Recent orders
Politicaleconomic arguments of worldly philosophers
Political/economic arguments of worldly philosophers:
Introduction:
There are several worldly philosophers who are known for their economic or political arguments. Some of these include Adam Smith, Joseph Schumpeter, Ayn Rand, Thorstein Veblen, José Ortega y Gasset and Karl Marx among others. Political science is one of the widest disciplines in the social sciences. It incorporates views, suggestions and or criticisms of ideas from many disciplines.
Abstract:
The Lenin-Hobson Theory of Imperialism is a theory which expresses imperialism, regional conflicts and world wars as being caused by international imbalances in income divisions in developed countries. Since workers from the developed countries receive so little from the income share such that they are unable to buy products from their industries, the imperialist powers struggle for division of the finite resources of the earth leading to world wars and eventually revolution for losers and profits for winners (Light 281). On the other hand Marxism was trying to find a way of avoiding all these chaos through a more just mode o production through Marxist ideas
This paper seeks to compare the views and or ideas of some of the worldly philosophers. In doing so we shall be applying the analytical tools of a subfield of political science referred to as comparative politics. Comparative politics according to many scholars is more methodological than substantive. Although it is a subfield of political science comparative politics, tries to gauge the value and method of analysis of different fields of political science. On the wider field political science is a science just like many other disciplines. Unlike many other disciplines political science concerns itself with the study of politics and political systems as well as political behavior.
According to early writers like Hobbes politics is just the real analysis of who gets what when and how. Regardless of this fact political science has many subfields. These subfields include political theory; international relations and public policy. Although comparative politics is a subfield of political science, it is unique since it deals with the comparison of different theories and assumptions related to different sub disciplines of political science.
Analysis:
The views of these philosophers are very different. As we have seen above some of them are more self-centered while others are more collectivist in nature. Marx’s ideas and thoughts gave rise to contemporary communism. In a particular reference to his magnum opus, the communist manifesto Marx said that “the history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles”. In saying so Marx had observed that the division of the classes into different classes was the main human problem and that is why he always coined that the oppressed will always try to rise against their oppressors. According to Marx capitalism had inherent internally destructive tensions. Looking at the world today we shall seem to agree with Marx. For example the current healthcare reforms that the Obama administration has brought about major divisions within the society. This is due to the fact that people don’t want their investments in their healthcare to be in any way controlled or guided by the government (self-interest) yet when the global financial crisis came calling they all wanted government help to avoid loses. This is what Karl Marx was afraid of when he advocated for Marxist ideas. The communism that Marx advocated for was not a degenerative form instead Marx wanted a form of socialism that would protect all members of the society while at the same time ensuring some form of responsibility. This according to Marx would have been achieved with aristocratic authoritarian leaders who had visions for their countries.
To assert this it is important to note that many of the newly industrialized countries in the world notably the Asian tigers entered the path to industrialization through a more communism lining economy under the leadership of authoritarian aristocratic leaders.
Some of the current authorities in political theory have been indirectly in support of Marxist ideas. For example John Bordley Rawls. he was an American philosopher, born in 1921 and died in 2002. He was regarded as a leading scholar in the fields of political philosophy and morals. His greatest publication was a theory of justice, published in 1971. In this book he argues that “the most reasonable principles of justice are those everyone would accept and agree to from a fair position (Rawls, 1971). He is mostly known for his theory of justice of fairness. This theory has been widely borrowed by economists, sociologists as well as other scholars in different fields. Drawing ideas from the original position and the veil of ignorance Rawls tries to demonstrate how distributive justice can be arrived at. This theory develops certain principles of justice that govern a modern social order. This theory provides a framework that explains the importance of equal opportunity that benefits the more and less advantaged members of the society. This was what Marx was referring to in seeking a communist society.
Marx’s ideas were also borrowed from classical political economists like Adam Smith and David Ricardo. In so doing Marx believed that a revolution of the working class would be the beginning of an end to the dominance of capitalism. Thus labor and workers would lead in this journey. The ideas of Adam smith are mostly borrowed from the theory of moral sentiments, since the other major work of Adam smith, ‘an inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations’ is more individualistic (capitalistic) than the former. Marx’s criticisms of some of the works of Smith have been reinforced by other political economists like Joseph Schumpeter. In support of Marxism, Schumpeter observed that in reference to smith:
“His very limitation made for success. Had he been more brilliant, he would not have been taken so seriously. Had he dug more deeply, had he unearthed more recondite truth, had he used more difficult and ingenious methods, he would not have been understood. But he had no such ambitions; in fact he disliked whatever went beyond plain common sense. He never moved above the heads of even the dullest readers. He led them on gently, encouraging them by trivialities and homely observations, making them feel comfortable all along.”
