Recent orders

Pre-screening document.

Professor’s name

Author’s name

Due date

Topic: pre-screening document.

A pre screening document is a set of questions set by an interviewer in order to get information from the targeted group of people or individual. This is mostly experienced in hospitals where patients seeking medical care are advised to fill in a form, describing their health history and their current health condition. The purpose of a pre-screen document or form is to enable doctors with diagnosis or what the patient needs for treatment. In a rehabilitation centre, for example a drug addict wants to quit using drugs, the doctor asks the patient to fill in a form describing some of the drugs the addict uses, how long they have used them and to what degree. These are some of the information details present in a pre screen document. Drug addiction is one of the leading fatal problems (Bier, 1962) reigning most of the youth today, some fight to get out of it but the environment or due to peer influence they find it hard to stop (Barnard, 2007). But some take the most difficult step and they decide to openly declare their addiction; they join rehabilitation centres where they are taken through step by step process in order to recover. As they join the rehabilitation centres, they are required to go through a pre screening interview either orally or via filling a form so as to give the counsellors and doctors a go ahead of what to expect and through that they can decide which path they can take towards recovery.

Fill in the following detail.

Full name:

Sex/ age:

Marital status:

Contacts/ email address:

As Drug Rehabilitation centre the knowledge about our client’s health history and his current health status is our concern. For the questions asked below a tick if the answer is yes if no leave the box blank. For the information you are required to write the answers please do. Pay attention to what is asked and fill in the correct information.

Which kind of drug(s) do you use? Yes or No

Alcohol

tobacco

Marijuana

Khat

Cocaine

When did you start using the drug(s)?

For how long have you used the drug(s)?

How many times in a day do you use the drug(s)?

How did you get introduced to the drug(s)?

How do the drug(s) affect your body function when used and when not used?

What made you decide to want to quit using the drug(s)?

Please indicate any diseases that have affected you since you started using the drug(s) and how many times you have sought medical attention at a clinic, dispensary or hospital as a result of the same (Brick, 2008).

How has the drug(s) affected your social life, e.g. family, partners or friends (Barnard, 2007)?

Have you had cases of the following diseases or been diagnosed with the following disorders?

Yes or No

Whooping cough

Tuberculosis

Cirrhosis

Lung cancer

If you suffer any of the following diseases or have one of the conditions above, what medical action have you taken?

Have you had cases of hallucinations, seizures, and episodes of deliriums?

What kind of food does your meal consist of is it balanced or has more of carbohydrates or proteins or fats, if any of the above, please indicate and any other additional information describing your eating habits.

What is your personal description of drug addiction and what is your personal opinion about it?

What do you hope to achieve at the end of this rehabilitation program?

When all answers are fully and correctly indicated the patient is to sign his name and signature. The medical officer or psychiatrist in-charge should also sign the document.

Above is chart that is used to learn about the addicted patient and through the information doctors and counsellors have a basis of what to do.

References:

Barnard, M. (2007). Drug addiction and families. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

Brick, J. ( 2008). Handbook of the medical consequences of alcohol and drug abuse (2nd ed) New York: Haworth Press.

Bier, W. C.(1962). Problems in addiction: alcohol and drug addiction. New York: Fordham University Press.

The Black Death

The Black Death

Institutional affiliation

Students name

date

The Black Death

The Black Death was a standout amongst the most decimating pandemics in mankind’s history, bringing about the passing of an expected 75 to 200 million individuals in Eurasia and cresting in Europe from 1347 to 1351. The bacterium Yersinia pestis, which brings about a few types of torment, is accepted to have been the reason. The torment made a progression of religious, social, and monetary changes, which effects the course of history. The Black Death is thought to have started in the dry fields of Central Asia, where it at that point went along the Silk Road, achieving Crimea by 1343. From that point, it was in all likelihood conveyed by Oriental rodent insects living on the dark rats that were normal travelers on trader ships, spreading all through the Mediterranean and Europe. The Black Death is assessed to have executed 30– 60% of Europe’s aggregate populace. Altogether, the torment may have lessened the total populace from an expected 450 million down to 350– 375 million in the fourteenth century. It took 200 years for the total populace to recoup to its past level. The torment repeated as episodes in Europe until the nineteenth century. The Black Death killed a larger number of Europeans than some other endemic or war up to that time.

