Recent orders
To What Extent Do You Agree With The Claim That Social Injustice Is The Cause Of Health Inequalities
To What Extent Do You Agree With The Claim That Social Injustice Is The Cause Of Health Inequalities?
Introduction
Health inequalities are the unfair and preventable differences in individuals, groups or population’s health status. These exist as a result of unequal distribution of economic, environmental and social conditions in the society. The conditions are involved in determining the chances of individuals becoming sick, ability to control sickness and chances to access better treatment.
Social injustice in the unfair distribution of resources such as employment and education in the UK influence the living conditions and health of a person. Smoking is one of the causes of death rate and inequalities in the UK. It is responsible for most of the premature deaths among the social classes.
The less advantaged group in the UK experience health discrimination because they do not have the economic power to access effective health care. Socioeconomic models like Whitehead and Dahlgren’s model of the social determinants of health inequalities highlight how an individual’s socio-economic lifestyle is dependent on their condition. If individuals from poor background contract tobacco-related diseases like lung cancer, they have a lesser chance to prolong their lives because they have limited ability to access medical attention. In contrast, if a smoker from a higher economic and social background similar tobacco related diseases, they have access to appropriate medical care.
The paper will look at such areas as social inequalities as a cause for health disparities, health inequalities for tobacco and the Whitehead and Dahlgren’s model of the social determinants of health inequalities. Based on this, the paper will provide some recommendations on the way forward for health inequality in relation to smoking.
Social inequalities as a cause for health disparities
Social inequalities as a cause for health disparities can be viewed in terms of alcohol consumption, smoking among others. People who wish to highlight the connection between social injustices and health inequalities state that health inequalities refer to differences in health between various social classes or groups who have different socio-economic advantage or disadvantage and different social hierarchy (Mcgillivray, Dutta & Lawson 2011, p. 254).
There is a connection between social economic groups and cigarette smoking. Smoking is a major cause of inequality. For example, in the UK, the rates of death emanating from tobacco are 2-3 times more among the disadvantaged social groups in comparison with the less disadvantaged social groups. Those who bear the greatest brunt are the long-term smokers as they are highly prone to diseases such as lung cancer. People living in social groups with a poor background tend to start smoking at an early age. Those from well up families will be preoccupied by other activities such as studies and therefore do not start very early. However, even they start early, their health does not deteriorate as they have access to better health care as compared to the long term smokers from poor background.
Socioeconomic research conducted in the UK to understand mortality differentials regularly use occupational social class as the major index of socio-economic position (Lynch & Kaplan n.d, p. 14). According to an analysis done on the decrease of mortality in Wales and England, it has emerged that the contribution of clinical medicine to the decline in mortality is small in comparison with the other influences (Marmot & Bell 2011, p. 73). Occupational socio-economic measures have also been used in these studies to show the association between mortality rates (Lynch & Kaplan n.d, p. 16) of people and socio-economic position (Blane et al 1998, p. 157).
Health inequalities for tobacco smokers
These are the differences experienced by disadvantaged groups such as women, the people, or racial minorities facing social discrimination in health care provision in comparison with the socially advantaged groups (Braveman 2006, p. 167). It refers to health disparities and pays attention to health differences among different social groups in the society (Braveman & Gruskin 2003, p. 254).
It is evident that the poor, ethnic minorities, racial, and other low class groups experience health discrimination. These health discriminations are reflected by high mortality and morbidity rates related to social class behavioral actions like smoking (Blane et al 1998, p. 157). Many European countries including the UK experience discrimination in the provision of health. Braveman & Gruskin (2003, p. 255) highlights that people belonging to the less advantaged social groups in terms of occupation, education, and income tend to die young due to smoking related diseases in addition to being vulnerable to health problems related to social class (Braveman & Gruskin 2003, p. 255). Smoking has been identified as the main cause of lung cancer, emphysema , chronic bronchitis, post-menopausal syndrome in women, and sudden infant death syndrome health issues (Blane et al 1998, p. 157), which is common in the less advantaged social class individuals as they cannot access effective health care (Braveman & Gruskin 2003, p. 255).
Whitehead and Dahlgren’s model of the social determinants of health inequalities
Whitehead and Dahlgren’s effort to highlight the social determinants of health provide a model that measures social inequities using socioeconomic position indicators (Braveman 2006, p. 179). This model includes health care as a component of an individual’s working and living condition because improvement and access to effective health care plays a significant part in reducing mortality rates (Whitehead & Dahlgren 2007, p. 24)
INCLUDEPICTURE “http://members.kwitelle.be/HEALTHEQUITY/_images/health_determinants_model_determine.jpg” * MERGEFORMATINET ( Whitehead & Dahlgren, 2007)
The Rainbow model shows the way social determinants in health are interlinked and the way the factors are involved in influencing health care.
