Recent orders

Compare and Contrast Modern Conservatism and Modern Liberalism

Online Course Number:

Name:

Professor:

Course:

Date:

Compare and Contrast Modern Conservatism and Modern Liberalism

The history of America is characterized by only one fundamental and predominant issue- individualism vs. collectivism. Do all people have the right to pursue happiness or do they have an obligation to live their lives for the sake of state? Does the American live as Thomas Jefferson and the Declaration of Independence deemed fit or is he/she controlled by the state and the society he lives in? Despite this issues being a paramount issue, it is not quite debated during the elections than other issues “sociologies” are. The ideologies of liberalism and conservatism today, are not quite as they were during the founding of the nation. Modern liberalism is neither entirely collectivist nor is it entirely individualistic, and so is modern conservatism. Both ideologies possess elements from both doctrines and do not provide a consistent approach to politics when compared to the first principles.

The Concept of Liberty

The fundamental liberal principle states that all human beings are free and equal and that any restriction to their liberties must be justified, can only be imposed by the government as the government should always ensure that the equal liberty of all people is protected(Guide, 4). However, different liberals hold different concepts of liberty. There are those who advocate for a negative conception of liberty, such as Isaiah Berlin, and others who advocate for a positive concept. According to Isaiah Berlin’s 1958 “Two Concepts of Liberty” negative liberty is defined as the freedom from outside interference while positive liberty is defined as the freedom to act upon one’s will(Guide, 5). Negative liberty is based on natural rights while positive liberty is based on the language of entitlement. Both these concepts support freedom but are nuanced. Negative liberty calls for the non-interference of the society or the state in an individual’s activities. Positive liberty calls for the achievement of personal goals regardless of external interferences or non-interferences. The Constitution and the Declaration of Independence provides negative liberties to the citizens. They call for the right of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness without the interference of others. John Stuart Mill’s two maxims of liberalism are also based on negative liberties. They state that, “the individual is not accountable to society for his actions, in so far as these concern the interests of no one but himself. If the actions are prejudicial to the interests of others, then the individual is accountable and may be liable for social or legal punishment.”

The limitations of negative liberty come about when an individual is unable to attain their goals due to the limited or complete lack of resources. For instance, Booker T. Washington’s book” Up From Slavery” states that after the emancipation proclamation and the slaves were freed, they did not what to do next. In the negative sense of liberty, the African Americans were free since they no longer could be subjected to slavery or being owned a white man. However, in the positive sense, the former slaves did not have any property or any money and were therefore not completely free since they could not afford food, shelter, education, or healthcare. Positive liberty therefore states that all members of the society have a right to food, employment, healthcare access, and education. Today, many liberalists lean on positive liberty while many conservatisms support negative liberties.

The development of modern liberalism and modern conservatism

In the liberal political theory, also referred to as the ‘old’ liberalism, private property and liberty are strongly connected. Classical liberals and libertarians state that an economic system where all rights are regarded as forms of property and where all individuals are allowed to live their lives, employing their labor and capital, is one of the most important forms of liberties. And that the economic system should therefore regard property as a form of freedom. The classical liberalism states that people are therefore free to sell their labor, save their income, or invest it as they want to. This ideology also states that the freedom to obtain and use private property is simply one of the features of liberty and that it is an efficient means of protecting the liberty of the people. Classical liberalism states that the power that emanates due to liberty in private property and consequently in a free market, protects the freedom of all citizens from encroachment by the state.

Classical liberals state that liberty is the primary political and social value and hence the government can only limit this freedom to keep the people and their property protected. Classical liberals also believe in individualism, that is, an individual’s needs should not be sacrificed in the name of “common good” since everyone’s needs are important and should be taken care of(Guide, 12). Classical liberalism is also skeptical about power, and the government should not use its power to coerce people into certain actions. Therefore, the power of the government should be controlled since the individual is the best judge of his/her interests. Classical liberalism hold the belief that the rule of law is are higher principles by which the government can be examined. This controls the government and its power. For instance, the US. Supreme Court can refute some legislations passed by Congress and signed by presidents if they go against the Constitution. The law is therefore an equalizer and everyone should be treated the same despite their gender, race, or religion.

Classical liberalism supports the formation of civil societies to be between the individual and the government since these volunteer societies are more effective at solving social problems since they have personal knowledge on individual circumstances than government bureaucracies. Classical liberalism also support spontaneous order, that is, order does not require institutions to manipulate and maintain order. People through voluntary interactions are able to spontaneous create rules by which the society can live by. For instance, the English language was not invented by a particular person, but arose from interactions and rules have been applied through time. Classical liberalism also promotes free markets that is, people can work wherever they want, when to save, what to produce, and that private properties are needed for free market, and there should be mechanism and structures to settle disputes peacefully.

