Recent orders

Gun Control Analysis and Discussion

Gun Control: Analysis and Discussion

Introduction

It is difficult to even briefly survey the current media without coming to the clear understanding that gun control and the debate surrounding it has become a fixture of the American experience within the past few months. Although this issue has long existed below the surface, several instances of extreme brutality via the instrument of the gun have spurred lawmakers and the Democratic controlled Senate to attempt to revive the debate and attempt to gain some traction where none has previously been possible. This paper looks at gun analysis and the issues/arguments surrounding the control.

Background

Specifically, the events of the Aurora, Colorado Theater shooting alongside the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre have galvanized public opinion on both sides of the issue. As such, this brief analysis will seek to consider the debate from the perspective of the pro-gun control movement. In such a way, it will be the express goal of this author to relate to the reader some of the most powerful arguments in favor of further gun control and the rationale behind these. As such, it is the author’s hope that the reader will gain a more nuanced and complete understanding of the main arguments for further gun control by an analysis of the following 4 arguments: the Second Amendment does not, nor did it ever, provide for individual gun rights, the high rate of gun related violence and death, as well as the societal needs for reasonable gun control laws, and whether or not further testing should be put in place for those individuals that have a propensity to instability. Finally, an examination of an even more vehement argument with regards to gun control will be entertained and discussed.

Evidence Pro

The first, and perhaps most contentious of the issues that this analysis will seek to discuss, is the issue of whether or not the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution sought to convey individual gun rights to the citizen. Although the law has long been interpreted to mean just this, the fact of the matter is that when one reads the Second Amendment from a literalist perspective, it is quite clear that the Second Amendment is speaking to the needs of the states and individual regions of the newly formed United States to form a militia as a means of protecting the Republic (Kopel 1530). In such a way, the Second Amendment can and should be interpreted as little more than admission from the Federal government that it promises not to infringe upon the rights of the militias (National Guard and Army Reserves) to maintain a stock of weaponry for the purpose of defense and securing the borders of the new nation. This particular argument hinges upon interpretation of the Constitution; one of the most contested documents within the political spectrum (Saenz 1). However, from a rhetorically honest standpoint, the text of the bill specifies specifically what it denotes; i.e. the right of the states and by extension the militias under their control to retain weapons. In short, such argument is valid; however, it cannot be used to effectively engage those members of the pro-gun persuasion due to the fact that they have almost invariably chosen to interpret the document by a wholly different standard (Winkler 12).

The second argument which will be utilized within this brief analysis is the fact the extraordinarily high rate of gun crime and the increasingly gruesome nature that it has taken within the past several years demands stricter gun laws. There have always been cases of extreme violence, even massacres, within American society; however, the fact of the matter is that almost all of these hideous crimes have a single factor in common; the widespread and pervasive use of semi-automatic weapons, readily obtained by individuals who can easily be described as unstable, as well as the implementation and usage of high capacity magazines. Whether or not guns should be allowed is not the central issue that is up for debate; rather, the issue at hand is the ease and availability that is unilaterally shared by almost all of the purveyors of these massacres. As such, a correct level of gun control could at least attempt to lessen the availability of certain aspects of these instruments of destruction. Naturally, the issue that is up for discussion hinges not upon whether these deaths may have occurred regardless; but rather upon the question of to what level the bloodletting would have happened if proper societal and governmental constraints were in place to restrict the availability of certain aspects of weapons, high capacity magazines, and the means by which they could be procured.

Ultimately, the third and final argument which will herein be discussed hinges upon the level of societal need for reasonable gun control laws. When one examines the rate at which laws and governance has grown and evolved since the time of the founding fathers, it is easy to note that key differences in the means by which the citizen integrates with concepts of property taxes, public education, and emergency services (not to mention a whole host of others); the reader can quickly come to the realization that the means by which government interacts with the citizen is undeniably far distant from the means that originally existed. However, with respect to gun laws, hardly anything has changed. Certainly, there have been a few exceptions with regards to the way that the federal government has sought to limit automatic weapons from the markets or the existence of sawn off shotguns. However, speaking broadly, there has been little change to the way in which the government has sought to regulate the use and procurement of weapons among its citizens in the past 280 plus years. This naturally represents a definite shortcoming. As such, the reader should consider the fact that at the time the Second Amendment was written, pistols were invariably non rifled and used a lead ball that had an accuracy of no more than 25 yards. Alternatively, the long guns or rifles of that era were also single shot; requiring priming of approximately 30 seconds prior to even the fastest shooter being able to reload. When one considers these facts, it becomes nothing short of shocking that the government has not sought further regulation of the different types of advanced weaponry that is now available to the general public.