An individual’s socio-economic life is dependent on their condition. An individual with a chronic smoking health issue in a poor neighborhood, poor living condition, and a poor working condition, is included in a disadvantaged social position (Marmot 2002, p.32). This class is characterized by social class habits like addictive smoking behavior as a way of displaying a person’s class position (Graham 2012, p. 84). The social environment determines smoking behavior when an individual reaches adulthood. Smoking behavior is determined by an individual’s occupational level at his adulthood, and is associated with age at leaving full time education (Galobardesr et al 2006, p. 10).
Health discrimination is regarded by U.S policy makers as an outcome of socio-economic injustices in health, and measures it at individual level characterized by an individual’s educational level and occupation (Levine & Munsch 2011, p. 83), or social level characterized by the neighborhood condition where they live (Aspen Health Law Center 1998, p.82). Education, economic income, and occupation are used in analysis to highlight the systematic difference at cross-national level (Galobardesr et al 2006, p. 9).
Smoking behavior is found to be associated with education. Occupational social class during adulthood is related to the age at which an individual leaves full time education. This suggests that health discrimination effects caused by smoking are linked to knowledge. Smoking behavior is linked to socio-economic indicators (Lynch & Kaplan n. d., p. 21), which confirms the suggestion that this health risk behavior is dependent on the social environment in which an individual lives (Blane et. al 1998, p. 159).
This model offers a starting point in understanding the social paths that lead to health discrimination. It provides insights that social factors are key in understanding the causal factors of health discrimination, which exist across interconnecting levels. In an attempt to understand and show how social process are connected to individuals’ discrimination in heath, researchers have identified that resources distributed across various social institutions such as workplaces (Macintyre 1997, p. 728), or education can significantly affect the life and health of a person (Lynch & Kaplan n.d, p. 22).
Lynch and Kaplan (n.d, p. 22) state that individuals in an advantaged social position have access to many resources, and consequently avoid risky social class behavior such as smoking, and consequences of these habits. High level of smoking and its consequences such as poor lung function, blood pressure were associated with early drop out of full time education, and manual/less advantaged social class (Galobardesr et al 2006, p. 8). This association between social class and high prevalence of smoking was found to be very strong in the educational strata.
It has been argued that different people differ from each other based on their different level of education. Studies have shown that education provides a person with favorable opportunities for employment with high levels of income, which can improve their living condition (Marmot 2002, p.32). Education has an impact on an individual’s health by influencing a person’s choice of health related lifestyle, which has the ability to reduce risks of mortality.
A comparison between mortality rates from three major death groups’ namely malignant diseases, cardiovascular health problems, and other diseases; and that from all death causes showed the same results that linked them to education and social class (Macintyre 1997, p. 736). Results based on all cause of death category revealed that people belonging to the manual or less advantaged social class, and those who dropped out of school while they were still young has a high death rate (Oliviere, Monroe & Payne 2011, p. 25). Deaths related to malignant diseases and cardiovascular health problems were found to be linked to education (Hamlin 1998, p.54).
The age at which people terminate full time education depends on various factors, which include a child’s aptitude, a family’s economic position, and opportunities for employment when an individual reaches the minimum age where they can leave school and be employed (Braveman 2006, p. 178).
The socioeconomic position of an individual is indicated using income, which measures material resources possessed (Marmot 2002, p.32). Similar to education, income is also associated with social health. It is undeniable that money has an influence and direct effect on health. Money and its related assets can be converted to health improving resources and services through expenditure. This is the concept of how money has an effect on health (Braveman 2006, p. 180)
There is emphasies in the United Kingdom’s national health policy to tackle the factors that influence the health, and health disparities of social minorities to achieve improvement of health for all. According to Link and Phelan (2009, p.87), this difference in access over social resources and socio-economic position underlies the relationship between social class and health because an individual social class determines access to health resources. It is from this reason that Braveman (2006, p. 181) identifies socioeconomic status as the cause of health discrimination.
Over the past century, cigarette smoking in the UK has radically changed. During the early decades of the twentieth century, smoking prevalence was very high because of high production and promotion of tobacco products (Graham 2012, p. 83). Currently, cigarette-smoking rates associated with behavioral smoking have decreased. This downward trend is popular in high income or more advantaged socioeconomic groups (Anderson 2004, p. 47). Studies on behavioral smoking rates conducted in UK showed that in less advantaged socioeconomic groups, behavioral smoking and its consequent health impacts rates were double compared to high-income socioeconomic groups: 50% of the lower social economic groups have high chances of contracting heart diseases (Petra, 2013, p1). The assessment of these rates show that smoking is associated with social class and related to a less advantaged or low-income socioeconomic groups.
Research conducted in the UK have showed that pathways related to disadvantaged groups starting from poor living conditions during childhood, termination of full time education early, and disadvantaged adulthood circumstances, are directly associated with health discriminated smoking risks (Kagawa-Singer 1996, p. 38). Domestic trajectories relating to women have also been identified to matter in these circumstances related. Smoking among women in low-income socioeconomic groups during motherhood increase health discriminated risks over pathways related to childhood, educational, and adulthood circumstances disadvantage. According to Graham (2012, p. 86), smoking rates among women in less advantage pathways in the UK who experienced poor childhood circumstances, left school at an early age, became mothers in their teenage years, and currently live in a less advantaged environment on a low income is about 70 per cent.
