Recent orders
compare the social media platforms of two prominent nonprofit organizations
Research Paper Assignment
OPTION 2
Use the standards and suggestions of Julia Campbell (Assignment 3 Video) to compare the social media platforms of two prominent nonprofit organizations. Then do an evaluation to determine which page is superior and make recommendations for future change. Do not use outside sources for this paper. Use the Campbell video for guidance in your evaluation. Be sure to use the subtitles below, and to use the name of the real nonprofit in the subtitle.
Introduction
Nonprofit 1 Evaluation
Nonprofit 2 Evaluation
Comparison of Two Nonprofit Organizations
Recommendations
Conclusion
Note that your initial evaluation must use Campbell’s criteria. However, in your recommendation section you are free to criticize Campbell’s criteria and make recommendations that contradict Campbell. If you do so please justify your reasons for doing so.
Law Enforcement Policies
Student Name
Supervisor Name
Course Name
June 30, 2020
Law Enforcement Policies
Law enforcement is part of the United States’ criminal justice system primarily responsible for enforcing the laws and regulations in the legal system as well as maintaining social order. It is lawfully mandated by the police power concept. Police power is essentially the government’s legal authority for enactment of laws and regulations. In the United States, police power is exercised by the multijurisdictional levels of government, that is, federal, state and local governments. The enforcement aspect of the law is the purview of the executive branch of all levels of the government, that is, president in the case of federal government, governors in the case of state governments and mayor in the case of local government. The executive uses its governmental authority for the establishment of operational policies and appointment of officials of the law enforcement agencies. Nevertheless, both the legislative arm and judiciary also contribute significantly to the law enforcement. The legislature formulates the statutory legislations under which the law enforcement agencies operate while judiciary offers legal reviews on the conducts of the arresting officers during the enforcement of the laws. Law enforcement is often approached in multiple ways namely systematic, legal, and global and public policy. The focus of this paper is on the public policy approach to law enforcement with the accompanying qualified immunity, at both state and federal levels.
Public policy refers to rules and regulations that are established by the legislative agencies (Conser, Paynich and Gingerich). The main emphasis in the policy approach is on the political process involved as well as on agencies internal operations. This method is principally common in governmental agencies with the executive team having the full mandate to do so. In this respect, law enforcement policy making process often encompasses internal management procedures, various legal as well as political processes, and high expectations of the society. The law enforcement policy making process primarily involves three phases namely the identification of the underlying need for the policies, the implementation of the formulated policy and the evaluation of effectiveness of the policies in satisfying the need. In a nutshell, law enforcement policy puts an emphasis on the systematic method of community policing by leveraging the governmental authority in decision making process.
Primarily, the United States Constitution makes provision for the states’ exclusivity in exercising policing authorities and limits the police power of the federal government. Every state has a mandate to form a police force and delegate its policing authority to any local agency within their jurisdiction (Barkow). The state legislature also has the mandate to come up with law enforcement legislative instruments that are applicable within state’s jurisdiction. For this reason, most states’ law enforcement policies and practices vary from one state to another. However, there three underlining functions of state law enforcement policies and agencies namely investigation and prevention of crime, traffic law enforcement and supporting local law enforcement. In respect to crime investigation and prevention, the state law enforcement agencies majorly exercise their policing authority where there is a crime involving multiple local jurisdictions which imply the local government agencies will be easily overwhelmed. The state law enforcement is also mandated to control traffic within their jurisdiction although they often exercise this authority in state highways and very rural areas. In addition to that, state law enforcement also collaborates with local or municipal law enforcement in some cases where the latter is ill-equipped to deal with. Nonetheless, the local governments under the mayoral leadership also has mandate to investigate and prevent any crime within their limited jurisdiction. They include the county sheriff’s office, city police departments, university police etc.
