Recent orders
Action Plan to Address Drunk Driving
Action Plan to Address Drunk Driving
Name
Instructor
Course
Date
Drunk driving among college age group between the ages of 18 and 25 is one of the most common social problems that are related to the use of alcohol. Drunk driving does not endanger the life of the drunk driver and passengers, but also other people who are on the road (Parks, 2010). Many lives being lost and continue to be lost as a result of driving under the influence of alcohol. There is the need to come up with measures to prevent individuals under the college age from driving under the influence of alcohol. The environmental strategies used in the action plan are not assured to changing the behavior of every college student, but they can certainly help in changing the aspects of college and community culture that supports drunk driving among individuals in the college age group.
Action plan
The safety of college students and those around them is of great importance. There is the need to ensure that the alcohol prevention program put in place is working. The alcohol prevention program should take the form of a serious action plan that needs to be implemented by educational, legislative and community support. The action plan comprises of the following action points;
Action point 1: An increase in the enforcement of laws that dictate the minimum drinking age
The minimum legal age that one needs to attain in order to start drinking according to the law is a well studied alcohol control policy. As compared to other programs that are generally aimed at the youth who are in the college age bracket, increasing the legal age required for buying and consuming alcohol is considered to be the most successful (DeJong, 2005). If the law can implement a higher legal drinking age then there will be a decrease in consumption of alcohol. This is because of the decrease in the amount of alcohol being sold to minors. There should also be efforts made to reduce false age identification in order to make this law more effective. This will in turn lead to a decrease in the number of fatal road accidents caused by drunk driving. This should be carried out as a joint effort between college lecturers and the community.
Action point 2: Increased publicity, implementation and enforcing laws aimed at reducing alcohol-impaired driving
The number of deaths due to drunk driving can be reduced through setting the legal content of alcohol in the blood for college age group to 0.2 % or even lower. This can also be implemented trough using sobriety checkpoints around colleges and campuses (DeJong, 2005). Administrative license revocation laws should also be implemented incase a college student is found exceeding the legal blood content. This will make these college students careful and avoid going beyond the stipulated legal content of alcohol in their blood when driving. They would not want to risk their licenses being revoked. College students should be educated against the dangers associated with drunk driving.
Action plan 3: screening and counselling college students
All the college students who visit health centers in campus should undergo screening for alcohol abuse. College students abusing alcohol and those at risk of alcohol abuse should be given personal counselling. The counselling should entail how alcohol can easily sabotage their academics and lead to death in road accidents (Miller, 2008). They should also be counselled on how they can handle social situations where they can access alcohol freely.
Action plan 4: Restricting the density of alcohol retail outlets around college compounds
There should be a reduction in number of alcohol outlets around colleges or recreational areas where college students like to spend their time (DeJong, 2005). The number and location of these outlets can be restricted either directly or indirectly through policies that make it difficult to obtain licenses. There would be a reduction in the consumption of alcohol by individuals in the college age if alcohol is sold far from their colleges or areas they like spending their time.
Delivery of information
This information can be delivered through law enforcement officers to the college students through college presidents, student and community leaders. The information can be delivered through seminars and sessions that are aimed at sensitizing college students of reduction of alcohol consumption.
Statistics on drunk driving among the college age-group
According to research, drinking and driving by college students is considered to be a major public health issue. One in every five college student admits to drive while they are drunk. About 40% of college students have acknowledged that they have ever been drove by a drunk driver. Another worrying fact is that the tendency of driving under the influence of alcohol starts when a college student attains the minimum legal age for driving. College students very limited experience in driving and hence making drunk driving by college students more hazardous.
Measuring success of action plan
In order to find out whether the action plan is successful or not fresh statistics can be taken on the number of accidents due to drunk driving among college students. If the number of accidents have decreased then it means that the action plan implemented was effective.
References
DeJong, W. (2005). Preventing alcohol-related problems on campus: Impaired driving : A guide for program coordinators. Bethesda, Md.?: Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Prevention ;.
Miller, J. (2008). A Drunk Driving Prevention Program for Your Students. The American Biology Teacher, 199-205.
Parks, P. (2010). Drunk driving. San Diego, CA: Reference Point Press.
Case 5.1 Marathon Runners at Different Levels (3)
Name
Professor
Course
Date
Situational Approach
Case 5.1: Marathon Runners at Different Levels
Part 1
The runners are new to this activity and have accumulated no experience at all. Because they are all novices to running, they are classified as (D1) under the development levels. Their excitement about the race and their effort to show up each day is an indication of high commitment. So under the development levels, they are D1, low competence, and high commitment. This group asks basic questions constantly and is worried about their abilities in the race. For this reason, David should adopt the qualities of a coach represented by (S3) leadership styles. The group needs direction on the technicalities of a marathon. David does not expect, however, to deal with these kinds of questions and is not prepared. He is rather prepared to use Directing (S2), in his mind, his work is to direct and not to encourage this group coming to him with childish insecurities.