Another ideology supported by classical liberalism is toleration, which is, “the belief that one should not interfere with things that one disapproves.” This ideology states that despite the government holding certain moral principles, it should not use its power to stop other people from activities perceived as “wrong.” Classical liberalism also holds that peace is important to a country. The government should avoid war and violence by limiting its interference with other nations even if these countries support a non-interventionist foreign policy. Interactions with other nation should be based on the four freedoms of movement, of capital and labor, people, goods and services, and ideas. Classical liberalism also believes in a limited government. The government should be limited to protect the lives, liberty, and property of the people.

The turning point of classical liberalism was the industrial revolution. Some liberals viewed this era as an embodiment of their ideals while others were concerned about the increased poverty levels and that it encouraged socialism. This group felt that the government had an obligation to improve economic opportunities for the less privileged to alleviate poverty. This resulted in the group splitting into modern/welfare liberalism.

Classical conservatism is the ideology that justified the rule of kings or the monarchy. It was the dominant philosophy before and during the American Revolution. This ideology holds that every individual in the society is born in the society for a particular reason, such as gender roles, classes such as peasants and the nobles. This philosophy emphasized the need for the principles of natural law and transcended moral order, tradition, hierarchy and organic unity, classism, and high culture (Guide, 32-37). Classical conservatism focuses on tradition and many followers of this philosophy are reactionaries who resist radical social change. Traditional conservatism also emphasized on the need for hierarchy and organic unity. This meant that persons with the ability to lead were made leaders after being chosen by a chosen few. This philosophy also promoted classism where people could either be born into the noble classes or the peasants.

Edmund Burke, regarded as the father of classical conservatism, formulated four main points for conservatism. He was inspired by the French Revolution, and stated that the masses needed to control because failure to do so would result in chaos as evidenced in France. His main points were, that society should be organized in a hierarchy with those best suited to lead at the top and others below. Second, government should be chosen by a limited electorate, third leaders’ responsibility should be to take care for the welfare others, and last, that the stability of the society, law, order, and the preservation of tradition are the main concerns of a society. Conservatism did not regard inequality as a concern. His ideas were against the classical liberalism stating that these ideologies sparked the French Revolution since they allowed the masses to be out of control. He believed that a prosperous society needed to control the masses.

Classical conservatism was threatened by the scientific revolution brought by the renaissance and empowered human being and reduced the reliance on God. Second, the protestant reformation that held that there was essential equality and everyone was equal before God- peasant, king, and the nobles. The third factor that challenged classical conservatism was the industrial revolution that began in England, where wealth was created for commoners. Classical conservatives could not explain this phenomenon. Classical liberalism was then born, as a reaction to classical conservatism.

Modern Liberalism versus Modern Conservatism

Modern liberalism is established on an egalitarian perspective, that is, this ideology holds that all human beings, despite their race, religion, or socioeconomic class, are equally free and should all enjoy equal opportunity. Therefore, all individuals have a right to a good education, healthcare, employment opportunities with good wages enough to provide for their family, right to live in a safe environment, and to retire with dignity by having social security. Modern conservatism is established on the ideology that a large government and too much government involvement brings about a lot of the problems. This ideology believes that regulation of the free market, imposition of taxes, and government investing in social welfare is too much government involvement.

Modern liberalism is divided into welfare liberals and neoclassical liberals. Welfare liberalism holds that that not only should all individuals be free, but that the government should support those in need achieve their goals. Welfare liberals on the one hand, believe in positive liberty and state that an individual cannot be totally free if they do not enjoy an equal opportunity to life. This ideology supports government involvement in social security, housing, healthcare, education, and affirmative action. On the other hand, neoclassical liberals also referred to as libertarians believe that the government should be limited since it infringes on people’s freedoms by being too involved. The libertarians state that government infringement is legitimate only if the security of the people and their property is at risk.

Modern conservative ideologies are mainly established on religious ideologies on morality and ethics. They are mainly divided into two ideologies, the neoconservatives and the Religious Right. Neoconservatives believe that the government should not be weakened, but strengthened for it to better satisfy the society’s needs. They also believe that the nation should have strong military action to achieve national goals. Neoconservatives also believe that certain attitudes towards the government are formed due to the current consumer ethos that supports “buying now, paying later” and hence the people are encouraged to live well beyond their means making them expect too much from the government. The Religious Right believes that government policies and action should follow Christian guidelines and teachings since, to them, the classical conservatism philosophy is no longer in use in the American society, and only Christian based-policies can change this.

