Recent orders

Aspects of Psychology

Aspects of Psychology

B.F Skinner described negative reinforcement in the operant conditioning theory as a response that can be strengthening by avoiding a negative outcome as well as aversive stimulus. Aversive stimuli involve distress that is physical or emotional. Behaviors are reinforced negatively when one is permitted to escape from aversive stimuli that are already present or permit one to shun the aversive stimuli prior to their happening. One way to remember the meaning of negative reinforcement is to thinking about it as something that is initially there, but taken away from the situation (Dennis coon 2008).

Operant conditioning theory explains that positive reinforcement includes anything that encourages the likelihood of behavior occurring in the future. In a situation, one is rewarded after an action; the behavior in the individual is strengthened. The basic way of identifying positive reinforcement is viewing it as an addition of something. This makes it possible to identify its examples in any given situation. Punishment is termed as a result, after an operant response in order to discourage the possibility of the same response happening in the future.

Behaviorism outlines positive punishment occurring when a negative outcome is used in response to behaviors viewed as undesirable. With time, positive punishment happens to discourage the behavior occurring in the future. In an effort to reduce the possibility of behavior taking place in the future, an operant response is followed by presenting of an aversive incentive. This is what is termed as positive punishment. Attempts to diminish the chances of behavior happening in the future, operant response is exerted by the elimination of the appetitive stimulus. This is termed as negative punishment (Carol Sigelman 2011).

From time to time, people innocently support undesirable behaviors. This has a great influence on the actions of an individual as it results to the unethical behavior becoming a habit. This also promotes inculcation of undesirable behavior in individuals making it difficult to change their perceptions on their behaviors. The scenario gives a basis to provide an ethical framework when dealing with a person behavior. It is important to use appropriate reinforcement to avert encouraging undesirable behaviors. A student who does not do his homework but gives it to the parent to help him or her out is not being honest. In most cases, the parent does not see anything wrong in that but with time it encourages dishonesty in the child. The most vital aspect as a teacher when dealing with the students is rewarding an effort that leads to a change to positive behavior (Kalat 2010).

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY l 1033 Carol K. Sigelman, E. A. (2011). Lifespan Human Development. New York: Cengage Learning.

Dennis Coon, J. O. (2008). Introduction to Psychology:Gateways to Mind and Behaviour. London: Cengage Learning.

Kalat, J. W. (2010). Introduction to psychology. London: Cengage Learning.

Various Perspectives (theories) of Psychology

In order to understand behavior, it is important to comprehend the evolving nature of psychology since the time of its origin. There are various aspects of psychology. Behaviorism as one of psychology theories is founded on the perception that all people’s behavior is acquired by the process of conditioning. It takes place through contact with the environment. The theory believes behavior can be learnt in a logical and visible manner with no reflection of internal mental states (Plotnik 2010).

Classical conditioning is a type of conditioning that is used in behavioral instruction which involves pairing a stimulus occurring with a response. Subsequently, a previously impartial stimulus is harmonized with the stimulus occurring naturally in the environment. Finally, the earlier neutral stimulus evokes the responses in the absence of the naturally occurring incentive. The two elements are identified as the conditioned stimulus as well as conditioned response (Chadee 2011).

Operant conditioning at times referred as instrumental conditioning. It is a process of learning that takes place through rewards and punishments directed towards behavior change. During operant conditioning, a relationship is made between behavior and a result of that behavior. An example of the theory is when a scoundrel presses a lever with its left paw, the right paw or the tail. All the responses have the same results as the final result is similar. Operants are frequently thought of as a variety of responses, where the persons differ but the class function is shared among them

Cognitive theory deals with the maturity of a person’s thought processes. It also takes into consideration the processes influencing how one understand and interrelate with humanity. Jean Piaget, the prime cognitive thinker, proposed a suggestion that seems evident now, however, helped transform how people think concerning child development. He believed children think differently as compared to adults. Piaget later came up with a cognitive theory to explain the steps and succession of children’s intellectual progress. Cognitive theory is an erudition hypothesis of psychology that tries to clarify individual behavior by taking into account the thought processes. The supposition is that human beings are logical creatures that make choices that seems sensible to them. Information dispensation is generally used to depict the psychological process, comparing a person brain to a computer (Chadee 2011).

