Recent orders
Safe Patient Staffing Ratio
Safe Patient Staffing Ratio
Name of Student
Institutional Affiliation
Change Model.
In the previous paper, it highlighted the proposed organizational structure change that will include the chief executive officer, a member of hospital management, doctor, nurse manager, and a nurse. Information was to flow from high cadre to the lower cadre. Change cannot just happen; it only occurs in the proper procedure; thus, in the system changes, Lewin’s Change Model will be considered. Kaminski (2011) notes that Lewin proposed three stages that can be used to achieve the desired change. The unfreezing, changing, and refreezing are the three change stages that should be followed to establish the new order. All factors in the three steps should be taken into consideration for change to be effective.
To begin with, unfreezing is necessary for any change to occur. In the hospital setting, just like any other organization, employees and employers have a norm that has become part of their culture. To institute management and information flow change, both the employees and employers should be enlightened on the need for change. In most cases, change is rejected since it threatens the existing order and norms, which is uncomfortable with nurses and hospital management. Therefore, there is a need that the hospital management and the nurses should be informed on the need to change as well as the flaws of the current order. The benefits of the new change should as well be told to them. In this first stage, the proposed changes may have not occurred, but the nurses and the hospital management are aware of impending changes. Thus they psychologically become ready. Change is needed as hospitals are profit-making organizations; therefore, they need to reinvent to keep up with market demands to offer better health care services and safety to the patients. By knowing about change, the nurses and hospital management become aware and feel the need for change.
Secondly, changing is the stage that the new order is to be established. In the transition stage, the new reality dawns on the hospital staff, and they struggle to adapt to the original order. This stage is characterized by a fear of unknown and uncertainty of what the new reality holds upon them. The nurses and hospital management begin to learn new behaviors, mannerisms, and ways of operation. For instance, in the proposed management changes, the dissemination of information will follow a different order that is systematic. Thus the nurse(s) will have to learn new ways of channelling their communications. The hospital management will as well hire enough nurses given they had prepared. This may affect the nurses positively since their workload will be minimized, and in turn, they will offer safety and better health care according to Koren (2010). In order for the change to be realized, the hospital management can organize for proper communication by expertise, education on the move in progress, give ample time that the hospital staff can process change, and support the team to embrace the new order. The hospital staff should be well versed with reasons for change and the benefits once implementation is concluded.
Furthermore, refreezing cement the new order after the change. This stage should be carefully handled so that the hospital staff may not go back to their old order. The unique culture should be supported and maintained by the hospital staff wholesomely. The hospital staff should be reinforced whenever they try to keep the new status quo since a positively reinforced behavior is likely to be repeated. This stage determines the success of the change process due to how it is handled. The nurses will have to be motivated through monetary gifts and humane treatment so that the management can help maintain the new order. The administration should as well recognized for its efforts to increase nurse to patient ratio.
The understaffing in the hospital, especially in the med/ surgical ward, has reduced the efficiency of better and safe healthcare. This issue should be looked into so that hospitals can ensure patients’ needs are well taken care of and nurses to be given a manageable workload. The hospital management should look to employ more nurses and improve the way of communication by centralizing it. Through centralization, the nurses will know the center of the command and the origin of the information. The nursing literatures exposed some of the fatalities the hospital is likely to experience in the event of understaffing—issues such as medical errors, overworking by nurses, and high mortality rate when the hospital is understaffed. Lewin’s change model will be instrumental in instigating changes. For instance, the hospital management should be prepared to allocate funds to hire more nurses and also change the structure of communication in the hospital.
Change is never easily accepted. However, it should occur in order for safer and better health care for patients. The nurse being used to the already existing plan may be adamant to accept the new changes. The hospital management as well may not want to employ more nurses as it may wish to keep the profits as it exploits the existing nursing staff. To sustain the changes, the hospital may reward those who embrace and try to conform to the new changes. The management should educate its staff on the need to change, and this should be done either after two weeks so that the team is constantly reminded. The administration should endeavor to set aside funds each financial year to employ more nurses so that they can meet the recommended nurse-patient ratio.
References.
Kaminski, J. (2011). Theory applied to informatics-Lewin’s change theory. Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics, 6(1).
Koren, M. J. (2010). Person-centered care for nursing home residents: The culture-change movement. Health Affairs, 29(2), 312-317.
comparative analysis of three major approaches to the issue of Armenian genocide
Surname
1
Student Name
Professor Name
Course
Date
Genocide Denied
I. Introduction
The principal purpose of the current thesis lies in the comparative analysis of three
major approaches to the issue of Armenian genocide. The researched worldviews include: the
Armenian
,
Turkish
, and
American
visions of the Armenian genocide. Also, a mental note
should be made that the investigated worldviews are discrepant and contradictory, making the
ongoing study more valuable. In other words, the relevance of the present thesis lies in the
necessity to ascertain which worldview with regard to the Armenian genocide is the most
viable and incontrovertible. Additionally, the current study is likely to explore the correlation
between the analyzed approaches to the matter of the Armenian genocide and the world
vision of the aforesaid genocide in general.