Modern conservatives generally prefer the traditional societal orders and oppose efforts that bring about fundamental changes. Conservatives underscore the benefits of a small government with the exception of the national defense to uphold individual liberties. Conservatives argue that the nation requires strong institutions of leadership, laws, and strict moral codes (PP Modern Conservatism). These ideologies are founded on religious teachings and traditional morals and downplay realistic theories proposed by economists and social philosophers. Conservatives prefer the elimination of abortion, labor unions, and affirmative action. The extreme conservative viewpoints agree to social inequities of privilege, status, and wealth, and often support returning to the former, more inegalitarian, and hierarchical political-economic order. Modern Liberalists support social and economic equality by eliminating discriminatory practices. The modern liberal ideologies advocate for egalitarian public policy that states that the government should provide all citizens with affordable and quality healthcare, education, clean environments, and social safety net initiatives. Liberalists also support union rights, progressive taxation, health and safety protection by workers, and affirmative action programs.

In conclusion, the ideals of modern liberals and conservatives differ radically and yet, these same philosophies work cooperatively to make up the framework of American politics. Liberal and conservative ideologies both have similar objectives for the nation’s prosperity but have polar opposite approaches of achieving these objectives. Liberalism is the belief in government action to achieve equity and equal opportunity for all. It is based on the philosophy that the government should alleviate social ills and protect civil liberties, individual and human rights. The government’s role is to guarantee that no one is need. Generally, liberal philosophies underscore the need for the government to solve its citizens’ needs and problems. The conservative ideology holds the belief in personal responsibility, a limited government, individual liberty, free markets, a strong national defense, and upholding the traditional American values. This ideology holds that the role of the government should be to provide its people the necessary freedom to pursue their own goals. Conservative policies generally emphasize on the importance of empowering an individual to solve problems.

References.

Guide.

PowerPoint presentations.

Sisterhood

Name

Professor

Course

Date

Sisterhood

Sisterhood by Robin Morgan is an anthology of essays written in 1970 by feminists. Morgan sought to write this anthology as a way of opposing the patriarchal society that was dominant in the ’70s. Patriarch had taken root and feminists as robin thought of finding ways to curb it; therefore, she wrote an anthology to express the women’s plight. Morgan also wanted to sell to the women about gender equality and the need for them to stand up for their rights. She wanted women to have knowledge of their rights and expose the evils of patriarchal society. Through such, she would reach a remarkable number of women that will gallantly fight for their space in the community.

Morgan, in her article, Activism and the Women’s Liberation Movement, she calls out on women to stand up to the battle and reclaim their glory from the patriarchal society. Morgan warns that the women have been molested for far too long. They should chart their course to achieve their lost glory. Morgan also calls for women to be active in advocating for women’s rights.

Morgan, in the article, Body Experience, she advocates that women’s bodies should not be used as a sexual tool. Both women and society at large should protect women’s bodies. Human dignity should as well be extended to women. The women, through the experiences in refugee camps and other societies that have molested women, should be called against, and the women should champion this noble course.

Morgan, in Changing cultures and the art article, calls for changes in the cultural norms so that women’s rights can be protected. The patriarchal nature of the society should be trimmed to be gender-sensitive so that the women can have a voice in the community.

The articles generally call for radical societal changes that will allow women to be heard. Morgan used these articles to speak against patriarch in society.

Compare and Contrast Canadian and Ethiopian Constitution

Student’s Name:

Instructor’s Name:

Course Code:

Date:

Compare and Contrast Canadian and Ethiopian ConstitutionThe Constitution is a powerful document that is used by countries as a guide on how to run their nation. Every country has a different rule of laws, and this means that every country might vary in the constitutional stipulations as the need of the people of a particular nation are used to develop the Constitution. In this line, the Constitution of the United States cannot be the same as that of the United Kingdom as both nations, despite having a majority of white populations, also differs in other areas. Some of the countries have a written constitution, while others possess a conventional constitution, with some of the countries having both. Another major distinguishing feature that makes the constitutions different is the geographical locations. Most of the European nations have a constitution that has a higher resemblance, but higher variations may be depicted in other geographic locations such as Africa and the Arabic countries. For this assignment will focus on the similarities and differences of the Canadian Constitution and the Ethiopian Construction.

The Canadian Constitution Act, 1982

The Canadian Act was established as part of Canada’s process of patriating the Constitution. The act introduced various amendments to the British North America Act of 1867 that included the renaming of the act to Constitutional Act, 1867. Besides the patriation of the Constitution, the act also enacted the Canadian Charter of Rights and freedoms, provided for future constitutional conferences, guaranteed the rights of the Aboriginal people of Canada, and as well stipulated the procedure that should be involved in the amendment of the Constitution in future. The process was, however, necessary essential as Canada allowed the British Parliament to temporally to retain the power to amend the Constitution after the Statute of Westminster, 1931, which was on request from the Canadian Parliament, and by 1981, the Canadian Parliament made requests that the UK parliament remove that authority from the United Kingdom, and this came to effect after the Canada Act, 1982 was passed in March to confirm the patriation of the Constitution, transferring the powers to Canada to amend its own Constitution.

