Recent orders

The Grateful Dead

The Grateful Dead

Introduction

Most of the current research shows that, in the whole world, there are more than estimated one billion Christians. Most of them belong to different denominations and independent churches, talking different languages. With such vast number of followers of Jesus Christ, and possibly much more, with various level of understanding of whom he was and what he stood and activated for.

It is in this context that Ken Kesey relates some of his work with Christianity, in the work one Flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest. He inserts some spiritual representation. Various opinions have been put forward for Kesey’s insertion of Christianity in the works, with some saying it was for Kesey’s own choice and a hint of personal thoughts and experience with Christ. However, it is not surprising that the spiritual model has brought an extra ordinary association between the readers and the novel. The similarity between the novel and Christ is enhanced as every person reading the novel finds an event, which they can relate to their lives. The similarity of character between Christ and Murphy is analyzed, and the outcome used in helping understand the themes.

Even for persons with little knowledge about Christianity, after reading the novel, it is remarkably easy to see the religious content in the novel. This connection is seen when McMurphy takes his patients to a fishing trip, as Chief Bromden says the twelve of them were led towards the ocean (Dodd & Spaulding 2000). This brings to mind Jesus Christ and the twelve disciples, even more astounding is that they have gone fishing. Just like in the bible Christ encouraged his disciples to be fishers of other men. Another obvious reference to the Bible is when McMurphy looses consciousness and ESP has to be administered. It is said his body is latched on the ground like a cross which is how Christ was crucified on the cross. Another reference to Christianity is noticed when McMurphy asks if he will get the thorn crown (Dodd & Spaulding 2000). This can be related to Christ when he was being crucified a crown made of thorns was put on his head. These last events can be related to Jesus Christ’s last days on earth; in Christianity Jesus Christ is betrayed by one of his disciples and subsequently crucified. In Kesey’s novel, Billy Bibbit is the traitor by saying that McMurphy is the one responsible for the events of the previous night. As a result, McMurphy is sentenced to lobotomy, right after Billy Bibbit tells this to Nurse Ratched he cuts his throat and dies just like Judas from the Gospel who commits suicide by strangling himself.

Even though Billy Bibbit death caused uproar, Ratched goes ahead, and orders McMurphy to be lobotomized which is death in itself as McMurphy is not able to do anything. The numerous events in the novel, which imitate how Christ himself laid his own life for the sake of Christians, has connected people even more to the novel, as it reminds them of Christ’s life. The similarity between the life of Christ and McMurphy have attracted more readers, who want to know more about the implication of similarity and the outcome it has on Murphy’s character. He is so much like Christ (Dodd & Spaulding 2000). The various qualities that McMurphy Shares with Christ include his capability to use his intelligence to ask questions, which could demoralize, and defy Nurse Ratched power. Christ was also ever asking questions which in themselves were defying the authority of his time, to prove to them every now and then that their actions were not right. McMurphy is the same, as it comes out in the whole novel where he questions everything he thinks is not being fair to him. Such as the reasons why the patients are not allowed to watch the world sports series, why the music should be played on a high volume and the reason why the toothpaste that they are supposed to use must be locked in the cabinets every morning.

McMurphy was extraordinarily active in defying the authority by using witty questions, and it is not a surprise that he gained popularity, and the support of so many people further enhances this fact. McMurphy was exceedingly experienced at, weakening the authority of those who he thought were unfair like Ratched. The same way Christ was, McMurphy has authority inside him. He is brave, no matter whom he is talking to, and always says what is in his mind. This trait is seen the very first time he walks into the ward, and demands to know who is in charge of the place (Dodd & Spaulding 2000). In the room which is occupied by hardened criminals, he displays no fear by asking for the leader of the ward. This is the same power that Christ Wielded.

While McMurphy and Christ shares various qualities. The characteristic that stands out from the rest is, they both dedicated their lives to helping those people who surrounds them. Despite the fact, that McMurphy was no sincere and a schemer, especially while playing poker with the fellow patients. Deep down he always wanted the best for his fellow patients, He was a source of encouragement, to the other patients. He always told him they were not acutely sick as people thought (Dodd & Spaulding 2000). He was there to give the other patients hope, even when they were destined to fail. Just the same way Christ came to give hope to mankind and deliver them from the eternal fire. McMurphy was a person who was willing to help other patients who were in need without expecting to be paid in return. Christ in the gospel teachings agreed to be crucified, not that because he expected to be paid but, he did it in order to save mankind.