With a specific end goal to better light up any progressions that happened in restorative practice after the beginning of the Black Death, one should first look at the condition of medicinal practice at the season of the Black Death. By the fourteenth century, medicinal specialists had been stratified into pretty much five gatherings, however there was absolutely cover among them depending especially upon the region in Europe being referred to. As per Loren C. Macintosh Kinney, these gatherings fundamentally took after a similar division of therapeutic experts laid out in Aristotelian idea in ancient times. In Aristotle’s work, restorative professionals had a place with one of the three after classifications: ace doctors, talented skilled workers, or instructed laymen, who considered prescription as a component of their general learning.

In spite of the fact that medieval therapeutic professionals had more degrees in status, the gatherings still fell inside a similar system of divisions. To finish everything, by the later Middle Ages, were the doctors prepared at colleges in medicinal hypothesis. Quite a bit of this preparation depended on the established thoughts communicated by Hippocrates and Galen, who likewise remarked intensely on Hippocratic compositions. Inside the corpus of lessons of Hippocrates, and particularly Galen, who was the specific most loved of medieval doctors, hypothesis was blended with training, and keeping in mind that both were accepted to be essential, hypothesis in view of reason was held to be better than training in view of understanding. The principle objectives of Galenic prescription were to recognize the reasons for malady, both discernible and hypothetical.

Causation was critical in light of the fact that the states of individual patients could help uncover bigger, more all-inclusive standards. Thoughts in regards to infection causation, forecast, and helpful procedure were established in the hypothesis of humors, created in Hippocratic works and utilized and remarked upon by Galen. As indicated by the humoral hypothesis, adjust of the four humors inside the body was the key to wellbeing, and any unevenness in that brought about ailment. To humoral hypothesis, Galen included the four humors join together to shape tissues, which thusly frame organs, which at that point frame the body overall. What’s more, his technique for curing infections stayed in light of sensible utilizations of humoral hypothesis Galenic restorative hypothesis was concerned with the act of medication as well as with epistemology, both therapeutic and philosophical. Galen recognized two methods for gaining information, that of reason and that of experience. Traditional therapeutic practice had, at any rate in talk if not entirely in fact, drawn a line between physical work, for example, surgery, which was humble, and hypothetical adapting, for example, prescription, which could and ought to be examined by instructed men of societal position. The early medieval period, before the ascent of colleges, saw a converging of classes into one gathering of medicinal specialists, with “no obvious qualification amongst doctor and specialist and drug specialist. Inside the medieval colleges, the seven aesthetic sciences framed the premise of training while philosophy, law, and prescription were viewed as the higher resources, which could be considered for the most part simply after the foundation of the human sciences was accomplished.

How infections are translated by the general population they debilitate changes after some time and inside societies. Be that as it may, there are normal components. One is a propensity to see sickness as originating from elsewhere from ‘other individuals’. Infection may even be given a human face through relationship with a specific person. At the point when stood up to by new and terrifying ailments, individuals can make substitutes as a completely misinformed method for adapting to fear, centering fault and reinforcing preference.

Peripheral gatherings, minorities and poor people have been basic targets. Jews were generally rebuked for the Black Death and migrant Irish laborers considered in charge of cholera pestilences in the 1830s. Fault can be universal. The presence of syphilis in Renaissance Europe turned into a great case of passing the fault. Syphilis was initiated the ‘French ailment’ by the British, however the French considered the Italians dependable. They restored the compliment. The Dutch faulted the Spanish, while the Russians faulted the Poles. In Japan the Portuguese were to blame, though the Turks basically called it the Christian illness. Also, when in 1769 Captain Cook watched the sickness on Tahiti, it was referred to all islanders as the British illness!

Such stereotyping can cause genuine mischief. For instance, early a century ago the frequency of syphilis in the United States was moderately high in poor dark groups. Some American analysts faulted this for what they saw as natural racial shortcomings. It was a ‘dark infection’, a confused partiality that motivated the notorious Tuskegee examine, a bigot and deceptive research venture in which 400 dark men conveying the ailment were kept under perception however left untreated for quite a long time.