Argument Con

The final argument is considered a hotly contested topic. This relates to the type of individuals that invariably commit the horrific crimes that have been used as a poster child for this particular case study. Invariably, these individuals have psychological issues that spur them to create horrific acts of violence on large groups of oftentimes unrelated individuals (Spitzer 220). However, regardless of the fact that this continues to repeat itself over and over again, little if any focus has been placed upon this by either the government or the medical community.

Ultimately, it has been tacitly decided that seeking to curb any gun rights is an issue of such dire consequence that the entire situation should best be left alone entirely (Brownholz 1). However, due to the recent situations that have prompted this response, it should be painfully obvious to the reader that ignorance of the situation or of the precipitating factors can no longer be feigned (Mekhalko 300). Rather, one of the primary needs and motivations for a further level of gun control within the current system is the need to ensure that weapons stay out of the hands of individuals that are at an increased likelihood of performing such a horror in the first place. While the right to carry guns is within the constitutional rights, new laws and bills are still being established about gun control in terms of who has to carry and who should not (Lott, pg.20).

Refutation of Arguments

Up until this point, the arguments that have been used have been concentric upon limiting access, and increasing laws regulating gun usage. According to Lott (pg.10), many studies have considered the importance of owning a gun with respect to crime limitation. However, there are many within the anti-gun camp that insists that the only way to reduce gun related crime entirely is to outright ban guns (Olsen 1). Although it is not the point of this analysis to put forward such a claim, this author will briefly discuss this claim and seek to bring it in line with the intent of those that put it forward. Firstly, when one considers the massacres that have occurred within recent memory, as well as the many instances of crime that occur, many of the weapons used are not legally obtained (Owens 1). Rather, they are stolen from friends or relatives and used in the commission of these crimes. In such a way, merely seeking to reduce the number of guns in society or implement a further layer of gun regulation will not result in a drastic decrease in gun crime; according to individuals that espouse such a view. As such, this particular thought process demands that the only reasonable means by which gun crime and the massacres that exhibit themselves on an increasingly more common scale, is to outlaw guns entirely. To the benefit of such an approach, it is one of the only approaches that would most certainly have a direct and noticeable impact upon the commission and rate of gun crime. However, with regards to the most salient drawback that such an approach exhibits, one must consider the strain on the prison system that such a plan of action would take. Moreover, along the same lines of those that support guns, this particular point of view falls prey to the age old logic of “if all guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns”. Though it is not the belief of this author that such an understanding is entirely true, it is quite probable that to a certain extent, it is partially true.

Conclusion

From the preceding analysis, the full depth and complexity of the gun control debate can be briefly seen. Regardless of the political beliefs of the individual, the fact of the matter is that the current prevalence of gun crime as well as the technologically advanced mechanics of the weaponry involved make the issue one that must be integrated with. The stage is ultimate set, the issue perfectly well understood, the ultimate question is therefore of what to do and how to do it in a way that will contribute to the greatest degree of civil liberties and personal rights while at the same time safeguarding the lives of the many innocent citizens that are put at risk as a result of gun ownership. Whereas completely outlawing guns will likely cause a great deal of political upheaval as well as other societal pressures, the shareholders within the political system as well as those within society must consider whether or not the momentary pressures that restrictions might impose upon society will ultimately be worth the benefit that can be gained over time.

Works Cited

Brownholz, Tara. “Scarborough: Republicans that filibuster gun control ‘put rapists’ rights over parents’ rights’ [VIDEO].” The Daily Caller. N.p., n.d. Web. 8 Apr. 2013.

Mehalko, Laura. “This Is Gun Country: The International Implications Of U.S. Gun Control Policy.” Boston College International & Comparative Law Review 35.1 (2012): 297-330. Academic Search Complete. Web. 4 Apr. 2013.

Olson, Alexander. “Gun Control Advocates Showing How Much They Like Guns.” The Huffington Post. N.p., 8 Apr. 2013. Web. 8 Apr. 2013.

Owens. “Newtown families voice support for gun control.” CBS News. CBS News, 7 Apr. 2013. Web. 8 Apr. 2013.

Kopel, David B. “The Great Gun Control War Of The Twentieth Century-And Its Lessons For Gun Laws Today.” Fordham Urban Law Journal 39.5 (2012): 1527-1616. Academic Search Complete. Web. 4 Apr. 2013.

Lott, John R. More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control . Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013. E-book Source.

Saenz, Arlette. “Gun Control Fight in Focus for President Obama.” ABC News. ABC News, n.d. Web. 8 Apr. 2013.