An incident, where McMurphy tries to teach the other patients is when they were in the tub having their bath; He talks of escaping from the ward, despite the other patients doubts he tries for along time to break free and fails, even so he tell the other patients after all he tried (Dodd & Spaulding 2000). With that, he shows all other patients that no matter what the situation one is faced with, self belief and never ever giving up one can achieve anything. Another trait of McMurphy is portrayed is self sacrifice; there is a high possibility that McMurphy intentionally stayed behind rather than escaping with the prostitutes. Even though at the in his mind he knew that he would be punished, McMurphy knew by not running away, he was sending a clear message to the other patients that they were strong enough to fight back. Eventually, he is lobotomized, and that enhanced his message to the other patients (Dodd & Spaulding 2000). McMurphy dies a truly happy man knowing that he has accomplished his duty. Just as Christ who died happily knowing that his death had saved mankind. McMurphy portrayed as Christ like person. The readers are given a deeper view of his character and his importance in the novel. Like Christ, he dies but, not in vain as his death brings redemption to those who he leaves behind.

As have been shown above from the explanations, McMurphy and Christ are alike, although in their own unique way. Kesey brings out Murphy as a character whose traits, and life history is very much familiar to that of Christ does not suggest that the views are similar to Jesus view. Kenny is trying to bring out the picture that just like Jesus, Murphy is also radical, and it does not go down well with all people just as many people were not happy with Jesus. Many attacked the opinion and beliefs of Christ. The nurse was not happy with McMurphy not because he was wrong but, it is because he always took the decision that were radial, and was never afraid to tell what he felt like saying.

McMurphy frequently faulted the ostensibly subjective systems, and the astringent rules in the ward where he stayed. This habit of being defiant annoyed the nurse in charge. He tells of the nurse after he is denied the time to watch an ongoing world series. His constant challenging of the authority in charge brings out the theme that one can fight oppression. Both Murphy and Christ were brave enough to do things that were not regular the society. The fact that Murphy had an extremely difficult life at times; he always had his own way to counter his personal problems. Christ also had his own share of problems that he dealt with by praying, and on the other hand, McMurphy would laugh, and the magnificent humor helped him counter his problem. This trait of McMurphy is seen while they were on fishing, and Bromden hurts his thumb, McMurphy laughs so loud, to help Bromden understand that at times laughing at something that hurts someone helps to keep one keep in balance (Dodd & Spaulding 2000). By using a character like McMurphy who shares more similar traits like Christ, the readers can see the reflection of Christ in McMurphy, and this draws them more to this Character.

Conclusion

The best works at times are like rock for one to get the minerals; it holds one has to dig through the rock. In Kesey’s work, he brings out Christ as the diamond that people have mistaken for a rock with no value, a few traits of Christ can be seen, although some few people can see the significance of Christ and how his presence changes the novels general outcome. But after cutting the tough surface and looking keenly at the text to see the various events of Christ life, the similarity of the character traits between McMurphy and Christ is evident, and it is this similarity that brings out the themes in the book. In that the jewel, which is the message that Kesey is trying to bring out is achieved.

Reference

Dodd, D. G., & Spaulding, D. (2000). The Grateful Dead reader. New York: Oxford University Press.

healthcare in germany and france

Author

Tutor

Course

Date

Healthcare in Germany and France

Introduction

Health is one of the most crucial and fundamental aspects for any country. It is evident that almost every other fundamental aspect is pegged on health. This explains why every country lays emphasis on the healthcare infrastructure and system. However, there are variations as to the healthcare systems of different countries. Two countries that stand out as far as healthcare is concerned include Germany and France.

Elements of Germany’s health care system

Germany incorporates one of the most successful, universal healthcare systems in the world. This system has been in place for close to 130 years, yet it still stands as one of the most successful and incredible in the entire world. However, it undoubtedly needs some reforms with some elements being refined and others remaining.

One of the things that should remain intact is the source of funding. The German healthcare derives its funding from public, as well as private sources. Employers are recognized as providing the largest percentage of funding for healthcare through paying into one of the numerous sickness funds that offer healthcare funding for the employees. This ensures that almost every German has access to healthcare, thereby safeguarding the health of the entire nation.

In addition, the diversity of hospital ownership should remain intact. The public sector retains the highest percentage at 54% of hospital beds, while nonprofit, private organizations take up about 38%. The remaining 8% is owned by private for-profit organizations. This encourages competition, in which case these institutions are constantly making efforts to raise the quality and standard of healthcare services.