(History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, p 185)
Conclusion:
Marxist ideas have been seen to have been more broad than narrow. Che Guevara observed that “The merit of Marx is that he suddenly produces a qualitative change in the history of social thought. He interprets history, understands it’s dynamic, predicts the future, but in addition to predicting it, he expresses a revolutionary concept: the world must not only be interpreted, it must be transformed.
Just like Rawls in contemporary times Marx tried to bring morality and compassion in the creation and distribution of resources and wealth. His works have had a very big impact in the study of social justice issues.
Reference list:
Baggins Brian “Karl Marx Critique of the Gotha Program” Marx/Engels Selected Works, 3.3 (1875) 13-30
Baird, Forrest E. and Walter Kaufmann From Plato to Derrida, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008
Dorfman, Joseph Thorstein Veblen and His America Harvard, Harvard University Press, 1934
GassetJosé Ortega y The revolt of the masses: Authorised translation from the Spanish, Y, New American Library, 1950
Gasset Jose Ortega Y. philosophical ideas 25 Feb 2004 22 Dec 2009 < HYPERLINK “http://www.philosophyprofessor.com/philosophers/jose-ortega-y-gasset.php” http://www.philosophyprofessor.com/philosophers/jose-ortega-y-gasset.php>
Heilbroner Robert L. The worldly philosophers: the lives, times, and ideas of the great economic thinkers; A Touchstone book Y, Simon and Schuster publishers, 1980
Hoaas, David J. and Madigan, Lauren J. “A citation analysis of economists in principles of economics textbooks” The Social Science Journal 36.3 (1999) 525–532
Light Ivan “The Lenin-Hobson Theory of Imperialism” A Didactic Drama in Five Acts 14.4 (1986): 281-286
Miller Arthur The price: a play, Michigan, Secker & Warburg publishers, 1968
Notes for the Study of the Ideology of the Cuban Revolution” by Che Guevara, October 8 1960. available at: HYPERLINK “http://www.marxists.org/archive/guevara/1960/10/08.htm” http://www.marxists.org/archive/guevara/1960/10/08.htm
Pressman Steven Fifty Major Economists NY, Routledge publishers, 1999
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971
Schumpeter, Joseph. History of economic analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
The Effects of Nazi Propaganda on the German People During World War 2.
The Effects of Nazi Propaganda on the German People During World War 2.
Name:
Institution:
Course:
Tutor:
Date:
Propaganda is defined as information spread for the purpose of promoting some cause. As Germany prepared for and carried out the Second World War, a variety of propaganda forms were implemented. This was necessary because of a number of reasons; apparently, two main agendas were to be served by these forms. It was important to convince the public to fight and that it was necessary to fight.
The German’s had gone through a power struggle to establish the superiority of the Nazi Party over the Socialists; however, it lacked enough political support to go to war. The main body of German propaganda consisted of material increasing or fueling the wartime effort. As Fest (2002) postulates Hitler and a good number of other Nazi leaders harbored racism and wished to begin the extermination of races deemed inferior (p.390). Despite there existing some discontent between the German Jews and other Germans, it was necessary to convince the necessity of the German population against them. The anti-Semitic material formed the second main body of German propaganda. Until the conclusion of the Battle of Stalingrad, in 1943, German propaganda emphasized the prowess of German arms and the humanity that German soldiers showed to the people of occupied territories. Pilots and Allied bombing fleets were depicted as cowardly murderers and Americans in particular, as gangsters in Al Capone’s style. The same German propaganda sought to alienate America from British ties, and both these nations from the soviets (p.392).
A variety of forms were utilized in the delivery of the German wartime propaganda. Much of these, George (1973) examines, were communicated through the newly invented radio, speeches from Nazi leaders, posters and other visual and printed material, like books. Production in America was extremely important just like it was for the Germans. Germany maintained a highly mechanized army of tanks and therefore required additional production in order to combat the allied forces. Posters which demonstrated the importance of labor were commonly displayed after the beginning of the war, when increased production was deemed as highly necessary (p.214).
