Recent orders
THE SUCCESS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION
THE SUCCESS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION
Name
Institution
Date
Introduction
The US remains the most developed nation in the world, and while at it, also the most influential country on a political scope. This was however not the case a few centuries ago, as American colonies at the time, had to unite, and fight for independence. This would later on be called the American Revolution. While there are many aspects of this revolution that have always been easier to understand, one area still remains grey and this will be the center of focus for this paper. To be precise, this paper expounds on the success of the American Revolution, given that it was not a traditional war involving one state and the other. At the same time, this paper also narrows down on how Americans succeeded, against what was the most formidable empire on earth.
The challenges Americans had
It is imperative to begin by highlighting some of the challenges Americans faced, because the same helps in understanding how they ended up on the winning side. The following are the main challenges faced by Americans at the time;
Leadership challenges: In order to go against an empire as strong as the British Empire of the time, then Americans needed to have proper leadership, and yet they came short in this regard. During the earlier year of the revolution, the Americans had leaders who were incompetent, and because of the same, they didn’t push for the agenda as they ought to have (Coleman, 2021). This became a challenge in the grand scheme of things, and one that also undermined the efforts of every other American.
The lack of unity: As cliché as it may sound, there is always the need for unity during a war or even a revolution in this case. The American colonies were very different from each other in culture, political understanding and many other smaller optics. With so much difference between them, divisions were witnessed in most cases and this, worked against their goal of attaining independence from the British Empire which was their main goal. While counting some of the main challenges faced by the Americans, then it is worthy to highlight this one as well.
These aren’t the only challenges faced by Americans, as there are other ones such as economic strain on their side, the British controlled every beat of the sea until the French arrived, and most importantly the lack of support from other countries until later on.
An explanation of American success
There are a number of important events and factors that contributed to the American success over the British during this revolution. In this part of the paper, they will be analyzed, and they are as follows;
American’s Diplomatic Relations: In order to stand against the empire that the British were, Americans needed strong diplomatic relations, and this is where Benjamin Franklin came in. His visit to Paris, ensured that Americans, who were a rather small opponent to the British Empire, were equipped with necessary arms, food and sometimes even warfare insights. It is this same diplomatic relations that ensured the French could step in, and compromise the British from the seas (Coleman, 2021). While counting reasons why Americans won the revolution, despite it not being a traditional war, and against a formidable opponent that the British Empire was, then it is imperative to mention the one herein.
The British’s own economic problems: A key part of winning any war, is weakening the opposition, or rather the opposition being weak for internal reasons. The latter was the state of affairs for the British, as they had their own money problems. It is clear that wars need money, and with a lot of its resources spread across the empire, and as large as it was, then very little was left to fight in the American Revolution. This created what can only be referred to as a “match” between the two. In the long run, and with the growing support of allies such as France, the Americans got an upper hand. At the end of the revolution, they were winning, hence another worthy explanation.
The insurgency in the South: At first, it was just the Northern colonies that were actively partaking in the revolution. However, when the Southern Colonies saw it wise to join with the North, so that they can preserve slavery, then the insurance became a game changer. The British who had now grown accustomed to fighting Northern colonies, now had a new front of enemy-power, and that is through the Southern insurgence. This insurgence, also acted as a source of motivation for the ones who were already partaking in the revolution, with an increase base of rebellion, the British Empire, even with all its might, was facing a group united by one strong ideology and that was powered with the need for both social and economic freedom. This is, therefore, an explanation and an analysis of why the Americans won, despite them having the slimmest of chances.
The intervention of the French: It is no secret that the French were an equally formidable force in the world at the time. When they joined the Americans later on in the revolution, then the dynamics of the revolution changed. The seas that were completely under the control of the British, had a new visitor, and this divided the thoughts and resources of the British. With the French joining as allies to the Americans, then wining became even easier, and hence another explanation (Bailyn, 2017).
These are the main reasons why the Americans won the revolution, but not mere justifications on why it happened. It is important to underline the fact that through these points, it is easier to conceptualize why Americans, from a point of low vantage, won against a formidable opponent that the British Empire were. It is also rational to acknowledge the fact that there could be many other justifications not mentioned in this case, but ones that are equally worthy.
Conclusion In a nutshell, the progression of this paper, has highlighted American success in the American revolution, bearing in mind that it was not a traditional war, but one where the opponent was a formidable empire at the time,. While using success optics by the Americans as the anchorage to this analysis, the paper herein also managed to justify American success. It is imperative to note that this paper didn’t fall short to mention the challenges Americans faced, and how they mitigated the same, to emerge victorious at the end of the day. This paper also managed to define the thin line on why the American Revolution was not a “war” or even “revolution” per se. With a keen eye to detail, this paper has indeed managed to cover the topic at hand.