However, I would wish to improve access of healthcare to the unemployed. It is worth noting that Germany’s healthcare system is employment-based. People who have never worked, such as homeless people, divorced housewives and asylum seekers, do not have the capacity to join the national insurance. These constitute about 1.5 percent of the entire population. They are, however, entitled to receiving welfare benefits. They get a booklet of coupons for each calendar quarter. These coupons entitle the individual to medical treatment in the course of that period. However, it would be preferable to allow them to join insurance programs as that allows them to pay for their healthcare irrespective of the specialty. In addition, there is the discrepancy between the privately insured people and everyone else. This means that rich always get better healthcare than the poor, something that should not be happening in the socialist Germany. In essence, it is imperative that the government ensures that there is a standard quality of healthcare services for all people irrespective of their class or economic status.

In the movie “Sicko” (not required viewing), Michael Moore describes France as the most ‘effective providers of universal health care’—do you agree or disagree and why?

France has been ranked as incorporating one of the best systems of healthcare in the world. In fact, a study conducted in 2000 rates France the first as far as the excellence of healthcare systems is concerned. While there may be divergent views about this aspect, I would agree that France is the most effective provider of universal healthcare.

First, it is worth noting that France healthcare is funded from private insurance and public (government) insurance. Most people in France get healthcare insurance through their employers. Every person in France has healthcare insurance. The difference between France and many other countries is the fact that, it does not have any waiting list as far as seeing a specialist or getting elective surgery is concerned. This makes it the most effective systems in the world.

In addition, France acknowledges the importance of personal choice despite valuing universal coverage. France’s healthcare system is set up to ensure that all patients have numerous choices as to specialists and doctors. In addition, their doctors are not limited in making medical decisions. Income and payroll taxes fund most of the national insurance programs, whose payments are channeled to the varied quasipublic insurance funds. These then negotiate on doctors’ fees with the medical unions. Doctors have the choice of working in or outside this system. Most hospital fees are regulated by the government, a system that works to keep the costs down.

In addition, France places its priority on the sickest people. In France, sicker people get relatively more coverage than their counterparts. In fact, people suffering from one of the 30 expensive and long term illnesses such as cancer, mental illness and diabetes have 100% of their healthcare expenses including drugs, therapies and surgeries taken up by the government. The high access ensures that healthcare is not only available to all but also extremely cost-effective.

Proposed Deliverables

Proposed Deliverables

6 Industry insight guest lectures with the characteristics of:

Useful knowledge related to PM

Experienced and powerful speaker involved

High-Quality content at student’ level

Different aspect covered in PM

Opportunity for Q&A

A external human resource pool: Include professional guest speakers who can provide long-term cooperation with the project.

A roadmap for industry Insights program: Provide a case study as a reference for other similar projects in the college.

A SOP for reaching external guest speakers: Procedures to contact, operate and maintain external human resources.

A pilot series for semester 2.

Marketing materials for the program to advertise it with the SOPM.

In addition to the above, the project will also require process deliverables. This will be the intermediate outputs that will move the project forward without a direct influence on the project requirement. As such the process deliverable will include:

Internal reports on possible bugs and glitches

An internal Gantt Chart that will inform the entire workflow of the project

Internal onboarding checklist that will enhance project kickoff

A project management plan that will lead to a review

Proposed Method: Hybrid (Waterfall and Agile)

Our entire project will be covered using the waterfall approach, but will incorporate the agile method in the implementation phase in order to improve the quality of the interview videos in each sprint. Traditional project and team management strategies are no longer effective in today’s rapidly changing workplace, which has heightened the argument between agile and waterfall approaches even more. For a long time, traditional project management and software development methodologies, such as waterfall, have been used in the software development industry. Despite the larger frames, the waterfall design continues to be quite popular among consumers. The agile project management methodology was created with the goal of reinventing software development.

When using the waterfall approach, the project activities will be divided into sequential, linear stages, each of which is followed by another. Prior to moving on to the next step of a waterfall project management, it is vital that all our prior stages’ outputs be available. The technique is often used in complex software development because it follows a waterfall-like evolution from idea to implementation from start to finish (Mahadevan, Kettinger, & Meservy, 2015). When developing waterfall diagrams, we will use Gantt charts as a planning tool. On the other hand, Agile development is a preferred method for software developers and engineers that work on projects that are continually evolving in scope and complexity. The route selection of cross-functional teams is impacted by end user input, which is why solutions vary over time. When it comes to resource management, task management, and project planning, flexibility in agile practices is available. For its iterative and flexible character, agile software development will well applicable in the implementation phase to cover the videos required for the interview process in each sprint of the project.