Part 2
It is clear from their choice of words and their concerns that runners in group two are considerably experienced and know a thing or two about running, they possibly lie under the (D3) developmental level (Northouse). With this group, David is at his element being highly supportive and because of their experience, he does not need to apply a hands-on approach or exercise high direction.
Part 3
This group’s experience and the ability of several of them to finish in the top ten put them at the D4 developmental category. It might not be David’s fault that he appears ineffective as a coach for this team. Their ego and an idea in their minds that they need a certain level of practice and tactics mean they do not appreciate David. They feel bigger than the New York marathon and look to focus on marathons beyond this one.
Part 4
David’s experience as a marathon runner himself is important for his coaching; his idea of the sport makes him suitable to speak to other people as a coach. The way he deals with group 1 may suggest a little bias, which is not a strong point for a leader. He needs to exercise patience if he is to succeed in this position. He also needs to exert a little more authority and demand respect from Group 3 runners.
Case 5.3: Getting the Message Across
Part 1
The current problem may be that training and leadership may be absent. It is good that Ms. Calder is interacting with students and relating with them, however, not having standards to run the station is major problem. She should focus some of her time training the students and holding them accountable than being friendly.
Part 2
Ann’s hands off approach means she is mainly doing things the S4 quadrant way and has no idea why the students are not following the rules. It is important for her apply the S1 or apply more of the S2 approach where she exerts more direction and becomes more involved. The nature of students and their ages mean their excitement for working for WCBA and learning the radio does not teach them right from wrong. They should be coached with an experienced individual and moderate during shifts.
Part 3
Ann can spend several shifts with the students and coach them on an individual basis. This will help her know how directive she needs to be with each of them. She will also be more informed on their level of skill. This is because situational leadership is based on the evaluation of employees’ skills and decides the level of need to amend in accordance.
Works Cited
Northouse, Peter G. Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications, 2018.
Motivation For Learning Foreign Language And How To Keep Students Motivated
Motivation For Learning Foreign Language And How To Keep Students Motivated
Contents
TOC o “1-3” h z u HYPERLINK l “_Toc377628860” Types of Motivation PAGEREF _Toc377628860 h 1
HYPERLINK l “_Toc377628861” Gardner’s Socio-Educational Model PAGEREF _Toc377628861 h 3
HYPERLINK l “_Toc377628862” Cultural and Social Milieu PAGEREF _Toc377628862 h 3
HYPERLINK l “_Toc377628863” Individual Differences and the Context/Setting in Which the Learning Occurs PAGEREF _Toc377628863 h 3
HYPERLINK l “_Toc377628864” Linguistic and Non-linguistic Outcomes PAGEREF _Toc377628864 h 4
HYPERLINK l “_Toc377628865” Ways of Motivating PAGEREF _Toc377628865 h 4
HYPERLINK l “_Toc377628866” References PAGEREF _Toc377628866 h 8
Motivation for Learning Foreign Language
Winke (2005) defines motivation as being encouraged to do something. Language is described as the medium through which thoughts are expressed. It is a social thing through which individuals offer their experiences to others and obtain their experience in return (Nakata, 2006). Motivation to learn a foreign language is described as the learner’s orientation with the purpose of learning a second language (Norris-Holt, 2001). Motivation to learn a foreign can also be defined as “complex of constructs, involving both effort and desire, as well as a favorable attitude toward learning the language at hand” (Winke, 2005, p3). In other words, the learner is encouraged to learn a foreign language because of the underlying factors such as integration into the society using the language. Motivation in learning a foreign language happens when the learners find importance in learning the language of the society they live in. The learners use the language to exchange opinions, and express their thoughts with each other and thus, increasing their urge to learn the language autonomously and continuously.
Types of MotivationMotivation can be categorized into integrative motivation and instrumental motivation. Integrative motivation is defined as the learner’s orientation towards learning second language (L2). Successful students in learning a foreign language tend to be those who admire people that speak the target language, like their culture and have the urge of integrating or becoming familiar with the society using the language. When an individual becomes a resident of a certain community that makes use of the target language in its daily interactions, integrative motivation becomes the key element in developing the level of language proficiency. It becomes mandatory for the individual to function socially within the community and becoming one of its members (Norris-Holt, 2001).
On the other hand, instrumental motivation is characterized by the need to gain something concrete or practical from the learning of a second language. The goal of acquiring second language in instrumental motivation is utilitarian, for instance, meeting the necessities for university or school graduation, application for a job, reading technical material, attaining higher social status, translation work, or request for high pay based on the language ability. Instrumental motivation is common in instances where the acquisition of a second language is not important for the learner’s social integration into the society (Norris-Holt, 2001).