In view of the above, the thesis statement should be formulated as follows:
The historical facts and documentary evidence proves the existence of the Armenian
genocide of 1915-1923, whereas the general political worldview, sustained by Turkey and the
United States, is based on the Armenian genocide denial.
In order to guarantee the coherence and logical consistency of the thesis, a set of
research questions needs to be answered. Therefore, the research questions must be
enumerated as follows:
1.
What is the Armenian vision of the Armenian genocide of 1915-1923?
2.
What is the Turkish position concerning the Armenian genocide of 1915-1923?
Surname
2
3.
What is the American position with regard to the Armenian genocide of 1915-
1923?
4.
Which of the worldviews regarding the Armenian genocide is the most
substantiated?
5.
What is the role of religion in the Armenian genocide of 1915-1923?
6.
What is the impact of the aforesaid study on the personal worldview?
II. The Armenian point of view concerning the matter of the Armenian genocide
To start with, it should be clarified that the issue of Armenian genocide is tightly
connected with the past status of Armenia in the Ottoman Empire. Analysis of the
complexities in the relationships between the Armenians and the Turkish will help to grasp
the impetus to the genocide. According to Suny (2009), Armenians passionately defend their
position that “massive deportations and massacres of a peaceful, unthreatening people were
ordered and carried out by the Young Turk authorities and that these events constitute a
genocide” (932). Also, the Armenian researchers emphasize that almost all prominent
scholars accept the position that the intensification of the massacres of the 1890s resulted in
the genocide of 1915. However, there are still disparities in various approaches to the nature
of the aforesaid massacres.
In this light, Richard G. Hovannisian starts his contemplations on the issue of the
Armenian genocide by asking the question, whether the results of total war in the Armenian
plateau are incremental cleansing or premeditated genocide (5). According to the author, the
strictly Armenian answer to the aforementioned question lies in the fact that the genocide is
the premeditated death warrant for the Armenian people. Moreover, the Armenian scholars
and their Western colleagues express confidence that the death warrant in a form of the
genocide had been issued in covert meetings of the Young Turk dictators before the Ottoman
Empire entered the Second World War as an ally of Germany (Hovannisian 5).
Surname
3
In contrast to the purely Armenian approach, certain Western thinkers, such as Jay
Winter, Norman Naimark, Ronald Suny, and Donald Bloxham are prone to believe that the
“total war” policies became worse after Turkey’s entering the First World War leading the
country to the deterioration and radicalization of different repressive measures “into the most
extreme form of persecution” – genocide (Hovannisian 5).
Nevertheless, the Armenian researchers accentuate the deliberate character of the
Armenian genocide in the Ottoman Empire. The Armenians substantiate their vision of
genocide with the historical evidence. Thus, various plans to deal with the Armenians, the
Institutional Affiliation
Case Study
Name of Student
Institutional Affiliation
Why is achieving a significant level of brand familiarity especially important for Google’s competitors?
There will be several reasons as to why Google’s competitors will look forward to achieving a certain level of brand familiarity. Most of these reasons are business motivated.
Firstly, Google competitors, especially Bing, run adverts on television to capture the attention of the audience. This way, Bing can make people aware of the existence of the searching site, therefore, attracting consumers. Bing, through its adverts, emphasizes that its website is not overloaded hence the best site one can research on. In the United States, for instance, Bing has 15% of the consumers in the online search. Thus familiarity gives Bing a platform to share customers with Google, which is a giant in the field according to Hsieh-Yee (2012). Therefore, Bing explains to online consumers how it better takes care of their interests.
Furthermore, other search engines have been localized; therefore, they are familiar with in a given domain. Google’s competitors, for instance, have gone language-specific, thus more appealing to the people who speak this language. Baidu, which is specifically for Chinese-language searches and Yandex for Russian-language searches, has been established as brands within these languages; therefore, it gives them an upper hand business-wise. The consumers also being familiar with these languages will prefer these brands to Google; therefore, they can compete with Google.
Moreover, other brands have established content-specific search sites, which become significantly vital since they offer consumers direct solutions according to Devine (2008). The fact that they solve particular issues become familiar with its target consumers, therefore, giving them an advantage to Google. This enables these brands to compete with Google. Brands such as Videosurf enables consumers to access video clips better compared to Google. Other brands such as Mocavo (used to search names for ancestors), Wolfram Alpha for mathematics, and findsounds.com.
In conclusion, these other searching brands should be familiar so that they can sell themselves to the consumers to compete favorably with Google.
Reference
Hsieh-Yee, I. (2012). Google scholar and its competitors: accessing scholarly resources on the web. Chandos Publishing (Oxford).
Devine, K. L. (2008). Preserving competition in multi-sided innovative markets: how do you solve a problem like Google. NCJL & Tech., 10, 59.
