Recent orders

W3 Assignment

W3 Assignment

W3 Assignment

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroductionIntroduction: Choose one recent (within 5 years) quantitative article related to any of the national practice problems.Requirements:a. Introduce selected practice problemb. Literature chosen is < 5 years oldc. Provides incidence and/or prevalence of practice problem 10 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent introduction. 9 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes all requirements with a very good introduction. 8 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes 2 requirements with a basic introduction. 0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Poor introduction and/or includes 1 or fewer requirements.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterary Search Strategy

Literary Search Strategy: Describe your library strategy for searching for the quantitative evidenceRequirements:Includes literature search strategy used:a. Identify databases searched to locate the recent quantitative literatureb. Include key words used in your searchc. Describe filters used 30 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent appraisal of the quantitative article. 27 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides a very good description of the literature search. 24 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes 3 requirements and a basic description of the literature search. 0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes 2 or fewer requirements and/or provides a poor description of the literature search.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritique of Article Using the John Hopkins Appraisal

Tool: Use the Johns Hopkins Appraisal tool to conduct a critique of the quantitative article.Requirements:a. Present the aim of the studyb. Share research method and design usedc. Provide Sample size & description of sampled. Present an overview of the findings/outcomese. Share strengths and limitations of the studye. Appraise the level and grade the quality of the study 30 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent description of the literature search strategy. 27 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides a very good appraisal of the quantitative article. 24 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 4 requirements and provides a basic appraisal of the quantitative article. 0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes 3 or fewer requirements and/or provides a poor appraisal of the quantitative article.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarySummary: Summarize in your own words the article findingsRequirements:1. Provide a summary detailing the main points and overall findings2. Discuss if this is a solution that can contribute to the practice problem 40 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides an excellent summary of the quantitative article. 36 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides a very good summary of the quantitative article. 32 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 3 of the requirements and provides a basic summary of the quantitative article. 0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes 2 or fewer requirements and/or provides a poor summary of the quantitative article.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusionConclusion: Effectively summarize the content in the paperRequirements:a. Provides a clear and logical conclusion in no more than 1-2 concise paragraphsb. Highlight the summary of findingsc. Highlights overall quality (level and grade)d. Conclude the value of the study to practice problem 10 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes all the requirements and provides an excellent conclusion. 9 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and provides a very good conclusion. 8 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no less than 2 requirements and provides a basic conclusion. 0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes 1 or fewer requirements and/or provides a poor conclusion.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style and organization for scholarly papers

Requirements:a. Use level I headers for each sectionb. References and citations are in correct APA format per the current APA manualc. Length of APA formatted paper is 2-3 pages (excluding title page and references) 10 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and presents excellent APA style and standards. 9 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes 3 requirements and very good APA style and standards. 8 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements of APA style and standards. 0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes one or fewer requirements of APA style and standards.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Writing

Requirements:a. Use of standard English grammar and sentence structureb. No spelling errors or typographical errorsc. Organized around the required components using appropriate headers 10 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and demonstrates excellent clarity of writing. 9 pts

Very Good or High Level of Performance

Includes all requirements and demonstrates very good clarity of writing. 8 pts

Acceptable Level of Performance

Includes no fewer than 2 requirements and basic clarity of writing 0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Includes 1 or fewer requirements and/or demonstrates poor clarity of writing.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppendixAppendix: Evidence supportRequirements: Embed the completed Johns Hopkins Appraisal Tool as an appendix 10 pts

Highest Level of Performance

Includes the completed John Hopkins Appraisal tool as an appendix 0 pts

Failing Level of Performance

Does not include the John Hopkins Appraisal tool in the appendix or includes an incomplete Johns Hopkins tool in the appendix

10 pts

Total Points: 150

PreviousNext

Vulnerability Assessment

Vulnerability Assessment

Name

Institution

Vulnerability Assessment

Vulnerability assessment is an information security community standard and promotes security content to standardize the transfer of information to other tools and services. The framework was used by the federal government agency to develop a plan to protect its infrastructure (Marwick, 1998). It involved a three-step process; to define minimum essential infrastructure, to identify vulnerabilities of MEI, and develop solution plans. However, the method has its weaknesses, such as it is limited to the purpose to which it is used. Also, the use of the scalable template to assess vulnerabilities may give a solution that may not necessarily apply, especially when the team was not committed or knowledgeable in the process of identifying the weaknesses. For example, if the team is not conversant with the process of assessment, a slight mistake causes a change in the solution plan, which affects an organization.

