Recent orders

Overview of Innocent Drinks’ growth

Table of Contents

Overview of Innocent Drinks3

Analysis on the business3

2.1 Competitive intensity of Soft Drink Industry3

2.2 Sustained competitive advantage of Innocent Drinks6

Reflection on team work8

Presentation experience10

Another example Green & Black’s with similar challenges11

Conclusion12

References13

Executive Summary

This report is an individual reflective report with the attempt to reflect on a personal gains and learning in a group assignment. This report will be divided into five major parts. The first part will give a brief overview on the target company called Innocent Drinks. The second part will utilize a set of relevant models, such as Porter’s Five Forces Model and VRIO framework to identify the challenges and opportunities faced by Innocent Drinks. The third part will briefly reflect on the team work and its influence in my future career development. The fourth part will reflect on my presentation experience and what I have learnt from this presentation experience. The last part will identify how another company called Green & Black’s deals with similar challenges in its growth.

Overview of Innocent Drinks’ growth

Innocent Drinks is a company which is mainly engaged in manufacturing and selling smoothies and juices. In 1998, it was initiated by Rich, Adam and Jon who were university schoolmates. They sold their first smoothies from a stall at a music festival. Since its inception, Innocent Drinks has gradually developed into a big worldwide corporation with a diversified product portfolio (Innocent Drinks, 2022). In 2009, Coca Cola began to invest Innocent Drinks. In 2013, Coca Cola increased its shares in Innocent Drinks to more than 90 percent (Innocent Drinks, 2022). At present, Innocent Drinks has already grown into a giant enterprise with dominant position in European juice market, which can be manifested in the following statistics.

In its financial performance, as shown in Appendix 1 taken from its 2019 annual report, its group net revenue has rapidly risen from only 0.4 million in 2000 to as high as 431.8 million in 2019 (Innocent Drinks, 2019). In addition, Innocent Drinks also gradually increases its market share in European chilled juice market. As shown in Appendix 2, the proportion of Innocent Drinks in European chilled juice market increased from 19.6 percent in 2018 to 21.4 percent in 2020 (Innocent Drinks, 2020).

In its sustainability, since its inception in 1998, especially after becoming a B corporation member in 2018, it has striven to improve its sustainability performance. In community, as shown in Appendix 3, its funds donated for charity purpose maintained approximate £1.6 million in 2018 and in 2020 and its products donated to good causes sharply rose from 520,070 in 2018 to 1,134,501 in 2020 (Innocent Drinks, 2020). In environmental emissions, Innocent Drinks also takes some effective measures to reduce its carbon footprint. As shown in Appendix 4, its direct green house gas (GHG) emissions decreased from 1,947 el in 2019 to 474 el in 2020 and its indirect GHG emissions also reduced from 226,611 el in 2019 to 222,716 el in 2020. It increases recycled content from 27% in 2018 to 31 % in 2020 (Innocent Drinks, 2020). All of these statistics indicates that Innocent Drinks has already achieved excellent and significant performance in sustainability since its inception.

Analysis on the opportunities and challenges faced by Innocent Drinks

This part will utilize Porter’s Five Forces Model, PESTEL model and SWOT model to identify the opportunities and challenges faced by Innocent Drinks and investigate its internal strengths and weaknesses under such circumstance.

Porter’s Five Forces Model

Porter’s Five Forces Model hypothesizes an industry competitive intensity can be measured by five variables: bargaining power of buyers, bargaining power of suppliers, threat of substitutes, threat of new entries and industry rivalry. The industry competitive intensity will eventually affect the profitability of an industry. The higher the industry competitiveness is, the lower the profitability of an industry is (Grundy, 2006).

Innocent Drinks is an England-based enterprise which is mainly engaged in manufacturing and selling smoothies and juices. As a consequence, it can be classified into the soft drink industry. The competitive intensity in British soft drink industry is high which can be manifested based on the following analysis through Porter’s Five Forces Model.

Bargaining power of buyers:

As shown in Appendix 5, irrespective of the dominance of Innocent Drinks in British ready-to-drink fruit and vegetable juice and smoothies market, there are still many other brands for consumers to choose, such as Tropicana Juices, Tesco and Sainsbury’s which also have high brand awareness and wide range of users (Statista, 2018). In addition, consumers can have other soft drinks choices, such as bottled water and carbonized drinks. From this perspective, the bargaining power of consumers is big.

Threat of substitutes:

In accordance with British Soft Drinks Association, there are a lot of soft drink substitutes, such as bottled water, carbonates, dilutables and sports & energy drinks. In addition, with the increase of the awareness in health, people pay more attention to the sugar intake from the drinks and tend to choose some healthy drinks, such as water. This undoubtedly becomes a significant barrier to the development and growth of 100% juice (including smoothies and coconut water). As shown in Appendix 6, the market share of 100% juice in total soft drinks market gradually declined from 7.5 percent in 2014 to 6.5 percent in 2019. The volume also decreased from 1,012 M Litres in 2014 to 891 M Litres in 2019 and its value M GBP decreased from 1,828 in 2014 to 1,591 in 2019 as well (The British Soft Drinks Association, 2020).