Spitzer, Robert J. The politics of gun control. Washington, D.C: CQ Press, 2008. Print.

Winkler, Adam. Gunfight : the battle over the right to bear arms in America. New York: W.W. Norton & Co, 2013. Print.

Music recording session planning

Music recording session planning

Name

Institution

Course

Date

How you planned the session

The initial steps commences with pre-recording preparation. The first step was ensuring that all items and instruments sounded good. This entailed turning of guitar, not only to recommended pitch, but also other instruments that were to be used in the recording. The other instruments that were tuned included basses, pianos. The checking also went on to list other tips for instance testing and replacing microphone heads, warming up the singer, checking amps for hum and buzz. The additional preparations included

Having the computer on and software to be used in recording ready

Setting up the mic stands and putting mics already and all power and sound cables properly plugged in.

The preparation also making sure the recording materials and software is site up to record the music kind needed.

The recording process entails

Basic tracks. The is the first step in recoding process whereby the chord instrument and rhythm are recorded. A great amount of time was spent setting up, optimizing quality of the sound of every instrument, adjusting microphones, replacing mike and preamps and other similar replacements. The final step in this stage was getting performance down to satisfy the artists.

Overdubs. This involved adding music components to basic tracks and this included harmony vocals, strings and percussion.

Mix down. After recording all parts, the mix down process blends each sound with others, messaging the sound into a compound stereo image.

Mastering. This is the final preparation for duplication. This stage entails putting the songs in the right timing and sequence, balancing the songs’ overall volumes, tones and dynamics so they flow from one song to another. The stage also involves putting the last “polish and spit” on the master. This is the final stage and can make a difference between high and low quality song product.

Pre-Production

For making this live recording, all rehearsals were made. The song was planned before stepping into the studio. Since the song recording was to be done by one person, there was no point of checking if the chorus were ready. Before the recording session, there was need setup tempos for the song to be recorded and getting accustom with playing. Different things were to be kept in mind for instance tracking session, as we wanted the song to have a touching feeling or groove. Some music sequencers do quantize all notes and taking away much of human feeling. Quantization literally means fixing the time of rhythms to the closest note. The sequences are normally adjustable for instance eighth or sixteenth note and the likes. This does not indicate that the song ought to be loose rather they ought to be tight and rhythmical and should maintain a given pattern and feel. This meant either loosening up on the quantize setting, or trying to play minus quantizing the song at all.

Some sequencers allow one to set the song to have human feelings without its quantization. They mostly assist add some life back to the song. The importance of using the sequencer is because it allowed the recorded to change the sound setting anytime. This gave the recorder the freedom to alter the sound of the drum and ability to switch it at virtual any time. It also enable switching sound from module and bringing in samples of something that sounded pleasing. This was useful in setting the designed feeling and tone based on the singer’s voice and designed tone.

The other point that was stressed is the significance of live instrument in a tracking which has been sequenced. Minute details for example crashes, and tom fills as well as percussion parts could cause a great difference in the final song feeling and tone. The parts could take what the music listener would brand a sound generated through computer and transforming it to be an actual performance. The other point that was considered is laying live bass and guitars to assist in sound control.

Setting microphones, mic and placements

Setting Guitars

This entailed adjusting and replacing strings and adjusting the sound before the actual recording sessions. This entailed working on vintage amp, stomp boxes prior to the actual recording session. Some experiments were carried out on the sound quality and type produced by the guitar in conjunction with singer’s voice. This helped in keeping the sound glued together. The turning of the guitar helped improving the performance and sound quality.

Setting keys

These were the easiest to set prior to the recording session. The keyboards were turned on based on the singer’s voice. Since there was an arsenal of modules, a mixer was used for feeding the engineer a stereo output. This was to ensure we had the intended sound, also in relieving the responsibility of communicating the sound verbally to the recorder. This saved time in the end. The challenge came when trying to produce the best possible product out of the singer. There was a great need in timing and sequencing everything to ensure the rhythm and flow. This does not indicate we had strict timing but big fluctuations were minimized. Once we had considered studio was set, we needed to think about what equipment we would use during the session and we started with microphones.

Microphone basic

In choosing a microphone, we considered its polar pickup patterns, frequency response whether it had a pad or roll off, its mic type and whether it needed phantom power. Some microphones were better suited, or at least more commonly used in the studio, for certain applications. Knowing this information helped in selecting the most appropriate one. It also ultimately assisted in recording better sounds. Microphone polar patterns range from Omni-directional to super-cardioids. The patterns indicate from what direction the mic receives audio signals.