The private sector company does not involve the government in its operations; therefore, its scalability process lies between the internal partners and its agency. The use of the mission essential process serves it best to identify the weaknesses that hinder the achievement of its mission. This involves identification of the mission and objectives, identifying the gaps, and finding the solutions. On the other hand, the local government consists of a project design for community mobilization hence more advanced analysis required based on the needs of the community (Preston, Brooke, Measham, Smith & Gorddard, 2008). Therefore, it uses poverty vulnerability assessment. A regional authority needs strategic planning and policy for a larger population. Therefore, a livelihood vulnerability index method can be applied to evaluate climate or economic changes affecting society.

Vulnerability assessment requires a constant flow of information hence the need for tools and software. Lack of these resources is a challenge to the process. Shortage of skilled staff to run the software or make the process successful leads to underdeveloped remedy or wrong plans (Cedergren et al., 2018). Also, the lack of defined criteria of assessment by the management affects the process and fails to provide efficient solutions to the challenges identified. Lacking these factors affect the operations of an institution or agency and reflects on the performance as security is critical for smooth functioning.

References

Cedergren, A., Hedtjärn Swaling, V., Hassel, H., Denward, C., Mossberg Sonnek, K., & Albinsson, P. et al. (2018). Understanding practical challenges to risk and vulnerability assessments: the case of Swedish municipalities. Journal Of Risk Research, 22(6), 782-795. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2018.1485169

Marwick, P. (1998). Vulnerability Assessment Framework. Critical Infrastructure Assurance Office.

Preston, B., Brooke, C., Measham, T., Smith, T., & Gorddard, R. (2008). Igniting change in local government: lessons learned from a bushfire vulnerability assessment. Mitigation And Adaptation Strategies For Global Change, 14(3), 251-283. doi: 10.1007/s11027-008-9163-4

VRIO Analysis

VRIO Analysis:

1. Introduction

In the resource-based theory, the superior performance and competitive advantage of an organization are driven by the strategic resources and capabilities. The VRIO framework is an internal analysis framework that is a part of this resource-based approach, requiring the categorization of resources and capabilities (Hamel & Prahalad, 1993). It is a set of strategic evaluation tool that is designed to help a firm identify and safeguard its capabilities and resources that provide competitive advantage in the long term. VRIO is an acronym that represents value, rarity, imitability, and organization. These are elements that represent the sustainability of an organization by providing a long term ability to compete with other firms in the same industry or sector. The advantages and differentiators identified determine an organization’s approach to the marketplace. The VRIO framework, through the capabilities and resources identified, informs strategic decisions and decision-making that shape the direction of a company. Google, one of this century’s organizational giants, has attained remarkable success through its sustained competitive advantage in different areas of its resources and capabilities. In this report, the company’s VRIO framework is broken down with an intention of identifying the key resources and capabilities that have helped it to gain industry dominance.

2. VRIO Framework

In the framework, the first element is value. The first question that firms are needed to answer if whether resources add value through the enabling of exploitation of opportunities or defending against all threats (De Witt & Meyer, 2004). When the answer is yes, the particular resource is termed as valuable. In short, the resource must gain some level of value for an organization. The second element is rarity. A resource that is available only to a handful of organizations is regarded as rare (Hitt, Ireland, and Hoskisson, 2016). Combining value and rarity, a resources gives temporary competitive advantage to a firm. When a resource is valuable but not rare, then competitive parity is the result. In the third element, imitability describes resources that are costly to copy. Inimitable resources are those that are difficult to imitate, substitute, or buy at reasonable prices (Martin, 2015). Imitation occurs through duplication of a resource or substitution using comparable products. When the above three elements (value, rarity, and imitability) are all present, then an organization might achieve long-term competitive advantage. The fourth element, organization, requires that even where resources are suitably valuable rare, and imitable, organizations must exploit the full potential of the resources and capabilities through a strategic organizational culture and structure (De Witt & Meyer, 2004). Organization demands that firms consolidate its policies, organizational culture, structure, management systems, and processes. When these four elements align, then an organization is able to attain sustained competitive advantage.

3. Google

While the scope of this paper does not include an in-depth look into Google, it is important to provide a brief description of the company in relation to its industry with the purpose of identifying its major resources and capabilities. Google is a global giant operating in the tech industry, including the cloud computing sector, the computer and mobile software sector, advertising sector, and artificial intelligence sector, among other notable global industries. The company has amassed large amounts of the global market share and capital as a result of its success in the aforementioned fields. Its technology infrastructure is hard to match for any other player in the industry. Its database centres and many servers, capital advantage, and global presence separates the organization from the rest in its category (Google, 2021). The table below shows some of the core competencies at Google summarized and tabulated to enable one to see how VRIO analysis has helped the organization to identify, isolate, and use the resources and capabilities for the benefit of the organization.