However, by contrast, the market share of bottled water has increased rapidly. As shown in Appendix 7, the market share of bottled water in total soft drinks market has rapidly risen from 16.9 percent in 2014 to 20.6 percent in 2019. Its volume has also increased from 2,263 M Litres in 2014 to 2,811 M Litres in 2019 and its value M GBP has risen from 1,319 in 2014 to 1,635 in 2019 as well (The British Soft Drinks Association, 2020). Such comparison between 100% juice and bottled water can clearly indicate that the threat of substitutes is high.

Bargaining power of suppliers:

Suppliers have little power as Innocent Drinks is a giant enterprise with large volume of need. From this perspective, it has high bargaining power over the suppliers.

Industry rivalry:

The strong competitor of Innocent Drinks is PepsiCo which also has many competitive capabilities and resources and high brand awareness.

The abovementioned analysis can be concluded in Table 1:

Table 1: Porter’s Five Forces Model Analysis of Innocent Drinks

PESTEL model

PESTEL model constituted by six variables: political, economic, social, technological, environment and legal (Ulubeyli et al, 2019). In the case of Innocent Drinks, social and economic environment will be mainly stressed.

Social environment:

At present, with the rise in the awareness in sustainability, those stakeholders in business operations begin to pay more attention to whether enterprises can perform in an ethical and sustainable manner. As for those sustainable enterprises, these stakeholders will present more supports and preferences. Under such social circumstance, corporate sustainability will have direct and significant impacts in organizational performance (Eccles et al, 2014). Eccles et al (2014) also stress that high sustainability companies are more likely to have established processes for stakeholder engagement, to be more long-term oriented, and to exhibit higher measurement and disclosure of nonfinancial information. In light of this, those high sustainability companies significantly outperform their counterparts over the long term no matter in terms of stock market or in accounting performance.

Such social environment is consistent with the organizational strategy established by Innocent Drinks to become a sustainable enterprise. Innocent Drinks is recognized as a Certified B Corporation which is named for Best For The World. A B Corporation is assessed by B Lab in terms of the performance of each corporation in its contribution to five aspects: community, customer, environment, governance, and workers. Only those global top 5 percent in their corresponding size group can be perceived as a Certified B Corporation (B Lab, 2021). As shown in Appendix 8, Innocent Drinks get a better performance in five aspects: governance, environment, community, customers and workers. Its score rose from 14.6 in 2018 to 15.1 in 2019 in the variable of governance, from 19.9 in 2018 to 23.2 in 2019 in the variable of environment, from 22.7 in 2018 to 25.3 in the variable of workers and slightly decreased from 35.1 in 2018 to 34.2 in 2019 (Innocent Drinks, 2019). This statistics indicates that Innocent Drinks obtains a good performance in all of these variables and establishes positive relationship with the stakeholders. For instance, since 2003, Innocent Drinks has been committed to using recycled plastic with attempt to reduce its carbon footprint. So far, it has already reduced the use of plastic by up to 2500 tonnes (Innocent Drinks, 2019). The consistency of Innocent Drinks’ sustainability strategy to the social environment will undoubtedly contribute to Innocent Drinks’ financial performance. As highlighted by Rodriguez et al (2002), from the resource-based perspective, the strategy of sustainable development will contribute to the businesses’ ability to create value and become a vital source of sustained competitive advantage.

Economic environment:

Since FYE 2013, median income has increased by 2.1 percent annually as of FYE 2020. In 2020, the average household disposable income (after taxes and benefits) increased by 2.3 percent to £30,800 compared to FYE 2019 (Office for National Statistics, 2020). With the rise in the economic capability of the consumers, they begin to pursue those products with high quality with less price sensitivity. Such trend is also consistent with the strategy adopted by Innocent Drinks. Innocent Drinks puts large investment to increase its product value. For instance, as mentioned in its 2019 annual report, Innocent Drinks realizes the importance of its product nutrition, health and quality in its sustainable development. As a consequence, it strives to shape its product as healthy drinks with lower calories, lower sugar and more fibre. In addition, it is also committed to using natural source of fibre (Innocent Drinks, 2019).

Environment:

Green house gases and water pollution arising from soft drink production and consumption exert negative influences in environment. Under such circumstance, the public and the government begin to pay more attention to the environment sustainability.

Legal environment:

The Food and Drink Federation’s Ambition 2025 outlines the target of the soft drink industry to encompass environmental sustainability as its core and major issue through a set of transformational changes. The British Soft Drinks Association also develops the Waste and Resource Action Programme (WRAP)’s Courtauld Commitment 2025 to reduce water usage by 20% and reduce carbon emissions (Mullan, 2020). Such legal environment increases the obstacle for some new entries and is beneficial to the growth of sustainable enterprises like Innocent Drinks.

The abovementioned analysis can be concluded in Table 2:

Table 2: PESTEL model analysis of Innocent Drinks

SWOT Model Analysis

The abovementioned analysis can manifest the opportunities, Threats, weaknesses and strengths of Innocent Drinks as shown in Table 3.