An Omni-directional mic receives audio signals from all directions, whereas cardioids microphones receive the majority of their signal from one direction only. Bi-directional mics pick up audio signal from the front and back of the mic while rejecting sounds from the side. In addition, if you look at the specifications of any mic you own you will notice that the polar pattern is slightly altered at different frequencies. For example, all mics, even Omni-directional mics, tend to become more directional when picking up high frequencies.

Your role in the recording team

The Producer

The producer has the final responsibility for the recording and the production. It is the role of the producer to ensure the recording process is perfect and this entails creating direction and business features. A good producer ensure the song and production qualities are enhanced. The other role of the producer is to evaluate the progressing performance of record when referring to the way they fit together in creating the best, high standards product.

Engineer’s roles

During production, an engineer’s responsibilities are about preparation and this include setup, equipment setup, and track assignments. Studio setup involves decisions about where instruments will be placed and where the players will be situated in the recording space. Equipment setup includes choosing microphones, amps, headphones, and effects, and checking that the equipments is in good working order. Track assignments refers to determining how many tracks one is going to record and how one wants then recorded. The number of tracks may be limited by the number of mics one has, the number of physical inputs, or the number of tracks one can use.

In the recording studio, the producer normally have at least one engineer, and possibly multiple assistant engineers, working during the session. The communication between the engineer and producer is extremely important for a successful session. The producer needs to be clear with his ideas and requests. This means being explicit and confident about what one needs, including the type of sound one wants on a track, how much pre-roll to give the artists, and where to punch in and out of tracks. Normally, it is also good to keep the mood tight by joking around with the engineer.

The communication is a two-way tracking. It is good for artists to be confident, check his or her ego at the door. Good engineers are normally a great source of information on recording techniques, the latest sounds, and new styles. The task of the recording engineer is to operate the equipment that captures and, in some instances, creates the sounds that the artist and producer want on the recording. To that end the recording enegineer is more of a technician that an engineer on the sense that the term is used in other professions. In addition to a thorough understanding of the specific equipment that they operate, most engineers find useful a basic level of knowledge in the areas of electronics, acoustics and sound, and music. Recoding engineers must also possess the ability to work with and get along with people, some of whom will have quite capable of discerning often subtle difference in sounds and an understanding of how those differences will contribute to or detract from the overall sound which the artists producer are trying to create. Engineers must also be capable of making creative decisions. The producer or artist may not be a every recording session for a particular project. The engineer may then have to decide what is the best sound for the purpose. Even when the producer or artist is present, they will often ask the engineer what they thing about a particular track or sound. Sometimes they want real advice, sometimes they only want their egos stroked. For all of those reasons, being an audio engineer is one of the more common paths to becoming a producer.

The role of an engineer can best be described as an interpreter in a techno-artist field. The engineer must be able to express the artist’s music and the producer’s concepts and intent through the medium of recording technology. The work of engineer can be best described as a techno-art form, because both music and recording are totally subjective and artists in nature and rely on the tastes, experience and feelings of those involved. In summary, a recording session, one or more engineers can be used on a project to:

Conceptualize the best technological approach for capturing a performance or music experience

Translate the needs and desires of the artists and producer into technological approach to capturing the music

Document the process for other engineers or future production use

Place the artists in the desired studio positions

Choose and place the microphones or pickup connections

Set levels and balance on the recording console or DAW mixing interface

Capture the performance in the best way possible

Overdub additional musical parts into the session that might be needed at a later time

Mix the project into a final master recording in any number of media formats

Help in meeting the needs for archiving and storing the project

In short, engineers use their talent and artful knowledge of recording media technology to convey the best possible finished sound for the intended media, the client and the buying public. Among the qualities and strengths needed for a recording engineer include strong technical skills, good communicator, patience, ability to work well with a variety of people, excellent troubleshooting skills and an outgoing personality.

In the recording engineer’s work is to operate the sound board and all the other electrical equipments necessary when making a recording. Prior to a recording session, one of the engineers prepares the studio before the act arrives. As according time is booked by the hour, no one wants to waste time waiting for the instruments to be set up or mikes to be placed, turned on, and checked. The recording engineer must discuss with the act and or his or her producer how they want the end result to b. it then becomes the engineer’s responsibility to make the record into the sound image the act wants. The record engineer the music.

Studio setup

The first step when preparing for the recording session as to plan how I would use the studio space. Some of the questions that helped in setting the scene included asking what instrumentation of the session is, whether we needed sound preparation, isolation, or buffing of some sort. This helped in setting sketching diagrams of possible setups to help us visualize.