Both instrumental and integrative motivations are important elements for success but it has been found that integrative motivation sustains long-term success in the learning of a second language. Research shows that integrative motivation is important in the formal learning setting or environment. It is important to note that both instrumental and integrative motivations are not necessarily mutually limited. Learners rarely choose one type of motivation when studying a second language. Instead, the learners combine both orientations. For instance, international students living in the United States learn English for academic reasons and at the same time, they desire to become incorporated with the culture and the people of the country. Motivation is an essential factor in second language achievement. Thus, it is crucial to determine the combination and form of motivation that helps in the effective acquisition of a foreign language (Norris-Holt, 2001).
Gardner’s Socio-Educational ModelThe model identifies factors that are interrelated in learning a second language. It is important to note that motivation to learn a second language is one variable and when combined with other factors, it influences the learner’s success. The work of Gardner focuses on foreign language acquisition in a language classroom. The model tries to interconnect four characteristics of second language acquisition and they include individual learner differences, cultural and social milieu, linguistic outcomes, and the context/setting in which the learning takes place (Norris-Holt, 2001).
Cultural and Social MilieuThe cultural or social milieu refers to the environment or the surroundings in which the individual is located, thus, they determine the individual’s beliefs about the other language and culture. The beliefs make considerable effect on the acquisition of second language. For instance, in the monocultural setting such as that of Britain, many people believe that it is not important to study another language and the minority groups are supposed to incorporate and become proficient in the country’s dominant language (Norris-Holt, 2001).
Individual Differences and the Context/Setting in Which the Learning Occurs
The four individual differences are also believed to have a considerable impact in the acquisition of a second language. They include variables such as language aptitude, situational anxiety, motivation, and intelligence. These variables are closely interconnected with conext/setting in which the learning occurs. In this regard, two settings or contexts are identified and they include the unstructured acquisition of a language in a natural setting and the formal instruction in the classroom. The effects of individual difference variables vary with the context or setting. For instance, aptitude and intelligence play a significant role in learning in a formal setting and at the same it exerts a weaker influence in the informal setting. Both settings are influenced equally by the motivation and situational variables (Norris-Holt, 2001).
Linguistic and Non-linguistic OutcomesThe last factor is the non-linguistic and linguistic results of the learning occurrence. Linguistic outcome is defined as the actual language skills and language knowledge. In entails test indicators such as the general proficiency tests and course grades. Non-linguistic results express the individual’s approach towards cultural beliefs and values, particularly towards the targeted language society. It is worth noting that those motivated to incorporate both non-linguistic and linguistic “outcomes of the learning experience will attain a higher degree of L2 proficiency and more desirable attitudes” (Norris-Holt, 2001).
From the Gardner’s Socio-Educational model, motivation is thought to have three elements. These three elements include affect, desire, and effort. Effort expresses the time spent or used in learning the language and the learner’s drive. Desire refers to level to which the learner wishes to become proficient or skillful in the language. Affect expresses the learner’s reaction towards learning the language (the reaction in this case is emotional) (Norris-Holt, 2001).
Ways of Motivating
From the research findings on the nature of motivation and the impact that it makes on the students’ learning perceptions, it is clear that there are clear aspects of motivation that define the ways from which it must be approached. Without a consideration of the specifics of motivation in defining a successful approach to assist foreign language student, it may not be possible to create the change of learning outcomes as expected in content based instruction approach. It is therefore important that the correct strategy to effect motivation in a foreign language classroom is adopted to attain the success desired of such an approach (Root, 1999). One of the main aspects of motivation is the definition of the goal, which must be clearly enumerated in the foreign language classroom. Changing the students’ mindset to embrace a totally different language from their mother tongue must define the goal of such studies and generate the desired trajectories. Secondly, specific effort must be cultivated in form of behavior contributions in order to achieve the identified goal. Thirdly, there must be a deliberate desire to achieve the outlined goal for studying the foreign language among all the students, which acts as an important determinant of attitude change. Finally, motivation must cultivate a positive attitude in order to spur the urge to keep studying the foreign language (Gardner, 1985). Apparently, the clarification of the aspects of motivation in a foreign language classroom will facilitate developing the best approach to keep students at pace with the focus needed to sustain attachment and concentration in the classroom.
The most applicable motivation interventions in a foreign language classroom have been developed using the underlying concept of spurring and sustaining aspects of motivation. They mainly target the behavioral framework of approach in influencing students to stay focused in learning the foreign language. According to Crookes and Schmidt (1991), motivation can be imparted as a skill in the learning process where students are guided to stick to internal and external attitude. The authors reckon that the most important aspect of motivation is captured not only by taking care of intrinsic factors alone but extrinsic factors that determine the attitudes and perceptions held by the foreign language learners. Internal factors are handled by capturing interest in the foreign language, creating meaning and relevance, establishment of success trajectories from the learning and outcomes. From these insights, it is possible for the instructor to develop the desirable influence on the student that is manifested in not only willful enrolment but persistence and proactive attitude (Root, 1999).