Table 3: SWOT model analysis of Innocent Drinks

3. Team Work

Our team was made up of five members, each explicitly assigned a different task, all fulfilling the requirements of preparing for the presentation. We followed the Belbin Model in an effort to create balanced roles, where a well-balanced team was created based on nine team roles: creating ideas, exploring opportunities, clarity of goals and decision making, driving the team forward, support and cooperation, discerning judgment, implementation, attentiveness to detail, and technical skills and knowledge (Aritzeta, Swailes, & Senior, 2007). Belbin believes that teams must be formed in such a way that they have a healthy mix of team duties (Smith, Polglase, & Parry, 2012). Nonetheless, we faced complications in terms of assigning roles and ensuring that these roles were not only fair but also balanced. We used a criterion based on individual choice for tasks and roles and adjoined some complex tasks together for easier completion.

The team forming process was fairly regular and in line with Tuckman’s five-stages of developing a team (Cresswell-Yeager, 2021). Our team went through forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. The forming stage was preceded by a phase of introduction and try to get to know one another. During this period, there was a great deal of uncertainty, and people were yearning for direction and guidance. To make it through the storming phase was perhaps the most challenging and important step of the process. The period was characterized by competitiveness as distinct personalities began to take shape. The team’s performance suffered at this stage as a result of the energy used on useless tasks. Subgroups and cliques evolved surrounding strong characters or sections of consensus as a result of the disagreements over team objectives and aims. During the norming stage, agreement was reached on the identity of the leader or leaders, as well as the duties of individual members. Interpersonal conflicts were beginning to also be addressed, and a feeling of coherence and togetherness was beginning to emerge. Team performance improved as members learnt to work together. When it came to the performing stage, agreement and collaboration were extremely well-established, and the team had reached a high level of maturity, organization, and efficiency. There had been a clear and steady framework in place, and all of the team members were dedicated to the task. Problems and disagreements continued to arise, but they were resolved in a productive manner. The majority of the team’s objectives were met during the adjournment stage, and the key objectives were the completion of last tasks and the documentation of the team’s efforts and accomplishments.

This group work experience is beneficial to my future career development as I intend to be a part of a well-functioning team. My aspirations are to work for a company in order to gather efficient skills and knowledge and later go into private business. The present group work experience will help me develop a better understanding of what I should pay attention to in team collaboration. Team collaboration, as I have found out from the Tuckman and Belbin models, requires a well-functioning structure, one that has clear presentation of goals and roles. In order to perform well with others, I will have to know what is required of me as a part of a team.

4. Presentation Experience

Working in a team meant a lot of learning, compromising, problem-solving, and altogether working towards a common goal. It was a steep learning curve seeing that we all desired to get a high score and also gain something out of the entire experience. I learnt a lot from this presentation experience. I learnt how to make a better preparation for the presentation and how to express myself better in public. For instance, prior to the group presentation, in order to have a better presentation, I had a full discussion with my group members on what models need to be employed to present the opportunities and challenges faced by Innocent Drinks. After deep discussion, we eventually decided to utilize as much as figures and statistics to present the opportunities and challenges faced by Innocent Drinks in a vivid and direct manner. This could enable the audiences to develop a deeper and better understanding of the situation. In addition, we also decided to add some pictures about Innocent Drinks, such as its logo, its sustainable trucks, into the presentation slides. The use of such visual pictures is proved to be successful to make presentation vivid and easier to understand and attractive. The presentation feedbacks from the teacher confirmed this point. In addition, I also learnt that good team cooperation and collaboration also contributed to better results and faster attainment of set goals. We modified the presentation drafts several times based on the suggestions from the group members, being considerate of every suggestion made. Factoring in the suggestions of every group member was an arduous task, one that meant delayed decision making and slower implementation. However, we were able to trust the opinions and skills of each member based on their allotted task, providing a lesson on delegation and team effort and contribution.

As for the presentation, I learnt that confidence and how to express our ideas in a clear and organized manner were the key contributors to a good presentation. Originally, as a result of nervousness and lack of confidence, I was afraid to look directly into the eyes of the audiences and failed to deliver the presentation in a smooth and clear manner. As a consequence, the presentation result was not good as the audiences could not understand what I wanted to stress and what I wanted to deliver through the presentation. However, in this group presentation, we mainly presented our reports through Microsoft Team. Without facing the audiences face to face, I became more confident. In addition, I also made some practices prior to the presentation. As a consequence, I made use of some stresses and pauses to deliver important information. Irrespective of some weaknesses in pronunciations and some stresses, I perceived that I delivered my best performance.

In our group, we used Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle to provide a framework to learning from the experience. The Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle that provides a framework for assessing events, and because of its cyclic character, it adapts itself exceptionally well with repeated encounters, enabling one to identify the most important tasks that went well or poorly (Markkanen et al., 2020). As defined by Gibbs, there are six distinct stages in the reflective process, each of which necessitates the completion of multiple questions in order to delve as deeply as possible within the stages of reflection including: description, feelings, assessment, analysis, conclusions and action plan. For me, this presentation preparation was by far more effective than any other team exercise I have been a part of before. I learnt to consider the opinion of others, leadership, responsibility, problem solving, and accountability.

