Recent orders
Calling for Reform to Marijuana Laws
Name
Institution
Date
Calling for Reform to Marijuana Laws
Current Federal Policy
Charlotte’s Web Holdings Inc. wants congress to pass laws easing the restrictions on the marijuana industry in order to allow it to interact well with banking services since the industry is currently barred from these services. The federal government should understand that marijuana is not going away, and it very essential for a huge group of Americans. The federal government has not been able to respond to this issue the way states have. It does not matter whether Colorado, the state where Charlotte’s Web Holdings Inc. operates, has legalized cannabis, financial institutions that work with our Company faces federal laws that put them at the risk of being charged with money laundering and racketeering for dealing with cannabis firms. Our supplies, growers, and the dispensaries that form an important part of charlotte’s Web Holdings supply chain cannot access banking services such as depositing money into accounts or accepting credit card payments.
Although some financial institutions have decided to carry the prevailing climate of non-enforcement to provide banking services to the cannabis industry, most financial institutions are not ready for the legal, regulatory or reputational risk that is associated with allowing business dealing in cannabis to bank with them. The industry has been crying for reform for a very long time. Charlotte’s will join with other agencies, including state attorney generals, financial services industry, and lawmakers have joined to raise the concern that the lack of access to banking services is a huge business brainer for these companies and also a public safety concern. The state is also not able to collect tax for the revenues generated by these companies.
Charlotte’s Web Holdings Inc. will rally behind the Secure and Fair Enforcement (SAFE) Banking Act that shows promise of banks, credit card unions, and financial institutions to serve the marijuana industry. Charlotte’s Web Holdings will work closely with Rep. Ed Perlmutter and Rep. Denny Heck, who are the leading proponents of the bill in congress.
More states are legalizing cannabis, and Charlotte is looking to expand its horizon into these new states, which is why the house committee must create a way for the financial sector to play a role in serving this growing industry. However, this is the first step because the Company also has an interest in the legalization of marijuana at the federal level. The Company’s interest grew stronger after realizing the possibility of this after the House Judiciary Committee approved a bill that removed cannabis from Schedule 1 of the Controlled Substances Act (LaVito, 2019). The legislation had good numbers where 24 to 10 ruled in its favor, which means the chance of it being approved in the Full House is higher since the chamber is controlled by Democrats who are the majority (Galston & Dionne Jr, 2013). However, the real task is passing the bill through the SenateSenate, which is controlled by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, who strongly opposes the legalization of marijuana with a majority of Republicans.
The good thing about the legislation and why it is important for Charlotte’s Web Holding Inc. is that it allows states to create their own policies and gives them the incentive to clear criminal records of people with minor marijuana offenses. The Company has identified job training and legal assistance for people hit hard by the war on drugs as its corporate social responsibility. The Company understands that marijuana makes up more than half of all drug arrests across the country. The disproportionate impact that drug laws have had on minorities is a point of concern for Charlotte’s as it should be for any responsible entity and individual. The decriminalization of marijuana is not just about growing the companies revenues but alleviating the imbalance that has defined our criminal justice system.
Polarization in Congress
The likelihood of enacting this legislation is not guaranteed since Republicans have already raised their concerns that the bill has gone too far, and Senate is unlikely to take up the bill. Majority of Republican Senators will not support the bill especially because of the influence of Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (Lovelace Jr., 2019). The Senate is even less likely to take it up. There is not much bipartisan support for this particular bill.
However, Charlotte will lobby to support an idea where House democrats will negotiate with the Senate and consider their concerns since it is clear they will not take up the bill as it is. As an advisor, I would not say that Senate will not take up the idea because if a bill passes the House then the process is rolling. It is not an end process.
Strategy for Influencing Senate Decision
Charlotte’s Web Holdings Inc. will engage Colorado Senator Cory Gardner to help mobilize the Republican Senate. The first step will be to increase the Senator’s involvement with the Cannabis industry. The Company will not use its financial power to influence this decision, initially lest it is translated into arrogance or attract sanctions due to violations. Modesty will apply with Senator Cory Gardner, although the Company will pledge their financial support coming to the next elections up to the limits of the law. I believe that the Senator does not understand how the cannabis industry has grown in Colorado with Charlotte’s at the center of it.