Reduction in smoking rates in developed countries such as the UK is associated with policies aimed at controlling smoking and social movement away from smoking, which are seen to play a significant role in smoking rates reduction. These social moves and policies are identified as important efforts to protect the public health by creating a social environment where behavioral smoking is stigmatized (Lambert, Gordon & Bogdan-lovise 2006, p.72).
Public health related policies have had a significant effect in increasing public awareness, and transforming people’s perception towards smoking. Campaigns conducted in the UK were targeted at health risks that smokers face when they engage in smoking (Lynch, Kaplan & Shem 1997, p. 73). Social class risk associated to smoking specifically to pregnant mothers and unborn children were integrated in the mid 1970s UK government campaigns (Lambert, Gordon & Bogdan-lovise 2006, p.76). Currently, tobacco control policies have taken a focal place in reducing non-smokers exposure to tobacco smoke. These policies target the non-smokers who are mostly in the high-income socioeconomic group through warnings found on the cigarette pack, regulations, and media information campaigns. Legislation control of smoking is seen as a social injustice to the less advantaged groups. Smoking is not allowed in selective places where the advantaged group individuals frequent, but it is less controlled in public places where less advantaged individuals frequent.
Recommendations
Evidence shows that oppression, exploitation, poverty, and other social injustices negatively affect health. George & Krieger (2008, p. 530) provide three effective recommendations, which offers a guideline to ensure an equality oriented society.
Improvement of living conditions is necessary starting from birth to old age. Equality in the workplace, social protection, and a universal health care system can effectively alleviate health outcomes caused by inequality. This reduces social injustice and promotes equality in health.
The government should ensure that all work places are smoke free zones so as to create a culture of not smoking hence control health impacts. High tax should be imposed on cigarettes to increase their prices, reduce their availability. This deters most of the people from the aspect of smoking. Advertisements on smoking should be reduced or banned and in place of these, labeling on the packs done with warnings to encourage individuals stop smoking. This reduces the chances of smoking on the side of people from poor backgrounds who are not able to access better health care.
It is important to effectively look at the way money, resources, and power are distributed. This refers to equality in policymaking, gender equality, responsibility and accountability in the economic market, political empowerment, and good governance. This will ensure that economic and social needs of development are balanced with health equity.
Finally, there is need for a local and national monitoring system of inequalities in health, assessment of current policies to reduce health discrimination, and training health experts in social health determinants to ensure accountability and galvanize action. This will ensure equality in health.
According to George & Krieger (2008, p. 530), there is need for both a top-down and bottom-up action in the national health sector. Regardless of an individual’s ability to pay for health services, social and basic human needs such as clean water should be provided to everyone. Participatory and democratic approaches are crucial in integrating multispectral agencies because they pay attention to the consequences of negative effect of social exclusion, discrimination, and gender inequality to health.
Conclusion
This paper has shown clearly that social injustice is the main cause of health inequalities experienced by the less advantaged socioeconomic groups in UK. Social inequalities for example provision and equitable distribution of social resources such as access to education define the lifestyle and living condition of a person. This paper has successfully shown that social condition relates to health discrimination among different socioeconomic groups in UK.
It is evident that poor, ethnic minorities and low class groups are prone to health discrimination. This is shown by the increased mortality and morbidity rates which are in line with social class behaviors such as smoking. Smoking is one of the main causes of lung cancer, chronic bronchitis and other diseases. People from less advantaged communities tend to die while still young as a result of smoking related diseases. This is because they are not able to access better health care. The Whitehead and Dahlgren’s model of social determinants in health inequalities provides a model that measure social inequalities making use of social economic position indicators. The model includes health care as a component of individual’s living and working condition due to improvement and access of health care which helps in lowering mortality rates.
There is need for people to be made aware of effects of smoking where the government could ensure the products are highly taxed no advertisements and instead warnings are put in place. More funds should also be directed to health for all to ensure equality. Monitoring of health inequalities should also be enhanced. All this ensures good health and equality for all.
Reference List
Anderson, NB 2004, Encyclopedia of health & behavior, Thousand Oaks, Calif, Sage Publications.
Aspen Health Center 1998, Employment discrimination in the health care industry, Gaithersburg, Md, Aspen Publishers.
Blane D, Hart, CL, Davey, SG, Gillis, CR, Hole,DJ & Hawthorne, VM 1998, ‘Association of cardiovascular disease risk factors with socioeconomic position during childhood and during adulthood’, J Epidemiol Community Health, Vol. 52, Viewed 10 December 2013, pp. 153-160 HYPERLINK l “otherarticles”http://jech.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/52/3/153#otherarticles
Braveman, P 2006, ‘Health disparities and health equity: concepts and measurement’, Annu. Rev. Public Health, Vol. 27, pp. 167-19
Galobardesr, B, Shaw, M, Lawlor, DA, Lynch, JW & Smith GD 2006, ‘Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1)’, J Epidemiol Community Health, Vol. 60, pp. 7-12
George, DS & Krieger, N 2008, ‘Tackling health inequities’, BMJ,pp. Vol. 337, 6 September, pp,525-530
Graham, H 2012, ‘Smoking, Stigma and social class’, Journal of Social
Policy, Vol. 41, pp 83-99
Hamlin, C 1998, Public health and social justice in the age of Chadwick. Britain:1800-1854. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kagawa-Singer, M 1996, Health issues for minority adolescents. Lincoln, University of Nebraska Press.