5. Common Themes

In reality, business enterprises face a host of obstacles and problems along the road as they embark on their entrepreneurial journeys. Businesses nowadays must learn to collaborate with a plethora of brand-new marketing platforms. They must keep up with the most recent technological developments, whether it’s social media, search engines, or website design and development. Furthermore, because digital media has no territorial boundaries, firms must compete with enterprises from all over the world on a global scale (Vanani & Jalali, 2018). There might be a range of supply chain and logistical issues as a result of these challenges, as well as the stoppage of internal activity.

The challenges identified for Innocent Drinks present common themes across the soft drinks industry. Green & Black’s also faces similar challenges. It also faces significant challenges like fierce competition from other strong rivals and changeable tastes of consumers. Mordor Intelligence (2021) highlights that the UK chocolate market is mainly dominated by some large enterprises, such as Cargill Incorporation, Barry Callebaut Group and Puratos Group and those small-scale compound chocolate makers are gradually merged by these large enterprises. All of these statistics indicate that Green & Black’s faces challenges of high competitive intensity, which will undoubtedly undermine its profit margin if it fails to take some effective measures. Another common theme is the need to keep up with technological advancements. For example, Innocent Drinks is required to think green in terms of environmental sustainability and adding value to the ecological system. This is also a problem that other companies like Green & Black face today. Because technology is changing at a quick pace, keeping up with technological advancements has become increasingly difficult for businesses. Furthermore, if a firm fails to innovate, its competitors will quickly seize control of the market share that was previously held by the company. As a result, technological improvements are forcing many businesses to shut down, and in order to prevent this, every enterprise needs to incorporate technology into its operations.

The reason for the common theme in terms of challenges and opportunities is because of the growth stages that a firm is currently experiencing. In the five stages of business growth, common themes appear because the challenges and opportunities faced also come with the phase a business is currently in. in the fist stage, existence, the main issues include obtaining customers as well as the delivery of product and services. Lewis and Churchill (1983) term the organization as very small leading to an owner doing everything themselves. In the second stage, survival, the enterprise has shown that it can work as a business entity and has enough customers and product to sustain them. The problems and challenges shift from just existence to include the connection between expenses and revenues. In the third stage, success, the company faces an issue on decision making regarding whether to exploit its success and keep expanding, or conform to profitability and stability (Lewis and Churchill, 1983). Take-off, the fourth stage, problems include how to grow fast and means to support the growth. Finally, resource maturity, the last stage, brings a problem of managing success through control and consolidation of financial gain and ways to retain the advantages achieved.

6.Conclusion

I have significantly improved my skills from this group assignment in team work and confident presentation. In addition, through the investigation in the challenges and opportunities faced by Innocent Drinks based on different models, I develop deeper and better understanding of what influential factors in the process of an enterprise’s growth and what strategies can be adopted to increase product value and gain competitive advantage.

References:

Aritzeta, A., Swailes, S., & Senior, B. (2007). Belbin’s team role model: Development, validity and applications for team building. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 96-118.

B Lab, 2021. Certified B Corporation. [online] Available at: < https://bcorporation.net/best-for-the-world-2021 > [Accessed 2 December 2021].

Biasutti, M. (2018). Strategies adopted during collaborative online music composition. International Journal of Music Education, 36(3), 473-490.

Cantele, S., & Zardini, A. 2018, ‘Is sustainability a competitive advantage for small businesses? An empirical analysis of possible mediators in the sustainability–financial performance relationship’, Journal of cleaner production, vol.182, pp.166-176.

Cresswell-Yeager, T. (2021). Forming, storming, norming, and performing: Using a semester-long problem-based learning project to apply small-group communication principles. Communication Teacher, 35(2), 155-165.

Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. 2014. ‘The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance’, Management science, vol.60, no.11, pp.2835-2857.

Green & Black’s, 2022. Our Story. [online] Available at: < https://www.greenandblacks.com.au/ > [Accessed 8 February 2022].

Grundy, T. 2006, ‘Rethinking and reinventing Michael Porter’s five forces model’,  Strategic change, vol.15, no.5, pp.213-229.

Hertel, G., Konradt, U., & Orlikowski, B. 2004, ‘Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams’, European Journal of work and organizational psychology, vol.13, no.1, pp.1-28.

Innocent Drinks, 2019. Innocent Drinks Annual Report 2019. [online] Available at: < https://www.innocentdrinks.co.uk/content/dam/innocent/gb/en/assets/pdf/innocent-good-all-round-report-2019.pdf> [Accessed 2 December 2021].

Innocent Drinks, 2020. Innocent Drinks Annual Report 2020. [online] Available at: < https://www.innocentdrinks.co.uk/content/dam/innocent/gb/en/assets/pdf/innocent-GAR-2021.pdf> [Accessed 2 December 2021].