The Company will mobilize its employees during the legislative process since people are the ones that make a difference. We will develop a grassroots policy in the Company, which will begin by following the legislative process closely. There will be alerts through mail on legislative action as well as a policy outline on how to respond to these alerts. The Company will issue a procedure for distributing alerts to every employee and insist that the employee participates. We understand that our employees have great steak in the affairs of the Company and have an interest in the bill that proposes the removal of cannabis from Schedule 1 of the Controlled Substances Act. The more people are contacting Senator Cory Gardner on this bill, the more effective his response.
The Company will also engage the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, which is an institution with massive social capital. The association is useful because it is able to establish a grassroots alert that does not only cover states but also national grassroots alerts. The National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws has the ability to reach beyond the national membership base and will broaden the reach of the original alert.
The Company will also organize a meet and greet at the company premises that seeks to bring together Senator Cory Gardner, Rep. Ed Perlmutter, and Rep. Denny Heck. The Senator should be able to see how many people are reliant on the cannabis industry and its potential in contributing to the economy beyond the myths going around. Bringing Rep. Ed Perlmutter and Rep. Denny Heck together with Cory Gardner is for the effect of initiating a compromise discussion between House Democrats and the Republican Senate to ensure the bill is taken up.
We are hoping that Senator Cory will be able to return for another facility tour with Majority Leader Mitch McConnell so that they can expand their understanding of how the Cannabis industry works and the importance of an entity such as Charlotte’s Web Holdings Inc. in the community (Monte, Zane, & Heard, 2015). These lawmakers will see how these issues are affecting not only the Company by the people it serves in growers, distributors, and consumers, most of whom have medical prescriptions. The Company hopes to include the increase of the scope of research on marijuana so that certain uncertainties can be cleared as part of the compromise that will see the bill adopted by the Senate.
To support the Senator’s argument on the floor of the House, if things go as planned, the business will take up the responsibility for message delivery using certain principles. The business, along with the stakeholders that it is associating with ensuring that the information given to the Senator, will be factual and accurate. The information ought to be personal because it deals with the intricate needs of the general population first, the population that has made Charlotte’s essential as demonstrated by the revenue the Company generates in the last few quarters. The information will raise problems but also outline solutions perfectly.
Charlotte’s Web Holdings Inc., through its co-founders, will arrange a fundraiser for Senator Cory for the upcoming elections. The Company has been monitoring the Senator’s campaign pledge and would like to be an active member of his course.
The Company will use its vast resources to engage the media through letters to editors. Using the media is an invaluable way of enacting a bill that eases the restrictions of marijuana. The letters to the editor will include information that educates the public and influence members of congress. The letter will hopefully generate public support and mention the Senator to put him in the spotlight. If it’s the will of the people to have marijuana legalized, he should be able to represent this will.
References
Galston, W. A., & Dionne Jr, E. J. (2013). The new politics of marijuana legalization: Why opinion is changing. Governance Studies at Brookings, 1-17.
LaVito, A. (2019, July 23). Senate Panel Looks at Easing Laws That Restrict the Cannabis Industry’s Access to Mainstream Banking Services. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/23/us-senate-looks-at-easing-cannabis-laws-that-restrict-access-to-banking-services.htmlLovelace Jr., B. (2019, November 21). House Committee Approves Landmark Bill Legalizing Marijuana at the Federal Level. CNBC. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/20/house-committee-approves-bill-decriminalizing-marijuana-on-the-federal-level.htmlMonte, A. A., Zane, R. D., & Heard, K. J. (2015). The implications of marijuana legalization in Colorado. Jama, 313(3), 241-242.
Molly Brown And Her Influence On Women Rights
Molly Brown And Her Influence On Women Rights
Contents
TOC o “1-3” h z u HYPERLINK l “_Toc377211427” Introduction PAGEREF _Toc377211427 h 1
HYPERLINK l “_Toc377211428” Her early life PAGEREF _Toc377211428 h 2
HYPERLINK l “_Toc377211429” Surviving the Titanic tragedy PAGEREF _Toc377211429 h 3
HYPERLINK l “_Toc377211430” Influence as an activist on women suffrage and human and labor rights PAGEREF _Toc377211430 h 5
HYPERLINK l “_Toc377211431” Conclusion PAGEREF _Toc377211431 h 9
IntroductionAs an activist and a big hearted philanthropist, Margret Tobin Brown, Molly to many, can simply be described as an one of the most influential women in America between late 1800s and early 1900s. She is also significantly remembered for having survived the sinking of the pleasure cruise liner RMS Titanic in 1912 and even going further to impose her will on the crew of one of the lifeboats to return to sea and search for survivors. Known simply as Maggie rather than Molly in her days, she was made famous by the 1960s musical performance titled The Unsinkable Molly Brown.