The hybrid project management approach is a little more vaguely defined than these other terms in project management. In our project, the term hybrid will simply mean the combination of waterfall and agile. It is possible to create a new and improved project management model by combining waterfall and agile techniques, which is consistent with the fundamental concept of both methodologies. In order to establish a hybrid method that boosts project development efficiency throughout the process, we intend to combine the greatest features of both worlds.

The Agile-Waterfall hybrid methodology brings together the best features of both techniques in a single package. Even if it may be utilized for software development or for the creation of a product that contains both hardware and software components, the Agile-Waterfall method is a challenging strategy for purists to understand and use well. Members of the team engaging on software development process may frequently employ the Agile methodology, however teams working on hardware development projects and product managers must generally adhere to the Waterfall methodology. Because Agile is more of a mindset and attitude than it is a technology, it is possible to mix the Agile concept with the more rigid Waterfall method and have both work harmoniously together in the same environment.

Using the Agile-Waterfall Hybrid technique, it is possible to develop products that include both hardware and software components of equal importance, as well as software that incorporates both back-end and front-end technologies in the same piece of software. A third sub-scenario exists in the context of hybrid software development. The majority of software projects begin as a reaction to a users’ request. Because there is no formal planning procedure in place, the end user may still be dissatisfied with the whole Agile methodology because the budget and timetable cannot be established and determined well in advance. The use of a hybrid method may be a suitable alternative in this situation (Goodison, Borycki, & Kushniruk, 2019). When it comes to application design, planning, and requirements definition, a Waterfall approach may be used, but an Agile approach can be used for development and testing.

When it comes to processes, the waterfall method is one that takes a long time to complete successfully. Since the results of deliverables will only become obvious after the conclusion of the development cycle, it is possible that the customer will not be able to witness the finished product for months or even years after the development cycle has concluded. Using Agile methods, you may reduce delivery times and collect feedback more quickly, helping you to better meet the needs of our end users (Prenner, Unger-Windeler, & Schneider, 2020). In addition to the fact that it speeds design, analysis, and planning, the Agile-Waterfall Hybrid approach also allows the team to establish project parameters such as budget and delivery time, among other benefits. As a side benefit, hybridization helps to retain compliance with standards while also increasing collaboration. It is also a helpful initial step when creating an Agile culture is difficult to accomplish. When using the Hybrid method, on the other hand, effective collaboration amongst teams is necessary in order to be successful. As a result, a distinctive set of communication formats and channels will need to be established. As a result, training for both kinds of approaches is often required in order to ensure that everyone understands not just the concepts, but also the advantages of using a hybrid model.

Our project is very well defined. Therefore, because they take into account the fluidity of projects, hybrid approaches provide for a more flexible and nuanced approach to project planning and task management than traditional methodology. The likelihood of success increases when there are a variety of choices for addressing a situation. Due to our well-defined project plan, a Gantt chart is an excellent tool to have on hand and use. Fixed expenditures and timetables may be tracked by executives and other stakeholders via the usage of this program. This approach is often used in large-scale infrastructure projects. A hybrid approach to task management is more suited to the agile way of working. For applications needing a high degree of adaptability, such as software and product design, it was created expressly for this purpose. All of the software implementations of the agile problem-solving approach. For project managers who are responsible for a large number of projects, a hybrid management software solution gives a number of perspectives that may be utilized to implement a variety of project management methodologies. Gantt charts are a typical project management tool, and agile teams may arrange their own work in a number of ways, depending on their own preferences. Everyone should be able to access the most up-to-date information available, regardless of the program they are using to get it.

References

Mahadevan, L., Kettinger, W. J., & Meservy, T. O. (2015). Running on hybrid: Control changes when introducing an agile methodology in a traditional “waterfall” system development environment. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 36(1), 5.

Goodison, R., Borycki, E. M., & Kushniruk, A. W. (2019). Use of Agile Project Methodology in Health Care IT Implementations: A Scoping Review. ITCH, 140-145.

Prenner, N., Unger-Windeler, C., & Schneider, K. (2020, June). How are hybrid development approaches organized? A systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software and System Processes (pp. 145-154).