Pure cognitive theory mainly rejects behaviorism in that behaviorism attributes complex human behavior to uncomplicated cause and effect. The tendency in the past has been to merge the two into a complete cognitive-behavioral speculation. This permits therapists to use techniques in helping clients attain their goals. Usually, they are reasonable, cultured things. Abstract philosophy comes into it. As one grows older, a person recognizes the consequences of one’s behavior as one thought develops and envisions the implication of one’s action (J. Shettleworth 2009)

Humanistic psychologist theory tries to view people lives the same way those people would envision them. It tends to accord the human nature an optimistic approach on human nature. It focuses on the ability of a person to think consciously, and sensibly, so as to be in command of their biological urges, and realize their full potential. In the humanistic theory, people are accountable for their actions and have the liberty and will in modifying their attitudes and actions. The capability to enjoy work and view it as a way of fulfilling a mission is an example of a humanistic approach to psychology. Humanistic psychology focuses on individual potential and emphasizes the significance of development and self-actualization. This has encouraged creativity and self belief among people. The three branches of psychology have led to a deeper insight in understanding the mind of an individual and behavior. Humanistic psychology dimension takes a more holistic view of the individual as a reason for one’s actions. Behaviorism mainly concentrates on a person’s behaviors and does not take into account the mind when dealing with behavior change (Plotnik 2010).

Cognitive theory based individual actions on the activities taking place in the mind. Therefore, stressing that people’s behavior is as a result of their thoughts. Social cognitive theory is applied in advertising campaigns as well as peer pressure situations. It is also helpful in the management of psychological disorders that include phobias. In today’s society, there is an agreement amongst researchers and educators that developmental psychology plays an important role in a learning environment. It encourages learners to learn and think therefore, bringing out their best. Humanistic approach stresses the present times and attempts to predict the future rather than concentrate on the past. It outlines that the objective of living is to achieve individual growth and understanding thus making one happy.

To be emotionally healthy, an individual has to be liable for their behavior in spite of positive or negative actions. It promotes appreciation of all human kind and emphasizes individual worth. Behaviorism is based on the suggestion that behavior can be researched scientifically without an alternative to the state in the mind. It denies any sovereign significance of the mind. This is important as it is used in psychological treatment as well as one of the foundations of pharmacological rehabilitation (Chadee 2011).

References

Chadee, D. (2011). Theories in Psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Plotnik, R. (2010). Introduction to Psychology. London : Cengage Learning .

J.Shettleworth, S. (2009). Cognition,evolution,and behaviour. New York: Oxford University Press.

 

 

How Adults Learn

How Adults Learn

Introduction

Transition is a mental or emotional transformation that people undergo in order to relinquish old methods and welcome new ones. Actually, transition is psychological process that takes place inside a person. Efficient transition is attained through coaching and mentoring of the concerned individuals. This system also includes organizational transformation processes, where major external forces stimulate change.

Mentorship facilitates adequate and reliable change management strategies that ensure that significant and valid changes are implemented in a controlled and systematic manner. One of the aims of change management in an organization is to overcome resistance to change, thus increasing involvement and attainment of organizational goals. Any self-respecting leadership is rooted on coaching and mentoring practices.

Thesis Statement

This study focuses on mentoring/coaching practices that generate unique leadership skills to individuals and organizations. It evaluates the importance of embracing transitional phases by adopting transformational leadership in organizations, and developing insight on individuals’ ways of life. The paper provides several qualities of good leadership framework that should add value to the organization, hence accumulating revenues. The study concludes by highlighting the importance of embracing leadership mentoring in all transitional aspects of life.

Principles of Coaching and Mentorship

Coaching and mentoring are two distinct development methods that nurture individual ability on behavior and performance. Coaching focus on instilling skills for personal development whereas mentorship emphasizes on adding value to individuals through communication. Despite this difference on definition, the two words are used interchangeably since one would remain meaningless in the absence of the other. Both mentoring and coaching are currently focused as the mechanisms for leadership development (Kotter, 1999).

