Recent orders
The two commercials in question here are the ZaZoo condom commercial and the Durex condom commercial
Banned Condom Ads
(Author’s name)
(Institutional Affiliation)
The two commercials in question here are the ZaZoo condom commercial and the Durex condom commercial. The ZaZoo commercial shows a man shopping with his young son when suddenly the son begins to show a fit of temper for no obvious reason. The father is unable to control the child, and he seems embarrassed by the son as the onlookers look at them disapprovingly. The son keeps on screaming for the whole span of the commercial and he ends up rolling on the ground. As the commercial ends, it emphasizes ‘wear a condom’ (Banned commercial- condoms).
Though this advert is obviously humorous, the interested parties banned it from the television for the obvious, serious message it is passing across (ZaZoo condoms). The message the commercial seems to be wear condoms to prevent these kinds of tantrums. The message also seems to be advising parents to wear condoms if they do not want these kinds of kids. It is likely that the commercial was banned for this message. Instead of the ad passing the right message, for example, condoms are ways of preventing unnecessary pregnancies and STDs, the commercial seems to be threatening customers to buy their products or end up like this frustrated parent (Banned commercials).
The other commercial in question is the one by Durex, which has a mass of sperms following their owner as he goes to talk to his girl. Her boyfriend’s sperms, which have been personified, rush the girl and a giant condom later rescues her (Banned commercials- Durex). The message the commercial seems to be passing is that the Durex condom can eat up sperm/ men and prevent pregnancy. The commercial is obviously funny and does not use explicit message or pictures, and that is the reason that leads one to wonder why it was banned. It is possible that the commercial was banned for its utilization of man/ sperm eating condom, and the utilization of man- looking sperm (Andersen, 2008).
References
Andersen, C. H. (2008). The best worst commercials you have never seen. AOI. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/charlotte-hilton-andersen/the-best-worst-commercial_b_108480.html
Banned commercials. Banned commercial videos, too hot for TV. Retrieved from http://www.bannedcommercials.org/banned-commercial-of-zazoo-condoms.html
Banned commercial- condoms. YouTube. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nojWJ6-XmeQ&feature=related
Banned commercials- Durex. YouTube. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bizJWtJ0xXo
ZaZoo condoms. The Rhetoric of Reputation. Retrieved from http://instructors.dwrl.utexas.edu/tbrown/node/104
Abrahams Expression of Faith in God
Abraham’s Expression of Faith in God
Name of the Student
Name of the Institution
Abraham’s Expression of Faith in God
Abraham’s expression of faith in God is expressed in Genesis 22. He expressed extraordinary faith in God when he agreed to sacrifice his son. Many Christians today agree that children and other properties are given by God. However, many of them would be reluctant to give their children as sacrifice to God. An individual is likely to find it difficult to offer his or her only son or daughter as a sacrifice to God, especially when there are no hopes of bearing another child. Abraham’s account acts as a challenge to Christians, with regard to their faith in God.
Abraham was living in Canaan when God asked him to sacrifice his son. Before moving to Canaan, Abraham did not have a child since his wife, Sarai, was barren. Although Sarai’s handmaid, Hagar, gave birth to Abraham’s child, the child could not become Abraham’s heir. After bearing the child, Hagar ran away from Abraham’s home. As a result of God’s intervention, Sarai became pregnant at the age of 90, many years after she had reached menopause. She eventually gave birth to a son called Isaac, who was expected to be the only heir of Abraham.
Earlier before the birth of Isaac, God had made a covenant with Abraham, in which He promised to bless and protect Abraham and his descendants. In turn, God required Abraham to be obedient and faithful to Him. Later after the birth of Isaac, God decided to test Abraham’s faith in Him. God recognized that Abraham loved his son, but He instructed him to go to the land of Moriah and sacrifice his son as a burnt offering in one of the mountains that he would find there.
In response to the instructions, Abraham woke up the next day early in the morning and started a journey to the land of Moriah, together with his son and his servants. They arrived close to the land after three days. When Abraham saw the land from a distance, he left his servants and his donkey somewhere and told the servants that he would walk a little farther with Isaac. Abraham had already fetched wood to be used for burning the sacrifice. As they walked towards one of the mountains in the land, Isaac carried the wood, while Abraham carried knife and fire. As they walked together, Isaac asked his father where the sheep meant for burnt offering was. Abraham responded by stating that God would provide it. They continued moving towards the lace where Abraham would make sacrifice.