Infection, similar to syphilis, acts gradually and distorts appallingly. Sufferers were known as ‘outcasts’ and were generally compelled to live segregated lives in untouchable states. They were avoided, despised and dreaded, and the word ‘outsider’ still has implications path past its strict restorative importance. Without a doubt, ‘For what reason should I be ousted like a pariah?’ was what Mary Mallon asked in 1909. Otherwise called Typhoid Mary, she was a transporter, however not a sufferer, of that ailment. In any case, she turned into the exemplification of infection in America and her outside beginnings a subject of open verbal confrontation, giving purposeful publicity to those requiring the inoculation of every new settler. The diary Scientific American summoned both antiquated partialities and torment myths while remarking that Mary ‘had rivaled the Wandering Jew in dissipating devastation in her way’ – the Wandering Jew being an incredible figure from Christian old stories, one of whose incarnations was as a spreader of malady Although the torment headed out starting with one nation then onto the next by means of tainted rats on board exchange ships, and in all likelihood assaulted people as contaminated bugs, the quick acting disease could just have spread through contact between city occupants, the London group finished up. Past research demonstrated that plague rates expanded in the fourteenth century because of Europeans swarming the urban areas. Once the bubonic frame found as dependable balance in a city, and advanced toward the lungs of a few occupants, the exceptionally infectious pneumonic type of torment more likely than not had the ideal reproducing ground in overpopulated urban areas with tenants in weakness, as fourteenth century London.

Dr. Tim Brooks, a specialist in irresistible sicknesses at Public Health England, who was associated with the Charterhouse Square research, contended that bubonic torment alone couldn’t have spread as quick from individual to individual, inundating whole urban communities in a short measure of time. Yet, the more harmful, airborne adaptation of the illness could clarify the lethal energy of the medieval pandemic.

Bugs, be that as it may, may not be free. Dr. Ken Gage, head of the torment segment at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), says the scattering of the torment bacterium by insects remains a legitimate hypothesis for quick acting pandemics. Gage concurred that rodent borne torment has a generally safe of disease from human contact. Additionally, there isn’t sufficient confirmation to recommend that dark rats, which commonly conveyed the malady, were available in the British Isles, and no records of an unstable rodent mortality, which ought to have gone before the human pandemic.

 The issue is to bounce to the conclusion that no one but rats can be the vectors,” Gage said in a meeting. “In the British Isles, there could have been another vector, the human bug. We found that a considerable measure of insects doesn’t get blocked productively, however can transmit proficiently in the initial three to four days when they get the disease from a creature or even a human. On the off chance that the human bug can do that, it could clarify the spread of torment, which was in all likelihood bug borne, not airborne.” Although a few cases could have been pneumonic, Black Death records recognize the malady by swollen lymph hubs, a normal for bubonic torment. Contaminated individuals can build up an auxiliary, pneumonic torment, which can be airborne, however in essential pneumonic cases, individuals would not have lived sufficiently long to create buboes, Gage clarified.

The Public Health England master concurs that insects and rats were a piece of the procedure. Tainted bugs can stick around for half a month, sitting tight for a casualty, to whom they transmit the contamination,” Brooks clarified. “This individual will create bubonic torment. 10% of individuals who have bubonic torment will create pneumonia from the foundational spread, and in their withering hours will hack this up. Individuals inside 2 meters or less of the casualty are in danger of disease through inward breath. They create pneumonic torment, which can be transmitted to others as beads. So on the off chance that you have enough individuals who can be contaminated by bugs, you will have a decent possibility of getting some pneumonic cases. In the event that these individuals live ten to a 3 meter by 3-meter room, they will get the infection as pneumonic torment, as will the individuals who come to tend to the diminishing family. They take it home to their friends and family et cetera. In this way, in the correct social conditions, with the correct conditions to unite people and rats, and in a general public where administering to relatives and neighbors was the thing, you get bubonic torment, trailed by pneumonic torment.

Specialists still can’t seem to concur on the genuine offender behind human torment pandemics. Be that as it may, regardless of whether individuals get the sickness from bugs, contaminated creatures, or from each other, once it ends up plainly airborne, it can produce a general wellbeing emergency.

Torment is presently treated with anti-toxins, and can be avoided by applying bug sprays to dispose of tainted insects. In any case, it remains an illness with a high death rate if left untreated. Since the torment bacterium has been utilized as a natural weapon before, with medieval armed forces

catapulting bodies over city dividers and present day armed forces associated with dropping tainted insects from planes, worries that the torment could fuel bio-fear monger assaults stay substantial in our circumstances. Torment immunizations are being developed yet are not anticipated that would be economically accessible in the quick future.

