Recent orders
At The English Colonization
Name
Professor’s name
Course
Date
The English Colonization
The main political motivation for English imperialism was the rivalry with its European counterparts. Imperialism is a term that refers to the expansion of the influence and power of a country through coercion or military force. In the 15th and 16th centuries, the main goal of European countries was to colonize. Spain, France, the Netherlands, and England were the main contributors to imperialization. At first, the English had not considered the option of setting up a home in America. They were mainly interested in the continent’s natural resources, including farmland, beaver pelts, and fish. The Englishmen men only started considering the option of putting up colonies in North America only after a war ensued between then and Spain. It was at this point that “English leaders started to consider planting colonies in the Western Hemisphere, thereby gaining better access to trade goods while preventing their enemy from dominating the Americans.” (Cox, 107). The English were politically motivated to keep the land northern colonies from being taken by Spain while at the same time providing its people with resources.
The social pressures that contributed to English colonization in America were overpopulation and religious motivations. Overpopulation in the cities of England was common. People competed for jobs, food, and clothing. There was an increase in employees which led to reduced pay and the increased cost of rent pushed the people into poverty. Furthermore, the colonization was also motivated by religion. Studies show that “some Puritans, Separatists, Presbyterians, and Catholics decided to move to America, where they hoped to practice their beliefs freely. Some fled to avoid arrest and imprisonment.” (Cox, 102). Most of the English moved to North America in order to practice their beliefs and religion away from the England church.
Colonies Table
Social Characteristics Economic Characteristics Political Systems
Massachusetts Bay To reside here, religion was a requirement. Supporting the church was customary, and the English were required to attend services.
Large families of about 5-7 people
Father was the head of the household.
Mainly Puritans Every woman and man was given land to reside, forming a community allowing exports from seaports.
Working in fields (family labour)
Growing crops
Blacksmith, fishing, building ships. To vote, one had to be a member of the church. The Puritans controlled the government.
Laws punishable by public humiliation and fines, including cursing, sex before marriage, and dancing were implemented by the church.
Virginia Upon arrival the English expected that Natives would take up their belief and convert to Christianity. The main source of money was tobacco.
The Englishmen came as indentured servants to Virginia to work on tobacco farms. Laws mandated land owners to provide clothing, food and not beat subjects extensively. People who did abide were turned over to the courts.
The Carolinas Women are expected to carry out household chores such as cooking, cleaning, and childcare.
Due to crime and debt, Indians were enslaved. The main crops were corn and tobacco.
They sold corn and cattle to planters located in the Caribbean.
Olives, figs, and grapes were common. Governors were elected by legislature and land owners.
Major Ideas and Events That Led to The American Revolution
Also known as the U.S. War of Independence, the American Revolution was an uprising by which 13 Great Britain North American colonies gained political independence forming the United States of America. The breakup of the British Empire in 1776 by the American colonists was not sudden. The coming together of the 13 colonies to fight for independence against the Crown culminated in a series of events that had started in the previous decade. Various pivotal movements triggered the American Revolution.
The Enlightenment philosophy was an international movement existing between the 17th and 18th century in ideas and sensibilities that emphasized critical reason rather than intellectual dogmatism. Enlightenment developed alongside the growth of scientific thinking and insisted on the importance of natural order and nature as being a source of knowledge. Enlightenment thinkers such as Isaac Newton, John Locke, and Voltaire employed the power of the press to question accepted knowledge and spread new ideas pertaining to investigation, openness, and religious tolerance across Europe and America (Orr, 904). The Enlightenment philosophy challenged traditional religious views. Enlightenment thinkers in Britain, France, and other areas of Europe asked questions about traditional authority ways. They also opined that humanity is enhanced by lucid change. The Enlightenment formed a range of laws, essays, wars, inventions, books, revolutions and scientific discoveries.
After the war with France, an extreme debt needed to be recouped. Parliament approved the Stamp Act Law that introduced tax range in the colonies. Prior to this law, the government in the colonies made decisions pertaining to paying taxes. After the Stamp Act law was passed, parliament attempted to pass another law known as the Townshend Act meant to apply tax on all imported goods from Great Britain (Tomaselli, 111). Americans were unhappy with the tax increase, prompting them to fight back. They started protesting and organizing a tax boycott of British goods. The Boston Massacre of March 1770 followed soon after a disagreement arose between a British soldier and an apprentice wigmaker. There was simmering tensions between Boston residents and British occupiers as a crowd of 200 colonists surrounded seven British troops. In the altercation, the soldiers lost their cool and started firing at the crowd. The Boston Tea Party took place in December 1773 after the British withdrew their forced from Boston and repealed the Townshend legislation. They left the tea tax and enacted a new law known as the Tea Act that would boost the British East India Company, which was struggling financially.