Leadership coaching is a general term that describes specific types of intervention that are applied to individuals or in organizations in order to boost their level of performance. It aims at directing individuals towards achieving a given mutually determined goal. As a result, leadership coaching can stimulate organizational progress by enhancing focus and awareness of doing something. It is about providing support to people who are being coached to reach fuller potentials to work efficiently.

An organization may apply both internal and external coaches in order to reach certain levels of performance. Internal coaches are employees of the company or the organization, whereas external coaches are contracted to work in the organization through mentorship, data evaluation, auditing and analysis work. It is important to note that confidentiality is critical in organization especially when these coaches are familiar with inside and outside of the company. Most mentoring approaches focus on absolute trust among the players in the company, thus creating liveliness and harmonious exchanges between individuals and their mentors (Synnot, 2007).

A toxic or moribund behavior in individuals can be replaced through working together in finding ways to create value-oriented system of doing work. More creative ways generates a positive contagion that affects the degrees of getting to the desired level. Leadership coaching is viewed as iterative process in which people can evaluate new behavior and endorse them, provided they adds hope and enthusiasm in the individuals’ ways of life or the organizational productivity.

Notably, people resist to changes even when leadership coaching/mentoring are meant to help them lessen psychological implications such as pressure, tension and anxiety. Individuals tend to doubt their abilities in doing something new since they are cultured to the old ways of life. When people in a company are driven by fear; a toxic culture may results. However, people are less likely to oppose a given change especially when their anxieties are controlled through mentorship.

Successful transformational leadership implies new ways of doing things. It is founded on innovation, technological practices, as well as change of roles. Mentors create awareness that higher qualifications varies directly with the levels of performance. It is from this perspective that people prefer to add knowledge and skills to their professions in order to become a powerful force in their duties.

Mentoring also helps individuals to remain focused on what is essential for personal success as well as organization growth. Whatever the context, transformational leadership is crucial for evaluating other sphere of life and even facing new challenge in the line of developing own career. Notably, the higher up the ladder a leader climbs, the more he or she is accustomed to limited responsibilities in the organization since much of the work is done through delegating it to the juniors. However, good relationship between the management and the workers is an issue of grave importance since it determines the levels of success. A friendly environment eliminates fear, desolation and suspicion among the workers (Synnot, 2007).

Erik Eriksen Eight Stage Process for Creating Major Change

There are several methods available to comprehending, frame-thinking and initiating a change. Erik Eriksen is one of the prominent thinkers who teach leadership across all areas of human life. He highlights key principles that relates to organization change, hence facilitating achieving the organization goals. These principles of changes ensure that leadership barriers are avoided, and dealt with whenever they emerge. The key leadership traits for creating major change are:

Establishing a sense of urgency- efficient leaders should strive to ensure that they help other members in an organization to see the need of a change and the important of acting on it. Actually, competent leadership is building on aggressiveness at work and the urgency to implement new production strategies within the organization so as to increase the productivity of the company. These objectives are possible only through amending the existing production and marketing strategies, thus building competitive realities. In addition, transformational changes are realized through identification, evaluation and discussion of the potential crises within the organization.

Creating Guiding Coalition- a leading organization is built on collective participation of its members in decision making. This goes hand in hand with team work; an attribute that creates self awareness, seriousness in taking responsibilities and respect to one another. Top management in organization should ensure that there are powerful groups coaching other members on appropriate leadership skills, communication skills, interventions during emergencies, and quality analytical skills.

Team work is an influential way of building organizational integrity, self esteem, exchange of ideas and cordial relationship at work. Indeed, a friendly environment is proportional to the rate of accomplishing a given task within a given period. Sour relationship trails the marketing processes within an organization. Powerful coaching is enough to lead organizational groups to work together in attempts of realizing the set goals.

Developing Vision and Strategy- individuals should clarify how the future will be different from the past by developing realistic visions. Visions go hand in hand with setting attainable goals based on the existing state of social, economic and political matters. Creating vision helps individuals to realize a given change without encountering difficulties as the urgency to attain and implement the change serves as the stepping stone.