Counteractive action rules from the CDC incorporate diminishing rat living spaces around homes, utilizing bug anti-agents on skin and apparel, and applying insect control items to pets. While these measures may keep a flare-up, center should move to human bearers once torment cases are recognized in a group. One thing we can detract from the Charterhouse skeletons is that chain transmission among people can have cataclysmic results. Close up close and personal contact inside two yards of each other is expected to transmit the disease among people, Gage said. Albeit bubonic cases still prevail today, chain transmission after the torment ends up plainly pneumonic is the genuine test, as delineated by the Madagascar episode.

In any case, fortunately we can interfere with the chain rapidly these days, the CDC pro said. We can treat the general population who get contaminated, give prophylactic anti-microbial to secure the individuals who interact with torment patients, wear surgical veils, and detach healing facility staff and other people who look after patients. Torment has all that it requires to cause the Black Death,” Brooks said. “All it needs is the open door. It’s still there. It’s as yet the one that we used to have, despite everything it has all the power and the risk that it used to have, and it’s just an alternate arrangement of conditions that is keeping it in its place. Torment has what it takes. Torment can do it once more.

Conclusion

By 1350, the survivors of the torment started to understand their bad dream was arriving at an end. The prompt result of the Black Death was a huge decrease of the populace; be that as it may, the torment additionally had numerous long haul impacts. A significant number of the academic individuals of the time kicked the bucket. This prompted a decrease in schools and numerous were obliterated. Moreover, a decrease in exchange happened on the grounds that individuals were frightful to exchange great with one torment swarmed nation. These components added to Europe’s time of diminished thriving. Amid the medieval times, the torment was known as all-pulverizing. 33% of a nations populace can’t be killed over a time of three years without impressive disengagement to its economy. Through these misfortunes, a modest bug toppled Europe’s social structure and adjusted medieval society for eternity

Bibliography

Ziegler, Philip. The black death. Faber & Faber, 2013.

Horrox, Rosemay, ed. The black death. Vol. 1. Manchester University Press, 1994.

Langer, William L. “The black death.” Scientific American 210, no. 2 (1964): 114-121.

Bridbury, Anthony R. “The Black Death.” The Economic history review 26, no. 4 (1973): 577-592.

Byrne, Joseph Patrick. The Black Death. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2004.

Bos, Kirsten I., Verena J. Schuenemann, G. Brian Golding, Hernán A. Burbano, Nicholas Waglechner, Brian K. Coombes, Joseph B. McPhee et al. “A draft genome of Yersinia pestis from victims of the Black Death.” Nature 478, no. 7370 (2011): 506.

The Berlin Brandenburg Airport Project

The Berlin Brandenburg Airport Project

By (Name)

Course

Professor

Date

Background of the Organization and Project

After the 1991 German reunification, Berlin’s new airport master plan was relatively plain and straightforward. The airport was supposed to serve almost twenty-two million passengers per annum, with a peak capacity of around six thousand passengers per hour. The cost of completing the project was not supposed to exceed one billion euros. The initial opening was scheduled at the turn of the new millennium. None of these goals were achieved. A long row of mostly unfiltered change requests contributed to frequent delays regarding the actual opening dates. There were significant cost overruns, which eventually led to a full rebuild of the airport’s main terminal. Air traffic demand has significantly increased since 2012, with the increase still being witnessed. This is because Berlin is still an attractive destination for tourists and business travelers.

What was expected to become the busiest German airport had ended up becoming a disastrous tale of how infrastructural and construction projects could quickly fail. It was projected that forty-five million passengers would use the airport on an annual basis, and it was supposed to replace the Tegel and Schoenefeld airports within Berlin. The key shareholders of the Federal Republic, Brandenburg, and Berlin agreed to establish the airport in 1996. It was proposed immediately after the German unification of 1990. Schoenefeld was selected as the best location for the project because of its closeness to Berlin and the availability of 3600 acres of free land. After pre-planning and the initial feasibility, which took almost fifteen years, the project’s construction began in 2006. It was proposed that the airport would take half a decade to construct, with 30th October 2011 being the target opening date, but the project was yet to open almost seven years later. The second opening date was pushed further to October 2020. It was initially supposed to be an airport that will be operated and owned by a private investor. This was, however, changed to public sector partners or BBF. This served as the first indicator for the team tasked with managing the project to identify and rectify whatever was wrong during the pre-planning phase of the airport construction.