Innocent Drinks, 2022. Our Story. [online] Available at: < https://www.innocentdrinks.co.uk/a-bit-about-us> [Accessed 4 February 2022].

Innocent Drinks, 2022. Things we do for the planet. [online] Available at: < https://www.innocentdrinks.co.uk/things-we-do-for-the-planet> [Accessed 4 February 2022].

Lewis, V. L., & Churchill, N. C. (1983). The five stages of small business growth. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.

Liu, T., Duan, L., Dai, R., Pelowski, M., & Zhu, C. 2021. ‘Team-work, Team-brain: Exploring synchrony and team interdependence in a nine-person drumming task via multiparticipant hyperscanning and inter-brain network topology with fnirs’, NeuroImage, vol.237, pp.118147.

Markkanen, P., Välimäki, M., Anttila, M., & Kuuskorpi, M. (2020). A reflective cycle: Understanding challenging situations in a school setting. Educational Research, 62(1), 46-62.

Mordor Intelligence, 2021. UK Compound Chocolate Market- Growth, Trends and Forecasts (2022-2027). [online] Available at: < https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/uk-compound-chocolate-market> [Accessed 6 February 2022].

Mullan L., 2020. How the drinks industry is responding to sustainability targets. [online] Available at: < https://fooddigital.com/drink/how-drinks-industry-responding-sustainability-targets> [Accessed 14 February 2022].

Office for National Statistics, 2020. Average household income, UK: Financial year ending 2020 (provisional). [online] Available at: < https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/personalandhouseholdfinances/incomeandwealth/bulletins/householddisposableincomeandinequality/financialyearending2020provisional#toc> [Accessed 14 February 2022].

Ramamoorthy, N., & Flood, P. C. 2004. ‘Individualism/collectivism, perceived task interdependence and teamwork attitudes among Irish blue-collar employees: a test of the main and moderating effects?’, Human Relations, vol.57, no.3, pp.347-366.

Rodriguez, M. A., Ricart, J. E., & Sanchez, P. 2002. ‘Sustainable development and the sustainability of competitive advantage: A dynamic and sustainable view of the firm’, Creativity and innovation management, vol.11, no.3, pp.135-146.

Smith, M., Polglase, G., & Parry, C. (2012). Construction of student groups using Belbin: Supporting group work in environmental management. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36(4), 585-601.

Staples, D. S., & Webster, J. 2008. ‘Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams’, Information systems journal, vol.18, no.6, pp.617-640.

Statista, 2018.Brands of ready-to-drink fruit and vegetable juice and smoothies ranked by number of users in Great Britain in 2018. [online] Available at: < https://www.statista.com/statistics/308483/leading-brands-of-ready-to-drink-fruit-and-vegetable-juice-and-smoothies-in-the-uk/> [Accessed 8 December 2021].

Ulubeyli, S., KAZANCI, O., Kazaz, A., & Arslan, V. 2019. ‘Strategic Factors Affecting Green Building Industry: A Macro-Environmental Analysis Using PESTEL Framework’, Sakarya University Journal of Science, vol.23, no.6, pp.1042-1055.

Vanani, I. R., & Jalali, S. M. J. (2018). A comparative analysis of emerging scientific themes in business analytics. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 29(2), 183-206.

Vince, R., Abbey, G., Langenhan, M., & Bell, D. (2018). Finding critical action learning through paradox: The role of action learning in the suppression and stimulation of critical reflection. Management Learning, 49(1), 86-106.

Appendix 1 Group Net Revenue (Turnover, GBP millions)

(Source: Innocent Drinks, 2019)

Appendix 2 Innocent Drinks’ market share in European chilled juice market

(Source: Innocent Drinks, 2020)

Appendix 3 Innocent Drinks’ performance in community

(Source: Innocent Drinks, 2020)

Appendix 4 Innocent Drinks’ performance in environment protection

(Source: Innocent Drinks, 2020)

Appendix 5 Brands of ready-to-drink fruit and vegetable juice and smoothies ranked by number of users in Great Britain in 2018

(Source: Statista, 2018)

Appendix 6 Six-year comparison in 100% juice from 2014 to 2019

(Source: The British Soft Drinks Association, 2020)

Appendix 7 Six-year comparison in bottled water from 2014 to 2019

(Source: The British Soft Drinks Association, 2020)

Appendix 8 B Impact Assessment Score of Innocent Drinks

(Source: Innocent Drinks, 2019)