It is crucial for individual or an organization to get their vision right. Visionary organizations or individuals cannot be deterred by challenges or complexity behind attaining a given task. This means that individuals should develop appropriate strategies that will be decisive in realizing their set goals.

Communicating the Change Vision- Kotter, (1999) argues that no man’s ideas have ever being the best. In case of an organization, manager should ensure that other members in the organization understand the intended change. This stage involves intensive evaluation of the intended change, synthesis and collaborative implementation. Executive board, marketing and production experts, employees and the surrounding community should held a discussion on the proposed change, facilitating coming up with amicable and coherent solution.

Individuals acquire mentorship regarding crucial matters in order to prevent their intended plans to backfire. Guidance on the key issues is important as it develops a creative and submissive way of attaining a given change. Psychological behaviors such as anxiety and pressure are accommodated, enabling individual to remain composed throughout the transformational period (Whitmore, 2002).

Empowering Far-reaching Actions- decision making is more about taking risks. Whenever individuals plan to usher in a new way of doing thing, abandoning the old ways, they forego many things that had been operational. Risk taking involves disregarding older methods and endorsing new ways. Apparently, individuals should strive to ensure that they remove all the barriers that may seem to prevent them from getting to the desired levels.

In case of an organization, leaders should encourage members to work tirelessly to enhance realization of the set objectives. Where possible, the management should restructure the organizational schemes and create efficient techniques for achieving the required change. Labor force should be integrated to comprise both skilled and non-skilled members in order to enhance infusion of quick, effective and valuable production and marketing processes. In exceptional and delicate levels of the organization, the management should employ qualified staffs who are capable of transforming the organizational to the expected levels.

Generating short-term improvement- Any development starts with making simple wins which matures into large parts. Visible and unambiguous successes boost personal morale of engaging stiffer measures on achieving long term goals. Any success is built on effective planning and collaborative participation of all the stakeholders in the projects. It is crucial to assess the weak points in order to initiate full achievement of the desired goals. Moreover, it is necessary to cement on the strongholds contributing to the development so that they supplement the weaker areas.

Good organizational leadership should embark on processes that improve levels of achievement and add resources on them in order to sustain productivity. The management should recognize individuals who are exemplary in various sectors of the organization. Motivational practices add power and willingness to remain committed in euthanizing the behavior practices of the organization (Kotter, 1999).

Consolidating Gains- After realization of first achievements, Erikson stresses on pressing harder and faster towards making broad gains. This momentum of work ensures that individual cope with complex matters in attempts to reach greater heights. For instance, it would be prudent to enroll in college education after completing high school studies. Interestingly, university education would add value to the knowledge attained. These systematic approach allow an individual to reach academic pinnacle via consolidation of efforts from prior achievements.

More change is realized by increasing credibility to change existing manner of solving issues, restructuring of working framework, and fitting of the policies of work. Further, it is prudent hiring experienced and professional mentors who assist individuals in making solid and workable decisions. These agents hold an important role in determining the success of an individual or a company. A management may acquire information on ways to improve the performance of the organization by gaining insight from auditors and economic analyst (Whitmore, 2002).

Anchoring new methods in the culture- transformational leadership or change of a system is made possible through holding on to the new ways of behavior despite the challenges encountered. Persistence on a given behavior, especially when aimed to replace the old habit, enhances its quick achievement. Subsequently, such behavior becomes part of very culture of the organization or an individual. New methods of work break the boredom, thus adding interest to continue with a given activity. Ever changing means of handling a given challenge score higher than living upon one style of dealing with the issue.

New approaches of work in an organization enhance good performance and setting of pace to work on. This works on cementing the customer-seller relationship, adding the revenues obtained in the company. Still, the management acquires an opportunity to effect management by articulating the new behaviors with the organizational success. Transformative leadership is also effected through implementing new working habits in the organization.

Conclusion

Mentors provide individuals with a safe transitional pace that enables them to remain devoted in realizing their ambitions. In organizational leadership, coaches act as the mirror for the management on what they are, what they need to do, and how to accomplish a given goal. Successful leadership mentors enhance transformational change through creational of transitional space for the stakeholders.

Leadership mentors provide the necessary support to individuals by recommending on the appropriate skills, resources and creative practices that are essential to reach to the next level.