Discussion of standard Criteria

Standard criteria for evaluating the success or failure of a project include whether or not the project was within budget, deadlines, and sustainability (Atkinson, 1999). For a project to be deemed a success, it should be completed within budget, the set deadline, and be sustainable in the long run (Thomsett, 2002). A failed project would experience budgetary overshoots, delay its completion and not be sustainable.

Critical Identification and Justification of the criteria

I believe that the criteria that would be deemed appropriate to evaluate this project are whether it was within its initial budget and was delivered on time. The justification for these criteria is because they are easily measurable and would adversely affect most of the stakeholders of the project (Duncan, 2004).

Critical Analysis

The project did not attain the discussed criteria due to various factors that were avoidable. The outcome of the airport was a disaster economically, including the significant damage that it caused to Germany’s reputation as a country that is renowned for having industrious and efficient people. A critical analysis of the events from a hindsight point of view highlights some of the factors that did the project not be completed within budget and within the set deadline. One of these factors includes the issue that there were very many and diverse interested stakeholders. In a project this large, the involvement of numerous stakeholders and their diverse interests is significant (Cleland and Ireland, 2010. Difficulties arose during the project’s initial years when there were queries regarding who owned the project. It was initially decided that the airport would be privately owned and operated. After a twelve-year period of planning, this idea was shelved, and it was instead decided that the airport would state-owned. It was supposed to be operated by the Flughafen Berlin Brandenburg (FBB). The German Federal Government, Brandenburg State, the airlines, the city mayor, the workers, the passengers, the citizens of Berlin, and the other older airports within the city were also interested stakeholders. The more the number of stakeholders, the more complex the project and the more effort required in change management and communication matters (Coronado and Antony, 2002). On top of this, in most critical projects, there is usually at least one stakeholder that would be glad that a project did not succeed. It could be assumed that some of the main stakeholders at the city’s Schoenfeld and Tegen airports did not mind the endemic delays or did not pay critical attention as to why such delays were taking place.

The scope of the project was also subjected to numerous major changes. Project scope refers to the part of a project’s planning that involves documenting and determining an outline of critical project deliverables, goals, functions, features, deadlines, tasks, and ultimately goals (Mir and Pinnington, 2014). The most challenging phase is to successfully deliver the project based on the initial plan whenever there are several changes in scope. Berlin’s Brandenburg Airport is a perfect example of scope creep or numerous scope changes. One case occurred when as the construction was taking place, one of the critical stakeholders, the airport management company’s general manager, requested the architects to add southern and northern piers to the primary terminal. This turned it from a rectangular shape to a U shape and significantly enlarged the floor space area. During a later phase of the project, the general manager, with the aim of making the airport to be similar to the Dubai luxury mall, requested to incorporate into the initial plan another level that would be filled with food courts, boutiques, and shops. These frequent and significant alterations in the project’s scope ended up delaying and increasing the costs over and above the initially projected figures.

The project was plagued with incompetence and incapable management. Top directors and their supervisors failed to formulate plans that reflected appropriate assumptions touching on uncertain issues about the airport’s commercial model. The initial estimations on the airport’s projected passenger demand were significantly inaccurate and low. Initially, the airport planned to handle twenty-two million passengers per year. Presently, the two other airports in the city are serving passenger volumes of 27 million per annum. Even before the project’s groundbreaking, it had become obvious that the new airport would not have the capacity to fulfill the expected demand. However, the project had already passed the point of no return since the master plan had already been approved. The fact that it was a publicly-funded project meant that the master plan could not be altered at this juncture. Any radical plan changes touching on critical design elements would be considered a failure by the public. In the German political arena, face-saving was at the time valued more than financial and economic survival.

The floor plans only allowed for relatively short passenger walkways and a single-level layout. This was to ensure there was ground-level space for the installation of technical equipment and luggage handling. Most of the modern airport business models concentrate on boutiques, shop revenues, eateries, etc. These business models call for shopping mall layouts. Separation of departures from arrivals is commonly attained by employing double-level passenger logistics. Airflow systems, luggage systems, etc. should be located on the rooftops or at the underground section. In a short-sighted and poorly informed attempt to minimize costs, only two main floor levels had been planned. The new modern and dynamic Airbus 380 aircraft was introduced within the airline industry. Catering for the needs of such an airplane had been regarded as a clear priority right from the initial announcement.