The 1995 Constitution of Ethiopia

The 1955 constitution of Ethiopia is still applied in the current state of the nation and thus has assumed the supreme law of the Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. The Constitution came to effect on 21st August 1995 and was drawn by the constituent Assembly that had been elected in June 1994. After completion, the Constitution was adopted by the transition government of Ethiopia in December 1994 and came into force after the May-June 1995 general election. The Ethiopian Constitution is made up of 106 articles which are contained in 11 chapters. The Constitution has various features, such as it provides for a federal government of the nine ethnically based regions that are governed by the Parliament. The Ethiopian Parliament is divided into two, and that is the House of Federation and the House of People’s Representatives.

Furthermore, the Constitution provides for a parliamentary system. However, the Constitution provides for a ceremonial president to be the head of state. The constitution vests the executive power in a council of ministers that is headed by the Ethiopian prime minister. The Ethiopian Constitution is just like any other constitution in regard to the rights and freedoms of the citizens. The Constitution has 13 articles that have been used to stipulate the rights and freedoms that are interpreted in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the international instruments as well as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights adopted by Ethiopia.

Similarities between the Canadian and Ethiopian Constitutions

One of the major similarities between the 1995 Ethiopian Constitution and the 1982 Canadian Constitution is that they provide for the rights and freedom of the Aboriginal people in the two countries. The Aboriginal and treaty rights are found in section 35 of the Canadian Constitution, which recognizes and affirms the existence of rights and treaty rights in Canada. The aboriginal rights tend to protect the activities, traditions as well as the practices of the indigenous people who are integral to the distinct cultures of the two countries. For example, section 35(2) provides that the aboriginal and treaty rights be extended to the Inuit, Indian, and Metis. Ethiopia is a federation composed of ethnic groups who are rued based on the regional states and chartered cities that are formalized in the Ethiopian Constitution.

Another similarity between the two Constitutions provides for the declaration of the human rights in which the basic sets of human rights are stipulated. The Ethiopian Constitution in Article 13 specifies the rights and freedoms of the citizens as interpreted by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms tends to be the first part of the Constitution and provides for the protection of legal rights, political rights, and the humans’ rights by the bill of rights. Finally, the Constitution of the two countries is that it provides a bicameral legislature. The Canadian legislature is made up of the house of commons of Canada and Senate of Canada. On the other hand, The Ethiopian Constitution also provides for a bicameral legislature with the House of Federation and the House of People’s Representatives, which makes it similar to that of Canada.

Differences in the two constitutions

One of the major differences between the Ethiopian and Canadian Constitutions lies in the judiciary. The Supreme Court of Canada varies with that of Ethiopia in that the judges are appointed by the governor-general on the recommendation brought forth by the prime minister. The Ethiopian Constitution has a federal supreme court, the judges both the president and the vice president are recommended by the prime minister, but unlike in Canada, the judges are appointed by the House of People’s Representatives. In regard to the other federal judges, the names are submitted to the House of People’s Representatives by the prime minister for the appointment.

The Canadian Constitution provides for a monarchial government, and therefore, the executive branch of the government is hereditary. The governor-general is appointed by the monarch on the advice of the prime minister and is esteemed to serve for a five-year term. After legislative elections, the leader of the majority party in the House of Commons is generally appointed the prime minister by the governor-general. On the Ethiopian Constitution, the president is elected by both chambers of the Parliament to serve for a six-year term, but they can as well seek for a second term. The Ethiopian prime minister is appointed by the party in power following the legislative elections. Another major difference is based on the legal law. The Canadian Constitution is based on the common law system, but there is the exception of Quebec as it uses civil law that is based on the French civil codes. However, the Ethiopian Constitution is based purely on the civil law system. Finally, the Canadian Constitution is made up of both written and unwritten acts, and this is different from that of Ethiopia, which is purely written. Still, there are ethnic laws which are not recognized by the Constitution.

The Canadian and Ethiopian Constitutions tend to be similar and also vary in great heights. One of the similarities that have not been mentioned is the suffrage rights for all, in which the two constrictions have recognized age 18 as the minimum voting age. However, various differences are brought about by the form of government. For example, the Canadian government is monarchial, and thus its system is hereditary while that of Ethiopia is elective. Based on this, it is clear that despite having universals providence by the constitutions, there are specifications that are tailored according to the needs of the local populations as it is the case of the rights and treaties for the Aboriginal citizens.

Works Cited

Act, Constitution. “Part 1: Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.” (1982).Retrieved from: http://tanakiwin.com/wp-system/uploads/2013/10/i-Constitution-Act-1982.pdfConstitution, F. D. R. E. “the Constitution of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia.” Addis Ababa 1 (1995). Retrieved from: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/et/et007en.pdf