Lambert, H, Gordon, E & Bogdan-Lovise, A eds 2006, ‘Social science perspectives 2 on evidence-based health care’, Social Sci Med; Vol. 62, pp.2613-719
Lang, K 2007, ‘Poverty and discrimination’. Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press.
Levine, LE & Munsch, J 2011, Child development: an active learning approach. Thousand Oaks, Calif, SAGE.
Link, B& Phelan, J 2009, ‘The social shaping of health and smoking’, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Vol.104, no.1, pp.S6–S10.
Lynch, J & Kaplan, G n.d, ‘Socioeconomic position’.
Lynch, JW, Kaplan, GA & Shem, S 1997, ‘Cumulative impact of sustained economic hardship on physical, cognitive, psychological, and social functioning’, N Engl J Med Vol. 337, p.1889–95.
Marmot, M 2002, ‘The influence of income on health: views of an epidemiologist’, Health Affairs, Vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 31-46
Marmot, MG & Bell, RG 2011, ‘Improving health: Social determinants and personal choice’, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 40, pp. s73-s77
Mcgillivray, M, Dutta, I & Lawson, D 2011, Health inequality and development. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, Palgrave Macmillan.
Oliver, D, Monroe, B & Payne, S 2011, Death, dying, and social differences. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Petra, R. 2011. Low Income Individuals Have 50% Higher Risk Of Heart Disease. Medical news Today.
Whitehead, M & Dahlgren, G 2007, Concenpts and principles for tackling social inequities in health. Copenhagen, WHO, Regional Office for Europe.
European politics
European politics
The European Union has a legislation that embodies a culture requiring imperative consensus among an exponentially growing number of member states given veto powers they mostly use to serve their different interests in integrationto the European Union not forgetting partisanCommission initiatives. Decision making in the EU only occurs from the presence of a unified agreement between numerous institutions and active players who each play a specific role towards the viability of the decision acceptance. According to political scientist George Tsebelis(Lelieveldt&Sebastiaan 241), decision-making is an European Union depends on the concession of a number of veto players who he articulates to exist in two groups, namely, institutional veto players and partisan veto players. Institutional veto players refers to the predefined institutions that have the mandate ofdeciding on whether to approve a presented proposal while partisan veto players describes parties within the deciding institutions that have the responsibility of determining the adoption of a proposal(Lelieveldt&Sebastiaan 241).By combining the three institutional veto powers namely, the Commission that governs production of proposals, the Council and the European Parliament that has the power to refute a proposal; it is imperatively clear that veto power play a major role to decision making of the European Union. The partisan veto power revolves around the Commission members’ agreement to a proposalbefore releasing itfor discussion(Lelieveldt&Sebastiaan 241).The decision of the Council depends not on the majority in number of proponents to a proposal but depends on the establishment of the qualified majority. This means that the majority are a reference of their argument towards a proposal essentially denoting that a minority number of member states with a credible argument have the power to reject a proposal from adoption. The increase in the number of veto players therefore makes decision making in the European Union very difficult considering the hoops the proposal has to overcome before it can be assented.
The treaty of Nice plays a significant role to the ability of the European Union make decisions by implementing considerable changes from the prior Treaty of Rome and Maastricht Treaty essentially to allow for further expansion of Europe to the east (Tsebelis et.al 302). The Treaty of Nice after its signing in 2001, led to the introduction of a triple majority requirement of council decisions before approval of a proposal. Council decisions after the treaty retained the aspect of a qualified majority but with a number higher than the prior numberto reach an aggregate 62% of all member states of the European Union(Tsebelis et.al 284). However, a qualified minority have the power to disapprove a proposal irrespective of a majority member state advocating for the proposal(Lelieveldt&Sebastiaan 242). Due to the influx in the number of majorities required in the council for decision making to take place, actors focus not in the majority but rather concentrate on the blocking minorities since the minority possesses the capability to nullify a proposal. Overcoming the minority figuratively clears the path for adaptation of the proposal. This is applies mostly to history making decisions that use high politics to actuate vital proposals such as amendment of treaties. The European commission treaties form the constitution of the member states and any change to such treaties requires the input of all member states. Through negotiations,member states achieve a common ground(Lelieveldt&Sebastiaan 231).
