Recent orders

Comparing Racism in “Yet Do I Marvel” and “Harlem”

Name

Professor’s name

Course

Date

Comparing Racism in “Yet Do I Marvel” and “Harlem”

Both Countee Cullen and Langston Hughes were poets of the twentieth century. The poem “Yet Do I Marvel” is a sonnet poem by Countee Cullen, an American poet, which was published in 1925 as part of his collection Color. The poem attempts to answer the question, “why would a loving God let so much suffering into the world. In the final part of the poem, the speaker talks about his own experiences. He questions God for creating a poet of color at a time of extreme racial prejudice. Cullen remains to be one of the most renowned poets during Harlem Renaissance, which adds to the power and poignancy of the poem. On the other hand, Langston Hughes the poem “Harlem” was one of his most renowned poem of the twentieth century, an era that followed the abolition of slavery. “Harlem” also known as “A Dream Deferred” talks about the possible negative things that follow when a people’s wishes or dreams do not work out, especially when they could have contributed to their happiness. The poem employs poetic techniques. Both poets employ various poetic techniques including metaphors, similes, and others to bring out the theme of racism. This essay compares and contrasts Countee Cullen’s “Yet Do I Marvel” and Langston Hughes’s “Harlem” in terms of the themes of racism as well as discusses the poems’ setting, literary techniques, including metaphors, similes, assonance, rhetorical questions, and imagery.

Themes of Racism in the Poems

In Cullen’s poem Yet Do I Marvel the theme of race does not come up until the final line of the poem. The speakers spends the first lines setting the stage for the last minute general conversation concerning God and suffering due to concerns for black poets at the time. In the final line, the poet says, ‘To make a poet black, and bid him sing!” In this line, the speaker’s curiosity about racism becomes intense than in the rest of the poem. At this point, it becomes evident the point that the speaker is really after. The point that the speaker is trying to put across is that the fact that God can create black poets only for them to get disrespected in the world they live. The speaker refers to the lack poet as being curious and marvel. Although he does not categorically state that readers can deduce that the expectations of white society contradicts the expectations of those people of color. Being a black poet is fighting an uphill battle against racism, exclusion, and stereotypes. Cullen lived at a time of intense prejudice against people of color. People of color were not expected to be make art or be educated. Notably, although Cullen came to be of age at a time when black artistic and intellectual revival, he himself did not have a lot of black poets to look up to.

Similarly, Hughes also touches on racism in his poem “Harlem.” The speaker in this poem is evidently a black poet. To understand the context, people of color at this time were being fed with dream about equality and equity although the dreams never came true. He wrote the poem in the twentieth century at a time when the slavery system had just being abolished. However, despite this, people of color were plagued by its legacy that essentially deemed them second-class citizens, as the ideas of racial segregation and discrimination still remained rampant in most societies. Black people were sold to a dream and it was impossible for them to experience an equal society. Their dreams never came true. They were sold dreams of justice, equality, indiscrimination, freedom that were never fulfilled. They were postponed, deferred, and delayed.

Additionally, both poets employ various literary devices in their poems. For instance, in Cullen’s Yet do I Marvel, the speaker employs literary devices including such as alliteration, imagery, and juxtaposition, while Hughes uses devices including simile, imagery, metaphors, assonance, rhetorical questions among others. In Yet do I Marvel, the speaker uses imagery in the line that says, “The little buried mole continue blind, /Why Flesh that mirrors Him must someday die.” Alliteration is evident in the mention of the words “God” and “good” in the same line (line 1) and “stair” and “struggle” in line 8. Juxtaposition is evidenced in the how the speaker contrasts the images in the poem. For instance, in the way the speaker speaks about God and then proceeds to describe a mole; one of the tiniest and non-important creatures in the world. Similies in Hughes “Harlem” is experienced in the statements “like a raisin in the sun” and “does it stink like a rotten meat.” Metaphor is employed to evoke feelings in the statement, “Or doe it explode.” Hughes uses the rhetorical question, “does it stink like a rotten meat, “; a statement that also doubles as a metaphor. Assonance of the /e/ sound is evidenced in the ‘Does it stink like rotten meat” line and the /o/ sound in the line that says, “Or fester like a sore.” While both poems employ imagery in their poems, evidently, Hughes’ poem has more literary devices than Cullen’s poem.

Letter of Transfer. REQUEST FOR TRANSFER TO A NEW POSITION

(Enter Name of Sender)

(Enter Address of Sender)

(Enter Date)

(Enter Name of Company/Recipient)

(Enter Address)

(Enter Zip Code)

Dear sir/madam,

REQUEST FOR TRANSFER TO A NEW POSITION

I have been a student of (name of organization) for over (number) years, in the department of (name of department). Throughout this period, I have worked hard with determination to achieve my educational goals and objectives. I have been aware of the organization’s expectations from me as a student and have worked tirelessly to assure that I do not go against the organization’s rules and objectives. The organization has been considerably beneficial to me, as it has provided me with the platform to further my education, and improve my knowledge and skill in particular areas.

I believe that the (number) years that I have been a student in this organization have been sufficient enough to help me build myself and attain some of my educational goals and objectives. However, I believe that it is time for me to move on to other positions so as to acquire new talent and skill. Accordingly, I am requesting for a transfer from (name of organization to transfer from) to (name of organization to transfer to), which comes as a response to the current opening at (name of organization to transfer to). I believe that this transfer will be beneficial for me, as it will assist me in the development of various skills and capabilities that are essential for my profession as a (name of profession).

