Recent orders
Title IX
Title IX
Do you think the effects of Title IX on sport have completely eliminated the disparity in self-confidence sometimes exhibited by men and women? Explain and defend your answer
Title IX was passed in the year 1972 and refers to the federal act that allows the non-discriminatory cases in the federal funded education programs. The program enhances the involvement of opportunities for the women in sports. Despite the efforts of the program, I don’t think that Title IX has completely eliminated the disparity in self-confidence sometimes exhibited by men and women in that despite having achieved a non-discriminatory participation among males and females in federally funded programs, it has not attracted as many girls to play in the tournaments but on the contrary has reduced the number of men participating in these games.
Women have received more attention as they have a long history of gender restrictions not only in sports but also in education. However, we can say that the program has tried to boost confidence, especially in women as it helped in stopping and reducing educational stereotypes that previously faced women reducing their confidence both in class and sporting activities. About 3 million teen girls are playing high school are in sports thanks to the Title IX, and this simply means that many of the girls have gained more self-confidence, becoming more outgoing as they are provided with equal chances to men. The full potential is yet to be realized, and thus, in my case, the complete confidence has not yet been achieved.
The evil in money
The evil in money
Money is one of the greatest economic artifacts in the contemporary society since it eases the payment of goods. In a traditional economic context, money is essential for paying for goods and services and repayment of debts. Economics, as a discipline, has identified three core functions of money as a store of value, a unit of account, and a medium of exchange. Money, however, raises serious discussions because it considerably affects the social lives of human beings. Money intrudes into normal livelihoods of people thereby influencing notable problems. The love of money causes notable evils in social settings.
Money is a detrimental to the survival of religions in the world. It is essential to highlight that religions have greatly contributed to the welfare of human beings. This is because religious entities induce discipline in social settings. Religion thrives on the behaviorist thought system whereby commendable behavior attains rewards while punishment tames antisocial behavior. Religion also helps in instilling morals such as love. Money, however, induces partial attention to religious matters as individuals become more concerned with material welfare. Spirituality occupies a vital place in human history since it influences people in perceiving themselves beyond superficiality (Bailey & Law, 2006).
Money creates inequality in the lives of people. Unlike the barter system, where individuals led simplistic lives, money complicates social relations, as it becomes wealth, in itself. In the barter exchange system, individuals could only exchange given goods for other goods. This suggests that an individual only exchanges one’s property when one needs particular commodities. Needs formed the primary purpose for economic exchange. On the other hand, the introduction of money means that individuals can purchase commodities that they do not need. In the end, the individual who possess more materials moves into a higher social class. This divides people into differentiated classes thereby inviting animosity from the less privileged members of the society.
Money destroys the harmony and health of family lives. Money is a deep manifestation of a material society that emphasizes on wealth accumulation rather than fulfillment of basic human emotional needs such as love (Bierlich, 2007). There is significant evidence that money is a major factor causing strains in families. In the current society, most parents spend considerable time looking for money. This suggests that children are increasingly spending limited time with their parents. In turn, children develop psychological problems such as attention disorders. Children who possess emotions of neglect do not afford quality relationships with others in their adulthood years. In addition, in cases of financial crisis in households, arguments between parents normally increase. This strains family relations as partners judge each other based on income that one earns.
Money is the root of notable evils in the world. Money significantly destroys the survival of religions in the world. This is because individuals accord partial attention to religious matters. Inadequate presence of religion in the society denotes poor morals and limited focus on non-material concerns of life. Money induces inequality in the liveS of people. In as much as money should essentially serve as medium of exchange, it also serves as a store of value. Money is a manifestation of a materialistic culture whereby people move into higher social classes through its accumulation. Individuals who are less privileged may, therefore, develop feelings of inferiority. Money also destroys the harmony of family lives. This is because parents devote limited attention to the nurturing of children when they spend considerable time looking for money.
References
Bailey, G., & Law, F. (2006). What’s it all worth?: the value of money. New York, NY: Capstone.
Bierlich, B. (2007). The problem of money: African agency and Western medicine in northern Ghana. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
Prices of highly advertised brands
Research
Name
Institution
Research
Prices of highly advertised brands
The frequently advertised commodities had become popular which made them leading brands and thus more expensive than other brands. Also, advertising expenses are normally exorbitant and thus the products must be sold at a higher price to reduce the effects of advertising expenses on the profit margins.
Price floor
Price floors are created when commodity prices are artificial maintained above the market equilibrium prices and are prevent from falling (Baumol & Blinder, 2010). Examples of price floors are numerous in agriculture. With the development of new technologies and farming method, agricultural production has always been on the increase. Increase in commodities consequently encouraged drop in the prices of the commodities and as a result farmer could not even raise their initial invest. To protect farmers and discourage them from stopping production of food, the government set price floor to ensure that farmers can still sell their products at profitable margins.
Price Ceiling
As Mankiw (2011) notes, a price ceiling is created when prices are artificially maintained under the equilibrium price and prevented from rising. Examples of price ceilings occur in many cities through legal rent control mechanisms. This involves the government of the local authorities stipulating the maximum amount of money that can be charged by as rent. Although the amount may be allowed to rise yearly due to inflation, the maximum payable rent remains below the market equilibrium value.
Impacts of a price floor
Price floor leads to a surplus of commodities, for instance, in agriculture; it leads to a surplus of agricultural products in the market. The government and producers have to find a way of storing their surplus products (Baumol & Blinder, 2010).
Impacts of a price ceiling
Price ceilings lead to shortages in commodity supply, since very few landlords will be willing to provide facilities at a price lower than the equilibrium rent. The shortages lead to rationing challenging, since, somehow, some buyer will have to get the commodities while some will miss out. The most common method of allocation of the limited facilities/commodities is first come, first served. There will be hundreds of tenant vying for a single apartment. Landlords/sellers may choose specific tenants/buyers (Mankiw, 2011).
Price ceiling benefit buyers at the expense of sellers. Sellers shy from selling their product at lower prices and encourage black and grey markets.
Price floor achievement of its objectives
Price floor serve to encourage continued production of commodities by protecting producers such as farmers from low prices that would lead to losses. Such losses would discourage the farmer from farming (Baumol & Blinder, 2010). However, since the assurance of a stable price encourages continued production; price floors in agriculture normally achieve their objectives.
Price Ceiling Achievement of its objective
Price ceiling help prevent consumers from exploitation by producers or suppliers. However, the shortages caused by this legal approach normally undermine the achievement realized through stable prices (Mankiw, 2011).
Reference
Baumol, W. J., & Blinder, A. S. (2010). Macroeconomics: Principles and Policy. New York: Cengage Learning.
Mankiw, N. G. (2011). Principles of Macroeconomics. New York: Cengage Learning.