References

Kotter, J. (1999). What Leaders Really Do. Harvard Business School Press, Massachusetts, USA.

Synnot, B. (2007). The Toolbox for Change. Practical Approach. Danjugah Pty, Brisbane,

Australia.

Whitmore, J. (2002). Coaching for Performance: Growing People, Performance and Purpose.

Oxford: Nicolas Brealey Publishing.

How a person thinks about his or her life is proper determinant of their health status

Name:

Instructor:

Course:

Date:

Positive thinking refers to the emotional and mental attitude that inclines on the bright part of life as well as expects positive results. A positive individual foresees health, success, and happiness. Not all people who accept positive thinking as others may consider it as scoff and nonsense for people who follow it. According to Martin Seligman, positive thinking is the ability to reason in a way that brings happiness and define a pleasant life. As positive thinking may indicate, numerous positive things come with a line of thought. Positive thoughts develop proper cognitive development and soberness that exposes one to creativity. As a result, advancement occurs in the lives for the positive thinkers. How a person thinks about his or her life is proper determinant of their health status.

Positive thinking reduces stress and depression leading to improved health. According to Bono et al., “naturally occurring positive events and positive reflections of employees lead to reduced stress and better health” (Bono et al 1603). An individual who focuses on positive thoughts does not dwell on regrets. He or she does not aim on the unfortunate events and their effects on the flow of their lives. Whenever, negative issues attack their lives they have a positive attitude that makes them approach the problem with a suitable solution. Stress mainly comes when an individual dwells in regrets over an issue that cannot change or would take massive time to change. Once an individual has fed his or her mind with positive thoughts, he avoids the stress line, which matures to depression. It is clear that the depression is a common health problem among people who do not believe in positive thinking (Dvorsky 02).

Positive thoughts help in relieving stress. The thoughts trigger the mind to think in the line of possibilities and not difficulties. Such minds do not recognize failure as a portion for their lives, and they believe in giving their efforts to every issue on their way. There is the willingness to push away any negative thought that may discourage their exclusive growth or concern for life. Positive thinkers carry out their activities in a logical and organized manner to ensure no confusion that may cause stress comes their way (Blum 249). Positive thinking sheds off extensive thoughts over an issue and focuses on the elements that would bring development. Positive thoughts kick away stress enabling development in an individual. Negative thoughts yield extensive stress which is the main cause of depression.

Positive thoughts are proper ingredients to quick recovery from medical issues. Aspinwall and Richard who are researchers in the field of psychology teaching the subject in various universities in the United States such as the University of North Carolina state, “Optimism also associated with positive behaviors, better recovery from certain medical procedures, positive changes in the immune system functioning and improved survival rates.” (Aspinwall & Richard, 05). In their argument, they add that optimist patients have approximately 10% survival chances from trauma compared to pessimists. Other times, it is difficult for the patients to recover from their poor health status if they cannot encourage themselves. There is proper need for them to develop positive thoughts. Since it may be hard for them to develop positive thoughts on their own, psychologists would play a critical role in influencing the patients’ positive thoughts (Lightsey 325). The hope that the patients obtain from psychologists would influence the health status of the patients. Patients who get moral support from psychologists are likely to recover faster (Blum 251). Positive thinking attracts proper health behaviors that assures one of good health.

The mind controls all the activities in the body of an individual. They determine how all body processes flow and the extent to which each process can go. Therefore, there is exclusive need to ensure the patients retain positive mind. The psychologists must portray their exclusive support for the patients to rejuvenate the wellbeing (Slegman 01). The support acts as therapy to the patients, and it becomes extremely easy for them to respond positively to medication. Therefore, positive mind would influence the health status of an individual (Aspinwall & Richard, 08). In this case, positive thinking would be highly effective for students. Positive thinking among children maintains soberness thus success for the students in their classrooms. Also, the psychological support may not have equal influence among patients. Some patients may not have a direct benefit from the psychological support. At some point, the psychotherapy may worsen their health status. The medical condition must be fulfilled if the psychological work is to influence the success of the recovery of the patient (Blum 252).