C. Peter.

Bacon

Telecommuting Unilever Case Study

Table of Contents

TOC o “1-3” h z u Telecommuting Unilever Case Study PAGEREF _Toc86244341 h 21. Introduction PAGEREF _Toc86244342 h 22. Challenges Leaders Face Due to Ongoing Remote Working in an Organisational Setting PAGEREF _Toc86244343 h 22.1 Lack of Trust PAGEREF _Toc86244344 h 22.2 Communication Issues PAGEREF _Toc86244345 h 22.3 Issues of Time and Distance PAGEREF _Toc86244346 h 23. Evaluation of Traditional Leadership Traits and Practices and their Advantages and Disadvantages PAGEREF _Toc86244347 h 33.1 Great Man Theory of leadership PAGEREF _Toc86244348 h 33.2 Trait-based Theory of Leadership PAGEREF _Toc86244349 h 44. Comparison and Contrast of the Foregoing Findings with the more Contemporary Leadership Styles and Traits PAGEREF _Toc86244350 h 54.1 Transactional Leadership PAGEREF _Toc86244351 h 54.2 Transformational Leadership PAGEREF _Toc86244352 h 64.3 Authoritarian-Autocratic Leadership PAGEREF _Toc86244353 h 74.4 Examination of whether both Traditional and Contemporary Leadership Styles Play a Role in Organizations and Remote Working PAGEREF _Toc86244354 h 75. Conclusion PAGEREF _Toc86244355 h 8References PAGEREF _Toc86244356 h 9

Telecommuting Unilever Case Study1. IntroductionThis paper will discuss challenges that leaders in Unilever are facing due to the ongoing remote working, the traditional leadership styles with their advantages and disadvantages when leading the telecommuting teams and a comparison with more contemporary leadership styles and the roles they play in leading teams and projects remotely to meet strategic business objectives.

2. Challenges Leaders Face Due to Ongoing Remote Working in an Organisational SettingTo succeed as a leader in a remote working environment, leaders face various challenges. The challenges include:

2.1 Lack of Trust

Being a multinational company, Unilever needs to establish successful international alliances which is based on trust. However, virtual teams face uncertainties and do not have complete knowledge of all the team members (Alfehaid & Mohamed, 2019). As a result, trust is considered to be more vital in virtual working environments compared to traditional face-to-face working environments. In fact, it is a necessary condition to ensure success in the organization.

2.2 Communication Issues

Virtual communication is different from face-to-face communication in the workplace because in the former, communication is characteristically based on asynchronous information mediated on a computer (Allen, Golden, & Shockle, 2015). However, traditional face-to-face communication uses turn-taking basis in which only one team member talks at a time (Kilpi, 2020).

2.3 Issues of Time and Distance

Typically, distance is among the major challenges faced by virtual leaders in Unilever. In a working relationship, distance may be physical when it is produced by time zone, geography, or organizational size (Bentley et al. 2016). Geographic distance and overlapping hours of work tend to impose burdens on not only the team leader but also on the team members.

3. Evaluation of Traditional Leadership Traits and Practices and their Advantages and Disadvantages

For a few months, telecommuting has been growing thanks to the pandemic and this has led to considerable changes in the methods of work. Unilever is one of the multinational companies that has implemented the telecommuting method of working amidst the COVID-19 pandemic (Contreras, Baykal, & Abid, 2020). The company has successfully implemented a flexible working methods not limited by location, time, communication technology, and use of information. Successful telecommuting requires technological, organizational, and social support through e-leadership practices in which the emergence of Internet services and digital technology facilitates the progress of telecommuting. According to Samartinho, Silva, & Faria, (2014), global virtual teams tend to face the same challenges as traditional teams in addition to the challenges that dispersion of team members generate and the complete dependence on ICT as a communication media. The communication media application affects a leader’s ability of conveying social presence integral to the traditional face-to-face environments (Mehtab et al. 2017). Therefore, with telecommuting, leaders tend to face diversified challenges which forces leaders to adapt to the new working environments. Below are some of the traditional leadership theories that were being implemented in the past. These theories are not applied in Unilever today but even so, they have their respective advantages and disadvantages.

3.1 Great Man Theory of leadership

The Great Man Theory of leadership argues that leaders in general, and particularly great leaders are not made, rather, they are born. According to this theory, it is mandatory for leaders to have certain qualities such as charisma, persuasiveness, charm, intuition, commanding personality, intelligence, courage, action orientation, and aggressiveness (Rüzgar, 2019). It asserts that these qualities are not taught and can never be learned formally. Leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi, Abraham Lincoln, among others are considered to be born with leadership traits and as a result, they were successful in their domains as leaders.

One advantage attributed to this leadership theory is that there is some level of credibility to an extent that great leaders in particular and leaders in general have some mystique about them and their followers view them with awe (Rüzgar, 2019). In some respects, the actions and qualities of such leaders tend to inspire implicit respect.

However, this theory has its fair share of disadvantages; firstly, it is based on the great leaders’ blind faith which happened in history. It looks at the change that these leaders brought without insights into their selfish motives and the real actions behind those changes (Rüzgar, 2019). Secondly, there is lack of great logic behind the great man theory of leadership. It is only based on assumptions and myth. Thirdly, the theory did not take into account the great leaders’ upbringing and childhood and also disregarded the impact of culture, environment, and society in their development. Finally, this theory lacks any scientific evidence to back it up.