The presence of a large number of veto players in the European Union involved in decision-making has compelled institutions to apply different tactics that ensure that proposals are reasonable and credible before they are accepted or endorsed. The Commission, which is the first institution that receives any proposal, has the responsibility of critically analyzing a proposal before passing it to the Council and European Parliament(Lelieveldt&Sebastiaan 240). However, once a proposal has reached the European Parliament, if they propose amendment to the suggestions presented by the Commission, they must consider in the same respect all aspects justifying the amendments such as the proposal acceptability by the Commission after the amendment(Lelieveldt&Sebastiaan 238). This is achievedby not only reviewing the European Parliament majority party group but also applying the same aspect of qualified majority present in the Council member states. This interaction between institutionsoperates on vibrant interaction of formal procedures and actual processes especially in the financial discourses. A perfect example is the negotiation of the European Council to adopting a Financial Perspective for all member states. The Financial Perspective firstly needed approval from two institutions, namely the Council of Ministers and the European parliament(Lelieveldt&Sebastiaan239). The European parliament after a majority vote had rejected the proposal from the Council of Minister before finally accepted it after the Council implemented the changes to the proposal.
A culture of consensus and compromise has arisen from the presence of a large number of veto players in the European Union. Veto power has made it that actors and institutions responsible for decision making have the power to approve and reject any proposal meaning that in any case the two parties work in unison,there is no chance for approval of any proposals(Lelieveldt&Sebastiaan 240). Actors and institutions use this aspect to conduct political ploys by threatening to reject proposals to create room for negotiations with the targeted parties after which they obtain compromise in the defining terms. This aspect of the European Union constitutional structure has led to adoption of most proposals of the Commissions. The case of Sweden is a perfect example for this case. After its integration into the European Union in 1995, it dramatically garnered an aggregate 30 rejections in votes against the Council. Since the European Union works in consensus, Sweden rejection to Council proposals led to its isolation by other member states in turn reducing the states influence in negotiating with the other states(Lelieveldt&Sebastiaan 243). The resultant from expelling Sweden from formulation of proposals consequently led to a reduction in the number of rejections to a conceivable number.
Work Cited
Lelieveldt, Herman, and SebastiaanPrincen.The Politics of the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011. Print.
Tsebelis, George, and Xenophon Yataganas. “Veto Players And Decision-Making In The EU After Nice: Policy Stability And Bureaucratic/Judicial Discretion.” Journal Of Common Market Studies 40.2 (2002): 283-307. Web. 4 Dec. 2013.
To what extent Customer Loyalty programme provides a Competitive Advantage to the Organisation
1.0 Introduction- 400 words
1.1 Company Background- 200 words
1.2 Rationale of the research- 200 words
1.3 Research Question Aims and objectives
1.4 Research Question
To what extent Customer Loyalty programme provides a Competitive Advantage to the Organisation?
Research Aims
To investigate how Competitive Advantage can be derived from Customer Loyalty programme at Tesco.
To examine if customer loyalty has an impact on the overall success of Tesco.
Research Objectives
Critically analyse the literature on competitive advantage and customer loyalty.
Identify the sources of competitive advantage.
Identify various aspects of customer loyalty and competitive advantage through a survey of 60 customers at Tesco.
Investigate the relationship between brand and customer loyalty.
Evaluate different strategies of competitive advantage.
Analyse to what extent Competitive advantage has an impact on the overall growth of the organisation?
Discuss the role of marketing tools to give competitive advantage to Tesco.
Recommend findings from the survey on loyalty programme to achieve competitive advantage.
Literature Review-
2.0 Introduction
Even though most customer loyalty programmes offer primary financial benefits, customer loyalty is about making customers love the company and its products or services. In essence, the loyalty programmes are meant to provide cost discounts. Consumers who purchase products or services do so due to low prices in a given shop and they tend to change if they find a cheaper product. The one and only way to create a long lasting relationship with the client is to establish a true friendship with them which is not only based on financial incentives, but on emotion, trust and partnership. Customer satisfaction is more about the customers’ assessments of what the business or organization provides. It’s about whether a business feels they get what they want from the client. According to Truss 2000, customer loyalty tends to be more profitable to the company as it costs less to service an existing customer than to win a new customer and hence its importance.
2. 1Types of customer loyalty
Monopoly loyalty
This is where clients have little or no choice and hence they become loyal to a given business. According to Thomson 2000, customers that have fewer options tend to be dissatisfied.
Financial constraints
In majority of the cases, the cost difficulty or hassle in changing from one product or service to the other become so great that clients only do it as a last option. As well, research indicates that customers tend to live on low satisfaction or on cheaper good (Thomson, 2000).
Incentivized loyalty
This has been the most over hyped marketing policy in the past years. The type of loyalty has effects on customers who are not using their own money.
Habitual loyalty
This might be the most rampant form of repeat business. Sometimes, when the prices of goods are increased, customers tend to change to other cheaper products or go without a particular good or service.
Committed loyalty
Just from its dictionary definition, it is where customers are committed to a given company. Committed customers play a big role as they are highly committed to the organization or company, not only in terms of purchase but they are also satisfied. The customer tends to make all the purchases from the given business.
