Recent orders

Presidential Deba, Obama Vs. Romney

Presidential Deba, Obama Vs. Romney

Barack obama made history four years ago to become the first African-American president and the 44th president of the United States. He was born on august 14, 1961 in Hawaii, to a Kenyan father and a white American mother from the state of Kansas. Mr. Obama joined politics in the year 1996 and won a seat in Illinois state senate. In 2008 he tremendously won the November 2008 to become the 44th of the United States. On the other hand, Mitt Romney is a renowned former Massachusetts governor who delivers a powerful insight on the present and future challenges facing the U.S economy. He is also known for his leadership and achievements as a public servant and in private businesses. He has greater achievements especially between the year 1978 to 1984 when he was the vice president of Bain and companies. Unlike Obama, Romney was first elected as the governor of Massachusetts in 2002 where he also brought quite encouraging developments like sustainable economic growth.

The anticipated presidential debates between President Barack Obama, and the former Massachusetts governor come businessman, Mitt Romney attracted millions of viewers across the U.S.A. The first televised debate was held at the University of Denver in Denvier, Colorado, and was moderated by Jim Lehrer. While the second debate held at Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York, and it was moderated by Candy Crowley, a CNN chief political correspondent. Unlike in the first debate, in the second debate, the audience was allowed to occupy the stage forming a circular pattern in the middle. In both debates, the president was accompanied by his wife, Michelle Robinson, and his two daughters, Sasha and Malia. And on the other hand, Romney was accompanied by his wife, Ann Davies, and some of his children and grandchildren.

Both scenes were well decorated, and the red carpets made the venues look awesome. Also, in both debates, the candidates were in elegant black suit, with a white fitting shirt, each. The only difference was their tie; in the first debate, Obama had a plain blue tie, while Romney had a red stripped tie. While in the second debate, obama had a maroon tie while Romney had a blue tie with white strips. They warmly received each other with a hug, in the first debate. However, in the second debate, only simple perfunctory handshakes were observed and the big smiles that were evident on their faces throughout the first debate were nowhere to be seen in the second debate. There were steady eye contacts in the first debate between the rivals than the second debate. They faced each other like a lion ready to pounce on its prey. In the second debate more eye contacts were between the candidates and the audience.

In the first debate, the president used his opening chance to wish his beloved wife, who was seated in the audience section, a wonderful 20th wedding anniversary. This seemed to irritate Romney who jabbed at the president: “Congratulations Mr. President on your anniversary. Am sure this was the most romantic place you can imagine, here with me. ” This sent the audience in to a laugh and nearly turning the event into a comic show. On the other hand, Romney took this chance to give accounts on how unemployment is making the Americans to suffer; he gave a scenario where a woman once grabbed his arm, cried for not having a job since May.

Unlike in the first debate, Romney was the first to address the audience by answering a question from one of the audience, and then the president came second. The meeting took the form of a town meeting, where audience posted questions to the candidates about foreign and domestic issues. Obama answered the

In the first debate, the focus was on the domestic policy from which the issue of economy took the center stage, especially, the issue of worsening unemployment. The two rivals differed over taxes, mechanisms needed to regulate unemployment and deficits in the ailing economy with each candidate striving to portray himself as a champion of the middle class. While in the second debate, the candidates were answering question from the panel 82 audience who were uncommitted voters. The body language and gesturing of hands was a clear indication how aggressive the rivals were to each other. The two economic pillars, employment and taxes, are the campaigning weapons for Romney to punch blows in to the face of Obama in the race to white house. This was evident throughout the first debate as Romney centered his arguments on the economy claiming that Obama had totally failed the U.S economy.

In the second debate, president Obama was seeking to recover from the previous defeat by Romney. He accused Romney of trying to mislead voters with his “sketch deals” which cannot give a clear economic policy. He also criticized Romney for the statement he made during a meeting “behind closed doors” that 47% of Americans depend on government and they have failed to take responsibility for their lives. Mr. Romney, on the other hand accused Mr. Obama of falsely claiming in his answer to have termed the incident that occurred in Benghazi, Libya as an “act of terror” during his remarks at the white house the following day. Unlike the first debate, the candidates moved freely leaving their stools while addressing the audience.

In the first debate, Mr. Romney at one point appeared to lecture the president when, President Obama accused him of intending to cut education funds. He said, “Mr. President, you’re entitled to your own airplane and your own house, but not your own facts.” This was not the case in the second debate; the president threw continuous blows on Mr. Romney from his first answer.

In both debates, Mr. Romney said his intentions are to stabilise the American economy, eliminate Obama’s health care plan, lower deficits, readopt Medicare, and forward a substitute for legislation amendments to avoid another financial tragedy like the one that is currently looming in the U.S economy. However, he provided no details on how he will achieve these proposals even after Obama’s jabbing.

Rhetorically, Obama asked during the first debate: “At some point the American people have to ask themselves: Is the reason Governor Romney is keeping all these plans secret, is it because they’re going to be too good?, because middle class families benefit too much? No.”