References
Bailyn, B. (2017). The ideological origins of the American Revolution. Harvard University Press.
Coleman, K. (2021). The American Revolution in Georgia, 1763–1789. University of Georgia Press.
A Summary and analysis of Nortel Networks Management System
RUNNING HEAD: SUMMARY
A Summary and analysis of Nortel Networks Management System
Name:
Course:
Tutor:
30th March, 2011.
I started working 100 hours every week to change a company that was struggling financially struggling company as the CEO at Nortel Networks, thinking it should be doing better since its products like network and CDMA Icode division multiple access are used everywhere by companies providing internet and cell phone services. I underestimated the magnitude of the problems and made a mistake of comparing it to GE and Motorola where I worked successfully previously.
My problem started when the management over reported earnings to produce corporate bonuses. I had thought that Nortel had corrected its financial reporting, but realized they had made the same error for the third time and had to make another report earning less profit. This brought the lawsuits against the company by shareholders who saw the Nortel stock value lose $30 billion and sought $9 billion for damages. I had to be sorry for this mistake and promise change as it would have put Nortel out of business. The first step was to reshuffle the staff and offer extra training.
It also demoralized the employees reducing the number of those highly satisfied with their jobs. When Nortel began being bankrupt I was supposed to convince financial companies that appeared skeptical to lend $2 billion to Nortel and keep it afloat, telling them of its worth . However, before that I had to cut down costs by reducing retiree benefits and lay off 1, 900 employees and 350 managers. I would ensure that the few employees are highly motivated in order for them to put maximum input in production.
In addition, Nortel’s main cellular technology CDMA was becoming old giving way to more powerful cell phone standards and equipment. This required introduction of new technologies so as to beat the competition
With the increasing problems I began contemplating how Nortel would return to profitability.
References
Cengage. What would you do? Retrieved 30 March 2011from < cengagesites.com/…/MGM
-%20What%20Would%20You%20Do.pdf>
A Summary Analysis of Steven Vogel Grades and Money
Name
Professor
Course
Date
A Summary/Analysis of Steven Vogel “Grades and Money”
In the “Grades and Money” Steven Vogel mainly focus on education as being the objective but not either grades or GPA. He asserts the every individual in the universe of relatively higher education normally pay lip service to the underlying idea that mainly pertain to education. Steven Vogel also asserts that students normally strive to maximize on their returns through learning the minimum necessary in order to attain optional grade. According to him the definition of grades and the corresponding whole grading system is purely based on attaining the requirement of a course syllabus at the expense of gaining knowledge that is offered when learning the underlying required content. Steven Vogel commences off his argument by recapping the period when he was in college in the year 1970’s. He asserts that during their period individuals was not concern with grades, which makes it different from the act of maintaining status quo of college student presently.
Vogel is surprised that the present students are mainly concern with grades. Parents want their children to learn history, philosophy, science, literature, and mathematics in order to be better personalities. Moreover, this would aids in development of talents, attitudes and habit for their future. The goals of education according to the present children are to make the grade by attending classes and doing exams. Steven also assert that relatively higher grade within the course is significant as it increases GPA according to the children. Moreover, the children prefer relatively higher GPA, which is fundamental for getting suitable postgraduate school and get a good job then subsequently make a lot of money. In nutshell, Steven Vogel asserts that everything is seen to be significant for something else according to this litany.
Steven Vogel’s repercussions concern the students in regard to grades and GPA that is seen as reckless. It is certain that the current professors were also concern about their grades and future. Thus, the position of power that they hold currently of playing it down portrays menial inconsequential facet of life. The actual issue did not commence with the students, but society emphasize on earning and corresponding placing of grades. Society stipulated that students ought to possess particular GPA in order to stay within school, receive scholarship, enter into graduate programs and correspondingly get a decent job. This therefore, makes it cumbersome for the most determined student not to focus on the grades since that is the sole means how the entire society judge student progress.
The emphasis on learning possesses purely systematic restructuring of the prevailing educational system where there are solely dual grades namely Pass and Fail and the sole means of passing entail full understanding of the underlying course material. This can be utilized in placing the entire student fraternity in developing leveled ground field mainly with full understanding of the underlying course material that will enable students to move forward.
Steven Vogel concurs that the students normally believe that grades are the sole motivating factor in the process of learning but solely for the money. Learners prefer grades since lofty GPA’s is equivalent to well-paying jobs. Nevertheless, negative impact of grades is that students require best grade with a minimal amount of education. This result to big conflict with Steven Vogel since his main objective is different from those set be students.
Work Cited
Kennedy, Mary, L, and Hadley, M. Smith. Reading and Writing in the Academic Community. Upper Saddle River, [N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2010. Print.