Once the Reich leaders noticed that their current forces would not be enough, the push for additional labor was strengthened. Several posters which sent out different messages were therefore used to garner this support. However those that promoted racism were uncommon and exclusively found in the World War II. These were avoided as they did very little to boost or aid the wartime effort owing to the fact that demeaned racial and political groups. Political cartoons and political advertising were a supplement of scarce posters that were racially or politically discriminative. They often demeaned or mocked groups based on stereotypes or prejudices. The purpose of these cartoons was undoubtedly different from the German anti-Semitic propaganda; however a number of comparisons existed between them. First of all, both used humor to pass a message, and exaggerated stereotypes of the group it wished to demean (p.216-217).
The German propaganda was extremely important to the course of World War II. By taking control of the media and printing or broadcasting of Nazi material, the Reich was able to effectively flood Germany with its propaganda. This combined with the genius of men such as Joseph Goebbels, created one of the most potent barrages of wartime propaganda in history.
Fest (2002) further expounds that Hitler’s regime played vital role in influencing the people through propaganda (p.393). From Goebbels perspective, it was not enough for the people to be more or less reconciled to the regime, to be persuaded to adopt a neutral attitude towards the regime rather, the regime wanted to work on people until they were capitulated to the same regime and ideologically grasped what was happening. The main forms of delivery were the radio and press. In order to effectively pass their message, the government made provisions for the production of cheap ‘receivers’ as only less than a quarter owned it. By 1939, three quarters of the total population owned a radio, as well as every café, factory, offices and other public places had a loudspeaker installed (p.397).
The press was difficult to seize control of, since over 4,700 official newspapers existed in Germany. Most of these were bought by the Nazi publisher, Eher Verlag, a daily press conference was held. Propaganda areas extended to radio, film, music, art and literature. These were used tot portray the German culture, for example only German musicians were allowed to be played, music composed by the Jews was forbidden. The Nazi Propaganda machine was rendered perfect by social rituals which included the ‘Heil Hitler’ greeting, the Nazi salute, the ‘Horst Wessel’ song and different kinds of uniforms all linked to the regime. The population was indoctrinated by the constant repetition of Nazi ideology and therefore it was easier to believe then what was presented rather than risk personal freedom, threatened constantly by the police.
Various social groups and organizations, logically connected or linked with the Nazi state, influenced the aspect of every German, no matter the age or gender. All of these skillfully thought to indoctrinate the people, spread Nazism and propaganda supporting Hitler across Germany. Hitler introduced a law that banned all labor unions or strikes of workers. Instead Nazi DAF was set up, obviously controlled by Nazis. Wages, working hours, stable rents and recreational provisions were organized by the Nazi KDF (Gooch & Alexander, 1945, p.93 ).
Women were, from a feminine angle, discriminated, to some extent similar to the inferior races. The Nazis, in contrast, claimed they were treating them differently. The role of women in the Third Reich was simple and easy, in a chilling way named the Kinder, Kirche, Kuche. Fundamentally, the Aryan female had to be fit and healthy, well groomed in a natural way, cook well and have children. There was a policy, that allowed any women with a double-figured number of children to have tea with Hitler. A text in one of the main propaganda media displayed the following phrase ‘Mothers! Fight for your Children!’ The mother portrayed has four children, consistent with the Nazi goal of encouraging as many births as possible (p.101).
The propaganda in Germany, late in the war resulted in the death of Jews. A movie against Jews, the worst of Nazi anti-Semitic films, entitled ‘The Eternal Jew,’ was advertised in 1940. The Nazi propaganda became more aggressive in this period and occurred at a time when the Concentration camps became Death Camps. Jews were specifically targeted early on, but the Holocaust expanded more and more as the war waged
At this time, everyone involved in cultural activity had to be accountable for their activity. All editors and journalists were to be accredited by Goebbels. In October of 1933, the new law made editors responsible for infringements of government directives. They were obliged to eliminate anything calculated to deteriorate the strength of the Reich. One would be therefore charged for treason in circumstances where they were proven to spread false news or rumors Radio wardens were appointed to report n people’s reactions to specific broadcasts and the people’s receiver could not pick up foreign broadcasts. At the start of World War II, the number of families with radios rose tremendously. Goebbels described the radio as ‘the spiritual weapon of the totalitarian state.’ All news came through the Nazi Office of Propaganda. The population was therefore locked out from the outside world (pp.104-109).
In the film industry, the government bought up shares in four major film companies and by 1942, film companies were completely state-controlled. Germany had a classical tradition which suited the Nazi’s cultural propaganda objectives while at the same, Jewish music composers such as Mahler were banned. New genres of music like jazz were labeled as ‘negroid’ and ‘degenerate. This promoted racial discrimination amongst the population.