Leah Schwartz best sums up her biography by stating that “the story of Margaret Tobin Brown is the story of the Westward Movement, of women’s issues, of family, of social responsibility, of individualism” (Schwartz). It is the story of experiences and issues every thoughtful person faces even today in the pursuit of living a meaningful life by coexisting with people from different cultures, economic statuses, and gender to attend one’s needs as well as those of the community.
She grew up in Hannibal, Missouri, and later moved to Leadville, Colorado where she met and married James Joseph Brown a local silver mines worker. She is significantly remembered as the founder of soup kitchens and a women’s rights activist in the mining regions. Some of her memorable contributions in Leadville include the promotion of women rights and founding of the National American Women’s Suffrage Association, Colorado chapter, besides establishing soup kitchens that were very helpful to the families of the miners (Lewis).
Her work with the American Committee for Devastated France during the First World War in reconstruction of French areas behind the lines of warfare and assisting wounded soldiers, earned her a French Legion of Honor award. Towards the end of her life, she was a well known actress. This strong woman who was known by many respectfully as the “unsinkable” Molly Brown died of a brain tumor in 1932 (Iversen 235).
This paper examines how her early life and status as a survivor of the Titanic tragedy, along with the fame and recognition that came with it, gave her a strong position in the community to promote social welfare issues like the rights of workers, provision of education for underprivileged children, women rights, as well as natural and historic monuments and lands preservation.
Her early lifeMargaret Tobin Brown, popularly referred to as “Unsinkable Molly Brown” was born in the year 1867 in Hannibal, Missouri to Irish immigrants John Tobin and Johanna Collins. Her siblings included Daniel, William, and Helen as well as two step sisters Catherine Bridget by her father’s previous marriage and Mary Ann Collins by her mother’s earlier marriage. Her parents had been widowed at an earlier stage in life. In Hannibal, she attended the local grammar school that was managed by her aunt Mary O’Leary and later worked at Garth’s Tobacco Company stripping tobacco leaves.
She relocated along with her brother Daniel and older sister Mary in 1883 to Leadville, Colorado when Mary’s husband Landrigan and Daniel went to work in the mines. Daniel later became a leading mine promoter. At Leadville, Molly worked in a department store and later for Daniels and Fisher Mercantile at the Carpets and Draperies section (Landau 18). It was while working here that she met her future husband James Joseph Brown. In her biography, Mary says she always aspired to marry a rich man but eventually married Brown, popularly known as J. J, simply for love. On her choice of a spouse she states:
“I wanted a rich man, but I loved Jim Brown. I thought about how I wanted comfort for my father and how I had determined to stay single until a man presented himself who could give to the tired old man the things I longed for him. Jim was as poor as we were, and had no better chance in life. I struggled hard with myself in those days. I loved Jim, but he was poor. Finally, I decided that I’d be better off with a poor man whom I loved than with a wealthy one whose money had attracted me. So I married Jim Brown” (Schwartz).
On 1 September, 1886, Molly and J.J Brown were married at the Annunciation Church at Leadville. They went on to have two children, Lawrence Palmer Brown and Catherine Ellen Brown and lived at Stumpftown, an Irish neighborhood in Leadville.
When J.J Brown had moved up at the mining company and become a superintendent, he invented a method of extracting gold from the bottom of the mine using his engineering skills. The invention was so instrumental to Ibex Mining Company that he was made a member of the board of the company with 12,500 shares. Molly and her husband suddenly became wealthy and relocated to Denver where she became an active socialite and political activist. She was also involved in many philanthropic projects.