However, there are various opposing views on that one’s outlook on life does not influence their health. Moreover, the argument is not significant in defining the relevance of marinating positive thoughts. Some people may argue on positive thinking as a way of life. They do not consider it as a factor that would influence their health status. Hope will always create a positive mind for people. Therefore, it is extremely difficult to conclude that the positive mind would influence the health status of an individual. Since every individual has hope for a successful life, it would be impossible to have sick people in the society. Therefore, positive mind cannot guarantee proper health (Dvorsky 02).

Hope shows the positivity of an individual to life. The main concern is on the sensitivity of how people would view hope as a healing element. The element just activates the willingness of an individual to respond to positively to medication. People must learn to differentiate between hope and positive thinking. There must be proper connection between medication and hope if positive thinking is to appear as a relevant element of a healthy life (Burkeman O1). However, it may not be guaranteed that the individual will heal depending on the level of his or her hope.

However, positive thinking alone cannot assure an individual proper health. Once a person is unwell, he or she must follow the right medical path to achieving wellness. There must be proper consideration for the necessary prescription to ensure good health. A patient must be ready to uphold certain medical rules so that he may recover from a health problem. At no point does the line of thinking for the individual come to rescue in case of a health problem (Oettingen 02).

Combination of positive thinking with proper medical and health standards can assure an individual proper health. The brain is recognizable as the controller of all the functions of the body. Therefore, the status of the mind would influence how the body functions. In this case, both positive and negative thoughts dictate the response of the body to certain health issues. It is proper to argue that both positive and negative thoughts would influence the health status of an individual (Sasson 01).

The mind of an individual is central to the activities that take place in the body. Numerous processes in the body have to rely on the mind. Therefore, the status of the mind would influence the status of the body. When an individual switches to a positive mode of thinking, proper health is guaranteed. Excessive exposure to negative thoughts attracts diseases and complication of the ones in existence. Therefore, the thoughts of an individual over his or her health determine the health status.

Works Cited

Bottom of Form

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Bottom of Form

Aspinwall, Lisa $& Richard, Tedeschi. The value of positive psychology for health psychology: progress and pitfalls in examining the relation of positive phenomena to health. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 39.1(2010):4-15

Blum, Alan F. “Positive Thinking.” Theory and Society (2013): 245-69. Print.

Bono, Joyce et al. Building positive resources: Effects of positive events and positive reflection on work stress and health. Academy of Management Journal. 56.6. (2013):1601-1607.Web

Burkeman, Oliver. “The Power of Negative Thinking.” The New York Times. The New York Times, 4 Aug. 2012. Web. 22 Nov. 2014. <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/05/opinion/sunday/the-positive-power-of-negative-thinking.html>.

Dvorsky, George. “Does “Positive Thinking” Really Make Our Lives Better?”Io9. Daily Explainer, 21 Nov. 2014. Web. 22 Nov. 2014. <http://io9.com/does-positive-thinking-really-make-our-lives-better-1661658148>.Top of Form

Lightsey, Owen Richard. “”Thinking Positive” as a Stress Buffer: The Role of Positive Automatic Cognitions in Depression and Happiness.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 6 (2010): 325-34. Print.

Oettingen, Gabriele. “The Problem With Positive Thinking.” The New York Times. The New York Times, 25 Oct. 2014. Web. 22 Nov. 2014. <http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/26/opinion/sunday/the-problem-with-positive-thinking.html?_r=0>.

Sasson, Remmez. “The Power of Positive Thinking.” And Attitude. SuccessConsciousness.com. Web. 22 Nov. 2014. <http://www.successconsciousness.com/index_000009.htm>.

Slegman, Martin. “Transcript of “The New Era of Positive Psychology”” Martin Seligman: The New Era of Positive Psychology. 8 July 2008. Web. 22 Nov. 2014. <http://www.ted.com/talks/martin_seligman_on_the_state_of_psychology/transcript?language=en>.

The Mayo Clinic Staff, “Stress Management.” Positive Thinking: Reduce Stress by Eliminating Negative Self-talk. Mayo Clinic. Web. 22 Nov. 2014. <http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-living/stress-management/in-depth/positive-thinking/art-20043950>.

Top of Form