3.2 Trait-based Theory of Leadership

This theory of leadership focuses on the identification of various characteristics and personality traits linked to successful leadership across different situations. This research line emerges as among the earliest forms of studies into the effective leadership’s nature and is linked to the great man theory of leadership. According to Hammershaimb (2018) extraordinary leaders continue to shape history. He asserts that the ability to be a leader is something than an individual is born with, rather than something that is developed. The ideas of Carlyle inspired earlier studies on leadership, whose focus was entirely on inheritable traits. Trait-based Theory of Leadership was based on the following rationale; certain behavioral patterns are produced by certain traits, patterns tend to be consistent across various situations, and that individuals are born with traits of leadership (Hammershaimb, 2018). From the standpoint of training and development, this theory implies that if an individual lacks the ‘right’ traits of leadership, then they will not lead effectively and their leadership will not be as successful as natural-born leaders. Furthermore, Hammershaimb (2018) claims that to some degree, training and development can nurture leadership abilities but the most important aspect is to possess the right personality profile or traits.

An advantage of this leadership theory is that is boasts over one hundred years of research to confirm its approach and provides a benchmark for the identification of leaders. It also has disadvantages; firstly, this theory is leader-centric and its focus is exclusively on the leader and not the situation or the followers. Secondly, the Trait Theory research does not take into account the way leadership outcomes is influenced by specific traits. Outcomes can be productivity, performance, and satisfaction.

4. Comparison and Contrast of the Foregoing Findings with the more Contemporary Leadership Styles and TraitsIn leadership just like every aspect of human activity, technology has permeated. With the constant evolution of technological advancements, leaders have experienced different challenges and opportunities in quest to accomplish the organizational objectives and goals. Along with other leadership styles, organizational leaders practice e-leadership irrespective of the size if the organization. As seen from the discussion above, e-leadership allows for leaders and team members to not only share but also improve communication. However, there are disadvantages with each style of leadership which include among other things breakdown of links, technological advancement, handling virtual teams, and lack of social connections among team members. Also, there are costs associated with the implementation of styles such as e-leadership.

An overview of traditional versus contemporary leadership styles reveals contrasts and similarities, yet the ultimate goal of every system is to motivate, guide, and inspire people towards a goal. According to Hussain et al. (2020), traditional leadership styles and traits are all about boundaries, control, regulations, and an array of rules. In the same vein, Bentley et al. (2016) remark that contemporary leadership approaches tend to provide more freedom in terms of thought and decision making, allows more room for innovation and creativity, welcoming new ideas, value the outcome, and embraces multiple perspectives in the decision-making process. Due to these differences in styles and traits, 21st century leaders who are still focused on traditional leadership approaches are unable to make lasting impacts and barely manage to motivate, inspire, and uplift people. For example, a modern-day leader who does not embrace the concept of shared ideas, multiple perspectives on issues, warm welcome on innovative and creative opinions, and a relaxed environment in terms of rules often ends up frustrating the younger generation of employees. As such, only contemporary leadership approaches would fit the modern business environment that makes the people a part of leadership and makes the organization vision a united objective.

4.1 Transactional LeadershipTransactional leadership is a style that values order and structure and it is the one that Unilever leaders mostly implement being that they operate in a large corporate environment. Being a multinational corporation, the leaders in Unilever require that the team members follow specific rules and regulations in order to complete the teams and individual objectives (Jensen et al. 2016). The advantage of transactional style of leadership is that the team members are always self-motivated despite the physical and social distance inherent in telecommuting. In addition, this leadership style enables work to be done in a highly structured directed environment and is focused on ensuring that results are produced above anything else. Although employees are working virtually, they are motivated to achieve organizational and personal goals because there are clear consequences and rewards offered (Jensen et al. 2016). However, within an innovative environment such as Unilever, it is difficult to develop achievable goals within the teams. Goals are only achievable when the ending points are defined. Transactional leaders tend to create such end points as a part of an organizational structure. This implies that each step that team members take has been outlined for them and this limits the achievable level of innovation (Kalsoom, Khan, & Zubair, 2018). Transactional leaders also follow a structured policy which dictates actions rather than common sense, thus, it is not easy for team members to demonstrate their creativity when the leaders dictate their level of creativity.

4.2 Transformational LeadershipTransformational leadership allows leaders to transform themselves through changing their actions and behaviors, they connect and interact with the team members. As a result, higher levels of morality, motivation, and performance are created. Unilever leaders practice transformational leadership during telecommuting through online interaction on zoom and other platforms (Budur, 2020). The leaders implement a dual dynamic between them and the team members to achieve organizational objectives. Through online interaction, transformational leaders at Unilever try to let the team members feel that they have mutual goals and that they are working together to achieve those goals. The disadvantage of this leadership style is that transformational leaders always assume or think that their subordinates will always be in agreement with their ideas and that they will always be motivated by their ideas (Kalsoom, Khan, & Zubair, 2018). This is a setback because there are situations where there is need for change.

4.3 Authoritarian-Autocratic LeadershipAuthoritarian-Autocratic Leadership is considered as one of the earliest or possibly the first style of leadership to be established. These types of leaders are described as power-orientated, closed-minded, and controlling (Hussain et al. 2020). At times, they practice transactional leadership style. Furthermore, autocratic leaders are portrayed dominant and overbearing and they control their subordinates with demands, rules, punishments, and threats. Unilever leaders do not practice autocratic leadership style because they believe that it would lead to the employees having resentment towards the organization and leaders alike. In addition, an autocratic leadership style is not friendly thinking outside the box nor is it innovation friendly which leaves employees feeling stifled intellectually (Hussain et al. 2020). Despite all the disadvantages of the Autocratic leadership style, one advantage is that subordinates are aware of what is expected of them and what happens if they underperform. This way, the organizational and personal goals are achieved no matter what which improves employee productivity.