Sound preparation

In multi-track recording, we usually try to isolate sounds as best we can to have more control over the mix. That is, if the guitar is isolated from the drums, we can put effects on the guitar track without changing the drum sound. But if there’s a lot of leakage from the drums into the guitar track, then whatever effect we put on the guitar will show up to some degree on the drums. The first technique was microphone placement aiming mics at only one source. The second technique was physical separation of the instruments from each other, which provided greater isolation for their tracks. In our recording as presented din the figure below where we placed guitar amp in the closets. This physically separated the loud amp so its mics picked up far less of the other instruments, and vice versa.

Figur1: this is shows how the recording room was set with the guitar placed closest to the amp, the standup in the hallway, the drum in one corner, and the keys/vocals in the adjacent corner. This setup facilitated enough sound separation to record treat tracks.

While performing signal processing, the engineer focused on the component parts of the sound qualities of the sound sources. Small, precise changes in sound quality are possible with signal processing, requiring the recorder to listen at the lowest levels or perspective, and to continually shift focus between the various artistic elements being altered. These changes are often subtle, and can be barely noticeable to untrained listeners. In the beginning we were not able to detect low levels of processing. This is a skill that had to be developed.

The signal processing involved critical listening. The sound source is considered for its timbral qualities out of context and as a separate entity. In this way, we could shape the sound to the precise sound qualities desired by the recorder, without the distractions of context.

References

Franz, D., 2004. Recording and Producing in the Home Studio: A Complete Guide. Publisher Berklee Press.

Music is a piece of art that is so important when it comes to the dissemination of message and entertainment

Introduction

Music is a piece of art that is so important when it comes to the dissemination of message and entertainment. Music as any other social phenomena has gone through transformation making it so dynamic in the world today. The following discussion will focus on the differences between the two eras of music which are the classical and the romantic.

Discussion

The classical era emerged in about 1750 to 1825. The main inherent characteristics of this piece of art were order, balance and control. There was no flexibility or the freedom provided to the artist to write a piece of art as they wished. They had to stick to the regulations of music of that time (Stephen 2004).

Classical music was more concerned on the objective phenomena than the subjective. This explains the reason why the music focused more on the things that could be observed in the nature which were also tangible. The subjective feelings which include the emotions were less used or ignored all together.

Classical music is said to focus more on the rational matters. Reasoning was therefore required when one was writing any piece of music. Matters of imagination which could not be substantiated by facts were ignored. There was no fantasizing about what the musician was trying to pass across to the audience. Passion was therefore less preferred as matters of reasoning always dominated the whole era of classical music.

On the other hand, the romantic music emerged at around 1825 to around 1900. the main dominant characteristics were freedom, movement and passion (Carlo 2000). Musicians were seeking for freedom from the traditional way of singing and writing and wanted to acquire freedom. Therefore, the rise of the romantic era was meant to abandon the traditional classics and have a whole turn to the more fanciful and passionate ways of passing a piece of art to the audience. This was also affected by the fact that the society was advancing in terms of technologies and also in their tastes and preferences. They wanted to see a change.

Contrary to the classical music, the romantic music was able to explore deep human feelings and externalize them in their music (Jim. 2001). This means that music was now transforming from being more objective to subjective. They would address the internal conflicts that people went through and this was important because people would identify with them.

Romantic music was written for the purpose of describing a person or a particular object. For instance, the musician could decide to describe a certain man and bring out all the qualities that are in him. This helps the audience to form a mental picture of what they are saying. On the other hand, the classical piece of music was only written for the purpose of musical value and many people could not identify with it.

Through the industrial revolution, the romantic music was able to grow owing to the increased size of the orchestra. This is because of the production of more effective musical instrument which also came in variety. This saw the shift from the traditional musical instruments that were mostly used in the production of the classical music.

Conclusion

The classical music had strict rules that had to be followed and this locked out many potential musicians. The rise of the romantic music gave freedom to the artists to shape their pieces of art as they wished.

Reference:

Cavalletti, Carlo. (2000). Chopin and Romantic Music, translated by Anna Maria Salmeri Pherson. Hauppauge, NY: Barron’s Educational Series. (Hardcover) ISBN 0764151363 ISBN 978-0764151361

Samson, Jim. (2001). “Romanticism”. The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, second edition, edited by Stanley Sadie and John Tyrrell. London: Macmillan Publishers.

Lihoreau, Tim; Fry, Stephen (2004) Stephen Fry’s Incomplete and Utter History of Classical Music Boxtree. ISBN 978-0752225340

Kamien, Roger (2008). Music: An Appreciation. 6th. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Print.