Core Competency/ Resource Value Rarity Imitability Organization Competitive Advantage?

Financial Position Yes Yes No Yes Temporary

Brand Image Yes Yes Yes Yes Sustainable

R&D Yes Yes No Yes Temporary

Superior Customer Experience Yes Yes Yes Yes Sustainable

Product and Service Ranges Yes Yes Yes Yes Sustainable

Dominant Market Position Yes Yes Yes Yes Sustainable

Customer loyalty Yes No No Yes Temporary

Human Resource Management Yes Yes No Yes Temporary

3.1 Value

Google has a number of resources and capabilities that add a lot of value, enabling the firm to exploit opportunities and defend/thwart all threats. Its financial muscle is one of the most important resources for the company. Financial strength enables the company to invest into any opportunities that arise and helps the organization to fight threats. For example, the company is able to acquire innovative up-and-coming organizations that are a threat to its competitive power, thus utilizing an opportunity and thwarting a threat at the same time. Another major core competency that the company has is its brand image. The perception of a brand by the consumer and external stakeholders is important in creating a competitive advantage. Brand image is a decisive factor in influencing the choice of products from a consumer’s perspective. Brand image adds value to Google because it raises the cost for new entrants. Not many companies are able to compete with Google over this resource. Another major valuable core competency is the company’s R&D (research and development). With the intense level of competition, R&D is a key resource that helps an organization to establish and maintain market dominance. A focus on innovation is attained through R&D and Google has this resource in plenty. Other notable sources of value include customer experience, product range, market position, customer loyalty, and its human resource management.

3.2 Rarity

Likewise, Google’s financial strength is rare in the industry. Only a few other large global firms like Amazon and Facebook are able match up to Google’s financial strength. As a core competency Google’s brand image is also rare. Similarly, the company’s R&D resource is rare. The customer experience, product range, market position, customer loyalty, and its human resource management also provide rarity because they are not available to other firms and gaining them is costly.

3.3 Imitability

In terms of imitability, Google’s financial strength is imitable. It does not provide an advantage. Other large global firms like Amazon and Facebook can duplicate Google’s financial strength. As a core competency Google’s brand image is imitable. It cannot be copied or substituted with similar resources. However, the company’s R&D resource is imitable. Companies like Amazon and Facebook have already established similar R&D resources to compete better in the tech world. The customer experience, product range, and market position are also imitable and other organizations do not have the right resources to duplicate or substitute this core competence. However, customer loyalty and its HRM function can all be copied.

3.4 Organization

Google consolidates its policies, organizational culture, structure, management systems, and processes to create a competitive advantage that is sustainable in the long term. Its financial muscle, brand image, the company’s R&D, customer experience, product range, market position, customer loyalty, and its human resource management, are all well organized to ensure the company is able to reap the benefits of a sustainable competitive advantage.

4. Summary

In this report, the company’s VRIO framework is broken down with an intention of identifying the key resources and capabilities that have helped it to gain industry dominance. The VRIO framework is an internal analysis framework that is a part of this resource-based approach, requiring the categorization of resources and capabilities. It is a set of strategic evaluation tool that is designed to help a firm identify and safeguard its capabilities and resources that provide competitive advantage in the long term. Google is a global giant operating in the tech industry, including the cloud computing sector, the computer and mobile software sector, advertising sector, and artificial intelligence sector, among other notable global industries. The company has amassed large amounts of the global market share and capital as a result of its success in the aforementioned fields. Google consolidates its policies, organizational culture, structure, management systems, and processes to create a competitive advantage that is sustainable in the long term. Its financial muscle, brand image, the company’s R&D, customer experience, product range, market position, customer loyalty, and its human resource management, are all well organized to ensure the company is able to reap the benefits of a sustainable competitive advantage, through value, rarity, imitability, and organization where applicable.

References

De Witt & Meyer (2004) Strategy: process, content, context: an international perspective (Chapter 5, Business level strategy / pp 231- 296)

Hamel, G. & Prahalad, C.K. (1993) Strategy as Stretch and Leverage, Harvard Business Review.Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D. and Hoskisson, R.E., (2016). Strategic management: Concepts and cases: Competitiveness and globalization. Cengage Learning. Chapter 1: The Internal Organisation

Martin, R.L. (2015).Strategy is about both resources and positioning. Harvard Business Review.