As pertains to literature, there were book burnings at the universities of Berlin and Nuremberg. Raids were conducted on public and private libraries since Goebbels wanted to eradicate overstated Jewish intellectualism. Targeted books were those of Jewish, socialist or pacifist nature. Over that period, two thousand five hundred writers exited Germany including Thomas Mann and Bertolt Brecht. However, writers who sympathized with the regime or accepted its philosophy, flourished (Fest, 2002, p.404).
Rallies were a regular feature of Nazi propaganda, with the first official rally taking place in Nuremberg in 1927. Apart from attending rallies, Hitler would parade through streets in open-top processions. The architecture of light was used to maximize the effect of gatherings and speakers. Sporting bodies were on the other hand co-coordinated under a Reichssportfuhrer. Hitler Youth and DAF, the German Labor Front, Nazi trade union movement, organized sporting events. The main aim was to encourage fitness and health which were useful qualities for increasing Germany’s military strength. The Gym displays were also seen as another way of presenting an ordered, regimental society.
Hitler was personally interested in architecture, just like art. He rejected decadent architectural styles like, works of Gropius and favored more traditional neoclassical style of Troost. Local housing was mostly inspired by traditional art regional styles. Through this, he instituted specific building styles and standards and subsequently quashed those that were not appealing to him. The people’s creativity was thus reduced to a specific style rather than a reflection of their true diversity (p.407).
The Nazi propaganda, according to George (1973), was successful in strengthening support for Hitler, but not its policies for example, anti-Semitism and some propaganda was arguably counter-productive such as the anti-church propaganda. Church officials were respected but at the same acted as effective media for the circulation of propaganda (p.78).
For the working class, Hitler claimed the credit for the economic recovery from Depression. More jobs partly compensated for the banning of the socialist and community parties and the abolition of the trade unions. Workers were instead influenced to join the Nazi controlled German Labor front. Low rent, low fuel bills and longer holidays contributed to the relative support of Hitler’s administration. This support was described as the ideology of ‘verbal social revolution’ which satirically meant that the Nazi propaganda inspired many workers to work for Germany and raised their status while being convinced that all Germans were equal.
Hitler’s invasion of the church was impossible as the church had a greater influence on the people, in particular, the possible opposition it could provide to the Nazis. During his reign, he had to forge a concordat with the church by granting it religious freedom. Despite his professed admiration of the church, church officials who talked openly against Nazi’s politics were not tolerated. They were prosecuted, often sent to concentration camps, even religious schools submitted to his rules (Fest, 2002, p. 415).
The seriousness of the impact of Nazi racial policies cannot go unnoticed. There was persistent and brutal prosecution of German Jews during the world war. This persecution grew more relentlessly as Hitler became confident that he would face neither the opposition at home or of foreign governments. Those who could fled, those who could not were destined for the extermination camps. The racial politics stretched further to all those who threatened the racial purity of Germany- the old and incapable, the physically and mentally handicapped, the deformed, criminals, gypsies and homosexuals, all were deemed life unworthy of life.
The Nazi propaganda was successful in suppressing traditional German prejudice such as nationalism and Belshovenism (George, 2002, p.205). It equally benefited those who were in congruence with the requirements, those working in Hitler’s regime, and further strengthened support for his reign. The negative developments such as the persecution of Jews, the suppression of women and other vital groups, the uprooting of Jewish orthodoxies in school curriculums as well as the religious fraternity, the restriction of freedom and the quantification of people’s responses regarded it as a failure to a large extent.
References
Fest, J.C. (2002). Hitler. Texas: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
George, A. (1973). Propaganda Analysis: a study of inferences made from Nazi Propaganda. New York: Greenwood Press.
Gooch, P. & Alexander, F. (1945). The German Mind and Outlook. London:Chapman & Hall Ltd.
The Effects Of Nanotechnology On Human Health
The Effects Of Nanotechnology On Human Health
Introduction
Issues pertaining to technology have raised a lot of controversy in the recent times. It goes without saying that technology has played an immense role in enhancing the quality of life, especially with regard to the efficiency in the production of goods and services. However, questions have been raised as to the costs and benefits pertaining to the adoption of certain technologies. This is especially for nanotechnology, a relatively new form of technology that involves the engineering of the functional systems at the molecular scale. One of the common things about the articles examined in this case is that their acknowledgement of the deficiency of tests pertaining to the effects of nanotechnology on human health. While nanotechnology may come with numerous benefits, it is evident that little is known about its effects, in which case its adoption should be checked.
