessary.
However, it turned out to be the cause of bitterness in Europe against the expectations of many especially those who fought. As most writers and filmmakers currently portray the events of the war, it created an age of anxiety in Europe. This includes Paul Valery who describes the civilization in Europe and European mind in his book “the Crisis of The Mind” where he indicates one of the effects as crisis. This he writes besides his being sure of Europe’s greatness where he refers to it as “the elect portion of the terrestrial globe, the pearl of the sphere, the brain of the vast body.
In his statement that people have realized their immortality he indicates how the Europeans viewed the war wrongly. Therefore they did not associate themselves with countries like Nineveh and Babylon that had experienced a similar fate and perceived them as vague (2). The age of anxiety is indicated from his relation of civilization to the fragility of life. He indicates this by the replacement of glory and honor with sorrow, cruelty and pity. The restlessness and uncertainty associated with anxiety is used in the civilization of the mind to prove this. In addition they are not sure of what will be born and harbor a fear concerning the future as a result of the destruction caused by the war (15-20). Although with vague hopes, their fears are more than the hopes they have for the future. This signifies the continuous doubt they have. These feelings are present consequent to the passage by the people through a series of great events followed by terrible times.
According to Valery the decline of Europe had begun long before the beginning of the war due to the fragility of civilization. This happened as it had reached the end of modernism (10) caused by lack of living and thinking systems hence the mind’s disorder. The lack of free coexistence present in all sophisticated minds, with dissimilar and contradictory ideas and principles of life and learning are all indicated as causes of the anxiety.
The decline in Europe’s politics became a weakness and contributed greatly to the characteristics. In addition to inequality of European predominance caused by the export of knowledge and applied science most people were forced to succumb to the anxiety created (25-30).
Other writers such as Erich Maria Remarque give way to this idea as well with the relation of life to death from the realization created by the war in a similar way to Valerie.
Cited Works
Valery, P. The Crisis in the Mind. 1919. HYPERLINK “http://www.historyguide.org/europe/valery.html.
Accessed 27 April 2011″ http://www.historyguide.org/europe/valery.html.
Accessed 27 April 2011.: par. 1-30
Evaluating Contemporary Views of Leadership
Evaluating contemporary views of leadership paper
A review of the commonalities and disparities between the contemporary views of leadership
The analytical matrix focuses on the description of some of the commonalities as well as disparities that emanate from six contemporary leadership views as outlined in Wren’s text. The leadership models in consideration from the text are inclusive of the Leaders-member exchange model (LMX) model, the In-group model, Charisma, mentor, Hersey and Blanchard model and leadership substitutes. From the paper, it is possible to identify that all the articles support the fact that in the Leaders-member exchange (LMX) model, leaders in an organization should be able to involve their subordinates in making some of the crucial decisions in the organization (Wren, 1995). The consideration of involving subordinates in some of the decision-making processes within the organization has an influence on the relationship between them and the leaders, which is a consideration that is likely to have an effect on the performance of the organization. Other models that exhibit commonalities are inclusive of the promotion on mentorship in some of the leadership schedules as well as the leadership substitutes.
Some of the models that exhibit disparities as indicated by the different authors are inclusive of charisma, the in-group model and the Hersey and Blanchard model. The different authors focus on different aspects of the models, which are likely to have an influence on the overall success or failure of leadership in an organization (Wren, 1995). The charismatic model emphasizes on the personal attributes of leaders, which are attributes that are likely to be dissimilar. The Hersey and Blanchard model also emphasizes on the ability of the leaders to mould their followers, and the likelihood is that leaders will exhibit different mannerisms in the quest of molding their followers. On the other hand, the in-group model emphasizes on the relational disposition of the leaders with their subordinates. There are different views on the same, considering the fact that the leaders should find a suitable way of dealing with task coordination between their followers (Wren, 1995).
Criterion to evaluate contemporary leadership theories
Leadership views in the contemporary world are always viewed depending on how people understand it especially when it comes to the basic leadership components. Leadership views play a vital role in determining or influencing how contemporary leadership theories are evaluated. Alternatively, there are various ways and criterion to evaluate leadership views in the contemporary world. Understanding leadership theories which underpins the current leadership practices remains invaluable for any leader in the contemporary world. This specific context reviews contemporary leadership models, views and theories that emphasize some of the recent conceptualizations including complexity leadership aspects, distributed leadership and global leadership.
As part of the criterions to evaluate leadership views in the contemporary world, there are various leadership perspectives, which are important in this case. Some of the perspectives include the theoretical perspectives, the conflicting perspectives and the alternative perspectives. The theoretical perspectives are categorized in four fold typologies, which are mostly based on some of the assumptions that dominate when it comes to contemporary leadership. The focus in this case is the appropriate set of leadership characters. Secondly, the focus will be on the universally appropriate behavioral styles. Thirdly, the focus depends on the situational contingent traits in leadership while the forth aspect will focus on the situational contingent behavioral style (Wren,1995).
Conclusions from the critical evaluation
From the evaluation of the contemporary leadership views, it is possible to insinuate that leaders should be able to employ clinical judgment and reasoning in the determination of some of the leadership orientations applicable in their position in an organization. As exhibited by the commonalities and disparities between the contemporary leadership views, an important factor to consider would be the creation of a suitable environment that will ensure good relations between leaders and their subordinates. This consideration follows the servant leadership view, which involves the philosophy of setting practices that enriches the relationships between individuals in the organization (Spears, 2001).
It is also evident from the evaluation regarding criterion to evaluate leadership theories in the contemporary world that in as much as leadership views is an important aspect when it comes to leadership, it generally vary depending on how people understand it especially when it comes to the basic leadership components. Alternatively, leadership views play a vital role in determining or influencing how contemporary leadership theories are evaluated. Alternatively, the three perspectives thus the theoretical perspectives, the conflicting perspectives and the alternative perspectives play a vital role during leadership evaluation. The assumptions, which dominate various aspects in the contemporary leadership also remains a key aspect during leadership evaluation and in this case, where the theoretical perspectives come in handy. With all these aspects in mind, the paper remains of great significance especially to contemporary leadership. Alternatively, the paper allows the identification of various articles, which support the fact Leaders-member exchange (LMX) model, and organizational leadership should always involve subordinates in making important decisions in the organization.
References
Spears, L. C. (2001). Focus on Leadership: Servant-Leadership for the Twenty-First Century. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Wren, J. T. (1995). The leader’s companion: Insights on leadership through the ages. New York: The Free Press.