2.2Factors affecting Customer Loyalty
There are a number of factors that the businesses must put into consideration in its endeavours to offer customer service. Various factors in turn affect the customer loyalty to a given business. First, customers tend to choose cheaper programmes. Offering a range of programmes to choose from is very important since every customer has his own needs and wishes that are to be met by the organization (Stewart, 2006). Customers also look for good services. The link between good customer service and value addition to the organization has been underscored by attempting to delineate the value brought to the organization by proper communications strategy that is intermarried with relevant marketing skills to offer the desired services. The impact of the customer service on the company delivery is another factor that must be put into consideration (Orlando & Johnson, 2001)
Quality in loyalty programmes is an imperative aspect in the development of teams meant to conduct business organization’s activities (Rahim & Minors, 2003). Quality is another factor affecting customer loyalty. Quality is usually aimed at eliminating the main causes of the problems, through continuous process improvement programs and therefore reduces the variations from the target to the aimed objectives in the firm (Graetz, 2002). It is aimed at improving the customer satisfaction through provision of better services and also removes the activities that have no value to the organization and customers. They also remove services that add no value to the clients.
2.3Conditions of loyalty
Conditions of loyalty vary from one organization or business to the other and also depend on the type of customer loyalty programme being undertaken. According Kleiner 2006, one of the conditions is membership. All participants have to first become members of the loyalty programme before participating in any loyalty programme. Points are associated with given prices and goods or services (Robinson & Kleiner, 2006). To get the points, customers and expected to make purchases from the store. The prices are to remain constant for all members. The more the participation the greater the earnings are also applicable to all customers. Tesco will increase in its earnings suppose many customers make more purchases to earn more point. The company and the customer hence remain interrelated. Form the store, customers will demand high quality goods and good services to remain loyal.
2.4Measuring loyalty
Customer loyalty is measured based on the customer increased or decreased purchase of goods or services. It can also be measured form the reaction of customers towards a given good or services after the introduction of the loyalty programme (Langley, 2000). It can also be measured form the increased profits acquired after the introduction of the loyalty programme. However, the increased sales or profits cannot be a trusted measure since increased purchase can be contributed by various factors (Rumelt, 2004).
Customer loyalty, measured by the help of surveys is assessed through the use of questions and items, reflecting the aim of the loyalty. For every good or services, clients are asked to rate their level of satisfaction. According to Rumelt 2004, the commonly used measure include
Customer satisfaction
Chances of choosing again the same product or service
Chances of recommending
Chances to continue buying similar product
Chances of buying different product
Chances of increased buying of the same product or services
Chances or likelihood of changing to another services provider
The measure of customer loyalty depends on the type of loyalty and its aims. One method of measuring customer loyalty can be applicable in one case but not the other and vice versa. Therefore, the repeat customer method can be the best measure of loyalty.
2.5Managing loyalty
Managing the loyalty schemes depend on the type of customer and the company. It requires a thorough understanding of the customers and their requirements. Tesco has a role to keep their eye on the loyalty scheme without which the schemes might turn ineffective. After some time, it is expected that customer tastes and preferences change and so should the scheme.
Since the programmes vary from one business or company to the other depending on the aim of the programmes among other factors, it is imperative to find a suitable programme for a given group and close monitor thereafter. In cases where the customer incomes and expectations vary by margins, two or more loyalty programmes can be designed (Sutton, 2005). This will give easy time in designing and their managements.
.
2.6Elements of a loyalty strategy
There are various elements of loyalty strategy. Though the elements depend on many factors the most common elements, referring to Tesco are four.
Customers segregation. All businesses are not similar or operate in same environments and so the differences in clients. All clients are unique and have varied tastes and preferences on each and every good and service. The aim when segregating customers is to recognize a potential client forms the existing ones. The managers tend to look for the key indicators for example, where the client comes from, the income of the customer, taste and preferences, customer potentiality among other factors (Hubert, 2000).
It is important to define the customer groups. Each group of customers behave differently and so deserve different treatments. The loyalty programmes should be aimed at addressing the requirements of customer groups. In cases where the taste and preferences are too varied to be bridged, different loyalty programmes are necessary (Gabriel & Griffiths, 2002).
Setting Goals for each segment or customer group is another important aspect. After the loyalty programme has been defined and set for a given customer group, low level strategy should be in place. The goal and targets required for the clients should be something achievable or measurable. This should be average billing, more referrals of clients, and increased number of visits among other factors. The loyalty should be specific to accomplish one or two objects.
2.7Loyalty and loyalty schemes
Customer loyalty is among the most important assets to be possessed by a company. With the increase in the number of competitors, goods and services, many product and services, and the expansion of the internet trading, loyalty is rarely existent in the modern retail environments. A customer loyalty programme is a structured and non-short termed marketing effort which gives incentives to the repeat clients (Dulewicz & Higgs, 2009). The programmes are meant to encourage the clients to make more purchase of some products or services, increase their number of visits and make them refer others to buy the same good or service. The loyalty schemes differs form one company to the other depending on the aim of the loyalty and the expected outcomes (Farmer & Kingsley, 2001).