Ultimately, Abraham and Isaac arrived at the place where the sacrifice was supposed to be made. Abraham made an altar, placed wood on it and tied Isaac on the wood. He then took a knife, ready to sacrifice his son. However, an angle of God intervened immediately and told Abraham not to hurt Isaac. Through the angel, God said that He was impressed by Abraham’s extraordinary faith, to the extent that he was ready to sacrifice his only son. After the communication from God, Abraham saw a sheep that was trapped in a bush. He took it and used it to make a burnt sacrifice for God. As a result of Abraham’s faith, God promised him that he would not let him down, and He would fulfill the promises that He gave when He made a covenant with Abraham.
Significantly, Abraham expressed an extraordinary faith since he did not even argue with God about the issue of sacrificing his only son, even though he did not know whether he would get another child. He demonstrated that he could do anything that God instructed him to do, irrespective of impact. The case presents a challenge to Christians, who would be reluctant to even offer God with their material properties, live alone a child. The key theme in the case is that Christians should strive to have faith in God, as Abraham Did.
Abraham Lincolns Assassination
Name:
Institution:
Course:
Tutor:
Date:
Abraham Lincoln’s Assassination
Introduction
Any type of leadership is often characterized by different forms of oppositions that stem from the conflict of interests. This is a common characteristic of any society and it is ingrained in the diversity and differences in personality that characterizes humanity. However, this has the capacity to culminate in far reaching implications if it is left to persist for a long period of time. In particular, it does not only threaten social cohesion that is fundamental for sustainable living but it also undermines the security of the individuals in power.
Lincoln’s assassination is a classic example of the extent of this type of opposition. Although he was an ideal leader whose mode of leadership was admired b various individuals, it is certain that the segment of the population that was opposed to his leadership could explore all possibilities to ensure that his ideologies are brought to an end. Notably, they were opposed to his mode of leadership and this contributed significantly to their feelings of contempt for him. It is in this consideration that this paper presents an explicit analysis of his assassination and underscores the events that characterized the same.
Lincoln Abraham was the first American president to be assassinated on 14th April 1865. This mission was carried out by a confederate sympathizer and actor, John Booth who conspired with George Atzerodt and Lewis Powell. The other government officials that the trio planned to assassinate were Andrew Johnson who was the vice president and William Seward, the secretary of state. The assassination took place at the Ford’s center while he was watching a performance together with two guests and his wife.
Initially, Goodwin indicates that Booth had planned to kidnap the president and not to kill him. As indicated earlier, Booth was a confederate sympathizer who was angered by Grant’s suspension of the much awaited exchange of the prisoners of war that was expected to take place in 1864. This had massive implications with the most profound being the cut off of the imperative reinforcement for the manpower than was required to provide reinforcement in the south.
This was also perpetuated by the fact that the soldiers in the south had limited resources and led desperate lives. Thus Booth’s initial thought was to kidnap Lincoln and hold him hostage to the south. This according to Jim would make the government to review its previous policy about the exchange of the soldiers. His close associations with Lucy Hale gave him a chance to monitor the operations of the president and make plans accordingly. However, these initial plans were cut short after Booth attended Lincoln’s speech that supported the idea of according African Americans equal voting rights. He became furious and swore that instead of kidnapping him, he would simply assassinate him.
On the day of the assassination, Kauffman recounts that the president was in a very jovial mood. This was atypical of him as in the past, he had been very pale. Before proceeding to his daily activities, he held a meeting with his cabinet and then with the vice president whom they had not met since his day of inauguration. This was because the president was annoyed with his drunken state on this important day. Booth found out about the president’s plan to attend the Ford Theatre and watch “Our American Cousin” at noon. He decided that this provided the right environment to assassinate the president together with his allies. He believed that the plot would be a success because he knew the layout of the theatre and had even performed there in the previous month. According to Goodwin, Booth believed that his would give the confederacy an opportunity to mount resurgence.
Booth proceeded to Washington DC and ordered for the preparation for his gun and ammunition in readiness for the operation in the evening. In the evening, he held a meeting with Atzerodt, Powel and Herold. According to their plan of action, Seward was to be killed by Powell and Johnson by Atzerodt. Herold was to play a critical role of leading Powell to the house of Seward and guiding them out of the city together with Powell after the action. Booth planned to Stab Grant using his knife and shoot Lincoln. Booth insisted that this needed to be done simultaneously after a few minutes past ten at night. Goodwin cites that despite the fact that Atzerodt made attempts to back off from the plan on the premise that had not been informed that the entire plan would involve killing, Booth insisted that it was late and as such nothing could be done to change the plans.