The Effect of the Political And Social Changes from The American Revolution
At one point in time, Native Americans were once skilled in the trade sector. When the English were struggling to grow food, the Native Americans assisted them with food supply. After the Revolution, the Englishmen wanted to make the Native Americans civil by making them adapt their way of life. The English believed that hunting was a not a way of getting food but rather a sport. They taught Native Americans to farm and not hunt. The Native Americans opined that farming was more of a woman’s role, so the English changed their beliefs concerning farming. African Americans were viewed as commodities that could be bought and sold. After the Revolution, slavery died slowly in some sectors and some states abandoned it completely. As slavery died down, this encouraged some sectors to grow grain rather than tobacco, which required much less labor. African Americans could still not vote. Women were viewed differently after the revolution took place. Abigail Adams, the wife of John Adams, a political figure, advocated for women’s rights. She was of the opinion that state governments should represent women. Women were also needed to instil republican values and teach them civic virtues. This was required since the sons were expected to engage in political activities as they grew up. Daughters were taught these virtues to pass on to their children in the future.
Works Cited
Cox, Jessica. “Canonization, Colonization, and the Rise of Neo-Victorianism.” English: Journal of the English Association, vol. 66, no. 253, 2017, pp. 101–23. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1093/english/efw058.
Orr, Ittai. “The Room Where It Happened: Race and the American Revolution.” American Quarterly, vol. 69, no. 4, 2017, pp. 903–15. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2017.0072.
Tomaselli, Sylvana. “The Enlightenment debate on women.” Mary Wollstonecraft. Routledge, 2017. 111-134. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315249575-11/enlightenment-debate-women-sylvana-tomaselli
At the beginning, of the 1940s, the African who had moved and settled in Chicago
Name
Professor
Course
Date
Introduction
At the beginning, of the 1940s, the African who had moved and settled in Chicago formed a unique style of music that gave way to rock and roll. This came to be known as Rockabilly and Psychobilly.
Originators
The migrants started by playing Rhythm and blues, Gospel, and jazz in small groups of approximately four to five people, it comprised of drums, saxophones, bass, and rhythm guitar or a piano. The rise of various musical styles was motivated by the difficulties the African Americans were enduring. In the 1950s, the migrants created an urbanized rhythm and blues. By the 1960s, the African Americans had invented various music styles such as Motown sounds and soul explosion.
Innovators
The restless band is one of the most successful of the rockabilly to date. They have sold thousands of records and gone all over the world singing to the millions of fans world wide. In the year 1998, during their tours the band showed intentions of ending their singing careers. At the time members of the group comprised of Mark Harman who was the vocalist and guitar player, Paul Harman who played double bass, Tyler played the drums. Later some more members joined the group this included, Mark who had stints with the cadets’ band. Others who joined and later left were, Ben cooper, Mick Malone, Steve white house, and Jeff Bayly who joined from the bands Frenzy and sharks respectively. The band was presented with an award in Birmingham right in the middle of their first song on press day. They were shocked as they had no idea of the presentation which was in honor of the sale of 25,000 units of their first album.
Another group that has made an impact is the Krewmen which was initially formed by Tony Macmillan. The band played pure rock at the time. From the year 1982 to 1984 the band played many shows in the UK, the shows were mostly in clubs and pubs. In 1985 the band was selected to play in the Elvis the Musical tour, it held shows in the USA, Canada, and the United Kingdom for nine months. On their return to Canada the band had made a name for them and had received various offers from the United Kingdom, France, and Holland. Just when, the group had received a recording deal, two of the members left the group to go and attend to some other issues.
Tony later brought on board other members such as Fahy playing drums and Leyland Carl Sonny on the vocals and Guitar. With the new members on board the band changed the sounds from pure rock to Blues they later signed a recording deal in 1985.
Even though the band was doing well it had problems, the major one was the attitude of Mark that was really bringing a lot of problems within the band. Every thing went on smoothly for the band for several years, until Dominic and Jason realized they could not handle all the clubs work.
Change of music
The music has not changed much although there is a slight difference in terms of technology and the instruments used. The music influence cannot become less influential as long as a section of the community feels short changed music will still be used to draw inspiration.
Influence of the music
Rock and roll is a style of music that is here to stay; it has withstood the test of time and has undergone numerous transformations, from when it was first invented in the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s to date. To all the pioneers of rock, their legend will live on, and they will never forget. It has inspired several revolutions over the years and will certainly do now and in the future.
Favorite song
The song I love most is Wild bills song unlucky woman. I like the beats especially the sound of the bass guitar and Bills voice. Another thing that led me to love the song was its title. I wanted to know the reason behind the woman in the song being called unlucky, and ended up loving the song.