2.8Reward design
Often, rewards are designed dependent on the number of earned point. The more points a customer has a greater the reward. This is fair method since it depends on the number of purchases one make in Tesco. Customers have positively responded to the programme. In reaction to the programme various Tesco competitors have designed different customer loyalty programmes to retain their present customers. In majority of the cases, they range from silver, diamond and gold depending on the number of purchases one make. The naming however varies from one competitor to the other like starter, middle, and advanced. In reaction to the competitors’ move Tesco has lowered the cost of their reward points. This has assisted it retain majority of its customers.
2.9Competitive advantage and its factors
Tesco has a great advantage as it established its stores in the areas with low competition. Since other businesses have already built a name in other parts, taking advantage of these areas is the only option of Tesco (McNamara, 2007). Since it has already attained its customer trust in these areas, its fame has spread to other areas giving it a competitive advantage. Tesco was keen in choosing its stores locations. They considered store visibility, accessibility, traffic and population’s age and income. This was to ensure that its stores are located in areas convenient for the majority of the target customers. The visibility of the store was also analyzed from a customers’ view point (Johnson, 2001). The more visible it is the less the advertisement needed. Tesco built up large retail stores in areas of high visibility and this helped it draw customers from other shops/stores. The visibility of the retail stores attracts customers as it acts as a means of advertisement (Giannini, 2000). Tesco has also retain its high quality products and this has helped it retain majority of its clients and capture more.
2.10Customer satisfaction and Competitive advantage
There is a great paradigm shift in the contemporary business environment and this intermarried with the day-to-day economic conditions that various businesses are subjected to; it becomes very essential for every business to explore the aspect of customer satisfaction thoroughly as an important aspect and process of business survival and growth (Collins & Porras, 2004). By exploring customer satisfaction, the business organizations not only gain knowledge of the customer satisfaction drivers but also establish strategies to retain them and have a competing edge over the competitors in the market (Combs, & Skill, 2003).
Knowledge of the customer satisfaction factors is a strong backbone upon which an organization can base its customer retention by knowing the satisfaction drivers of the customers it has attracted (LeBlanc, et al, 2000). Furthermore, though there is a great significance of using customer opinions and attitudes in various fields, not many studies have specifically focused on assessing the attitudes of customers with respect to their satisfaction with the products offered especially in developing economic systems (Buren, 1999). This section attempts to give an assessment of the studies that have been undertaken in an attempt to investigate the relationship of the two broad dimensions of customer satisfaction and that of customer retention. These two dimensions are powerfully related when attempts are made to understand or debunk on customer satisfaction (Crutchfiled, 2000). After all, the ideological significance of endeavouring to satisfy the customer is to retain the attracted customer and attract more hence creating a pool of loyal customer in the market. The end result: – strong customer base and hence formidable market dominance.
In definition, customer satisfaction can be understood as an attitudinal concept which reconciles the customer expectation and actual experience. When the difference between the two aspects (for instance expectation and actual experience) is wide, then there is little satisfaction and an organization stands high chances of losing the attracted customers (Chen, 2001). With the changing characteristics of the market platform on which business is conducted, the aspect of customer satisfaction becomes even more relevant. Online businesses that deal with clients in a virtual world would wish to know the satisfaction of their customers.
2.11Business Strategy and competitive advantage
Since Tesco is relying on high technology to make the purchase of products more convenient for its customers, it is likely to attract more customers. Its system will involve making orders by phone, a factor that will result in saving time and transportation cost. Despite the fact that other business are on the low prices of their products, it is likely to loss many customers to Tesco. By gaining more customers in the area where other competitors are less known, Tesco can easily build on customer confidence. It will later expand to areas where Tesco is well established basing its support from it excellent customer services in other areas. This will negatively affect Wal-Mart as it will loss customers and Tesco will remain its threat even in the future (Oxman, 2002).
2.12Innovation and competitive advantage
To innovate is to create and commit to a strategic focus for creativity and innovation to succeed. There are generally various types of innovations that companies consider for pursuit. Some of the innovation types are more applicable in given cases as compared to others. This depends on the status and stage of company development and objectives. For a starting company, the type of innovation might differ from the ones employed by the growing company (Bontis, 2006). Product innovation or service innovation which is the most common types of innovation results from improvements that are made to existing products and services. Almost all companies that have been established should focus on service or product innovation or they might not gain market share to a more violent competitor (Chauvin & Hirschey, 2003).
2.13Core competencies and Competitive advantage
Accessibility to Grocery stores
Proximity is another issue that the grocery shoppers will analyze before purchasing any product. A consumer may prefer to purchase other groceries in the nearest stores when Tesco is far away (Knight, 2000). Thus the managers of the Tesco should make the stores available in the small towns that were not served by the competitors as this will allow it to launch itself as the sole retailers in these areas thus the consumers will tend to purchase groceries from the stores more so if they are offering better prices than stores in the city which normally take two to four hours to get to by car (Adler & Kwon, 2002).