Lincoln attended the play with his wife, Cara Harris and her father Major Henry Rathbone. The Grants were absent because of the fact that Mrs. Lincoln was not in good terms with Grant’s wife. A policeman named Parker was assigned the duty of guarding the President’s box but left with his coachman. Sandburg posits that it is not clear whether he was on duty at the time the president was shot. Since booth knew the play very well, he waited for perfect moment when the gun shot would not be heard by the audience. When this moment reached, he took a practical action and shot Lincoln on his head. Immediately, the president slumped in his chair and was unconscious. His wife had a look at him and screamed.
On seeing this, Rathbone made rushed forward and made an effort to prevent Booth from escaping. However, Booth used his knife to stab him on the arm violently. Nonetheless, Rathbone recovered quickly and again made efforts to stop Booth from escaping but this were again stabbed. He jumped from the rill box and landed on the stage in an awkward manner. Despite having had a fracture, Jim reports that he rose to his foot, held his dagger and shouted that the South had been avenged. He escaped using the backstage door and the horse that he had strategically placed outside the theater. Although several men made after him, they did not catch him as he managed to escape using his horse and went to Navy Yard Bridge, where they were expected to link up with Powel and Herold.
Steers indicates that the screams by the trio in the president box made the audience to realize that that was not part of the play. The first efforts to save the president’s life were undertaken by Dr. Charles Leale who was a surgeon and worked with the army. After examining the President and finding out that he did not have a pulse, Leale contended that he was already dead. However, together with Dr. Taft, they discovered the hole of the bullet in Lincolns head and after removing the clot of blood from this, the president’s breathing got better.
Despite this effort, Leale maintained that his wound was mortal land that he could not survive. Another doctor who was also in the audience, Albert King joined the two and after consultations, they decided to carry the president to a house. These three doctors were later joined by other doctors and made desperate efforts to save the president’s life. Regardless of this, the president did not survive the ordeal and according to Goodwin, he passed on at quarter past seven the following day and at fifty six years of age.
Powell’s mission also took place at almost the same time as he attacked the then secretary of state. Seward was resting and recovering from a previous carriage accident. Powell was accorded admittance in the house after reporting that he was to deliver some medicine personally. Although the butler took this, Seward’s son grew suspicious and his efforts to stop Powell from entering his father’s room led to a fight that left Fredrick injured. He stabbed Seward’s neck twice although this did not have an effect as Seward had been fitted with a surgical collar. Atzerodt on the other hand went to drink and after this became too drunk to do anything. This made his to panic and as a result, he threw his weapon in the streets. He later took a room in a hotel and slept till morning without accomplishing his task.
After making their respective attacks, Powell and Booth met at the Navy Yard Bridge and rode towards Maryland. Booth then consulted a local doctor who confirmed that his leg was broken and fitted the same with a splint and provided him with crutches. After this, they hid in a swamp near the house of Thomas Jones for five days. Sandburg believes that this gave Booth a chance to recover in order to be able to cross River Potomac. They continued to go in hiding until April 26th when they were tracked down by the union soldiers. They had been locked in Garret’s barn and although Powell surrendered when the soldiers arrived, Jim indicates that Booth declined. This prompted the soldiers to set the barn on fire and shoot him. Before his death, he requested the soldier to inform his mother that he had died for his country.
After this, all the conspirators were captured and imprisoned accordingly. In addition, al the individuals that were suspected to have been related to the principle conspirators in any way were arrested tried and imprisoned accordingly. Lincoln was buried and Andrew Johnson assumed presidency. Further, Jim cites that there were attacks made in different cities that supported Booth’s action.
Conclusion
The death of Lincoln had far reaching implications on the wellbeing of America. Historical evidence affirms that very many individuals mourned his death and considered this a loss of a very important person. From the review, it is certain that leadership is a complex conception that is perceived differently by various segments of the society. It is unlikely that a leader can have the support of all the subjects. As it has come out from the study, some forms of opposition do not only undermine social cohesion but they also compromise the safety of individuals in power. At this juncture, it can be concluded that besides having been a great leader, Lincoln’s inability to satisfy the wishes of the entire population contributed significantly to his assassination.
Bibliography
Bishop, Jim. The Shooting of Lincoln. USA: Harper, 1955
Carl, Sandburg. Abraham Lincoln. USA: Brace & World, 1986.
Doris Goodwin. Team of Rivals: Understanding Lincoln’s Death. USA: Simon & Schuster, 2004.
Edwards, Steers. The Death of Abraham Lincoln. Kentucky: University Press, 2001.
Michael, Kauffman. How Lincoln was shot. USA: Random House, 2005.