Surviving the Titanic tragedy
Long before the Titanic tragedy, Margaret Tobin Brown had already made an impact in the world especially in her hometown in Denver (Natasha). Before she boarded the Titanic for that fateful trip at Cherbourg in France, Molly along with her daughter Helen had been to Europe and Cairo travelling and sight seeing. Incidentally she had received word that her grandson had fallen ill and had to cancel her trip and leave for New York. The Titanic was the earliest ship and the only choice if she had to reach New York in good time. It was a quick decision and therefore not many of her family knew she was aboard the ship.
The Titanic never made the trip to the United States. It hit an iceberg and sunk (Smith). The Titanic tragedy death toll was over 1,500 people (Hitchner). Margaret was one of the survivors who assisted many others by loading them into lifeboats. So dedicated was she in helping others that she had to be forced to board lifeboat six. She was a great encouragement to other women in lifeboat six and together they rowed to safety. Her most significant role in helping Titanic survivors was in the rescue ship Carpathia wher she helped ailing and frost bitten survivors. She even established the Survivors Committee aboard the Carpathia and was elected the committee chairperson. The Survivors Committee raised $10,000 for the survivors (Barczewski 30).
Her language skills which included proficiency in German, French, as well as Russian were very valuable in communicating with the survivors. She never left the Carpathia until all the Titanic survivors had been reunited with their families. On the praise and fame that followed her role in the tragedy, she later wrote to her daughter stating, “After being brined, salted, and pickled in mid ocean I am now high and dry… I have had flowers, letters, telegrams-people until I am befuddled… they are petitioning Congress to give me a medal… If I must call a specialist to examine my head it is due to the title of Heroine of the Titanic” (Schwartz).
She later presented an award to Carpathia’s Captain Rostron and to each of its crew members on behalf of the Survivors Committee on 29th May, 1912 (Barber). She would later help in erecting the Titanic memorial that still stands today in Washington, D.C. What really upset her most about the tragedy was the fact that she was denied a chance to testify in the hearings about the Titanic tragedy simply because she was a woman which prompted her to write her own version of the events.
Influence as an activist on women suffrage and human and labor rights
Besides her famous role in assisting the survivors of the Titanic tragedy, Margaret Tobin was also well known for a number of feats and achievements that no other woman had achieved by her time. It was, however, the aftermath of the tragedy that put her in the national limelight. She particularly played a major role in fundraising for the construction of the Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception in Denver until its completion in 1911. Together with Judge Lindsey, Margaret also helped in the establishment of the first juvenile court in the United States which later formed the basis for the current juvenile court system in the U.S. Her concern for children and families from every class of citizens and her philanthropic nature were the driving force for establishing the juvenile court system.
Margaret Tobin is also significantly remembered as the first woman to ever run for political office in the history of the United States (Bigham). She first campaigned for a seat in the senate in 1914, eight years before women were allowed to vote. She only stopped her campaign for a senate seat when her sister Helen’s marriage to a German baron ruined her campaign. Teaming up with Alva Vanderbilt Belmont, who was also popularly known as Mrs. O. H. P. Margaret was instrumental in the organization of a global conference on women’s rights that was held at Marble House in Rhode Island city of Newport. The conference was attended by human rights activists from major parts of the world.
As a dedicated and lifelong agitator of human rights, Margaret is also remembered due to her prominent role the April 1914 Ludlow massacre that happened in Trinidad, Colorado which was a monumental landmark in the United States quest for labor rights. Miners in Colorado had been on strike for months against their employer, the Colorado Fuel and Iron, citing cruel and unsafe working conditions and inhumanely long hours. On the basis of her fame, Margaret’s leadership skills were sought for by local women asking for her assistance. However, on April 20th the tension between the miners who were on strike and the CF&I private guards culminated in a violent confrontation that left twenty people dead among them women and children. The Ludlow tragedy became a national crisis and is recorded among the most violent labor related confrontations in the history of the United States.
In response to urgent appeals from each side of the conflict, Margaret Tobin travelled to Ludlow to resolve the conflict. Each side in the conflict saw her as an ally and she did her best to maintain a middle ground. She refused to agree to the calls by the radicals for the governor’s resignation but openly challenged Rockefeller for his unethical business conduct. She spoke about the miners rights making Rockefeller to agree to concessions. The Ludlow conflict was eventually resolved resulting in the end of radical workers’ movements in the U.S and the growth of ethical industrialists like Rockefeller.