At the federal level, the agency responsible for the law enforcement duties is the Department of Justice. Under this departmental agency are other agencies such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Drug Enforcement Administration, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Marine Services and the Federal Bureau of Prisons (Conser, Paynich and Gingerich). All these agencies derive their jurisdictional authority from the United States Code depending on their specific roles. Additionally, the U.S. Constitution also gives law enforcement legislative powers to the U.S. Congress under clauses such as the Commerce Clause, Necessary and Proper Clauses, Spending Clauses and some sections of the Civil War Amendments of 1870. However, for effective influence of the law enforcement policies at the local levels of governments, congress can only make use of federal processes of data collection on policing matters as well as through exploitation of the consultative relationship between the Department of Justice and various police agencies in the U.S.
In summation, there are multiple federal, state and local law enforcement agencies all primarily deriving immunity for their activities from the United States Code and the multifarious State enforcement-related legislations. Also, each agency or department is at liberty to come up with their own internal enforcement policy instruments. Nonetheless, there is still considerable collaboration between these agencies at all levels to ensure the social order and public safety for US citizens.
Works Cited
Barkow, R.E. "Federalism and Criminal Law: What the feds can learn from the States." Michigan Law Review (2011): 519-580.
Conser, James A., et al. Law Enforcement in the United States. Burlington,MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2013.
Compare and Contrast
Student’s name
Course
Tutor
Date
Compare and Contrast
Apple and Amazon offered me a software engineer job. I choose to work in Apple Corporation for various reasons. The culture of the company matches what I like and fits my personality the most. Apple offers flexibility and travel opportunities, which I like. Amazon is a solid company but their culture doesn’t fit with mine because it’s very corporate and doesn’t prioritize flexibility or cultural fit over financials. The best reason to choose a certain organization over another is the company culture that matches your personality, as well as how much they will pay you for your work. For me, Apple was the better choice because of the type of work I do and their cultural values that match my personality more closely than Amazon’s. This article gives advice on what to look for in an organization when choosing them for employment.
Apple Corporation offers special employee pricing on Apple products, as well as benefits such as company-paid healthcare, flexible work hours, and stock options. With Apple Corporation supplying employees with such conveniences, it’s no surprise that the company is able to retain such a high level of performance. For instance, last year, Apple was ranked as the 74th most-attractive employer in the world by Business Insider. Employees were also found to be more loyal than those of other companies, with a staggering 91% of our employees staying with us for more than five years! Thus, it will be more beneficial to work in this corporation since it tends to have a better job security.
They also have an incredible corporate culture and a learning program, which has been highlighted by Forbes that helps you develop the skills needed to succeed in the workforce. For example, they encourage cooperation with their employees so that the company can maintain high productivity levels. This is a great opportunity for those who are looking to make a change in their career path because of changes like marriage or personal interests (Henry, 32). Thus this company will enable me to achieve a good living standards for me and my family.
Apple offers a great work-life balance for its employees. It offers free on-site child care, and offers employees up to four years of tuition reimbursement for primary and secondary education. They also offer generous maternity and paternity leaves, reasonable respect for religious belief in the organization and reasonable dress-code for the office. The corporate culture is collegial and it’s OK to be passionate about a product. The corporation values flat organization, and therefore there is no hierarchy of job listing. It also discourages group decision making, which rather limits its development into a better company.
Apple Corporation is also known for its enhanced fight against any type o discrimination and bias. It incorporates diversity and inclusion in the company it targets towards the betterment and wellbeing of the people of the world. It invests a lot in the various recipients of the labor in every part of the globe. Apple Corporation recruits people of different backgrounds, countries and cultures. It ensures that a diverse workforce is employed. The corporation does not have any issue with religion or race and understands that people should have equal opportunity. Still, there is some kind of strict policy in place to ensure that jobs are not only assigned to the employees based on the race, religion or other factors. Apple has shown that they want to create a more inclusive environment while working. It makes sure that they recruit more than one employer in every city.
In Conclusion, it will be better to work in Apple since it has better working conditions for its employees; and it is improving the quality of its manufactured products. There are many positive aspects in working for. If a person wants to be a writer, then the best thing for him is to be a writer for Apple. A person will prosper if he works for Apple. It is vital for an individual to consider a variety of factors to determine if they are fit for the job.
Works Cited
Henry, C. (2019). Leander Kahney: TIM COOK: The genius who took Apple to the next level. TLS. Times Literary Supplement, (6067), 31-32.