In essence, my transfer to (name of organization to transfer to) will allow me to improve my knowledge on logistics and other office functions that I may be required to undertake during my professional duties. This is because their curriculum integrates these subjects, something that the curriculum in the current school does not. The curriculum at (name of organization to transfer to) is much broader than that of (Name of organization to transfer from), and I believe that this will expose me to a better level of education than my current. Additionally, transferring to the organization will improve my planning and coordination skills, this will help me be a better leader when performing my professional duties. I am aware of (name of organization to transfer to)’s management and leadership program, which students are allowed to take part in every year. I believe that this will be key to making me a better leader, thus allowing me to achieve my goals and objectives. Conclusively, a transfer to (name of organization to transfer to) will expose me to a variety of cultures, who make up the population of the school. This will, in turn, provide me with international exposure, that maybe good for the performance of duties in my later years.

Accordingly, my immediate instructors and lecturer have are familiar with my potential and abilities, and for that reason can act as my referees in case you require a confirmation of my performance. They will also explain the importance of this transfer for my personal and educational development. I am confident that the feedback gained from my referees will be pleasing to you, and you will consider my request for transfer.

I am ready and willing to meet with you and discuss any other issues regarding the transfer. Thanking you in advance.

Regards

(Name of Sender)

Comparing Matthew Arnolds and Thomas H. Huxleys Arguments about Education

Name

Professor

Course

Date

Comparing Matthew Arnold’s and Thomas H. Huxley’s Arguments about Education

Introduction

Matthew Arnold’s and Thomas H. Huxley arguments in regard to education assist scholars in filling several breaches in comprehending their contentious, yet amicable connection. The significance of the different contributions they made depends upon the perspective of the argument between Huxley and Arnold in relation to the nature of education requisite in fostering ingenuous culture. This paper posits to provide a synopsis of the two arguments.

MATTHEW ARNOLD’S ARGUMENT

Arnold argues in support of universal educational opportunities.  His analysis of the rationale of education is comparable to his analysis of the function of art. Arnold is much more troubled with culture and enrichment than with relevance and practicality. He proposes that the English people assume the movement in overseas schools of commanding identical subjects for all students in elementary school. It would follow that every child might decide between natural science or humanistic curriculum, depending on their interests and objectives. Persuaded by the humanizing consequences of literary study particularly, Arnold recommends the learning of Greek literature as well as art. His inclination is informed by the fact that Greeks performed extremely well in these areas. He points out that, whereas the English rage in relation to the excellence of English schools, schools in Holland, Germany, as well as Switzerland are evidently better-quality. In his argument for better quality of instruction for the middle classes, He points once more to the stagnation attributable to complacency. Arnold maintains that, the foreign countries have civil organizations, which are framed, with foresight as well as design, in order to fulfill the wants of contemporary society. He asserts that the English civil organization remains at the level whereby chance and time have dictated. Since the middle class runs industry, government, and commerce, it is imperative that the middle class be well educated to so (Matthew 10).

Thomas H. Huxley’s Argument. Huxley posited that, probably the most precious outcome of all education is the aptitude to make oneself accomplish the things they have to accomplish when it should be completed, whether one likes it or not. This would be the primary lesson that should be learned regardless of how early a person’s education begins, it is most likely the final lesson that they thoroughly learn. According to Huxley, education is the training of the intellect in relation to the laws of Nature. He claims that anything, which is acknowledged, as education should be tried by the standard of the laws of Nature. According to him, it is essential to acknowledge that, in firmness, there is nothing as an uneducated person. Nature teaches a person through the, the eye, touch, as well as the characteristics of objects. Pleasure and pain would tell a person to do this, or avoid that, and by slowly the person would acquire an education which, if contracted, would be methodical, real, and sufficient to his status, though there may be no additions and extremely few accomplishments (Paul 1).

Huxley asserts that, an educated person has acquired a liberal education and has been so educated in formative years, that his body is readily a servant of his willpower, and performs with pleasure and ease, all the labor that it is skilled to accomplish. This is an individual whose mind is amassed with knowledge of the fundamental and great truths of Nature, in addition to the laws of her functions (1).

WHO AMONG HUXLEY AND ARNOLD IS RIGHT, AND WHY?

In comparing the two arguments, this paper is of the opinion that Huxley. A great advocate of contemporary science and Darwin argues that education ought to be founded on an unreserved faith that the free utilization of the rationale, in harmony with the scientific process, is the sole technique of attaining the truth (Tinker 25). On the contrary, Arnold responds by alleging that education entails teaching, the finest that has been uttered and taught in the world, since education encompasses humanity’s need for demeanor, as well as the need for exquisiteness (Matthew 10). In the opinion of this paper, Arnold’s argument is more superior to Huxley’s, since it appreciates the need for formal education in its inclusiveness.

Works Cited

Paul H. Modern History Sourcebook: Thomas H. Huxley (1825-95): Science and Culture, 1880 1998 Web. 25 Apr. 2012

Matthew A. Culture and Anarchy: An Essay in Political and Social Criticism, London: Smith,

Elder, 1869. Print.

Tinker C. The Poetry of Matthew Arnold: A Commentary. London: Oxford University Press,

1940. Print.