After the Ludlow labor conflict, Margaret spent most of her time in Newport, Rhode Island, which had become a resort for the 20th century American high society. It was the first American town with a golf course, leisurely use of automobiles, and even a tennis club. It had lavish homes whose owners frequently threw spectacular parties and was dominantly populated by women since husbands were always away at work in New York. Margaret Brown was thus heavily influenced by the independent women in Newport despite the fact that her wealth was comparatively smaller than theirs. However, she was easily accepted by some of Newport’s women leaders including the president of the National Women’s Suffrage Association, Alva Vanderbilt Belmont (Blos 57).
Together with Alva, Margaret took a prominent role in the National Women Trade Union League which involved women from both the working and upper classes. The League sought to have the minimum wage implemented as well as an eight-hour workday. Margaret involved herself in the League activities and travelled all over the country telling people about women issues and labor rights. She also wrote many articles in newspapers. She was also very close to Alice Paul and her radical women’s party in advocating for a suffrage amendment nationally. She was very instrumental in the organization of the Conference of Great Women in July 1914. The conference led to the August pronouncements of even more insistent suffrage campaigns. At the July conference, Margaret spoke about the conditions of the Colorado miners and rallied for a movement to agitate for rights of all citizens to counter labor injustices perpetrated by greedy corporations. This was the main objective of the suffrage movement.
Margaret’s active role in the Conference of Great Women and in the national suffrage movement and working with influential leaders like Alva Belmont and Alice Paul prompted her to bid for a political seat as a Senator representing Colorado. She had a campaigning style that appealed to both men and women seeking for a candidate who represented progress. She was hailed by the Colorado press as well as the New York Times as a likely winner.
The emergence of the First World War, however, changed her focus from politics to relief efforts that saw her travel to France on behalf of the American Committee for Devastated France (Schwartz). She was later awarded the French Legion of Honor as a result of her efforts in the reconstruction of France during the war.
After the end of the war, the general interest for most Americans shifted to a perception of a larger world beyond the United States borders. Most urban Americans at this time valued concepts like theatre, art, and music from other parts of the world. With the passing of the war, the enactment of women’s suffrage in 1920, and the death of J.J. Brown in 1922, Margaret dedicated her energies and efforts in cultural renaissance activities like acting on stage. Her heroes included Sarah Bernhardt whom she played in L’Aiglon staged in New York and Paris. Her dramatic work and interpretation of Sarah Bernhardt both in France and in New York during the 1920s earned her the Palm of the Academy of France (Whitacre 56).
The development of New York and Paris as world cultural centers attracted many people especially southern African American immigrants and not only made New York a cultural melting pot but also a place where the identity of a “new woman” was created. Margaret Tobin was one of the prominent women who brought abut this cultural revolution through her acting and influence. She has been described in many ways as “the embodiment of the New Woman of the twenties: free, liberated and self-sufficient” (Whitacre 79).
Her love for art is well portrayed in the donations she gave to the Denver Art Museum and her patronage of theater is well reflected in her drama and music studies and accomplishments. She was an ardent student of music and even sacrificed two years simply to learn how to play the yodel. Her life was dedicated entirely to scholarly work that saw her enroll at New York’s Carnegie Institute in early 1900 becoming the first woman to be accepted at the prestigious learning center. She was a first woman in many things.
She was a leader in the fashion world with an extravagant taste in clothes and jewelry. She was famous for her floral arrangement just like she was for her efforts in education, philanthropy, and human rights advocacy. She mingled with New York socialites and European royalty just as equally as she did with miners and garment factory workers. All along she never stopped lecturing widely on cultural and social issues.
Margaret and J.J. Brown were married for a period of twenty three years after which they privately signed an agreement for separation in which Margaret retained the possession of the house in Denver and a cash settlement. She also got a monthly allowance of seven thousand dollars that she used for her travelling and social work expenses. On 26th October, 1932, she passed away in her hotel room at the Barbizon Hotel, New York City after what her death certificate stated as cerebral hemorrhage (Carberry). An autopsy performed later showed that she died of a brain tumor.