Negative Effects of Divorce on Children
Negative Effects of Divorce on Children
Name
Institution
Negative Effects of Divorce on Children
Married people legally separate, which is otherwise known as divorce, based on various reasons. Indeed, there is no sure way to identify the most serious reasons behind the divorce, but some cases occur more than others. Infidelity, for instance, is a common cause of divorce in the society. Other reasons as to why people divorce in marriages includes money problems, emotional disconnection between the couples, dishonesty and lack of proper family planning (Solinger, n.d.). As such, many couples have at least a reason as to why they would decide to go on separate ways. Amid all the divorce processes, there are victims who often suffer in silence, the children. Based on the information gathered from my research, I choose to talk about the negative effects of divorce on children. My interest is to determine whether children are affected by divorce or not, regardless of its form, whether on a mutual basis, peacefully or violently between the divorcees.
Mary Ann Lamanna and Agnes Riedmann, in their book Marriages & Families expound on various links that make couples get married. For example, they talk about couples getting into a legally binding relationship for companionship and form a family with children (Lamanna and Riedmann, 2008). Therefore, they either bear children or adopt them to form a family. At first, to me this is a wonderful gesture, but the things that happen once trouble sets in become questionable. Most parents, at this point, focus on relinquishing anger on their ex-spouses, for those who end their marriage in bitterness, and winning as much property as they can from the relationship. Hence, I question, where are the links that had initially brought the couple together to an extent of getting married? There other disturbing issues upon understanding the troubles that divorce ensues are the parents still considerate about their children? As such, children are left to face the aftermath of the separation, which may be favorable or extensively hurting at times. These form the two most probable effects that children face following a divorce. However, I understand that a rare case may happen where the children are not affected by the situation directly. These are cases where the children are either young to comprehend the divorce situation or they ignore the occurrence, which is exceptionally rare (Clarke-Stewart and Brentano, 2007). Such children end up being affected indirectly by the divorce, for example, they may end up living with one of the two parents who is financially incapable of fulfilling their economic needs. Subsequently, they suffer since their needs are not met (Knox and Schacht, 2011). It is clear to me that children are bound to negative effects either directly or indirectly once their parents finalize the divorce process.
I also learnt from literature that a probable effect of divorce on children is happiness. Some marriages have parents who are abusive to the children, or spouses that hurt each other. Thus, this is a hostile environment that children dread living in while their parents are still together. Chances are that the children experience emotional or physical pain inflicted by the parents as they fight (Hansen, 2013). Other parents are careless and do not cater for their children, which often leads to negative impacts on the young ones. Children are often emancipated from such situations once their parents undergo a divorce. For example, if the judge grants the reasonable parent custody of the children, the young ones live in a favorable environment. Moreover, the children’ physical and emotional health is restored once in the hands of a caring and responsible parent. This is an exceptional case, but it is within my knowledge from the sources used that such children will still face negative effects of divorce. For example, a motherly or fatherly figure is an important factor for the children to have in the house. Once they are denied this aspect through the divorce, they most likely miss it. In turn, they turn to strange behavior, for example, they become violent and hostile when around other children (Harvey and Fine, 2010). This begs another vital question as to whether a much-needed divorce in a family ends up inflicting positive effects on children or not?
Sources used also informed me that sometimes spouses divorce on mutual grounds and their marriage problems do not affect their children. Is this entirely correct about the claim concerning the marriage institutions? In such a case, the children face distressing moments because of the effect divorce has on them. Firstly, they face a dilemma in choosing the parent they want to live with after completion of the divorce process (Solinger, n.d.). In cases where the married spouses kept things from their young ones, it is essentially difficult for the children to decide the parent they will follow to their homes. Although, a parent winning custody of the children lifts the deciding burden from the young ones, there are chances that the law will force them to live with the parent they do not want. Consequently, the children suffer because they are forced to live in an uncomfortable environment. Divorce at times exposes children to psychological problems because they are unable to accept the situations surrounding their families (Gibbons, 1986). As such, I have established that divorce, regardless of its reasons or grounds of its occurrence, has profoundly adverse effects on children. This is conclusively determined via the resources used in the above research.
References
Clarke-Stewart, A. & Brentano,C. (2007). Divorce: Causes and consequences. Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Foulkes-Jamison, L. (2013). The effects of divorce on children. Retrieved on 22 Oct. 2013 from http://cpancf.com/articles_files/efffectsdivorceonchildren.asp
Gibbons, J. (1986). Children’s mental health : Problems and services. Washington: DIANE Publishing.
Hansen, L. (2013). “9 Negative effects divorce reportedly has on children”. The Week. Retrieved 23 on Oct. 2013 from http://theweek.com/article/index/242059/9-negative-effects-divorce-reportedly-has-on-children
Harvey, J. & Fine, M. (2010). Children of divorce: Stories of loss and growth. Massachusetts: Routledge.
Knox, D. & Schacht, C. (2011). Choices in relationships: An introduction to marriage and the family. California: Cengage Learning.
Lamanna, M. & Riedmann, A. (2008). Marriages & families: Making choices in a diverse society: Making choices in a diverse society. California: Cengage Learning.
Solinger, J. (n.d.) The negative effects of divorce on children.Retrieved on 23 Oct. 2013 from http://www.public.iastate.edu/~rhetoric/105H16/cova/jlscova.html