Engineering firms that had been tasked with designing and constructing the project’s large and futuristic integrated fire protection and air ventilation system conspired with technical design offices and architects contracted to plan and run the facilities at the airport. The firms convinced one another that any kind of unresolved queries touching on the complexities of the airflow control interactions with disposal of smoke could be deal with ‘on the fly’ during equipment installation. On top of that, architects and airport designers colluded with the project’s passenger logistics planners. Eventually, potential shop owners and airport management convinced one another of the overall airport layout’s scalability. They assumed that the original plans could be altered at minimal costs in case of an expansion in demand and passenger traffic.

Communication is also one of the most critical tasks whenever a project is being done. Communication also entails sharing the correct information to the intended people through the right channels on the project’s status (Davis, 2014). The mayor of the city at the time, Klaus Wowereit, who also doubled up as the project’s sponsor and the supervisory board’s chairman, was accused of pretending that there were no issues during the airport’s construction. He maintained this stance even as the situation worsened. This lack of acknowledgment of the dire situation provided the impression that there was no reason to act. The mayor was removed from the post in 2013. Project leaders should not be afraid of addressing and communicating information about any bad news to the project’s stakeholders.

There were also ineffective quality tests. Quality inspections and tests unearthed two critical issues. First of all, the airport terminal’s alarm and fire protection systems were not constructed according to the construction permit or the required building codes. The other issue is that the smoke extractor fans that were supposed to be used were not effective. There are extensive reconstructions that have been planned to correct this situation. Quality checks are usually planned throughout a project to evaluate and make sure that the final project meets all the deliverables. The airport project eventually encountered numerous quality issues. This is surprising, bearing the fact that Germany is a country that has a reputation of focusing on high-quality standards and reputations. Official reports state that there were over 66,000 defects, with 34,000 of these defects being described as significant and over five thousand of the defects classified as critical.

Suggestions and Recommendations

Based on the report and information discussed pertaining to the project’s failure, this section outlines some of the actionable recommendations and suggestions to be incorporated in future similar projects. During the initial phases of layout structuring and design, it is important to consider both optimistic and pessimistic consequences and develop the plans accordingly. There should be a plan for comprehensive and early identification of critical issues that need to be dealt with. Effective management decisions should be made under a veil of uncertainty and effective execution of crucial decisions.

The project managers should consider the worst-case scenarios as the most likely to occur. Misled project managers tend to believe that the worst-case scenarios are the exceptions and not the rule. When conducting a risk assessment, it is crucial to consider all the likely risks and come up with the action items for every item when such risks trigger. When formulating scenarios and seeking the worst case, project analysts habit of limiting their scope to ‘much better than expected’ and ‘bad.’ The engineers should ensure an acceptable level of functionality. This could be attained by completely separating automated passenger emergency control, air conditioning systems, smoke disposals, and fire extinguishing equipment both in their operational control and physically. Integration of such systems often comes with substantial costs and complexities. Generally, it is important to look for the significant benefits linked with the investment costs instead of looking at the project’s total costs.

Conclusions

No large engineering construction project has ever been completed without significant issues, and the Berlin airport is no different in this aspect. However, what is different is how it went wrong. The project’s decision-making was mostly inconsistent and unclear, with wild budget fluctuations, inept consultancy, and design teams, and internal struggles linked to the different stakeholders’ interests. The only certainty of the project is that it has large expectations to live up to, and only time will prove whether the airport project’s fortunes could be reversed.

List of References

Atkinson, R., 1999. Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a

Phenomenon, it’s time to accept other success criteria. International journal of project

Management, 17(6), pp.337-342.

Cleland, D.I. and Ireland, L.R., 2010. Project manager’s portable handbook. McGraw-Hill

Education.

Coronado, R.B. and Antony, J., 2002. Critical success factors for the successful implementation

of six sigma projects in organisations. The TQM magazine.

Davis, K., 2014. Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project

success. International journal of project management, 32(2), pp.189-201.

Duncan, W.R., 2004. Defining and measuring project success. Accessed on 15th April, 2014 from http://www. pmpartners. com/resources/defmeas_success. html.

Mir, F.A. and Pinnington, A.H., 2014. Exploring the value of project management: linking

project management performance and project success. International journal of project

management, 32(2), pp.202-217.

Thomsett, R., 2002. Radical project management. Prentice Hall Professional.