Conclusion
Margaret Tobin Brown was an energetic healthy woman who was everything she wanted to be and never let anyone stand in her way. While the more conservative wished her to be more ladylike, most people found her zest and confidence admirable. Contrary to tall claims by her critics, Margaret Brown claims in her biography that she “certainly never used the street language and grammar of her later media representations, or worked in a bar, or burned money her husband had hidden in the stove, or carried a gun and shot grapefruit thrown from the deck of the Titanic” (Schwartz). She was never referred to by the name Molly in her lifetime and the unsinkable title was coined by the press after her husband observed that not even the ocean could bring her down. However, self-confidence, talent, generosity, and energy made her an original American who was truly “Unsinkable.”
Works Cited
Barber, Mark. Titanic Survivors Honor Capt. Rostron. New York Times, Thursday 30 May 1912.Web. 25 April 2011. <http://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/titanic-survivors-honor-capt-rostron.html>.
Baber, Mark. Women Revealed as Heroines by Wreck. New York Times, Saturday 20 April 1912.Web. 25 April, 2011. <http://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/women-revealed-as-heroines-wreck-1.html>.
Barczewski, Stephanie, L. Titanic: A Night Remembered. 2004. Books-Google-EC. Web. 25April 2011.<http://books.google.com/books?id=yYX4s1_6IlEC&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30>.
Bigham, Randy, R. Seat in U.S. Senate Chief Ambition of Noted Society Woman fromColorado. Washington Post, Sunday 26 July 1914. Web. 25 April 2011.<http://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/seat-us-senate-chief-ambition-noted-society-woman-from-colorado.html>.
Blos, Joan, W. The Heroine of the Titanic: a Tale both True and Otherwise of the Life of MollyBrown. New York: Morrow Junior Books, 1991. Print.
Carberry, Jack. Death ends picturesque career of Mrs. J.J. Brown. Denver Post, Friday 28October 1932. Web. 25 April 2011. <http://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/death-ends-picturesque-career-mrs-jj-brown.html>.
Hitchner, Earle. “In Titanic’s Wake: A Voice to Remember.” The Wall Street Journal, 12 march,1998. Web. 25 April 2011.<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB889672431117893500.html?mod=googlewsj>.
Iversen, Kristen. Molly Brown: Unraveling the Myth. The true life story of the Titanic’s mostfamous survivor. Boulder, Colorado: Johnson Books, 1999. Print.
Landau, Elaine. Heroine of the Titanic: the Real Unsinkable Molly Brown. New York: ClarionBooks, 2001. Print.
Lewis, Christina. Margaret Brown – The “Unsinkable” Survivor. History’s Women OnlineMagazine. Web. 25 April 2011.<http://www.historyswomen.com/moregreatwomen/MargaretBrown.html>.
Natasha, Gardner. Molly and Me. 5280 Magazine, March 2011. Web. 25 April 2011.<http://www.5280.com/magazine/2011/03/molly-me>.
Schwartz, Leah. Margaret Tobin Brown: A Brief Biography. 1912. Web. 25 April 2011.<http://teach.maryville.edu/schwartz/molly_brown.htm.>
Smith, Adam. Review of Titanic. Bauer Consumer Media. Web. 25 April 2011.<http://www.empireonline.com/reviews/review.asp?FID=3396>.
Whitacre, Christine. Molly Brown: Denver’s Unsinkable Lady. Denver: Historic Denver, Inc.,1984. Print.
Modernization of Estonia
Name
Professor
Course
Date
EstoniaIntroduction
Modernization of Estonia commenced its period of their independence amidst 1918 and 1940. It provided familiarity of democracy construction and development of market propelled economy and volunteer conversion back to an authoritarian administration subsequent to experiencing democracy. The initial duration of Estonian independence took place after fifty years of Soviet business that possessed strong cultural and corresponding demographic inspiration upon the country (Malfliet, 89-124). Estonia’s transition subsequent to its independence within the year 1991 was drastic and radical in regard to choices and outcome. Through choosing of liberal economic reforms and influential political independence, Estonia played significant role in restructuring the Soviet Union and enhancing other underlying republics towards reconstruction and independence. Moreover, the predictions of the underlying membership within the Western organization that include European Union and NATO that are the main promoters for the decisive social, economic and political reorganizations framed in the year 1993 Copenhagen benchmarks. Estonia has more accomplishment than its corresponding Baltic neighbors. Multilateral associates played significant role in choosing of the suitable transition strategy and execution methods subsequent to the downfall of the Soviet Union in the year 1991 (Bulmer, 89-154). The role of the European Union within the Estonia transition process during the period that ranges from 1991 to 2004 was purely supervision and offering structural advice. Estonia was mainly charged with accomplishing the compliance conditions and responsibilities whilst European Union offered technical and financial support. Moreover, European Union is depicted as a philanthropic actor by the Estonian public and its corresponding elite.