In an article at Huffington Post, Wong acknowledges that nanotechnology provides numerous potential developments in tissue regeneration, pharmaceuticals, diagnosis, medical imaging, cancer treatment, as well as multifunctional platforms that blend a number of these modes of action (Wong 3). A large part of the projected promise of the use of nanotechnology in medicine revolves around smart technologies, with future developmental phases in nano-medicine being likely to take advantage of blended applications. This would occur through the use of nanomedicine blended with current treatments or even the application of single nanomedicine applications in varied modes of action such as treatment and diagnosis. However, it is still unclear whether increased exposure, production and handling of nanomaterilas would result in adverse effects to the environment or human beings. Indeed, public acceptance and commercial success of technology-based products may have been limited by toxicity (Wong 15).
In the New York Times, Storm echoes similar sentiments and notes the increased incorporation of nanotechnology in well-known food products, as well as their packaging (Storm 1). However, few companies acknowledge to using the technology or even have concrete policies pertaining to the same. While a number of food companies may have shown some interest in nanotechnology as it would assist in brightening colors, enhancing flavors and making the products creamier without the use of additional fat, they have disastrous effects on cells and mice. They come in extremely small sizes that allow nanoparticles to enter body parts where larger particles would be unable to enter. Indeed, these particles find their way to the blood stream after inhalation and ingestion, with studies showing that they have deleterious effects on cells and mice.
However, Leonard seems to disagree with the notion on the negative impacts of nanotechnology. He sees the key negative impact would revolve around the inequality among people of different classes. He states that such technological convergence would improve the possibility of enhancing the capabilities, functions and structure of human brains and bodies. It would not merely result in the elimination of disabilities and illnesses, rather it could also lead to faster, stronger bodies that would perform way better than brains. On the same note, he states that the key problem lies not in the use of this technology, not to treat ailments but to enhance human body capabilities, in which case, it will be more difficult to tell the difference between ailments and less-than-optimum health, or distinguish between enhancement and therapy (Leonard 3).
Nevertheless, Priest presents the dilemma that comes with the nanotechnology. She notes that there has not been much popular alarm in spite of the emerging evidence pertaining to the potential toxicity on the environment and human health from some types of nanotechnology (Priest 2). Indeed, there is uncertainty over the products and circumstances that should trigger concern. While there may be no clarity as to the effects of nanotechnology, Priest quotes two prior incidents when nanotechnology was shown to have devastating effects on human health. In 2006, German consumers apparently had serious respiratory problems from the use of a household cleaning product. Three years later, reports were published indicating that a group of Chinese factory workers suffered from severe lung disease, as well as deaths thanks to the exposure to nanoparticles alongside other chemicals (Priest 2). While being fearful of technology may hinder individuals from enjoying its benefits, being too trusting may expose them to too many risks.
In conclusion, these articles underline the fact that there is no clarity as to the potential effects of nanotechnology on human health and environment. However, prior reports have indicated that it may have negative effects. There have been reports that nanoparticles are extremely small in which case they can get sucked to the blood stream after being inhaled or ingested. In addition, some reports have indicated that the technology causes respiratory diseases, lung diseases, as well as death, with varied incidents having been reported in Chinese factories and Germany. Nevertheless, fearing this new technology would make individuals lose out on its benefits, while being too trusting of it would expose individuals to risk. In essence, it would be imperative that comprehensive experiments are carried out to determine its impact, which would allow for the weighing of its benefits against the costs or impacts, thereby determining its appropriateness.
Works cited
Strom, Stephanie. Study Looks at Particles Used in Food. The New York Times, 2013. Web retrieved from HYPERLINK “http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/06/business/nanoparticles-in-” http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/06/business/nanoparticles-in-
Priest, Susanna. Opinion: No Objections to Nano? The Scientist Magazine, 2012. Web retrieved from HYPERLINK “http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/31674/titl” http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/31674/titl
Wong, Julielynn. Nanomedicine: Big Potential for Small Products. The Huffington Post, 2013. Web retrieved from HYPERLINK “http://www.huffingtonpost.com/julielynn-wong-md/nanomedici” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/julielynn-wong-md/nanomedici
Leonard, Andrew. Nanotech class warfare. Salong.com 2006, web retrieved from HYPERLINK “http://www.salon.com/2006/09/13/nanotech_south/” http://www.salon.com/2006/09/13/nanotech_south/