Oh! I think this was a good question. If you carefully examine the question, you will spend the whole day before you come up with the correct answer, but anyway, its politics.

Ask Lehrer, it was a hectic moment for him to enforce the set fifteen minute segments covering the health care, economy, among other topics as the two rivals extended their time limit throughout the debate. His authority was not felt at all, and even Romney went further to declare to Lehrer that if he becomes the president, he will stop the subsidization of the PBS. There was sanity in the second debate; hence, Crowley had easier time in moderating the candidates.

After the first debate, a lot of questions lingered in the minds Americans about the accuracy of the speeches made by the two contestants. President obama’s campaign team, on the other had vowed to attack Romney’s side especially after Mr. Romney gave statements which were mere editorial to support his policies. These claims have been proved in the second debate, when Mr. Obama came out strongly swinging, and stricking immediately at Romney’s opposition in tackling of issues such as the automobile industry.

In the first debate, Romney won decisively which saw his popularity increase in polls. He made the President restless and gave him a rough time in defending his policies. Unfortunately, some analysts’ claim that what Romney said were only but a mere bunch of lies, contradicting his initial positions. And what Obama did was to watch him get away with contradictions and lies throughout the night. In the second debate, the president came out strongly to claim a clear win over Romney with opinion polls giving a 46% and 37% score to the president and Mr. Romney respectively.

In summary, people across the world are waiting for the November election, to see who will the next president. Will the current president be re-elected? This is the big question to many.

The essay critically evaluates the website (httpghr.nlm.nih.gov) in terms of authority, sponsor bias, currency credibility, v

EVALUATION

NAME

PROFESSOR

INSTITUION

COURSE

DATE

The essay critically evaluates the website (http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov) in terms of authority, sponsor bias, currency credibility, validity and documentation. The authority of a document in the website entails outlining the publisher of the document and whether it is a separate entity from the webmaster of the domain. It also checks on the domain of the content and the institution responsible for the publication of the document. The publisher’s qualifications are also enlisted in the not leaving behind the credentials for the authors and the place of publication of the document. The website is a service of the U.S National Library of Medicine. This indicates the institution of publication of the website. It is a separate entity from the webmaster of the domain since links to websites outside the Federal Government don’t constitute an endorsement. The domain of the website is preferred since it is abbreviated (.gov). The website is a property of the U.S National Library of Medicine, 8060 Rockville Pike, Bethsaida, MD 20894

In terms of sponsor of a web document, it should clearly indicate the person who wrote the page and the means possible of contacting the author. One should be able to know the distinction between the author and the webmaster. It also enlists the sole aim of publishing the document and the reasons why it was produced. It also checks on the academic qualifications of the writer. The website provides a link through which one can contact the National Library of Medicine. The author of the document is the National Institutes of Health. Am email address (custerv@nlm.nih.gov) is also provided in case one needs to gather more information about the website. This government owned website containing health information sources. It also provides phone numbers on how to reach the National Institutes of Health both for local and international calls.

Biasness of a web document entails checking on whether the page is used for making advertisements of other things apart from the one it is meant for. In case of other advertisements on the page, then it is a mask for advertisements. The website doesn’t have any advertisements concerning different information apart from the Genetic Home Reference. It only provides information concerning the understanding of genetic conditions.

Currency of a web document entails checking on when the site was produced. The updates are also enlisted and determination of how up-to –date are the links to that website. The dead links to that website are outlined and checks on whether the links are current and updated regularly. Expiry of the information on the web page is also considered. The website was first published on 1st January 1997. This indicates the date of publication of the document. It was last reviewed on 30th November 2012. This shows that the website has currently been reviewed thus the information is no expired. The webpage was last updated on 30th November 2012. This shows that the webpage is regularly updated. The webpage has no dead links. This also ensures credibility and validity of a document. The information is valid and credible since it is up to date.

Documentation of a web document checks on whether the links are well evaluated and whether the complement the themes of the document. It checks on whether the webpage is comprised of only images or a combination of both text and image. In case the page requires a type of special software application to enable access of the information, to what extent can one not be able to view the information and whether the information is offered at free of charge or at a fee. Checks on whether the webpage provides a browser to help enhance better view of the document are also done. The web page has some few images thus a combination of images and texts. The links to websites outside the Federal Government do not constitute an endorsement as per the web page. The page provides links on how to gather more information on chromosomes, genes, and other genetic conditions. A glossary and handbook is also provided to help acquire more information about genetic disorders. PDF resources are required for the PDF reader.