Succession of the prevailing European Union and NATO is the major cause of lofty expectations for the swift advancement of the welfare and security within the Estonian society. Public attitudes in regard to the integration of Estonia into the underlying European Union and NATO is depicted to be non-committal and skeptical at the commencement of the succession procedure with approximately half of the population supporting them (Sperling, 67-99). The Estonian political elite treasured distinct and structural approach in regard to the Copenhagen criteria. Pre-structural method assistance reserves are fundamental for the Estonia’s target groups. European Union interference has efficiently steadied the prevailing national currency though it had negative impact on employment rates coupled with social security. The effect of macroeconomic advancement is positive that is period amidst of 2004 to 2006 realized a total of 371.4 million euros and 428.2 million euros from interconnection reserve. Structural Assistance fund amounting to 3.4 million euros was apportioned to Estonia in the period of 2007 to 2013. European Union and Estonia transition does not rely on the combined pressure for the reforms devoid of appropriate and adequate financial support but entire modernization period.
Political and economic developments
After downfall of the Soviet Union, the Resolution on National Independence of Estonia was approved. Diplomatic associations with other corresponding states were mainly re-established and the Constitutional Assembly was developed for the purpose of conscripting of constitution. Moreover, Republic of Estonia was purely re-established as a parliamentary social equality due to the Constitution that was approved in the year 1992 (Malfliet, 89-124). The fundamental of legal continuity is considered to be the basic constitutional debates in the 1990s. Member of Parliament are not normally allowed to be employed either organizational or non-governmental institution. Subsequent to the Estonia independence the country is faced with myriad of political challenges that encompasses inter-national acknowledgment which mainly compose of thirty percent of its total population speaking Russian and nor possessing Estonian citizenship. Soviet legacy in regard to the political system, besmirched bureaucracy coupled with structured economy has resulted to complication in the reform process (Bulmer, 89-154). Political transformation have taken places in Estonia amidst the year 2004 and 2010 due to the underlying multiparty efforts of the prevailing local elite, a sympathetic electorate and corresponding multilateral donors.
Integration within the European Union altered European Union Estonia political culture in regard to the institutions and power division. Moreover, political and administrative alterations within the 1990s led to economic developments and security advancement. This was mainly dependent on the wide societal agreement on benefit of the prevailing EU membership and Euro skepticism of Estonia. Subsequent to Estonia’s independence its underlying central foreign policy objective was joined to EU and NATO (Bulmer, 89-154).
Estonian labor market is highly unsteady and unemployment rate is projected to be less than five percent but it recently reached above fifteen percent in the year 2009. The prevailing low level of official unemployment is mainly caused by stumpy unemployment benefits. Within the year 2008, Estonia’s level pertaining to unemployment is still lower than the corresponding European Union average.
In terms of public debt, Estonia had the best scores in European Union from the year 2009 to 2011 (Sperling, 67-99). In the end year 2007 public debt to the underlying GDP ratio decreased to three point five percent which subsequently increased to four point three percent in the year 2008. This is still lower as compared with that of European Union. In the year 2008 and 2009 there was increase in the government lending that was mainly instigated by the underlying co-financing requirements for the underlying European Union structural funds investments. Relatively higher borrowing levels were planned subsequent to linking the euro for the corresponding fiscal years of 2011 and 2012. By the end of the year 2010 public debt increased to seven point two percent of the GDP. Similarly, the general debt that is the total debt of include public, private and corresponding commercial debt developed to the uppermost levels per capita in the CEE countries thereby reaching one hundred and thirty five percent of the underlying GDP within 2010.
