Recent orders
Consumer Economics and Financial Services (2)
Consumer Economics and Financial Services
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Tittle
Professor’s Name
Date
Career Analysis of Real Estate Agent
I will be conducting information about a Real Estate Agent. A real estate agent is one licensed expert that organizes real estate business transactions; bring together the purchasers and sellers and play the role of negotiation representative. Agents in real estate are mostly paid totally through a percentage commission of the assets buying price. Hence mainly, their earnings vary depending on the capability to seal a deal. In the majority of locations, a real estate agent needs to be associated with a real estate broker (a brokerage firm or a person) that may be certified to a higher degree or has more experience.
As the real estate agent career is my chosen one, there is some licensing or accreditations that are usually needed in the U.S. First; candidates have to pass the state real estate exams to fully complete a pre-license learning course which is usually differ depending on which state you are in and also someone has to be over the age of 18 years. About the state location, some states require about 65- 95 hours of college education on the basics of real estate. As for the residential real estate agents, they need to get certification called Accredited Buyer’s Representative (ABR) given through the Real Estate Buyer’s Agent Council of the National Association of REALTORS (REBAC). The second certification is the Accredited Seller Representative (ASR): given through the Accredited Seller Agency Council. As a commercial real estate agent, one needs to get Certified Property Manager (CPM): The CPM title is given through the Institute of Real Estate Management (IREM) and also the Accredited Residential Manager (ARM): IREM gives the ARM qualifications(Shaw, 2020 ).
For the career of a real estate agent, there are some skills required to be developed and learned. Some of them include communication skills, listening skills, honesty and integrity, good negotiation skills, patience, customer service, and marketing skills.
Reference
Benefield, J. D., Sirmans, C. S., & Sirmans, G. S. (2019). Observable agent effort and limits to innovation in residential real estate. Journal of Real Estate Research, 41(1), 1-36.
Shaw, J. (2020). Platform Real Estate: theory and practice of new urban real estate markets. Urban Geography, 41(8), 1037-1064.
Dear Martin Book Review
Name
Professor’s name
Course
Date
Dear Martin Book Review
Published in 2017, Dear Martin is an adult novel authored by Nic Stone as a reaction to the killing of Jordan Davis in Florida. Davis was a 17-year-old student who was murdered at a petroleum station by a 45-year-old white man called Michael Dunn over an argument about loud music. Dear martin follows an Atlanta-based high school student named Justyce McAllister. McAllister is a black boy attending a predominantly white school on a scholarship. An incident occurs where Justyce gets arrested and is thrown to the ground as he is handcuffed by a white police officer. Following the incident, Justyce tried to make sense of life as a black young man in the-then political climate. McAllister starts asking himself what Dr. Luther King would do if we had been alive, prompting him to write letters to King’s spirit.
In Dear Martin, Stone gets brutally honest and expertly talks about and portrays the extent of racism in society. Although this is the first novel that Stone has written, I found her skill extremely intriguing, competent, and well-articulated. Honestly speaking, Stone impressed me through the way she simultaneously brings out the themes of ethnic profiling and racism while at the same time developing raw and believable characters. She discusses a blend of unsparing incidents of racism, classroom conversations, and well-crafted dialogue. In so doing, she provides a clear message and accurately portrays the typical life of a black teenager. It is easy to relate to the book because I have already seen this story unfold many times in contemporary society. The storyline reminds me of the Black Lives Matter movement, that is known for its activism against racism and police brutality across the world.
At the beginning of the story, McAllister has things going on well for himself. He gets a scholarship to attend an elitist group. He is a member of a high ranking member in the debate club, and because of this, he gets to attend Yale University. After the incident where McAllister is harassed by a police officer, he starts to question racial issues that exist in society. Because of this, he starts a project titled “Dear Martin,” a series of letters to Dr. King Jr. As he goes through the entire ordeal, he keeps on asking himself only one question, which is, what would King do?
Since the start of the novel, McAllister comes off as an empathetic protagonist. There was an explanation for every action he made particularly during times that he would face a dilemma over the making the right choice. He often considered how these actions would affect him and the people surrounding him. In writing letters to King, McAllister did not refrain from speaking questions and was articulate in his thought processes. In spite of any conceived notions concerning his race, McAllister always did what he felt it was the best he could do for a specific scenario.
Additionally, Dear Martin gives a story of well-thought-out and well written characters where every character feels real. What is most interesting is that each characters are representative of attitudes of individuals from all walks of life in society. The characters are a reflection of the attitudes of individuals from all walks of life. The interactions and dialogue between characters in the novel felt natural as they flowed well in line with the story’s context. The one character that stood out for me was Manny. This is because he is the complete opposite of McAllister. Manny was born into a well-off family, unlike McAllister, who studies under scholarships. He also avoided interactions with individuals from his own race and he did not bother to take any action and ask the questions that needed to be asked. When his peers made racist remarks to him, Manny would take it and comply. Even as the study continues to progress, Manny opens his eyes to what is truly happening in society and sees the injustices for what they are. The way Stone develops Manny’s character from the start to, from when he is naïve up to when he wakes up to the rampant racism that is going on, is impeccable. Manny is one of the most remarkable characters in the novel as he reminds us about the people that tend to turn a blind eye to issues. He is a reminder that no matter how reluctant a person is, they are still bound to change.