General practical applications and approaches of motivation in a foreign language classroom have been designed through research. These approaches as observed in MacIntyre, Moore and Noels (2010) are designed to ensure undivided attention in a foreign language or any other classroom. Alexenoamen (2009) provides a number of practical interventions that can be implemented in various learning assignments that attempt to maintain interest and commitment among the students. One of the interventions is grouped work or paired work in class where students are encouraged through the interest of their peers inside the classroom. This approach is based on the premise that students have different learning capabilities and that the challenge established when they are grouped together in the learning environment acts as a motivation to stay focused in the classroom. Additionally, the author reckons that the sitting arrangement inside the classroom is important in the establishment of appropriate learning outcomes. Language lessons are dependent on the environment that the learner is exposed to, which implies that the sitting arrangement is important in the creation of learning coherence. Sitting patterns that motivate interest and focus may involve elimination of obstructions and minimizing movements inside the classroom while the lesson is in progress.
Alexenoamen (2009) also reckons that the correction of errors made by students is very important in languages than in many other subjects. It is therefore important that students are kept at pace with the learning outcomes at the most appropriate instance in order to develop interest and commitment from avoidance of discouragement occasioned by such mistakes. In addition, the author also reckons that the design of the lesson by the teacher must employ interesting interjections into the lesson to maintain top level focus from the students. Keeping the lesson as lively as possible through such interventions as role plays is important for student’s learning process. Interest can also be developed by the instructor through a variety of interventions that include visual aides in the delivery of content, which facilitate the breaking of monotony and boredom. In a similar effect, the application of audio tools in the delivery of the class work is important in the learning outcomes.
In an attempt to make sure that the delivery of the material is in coherence with the expectations of a motivated classroom, Root (1999) reckons that the main areas of the motivation concept must be summarized in as brief concept as possible. Firstly, the instruction delivery must be taken care of which involves the realignment of the instructor’s approach and attitudes with the concepts outlined above. As an illustration, notes giving and introduction of visual aides alongside application of dialogue among other interest generating interventions are entirely dependent on the instructor. Content delivered must be organized from simpler to complex language levels to avoid loss of interest and keep students at pace with their own level of understanding. Assignments given must also comply with the focus spurring concept of foreign language delivery. Student assessment in the same level of importance is expected to initiate motivation in the classroom, which implies that from the design of the examination to delivery of results must be captured in the motivational concept.
In conclusion, ways of motivating students must be prompted by the need to develop a balance on the various perspectives that highlight the main motivation concepts outlined in foreign language studies. It is important that the learner-instructor relationship is based established on the understanding of the most important factors of motivation. Intrinsic and extrinsic factors that determine motivation must be understood to develop the appropriate environment in which the students can be assisted to exploit their potential in learning outcomes. To that end, teacher specific and student specific approaches must be brought out in a balanced measure in order to ensure that the student remains motivated throughout the learning process (Root, 2009).
ReferencesAlexeamen (2009) “Ways of Motivating EFL/ESL Students in the Classroom” Retrieved from: HYPERLINK “http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/blogs/alexenoamen/ways-motivating-efl-esl-students-classroom” http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/blogs/alexenoamen/ways-motivating-efl-esl-students-classroom
Gardner, R. C. (1985) Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London, UK: Edward Arnold
Gonzales, R. (2010) “Motivation Orientation in Foreign Language Learning: The Case of Filipino Foreign Language Learners,” TESOL Journal, 3:3-28
MacIntyre, P., Moore, B. & Noels, K. (2010) “Perspectives on Motivation in Second Language Acquisition: Lessons from the Ryoanji Garden” Retrieved from: HYPERLINK “http://www.lingref.com/cpp/slrf/2008/paper2381.pdf” http://www.lingref.com/cpp/slrf/2008/paper2381.pdf
Nakata, Y. (2006). Motivation and experience in foreign language learning. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Norris-Holt, J. (2001). Motivation as a contributing factor in second language acquisition. The Internet TESL Journal, 7(6). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Norris-Motivation.html
Root, E. (1999) “Motivation and Learning Strategies in a Foreign Language Setting: A Look at a Learner of Korean,” Retrieved from: HYPERLINK “http://www.carla.umn.edu/resources/working-papers/documents/WP14_Learner_of_Korean.pdf” http://www.carla.umn.edu/resources/working-papers/documents/WP14_Learner_of_Korean.pdf
Winke, P. M. (2005). Promoting motivation in the foreign language classroom. Center for Language Education and Research, 9(2), 1-12.