The main long term approach of the Estonian government in regard to economic policy is mainly to attract foreign direct Investment at all prevailing cost. This was majorly initiated by radical privatization and currency reform in the year 1992 (Malfliet,89-124). Nevertheless, dramatic inflation prior to the currency restructuring and designated exchange rate made underlying investors and corresponding property holders incapable to purchase local enterprises. Initial influence of the underlying euro location membership is mainly aimed at controlling inflation to approximately five percent yearly thus reducing the massive rate of unemployment. Estonian is also concern with the share within the ESM that demands open public discussion. Lofty inflation led to radical reforms within Estonia in 1990s. Because of the cumbersome experience with elevated inflation within the Soviet times and corresponding initial years of independence, the main question pertain to benchmarks for the underlying electorate in examination of the government’s economic accomplishment or failure.
Fig. GDP of Estonia from 1994-2009
Social, labor and corresponding educational policies were frequently sacrificed in order to accomplish the prevailing electorate’s inflation expectations. Nevertheless, there was massive inflation decrease of eight percent in the year 1998 and corresponding drop of one point three percent in the year 2003. The European Union resulted to a modern rise in terms of inflation that increased to four percent in the year 2004, four point four in the year 2006 and corresponding ten percent in the year 2008 (Sperling, 67-99). Within the year 2009 Estonia managed to control inflation to be under three percent.
Fig for inflation of Estonia from 1994-2009
The underlying population dynamics of Estonia is mainly categorized by the dual central tendencies that have been significant in the recent years acting as both imposing reforms within the prevailing social security system. Estonia population decrease commenced 1990s with the decreasing number of aging population. By the year 2009, Estonian population had reduced to 1.34 million. Within the year 2008, the underlying rate of populace aged sixty five and above was approximated to be twenty five point three as compared to the corresponding working age population within the bracket of 15-64. Moreover, this has continued since the year 2000. The prevailing ageing population possesses robust impact on the labor market considering that the fraction of populace aged between 5-14 and 55-64 are approximated to leave the existing labor market. The underlying natural escalation of Estonia’s population continues to be negative and the corresponding mortality decreased and average life expectancy has escalated in both male and female. The life expectancy of women in Estonia in the year 2008 was 79.2 years whilst men were 68.6years. The mortality rate of the men that are below the age of 65 is three times relatively higher than the corresponding mortality rate of female.
Fig.showing population evolution of Estonia 1994-2010
Social services coupled with priorities within Estonia in the years 2004 to 2010 is depicted to be liberal perspective as the state was solely providing minimum level required. Pensions and corresponding unemployment support is relatively lower as compared to the prevailing CEE member states. Social services coupled with benefits within Estonia are majorly funded from the underlying state budget and corresponding insurance funds. Moreover, social expenditure mainly entail pensions, state family and maternal benefits, disability benefits and allowances billed to the underlying families. The prevailing percentage of social insurance expenditure within GDP has escalated gradually over the last eight years that is from 2001 to 2008.
Efficacious UE affiliation has been the first precedence both for the political elite and the electorate within Estonia in the last six years within the Union. European integration is the best probable pertain to construction of the well-being state coupled with warranting social security. Taking into consideration the underlying historic situations coupled with reasonable progress of its Baltic neighbors, Estonia’s transition procedure is normally within at the belief of local policymaker and corresponding electorate. Conversely, Estonian transition possesses quite precise choices such as essential currency reform, swift privatization coupled with shockwave therapy. Thus, Estonia is found either at the top or bottom in regard to the scoreboard as the swiftest economic development, which combine weakest social safeguard. Estonia’s long term economic viewpoint modernization coupled with export competence commenced with support from EU that offered sustainability. Modernization of Estonia commenced its period of their independence amidst 1918 and 1940. Estonia’s transition subsequent to its independence within the year 1991 was drastic and radical in regard to choices and outcome.
Work Cited
Malfliet, Katlijn. The Baltic States in an Enlarging European Union: Towards a Partnership between Small States?Leuven (Belgium: Garant Publ, 1999. Print.
Sperling, James. Two Tiers or Two Speeds?: The European Security Order and the Enlargement of the European Union and Nato. New York [u.a.: Manchester Univ. Press, 1999. Print.
Bulmer, Simon. The Member States of the European Union. Oxford [u.a.: Oxford Univ. Press, 2012. Print.
Lejeune, Ine. The Enlargement of the European Union: Opportunities for Business and Trade. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2004. Internet resource.
Spilling, Michael. Estonia. New York: Marshall Cavendish Benchmark, 2010. Print.