Grocery shoppers also want to shop in stores that are not too far away from where they live. Grocery shoppers just like any other shoppers tend to have a favourite store suppose incentives are issued. This is usually based on what the store offers which are mostly, reasonable prices, availability of items as well as good quality of the good and services (Brown et al. 2007).
2.14Marketing tools and competitive advantage
2.15Key Success Factors In Retailing
The programmes should have one main aim. This will help the managers have one major focus other things being secondary. Offers should be provided for the repeat clients. Offers act as incentives. When a customer is rewarded according to Oriento 2002, this increases their company lifetime.
2.16 Summary
Based on the literature review, a number of issues are evident. First, given that customer satisfaction is not a quantitatively measurable variable and it ideally depends on the behaviour of consumers, more investigative efforts should be put in understanding consumer behaviour of consumers in a particular industry, geographic location and across gender (Liana & Buren, 2006). However, it must be taken into account that consumer behaviour is not only a profound process in business interaction with the society but it also has many intervening variables which cannot be assumed. On the same basis, an organization that wants to ensure a satisfied customer without examining the consumer behaviour of customer with respect to changes in quality of services offered and market approach strategies employed may also not be planning to succeed. Customer satisfaction and brand loyalty have a causal link, which means that utmost care must be borne in mind when attempts are made by business organizations to develop satisfaction strategies (Nerdrum & Erikson, 2001). An oversight may easily lead to the plan not working at all. Since the characteristics of the variables a long this causal link may not be similar across the industries and may also vary from business to business, every organization must examine directionality of its customer satisfaction thoroughly (Nahapiet & Ghoshal, 2008).
3.0Research Methodology- 200 words
3.1 Research Approach-200 words
3.2 Research Strategy -200 words
3.3 Data Collection Methods- 300 words
3.4 Limitations of the chosen methods- 150 words
3.5 Ethical implications- 150 words
Analysis and Discussion:
4.0 Survey of customers
This study has collected data from various sources and analysed it to reach to conclusions. Data collected through survey has been analysed and interpreted in a meaningful format.
Customers were asked to disclose their gender during the survey. This is to identify customer if any particular group is more interested about customer loyalty and competitiveness of Tesco. From the above bar chart, it is clear that there are more female shoppers than male who shops at Tesco. On the other hand, only two percent customers did not feel that there gender matters when shopping at Tesco and did not disclose their gender.
During the survey, customers were also asked to disclose their age group. This is to identify if there is any particular age is more inclined to shop at Tesco. The above bar chart represents that majority of customers who shop at Tesco falls within the age rage of 35-45. However, the number of shoppers decrease with their age as only twelve percent shoppers age over 65 went to Tesco for shopping who felt that there is link between customer loyalty and competitiveness.
Researcher wanted to identify if customers who shop at Tesco considers themselves as loyal customer. The above pie chart represents that fifty three percent customers who shop at Tesco considers themselves as loyal customer. This information is crucial for Tesco to analyse market share. If Tesco can increase the number of regular shopper through different marketing tools and loyalty program, the revenue is expected to rise. On the other hand, if Tesco can remain this customer loyal, it will have competitive edge over other stores in surrounding areas. Hence, the percentage of loyal customer is crucial to survive in this competitive environment.
Customers were asked to disclose how they came to know about the store in Laytostone. The above chart represents that thirty eight percent customers came to know about Tesco due to direct marketing. The second highest, around thirty percent concluded that they knew about Tesco through advertisement, loyalty programme, followed by thirteen percent through word of mouth, twelve percent through personal recommendation. On the other hand, seven percent customers said, they knew about Tesco through third party such as magazine company, ice-cream company etc. These companies placed their product on Tesco’s shelf only which made customers to come to Tesco for those particular products. One customer said “ I only come to Tesco because the ice-cream I buy is only available at Tesco, you cannot find it anywhere”. This shows that customer can be loyal to the store due to strong brand awareness of customer.
It was imperative to understand why customers shop at Tesco Leytonstone and not other superstore. The above pie chart represents that forty one percent of customers shops at this particular store due to convenience followed by thirty percent due to availability of products they require for households. On the other hand, twelve percent customers said there is no other alternative and large superstore like Tesco and there is no place to go. Seventeen percent felt the location had good transport link and the shop was available twenty four hours. From the above data, it is also clear that lack of competitors also bring customers back to Tesco, hence it is not absolute that loyalty programme is more effective than any other means.
To identify whether customers are loyal due to the location and distance to Tesco, researcher asked customers how far do they live from the store. From the above chart, it appears that majority (seventy five percent) of Tesco customer live locally, within two miles from the store. However, twenty five percent customers live more than two miles away still shops at Tesco. This figure represent that not only local customers are loyal, but also customers from outside locality is also loyal to customers which contributes to the competitiveness of Tesco.
Management Analysis:
5.0 Recommendation
5.1 Conclusion
4.1 Survey of Employees
5.0 Recommendation
5.1 Conclusion