4.4 Examination of whether both Traditional and Contemporary Leadership Styles Play a Role in Organizations and Remote WorkingTraditional leadership styles present several communication issues. While traditional face-to-face communication is richer in para-verbal (auditory) and nonverbal (visual) cues, it also means the current issue that has demanded organizations to use remote working as a necessary requirement cannot occur. Secondly, there is a lot of information that is lost because of the multiple communication channels that team members use simultaneously. Thirdly, virtual communication minimizes feelings of conversational involvement and social presence. Moreover, virtual communication in the workplace may result in leaders losing contextual or social information such as a member’s expertise level thanks to anonymity (Allen, Golden, & Shockley, 2015). This happens because communication in a virtual setting occurs through electronic channels and that there is a lack of physical contact.

Overall, both traditional and contemporary leadership styles have a major role in shaping the success of remote working or otherwise. From the discussion above, the benefits of a contemporary leadership style in regard to remote working outdo the problems with traditional leadership styles.

5. ConclusionWhether in traditional or contemporary leadership style, the objectives are related. The fundamental objectives of leadership have not changed and that they continue to tackle the issues of direction, vision, inspiration, and motivation. In this regard, contemporary leadership wins in the effort to effectively apply remote working at Unilever.

ReferencesAlfehaid, L., & Mohamed, E. E. (2019), ‘Understanding the influence of E-leadership on Virtual Team Performance Empirical Study’, Int. J. Bus. Appl. Soc. Sci, 5, pp. 21-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.33642/ijbass.v5n10p3

Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015), ‘How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings’, Psychological science in the public interest, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 40-68. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1529100615593273

Bentley, T. A., Teo, S. T., McLeod, L., Tan, F., Bosua, R., & Gloet, M. (2016), ‘The role of organisational support in teleworker wellbeing: A socio-technical systems approach’, Applied ergonomics, vol. 52, pp. 207-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.07.019

Budur, T. (2020), ‘Effectiveness of transformational leadership among different cultures,’ International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 119-129.

Contreras, F., Baykal, E., & Abid, G. (2020), ‘E-leadership and teleworking in times of COVID-19 and beyond: what we know and where do we go’, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 11, pp. 3484. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.590271Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019), ‘Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research’, The leadership quarterly, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 111-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004

Hammershaimb, L. (2018), ‘Distributed leadership in education’, Journal of Online Higher Education, vol. 2, no. 1.

Hussain, A., Yang, X., Yali, L., Ibrahim, A., & Hussain, S. (2020), ‘The Impact of Autocratic Leadership on Disruptive Political Behavior, Moderating the Relationship of Abusive Supervisory Behavior and Mediating the Relationship of Employee¡¯ s Perception of Job Insecurity’, International Journal of Economics and Finance, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1-57. doi:10.5539/ijef.v12n6p57

Jensen, U. T., Andersen, L. B., Bro, L. L., Bøllingtoft, A., Eriksen, T. L. M., Holten, A. L., & Würtz, A. (2019), ‘Conceptualizing and measuring transformational and transactional leadership’, Administration & Society, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 3-33. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0095399716667157Kalsoom, Z., Khan, M. A., & Zubair, D. S. S. (2018), ‘Impact of transactional leadership and transformational leadership on employee performance: A case of FMCG industry of Pakistan’, Industrial Engineering Letters, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 23-30.

Kilpi, A. (2020). Practical Factors of Successful Telecommuting. https://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/347327/Kilpi_Aki.pdf?sequence=2

Mehtab, K., ur Rehman, A., Ishfaq, S., & Jamil, R. A. (2017), ‘Virtual leadership: a review paper’, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 8. No. 4, pp. 183-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2017.v8n4s1p183Rüzgar, N. (2019), ‘Leadership Traits of Suleiman The Magnificiant, In Terms Of “Great Man” Theory’, Journal of Ottoman Legacy Studies. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Niluefer-Ruezgar/publication/335267935_LEADERSHIP_TRAITS_OF_SULEIMAN_THE_MAGNIFICIANT_IN_TERMS_OF_GREAT_MAN_THEORY/links/5db947b9a6fdcc2128ebe672/LEADERSHIP-TRAITS-OF-SULEIMAN-THE-MAGNIFICIANT-IN-TERMS-OF-GREAT-MAN-THEORY.pdf

Samartinho, J., Silva, P., & Faria, J. (2014). ‘Good practices in virtual leadership–the e-3cs rule (communication, trust and coordination)’.

Van Wart, M., Roman, A., Wang, X., and Liu, C. (2019) ‘Operationalizing the definition of e-leadership: identifying the elements of e-leadership’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 80-97. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0020852316681446