The chapters in the book alternate between detailing the encounters of McAllister and the letters that he was writing to the spirit of Dr. King. I enjoyed reading the letters for numerous reasons. One of these reasons is that the lessons drew parallels between what is currently going on in society in matters of racism and the issues that transpired during the reign of Martin Luther Kings as president. Although it has been years since his passing, the letters that McAllister writes prove that clearly, things have not changed much. The issues keep recurring, if not getting worse. Worth noting, McAllister’s letters speak to his character. The author writes this part of the novel in the third-person to help the readers understand where McAllister’s point of view. The letter displays his thoughts and emotions and shows that he is taking responsibility because the treatment of people of color did not sit well with him. The writing style that Stone employs is concise and straightforward and details the occurrences and ongoing issue without over complicating the plot. The author tackles the story’s content thoughtfully and never stops impressing his readers. The only issue I have is that the present-tense that he employs can potentially disrupt the otherwise perfect story.
Ratification of the Constitution State vs Federal Government Powers
Name:
Professor:
Course:
Date:
Ratification of the Constitution: State vs Federal Government Powers
When United States got its independence, trying to come up with a way on how they could now exercise their self-rule proved difficult. The delegates had issues they could not agree including the division of power between the branches of the government and the powers of the state. According to the article of confederation, the states seemed to have more power and constitutional amendments were quite difficult to undertake as a unanimous vote was needed. The states had been granted powers including collection of revenue, this proved a problem as the congress lacked the revenue needed in running the government (The Constitutional Convention and Federal Constitution). In creation of the constitution delegates were divided on creation of the executive and position of presidents as representative from some state saw this as a monarch kind of system. In ratification of the constitution the issues that were key included creation of strong central government and representation of the states in congress.
Patrick Henry was among the founding fathers of our nation who participated in the ratification of the constitution. He was opposed to the ratification of the constitution as he thought that central government had been handed too much power and states should be more powerful. In his speech, Henry pointed out the uneasiness that came with ratification of the constitution. According to henry, the new constitution would create “a great and mighty president with…the powers of a king” (Henry, pg. 8). He was also worried that the congress would give powers which they would have “unlimited…direct taxation” as well as powers to suspend state laws. According to henry, it is these powers that actually resulted in the revolutionary war. Henry had the support of anti-federalist who believed majority of the Americans did not want a central government. Although eventually Henry lost as the constitution was ratified, the anti-federalist papers were vital in creating the Bill of Rights which were amendments that protected people’s liberties and also placed limits on powers of the government (The Constitutional Convention and Federal Constitution).
Edmund Pendleton also had an impact in the ratification of the constitution. Unlike Henry who was anti-federalist, Pendleton was a federalist and was in support of the ratification of the new constitution. He had served as a member of the first and the second continental congress and was also the president of the Virginia Ratifying Convention. According to Pendleton, the creation of a strong national government “is necessary to protect liberty” (Pendleton, pg. 9) Edmond did not see national government as a threat on state government as there were laws that would ensure powers are not misused and the Judiciary as well as legislature would keep check the national government. Edmund supported the idea of government levying taxes directly as opposed to letting the state government do so, “Government must be supported this cannot be done without a revenue…. Recurrence must be had to direct taxation” (Pendleton, pg. 10). Pendleton believed that constitution would put in place check and balances to ensure that the three branches do not become too powerful thus threatening freedom.
The type of federalism that exist gives the states its power while still recognizing that national government have their highest power. States seem to have grown more powerful, and under the idea of devolution, certain responsibilities were granted to the states. For example, the issue of healthcare, state seems to be trying to provide affordable and better healthcare for their residents. For example, Hawaii and Massachusetts have enacted laws mandating employers to offer medical insurance to their employees. There are laws that differ between states and at times it requires intervention by federal judges or government for changes to occur. A good example is ban of same sex marriage. While some states allowed for same sex marriage, others were against it. The land mark ruling of 2015 in the case Obergefell v. Hodges, the supreme court ruled that all states had to accept same sex marriage. Some states saw this ruling as overstepping by the federal government on state issues. It is for a fact even in the 21st century there is still a tug of war between States and the federal government in regards to powers most of the time the state accusing the government of processing more powers while the aim of federalism was to create a balance.
In conclusion, creation of the constitution was a long process that involved a lot of compromise and agreement. The federalist and anti-federalist all wanted to create a document that would preserve both the liberty and freedom of a young nation. There have been issues that have often created standoff between the national and federal government for example the death penalty. This is an indication that the debate that existed during the ratification of the constitution still exist. How can a balance of power between the federal and state governments ever be established without one felling the other is overstepping?
Works Cited
Foner, Eric, and Give Me Liberty. “An American History.” Seagull Edition), New York and London: WW Norton and Company (2006). Pg. 7-10
Learning, Lumen. “HIST 1301: US to 1877.” Lumen, https://courses.lumenlearning.com/sanjacinto-atdcoursereview-ushistory1-1/chapter/the-constitutional-convention-and-federal-constitution/.