REFERENCE

Kapoun, J. (1998) “Teaching undergrads WEB evaluation: A guide for library instruction.” C&RL News

The Equal Employment Opportunity Act

The Equal Employment Opportunity Act

Name:

Institution:

Course:

Instructor:

Date:

The Equal Employment Opportunity Act

The equal employment opportunity act as a law has protected the rights of numerous employees in the American job market. These laws were enacted by the commission in charge of the equal employment opportunity in the United States. This commission is in charge of ensuring that every individual is entitled to an equal employment opportunity when the right time comes (GSA, 2012). Every year the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) files more than two hundred work related discrimination

In 1975, the Age Discrimination Act was enacted. This law prohibits workplace discrimination in terms of age in accordance with the programs received federal financial assistance (Burstein, 1994). This law stipulates that individuals who have attained the age of forty and above should not be excluded from employment privileges, they have equal rights of being hired based on merit like the other company employees (Burstein, 1994), age should not be a reason for firing them and in their work places, and they have a right to be promoted. The civil right centre is in charge of ensuring the discrimination act is followed to the latter.

Title I and Title V was amended in 1990 under the American with disabilities act to protect individuals from discrimination. In the past, disabled individuals had a really hard time looking for employment because the employers employed people in terms of their physique. When the disabilities act was implemented, it ensured disabled individuals were accorded with the stipulated employment conditions based on their merits, they were entitled to promotion, hiring, training workshops in the work place and other employment benefits available. These acts also prevent employers from judging their employees because of their mental of physical disability but treat them equally and judge them according to their performance. An example of the American with disabilities act was between the Waffle House Incorporation versus the EEOC filing for Eric Baker (US Supreme Court Centre, 2002). This case was filed after Eric baker was fired by the employer, Waffle House because he suffered a seizure while at work. He filed a timely discrimination charge whereby his rights under the Title I disabilities act were violated. The EEOC claimed Eric’s employer was discriminative towards their employers and the basis of firing him was intentional and malicious. The complaint was requesting for compensation and punitive measure to be carried out to the company (US Supreme Court Centre, 2002). According to the judge, both the complaint and the company ought to come to an arbitrary agreement. The verdict stated that (US Supreme Court Centre, 2002). The Waffle House Company ended up incurring a lot of unnecessary costs because of their mistake and they had to compensate the disabled employee Eric Baker and then employ him again in one of their company outlet.

In the past, a lot of people especially the women suffered a lot and became disadvantaged against in the employment industry. In terms of payment, they obtained minimal wages irrespective of the quality of work done. The Title VII was amended in 1963 under the Civil Rights Act to make sure there is equality in the form of payment between men and women in the work place. This law stipulates that women should be given opportunities especially managerial opportunities at work based on their academic qualifications, it also prohibits female discrimination during hiring and promotion too.

In the past, employment discrimination affected numerous individuals among the affected were the minority in the society, those who do not belong to the same ethnic community. Genetics was one aspect that had a lot of discrimination among the employers. Because of this, the Title II was amended in 2008 under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act to protect individuals under such areas. The act prohibits employers from showing favoritism to individuals who are related in one way or the other be it in terms of genes or any other ethnic aspect. It encourages equality based on genetic information during hiring, job workshops, promotion and other employment related issues (Connolly & Connolly, 1979). This law prohibits employers from getting their employees’ genetic details and disclosure of genetic information at the workplace. The genetic information includes the individual’s tests, details of their family members in case they have disease that are recurring and hereditary disorders, and a receipt of the applicant’s genetic services that have been provided (Connolly & Connolly, 1979).

One legal proceeding, which involves genetic discrimination was a case filed by Michael Peel against his employee, Nestle Food Company in 2010 (Wagner & Vorhaus, 2012). The complaint was on the basis of acquiring the employee’s genetic information by the company through undertaking a medical assessment terming it fitness for duty test (Wagner & Vorhaus, 2012). This information included the employee’s family medical history and after acquiring this information, the company terminated Mr. Peel’s employment. Under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, an employer should not ask for their employee’s family record history as a means of employment. Because of this, the company was issue with a subpoena to disclose prior information regarding employee- employer disclosure of their genetic information (Wagner & Vorhaus, 2012). The case ended with Mr. Peel being compensated as per the GINA act and Nestle Company ended up being investigated further (Wagner & Vorhaus, 2012). The Equal Employment Opportunity Act aims at ensuring that workplaces have rules and policies governing their workers. These rules will ensure that the workers work at their maximum capabilities in the career pursuits without and fear. This act also aims at creating awareness and protecting individuals who are employed.

References

Burstein, P. (1994). Equal Employment Opportunity: Labor Market Discrimination and Public Policy. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.

Connolly, W. B. & Connolly, M. J. (1979). Practical Guide to Equal Employment Opportunity. New York. Law Journal Press.

US General Services Administration. (2012). Equal Employment Opportunity. Retrieved December 01, 2012, from http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/101013US Supreme Court Centre. (2002). Retrieved December 01, 2012, from http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/534/279/Wagner, J. K. & Vorhaus, D. (2012). The Burden of Enforcing GINA: EEOC v. Nestle illustrates One Challenging Pursuit Genetic Discrimination claims. Retrieved December 01, 2012, from http://www.genomicslawreport.com/index.php/2012/06/20/the-burden-of-enforcing-gina-eeoc-v-nestle-illustrates-one-challenge-in-pursuing-genetic-discrimination-claims/