Recent orders
Rhetorical Analysis of Code Switching from Blogs
Student’s Name
Course
Professor
Date
Rhetorical Analysis of Code Switching from Blogs
Introduction
Code-switching gets construed as a condition where a speaker alternates two or more languages to create a comprehensive meaning of an action or art that the information characterizes. Majorly, artists and politicians used code-switching to deliver their information to the audience for an array of message conceptualizations. My analysis of code-switching depicts a scenario where Rihanna, a celerity icon code, switches to release the anti, asexual exploration of womanhood, relationships, loneliness, and success that characterizes her situation. Also, senator Bernie Sanders used Code-switching to woo the African American votes. Therefore, the paper uses rhetorical analysis to examine the code-switching of Rihanna and Bernie Sanders.
Rhetorical Analysis
Pathos
Rihanna uses code-switching to represent the sexual exploration of women. Through her Bajan accent, which the white audience finds unfamiliar, Rihanna conceptualizes the information on the need to protect feminism in society. However, the audience responded to the code-switching with ignorance (LanguagesinConflict 1). Also, the audience thought she was speaking nonsense hence having a sad feeling that Rihanna should change her motive of singing. Continuous incorporation of the Caribbean English Creole using the elements of syntax created a mixed reaction by the audience but sent the information to those who could understand her motive. Consequently, Bernie Sanders used code-switching in his campaign to woo African American voters to support his candidate (Diaz 2). The African Americans felt that the Bernie Sanders team was with them, creating an emotion o the need to vote for the team.
Logos
The logic was spoken by Rihanna when she used code-switching to speak about the need to fight against the social marginalization that women have undergone in several countries. Also, the logic of code-switching acted as a representation o recognizing the Jamaican Patois and Caribbean Creole, which depicts the oppression and the Eurocentric dominance that the African Americans had undergone (LanguagesinConflict 2). Bernie Sanders continues to use Logos through the logical argument about the inclusivity of African Americans in the governments during his political campaign (Diaz 2). The logic creates a sense of belonging where the youth will fight against the social oppression in society.
Ethos
Ethos involves the use of ethics in Rihanna’s song. Rihanna uses code-switching to ethically conceptualize the musical information she needs to deliver to a broad audience (LanguagesinConflict 1). Moreover, Ethos is applied by Bernier sander in his campaign that included the Code Switching to create a sense of oneness with the Arica American youths.
Language, Audience, Tone, Purpose, Stance, or Structure
Rihanna was singing to the white audience to protect the feminine through the use of the Caribbean creole structures. Also, Bernie Sanders used the African American accent to lure the youth to support their candidates using a linguistic structure that youths can easily conceptualize (Diaz 1). He saw that he would gain more votes from the young black Americans.
Conclusion
The application of code-switching has enabled Rihanna to deliver information on the need to protect women against aggression in society. Also, Bernie Sander has used code-switching to lure the African American youth to vote for his kin senatorial position. As such, the rhetorical analysis of Rihanna and Bernie Sander’s use of Code Switching has conceptualized the use of logic, emotions, and ethics.
Works Cited
LanguagesinConflict. Rihanna’s Code Switching. 2018. https://languagesinconflict.wordpress.com/2018/05/14/rihannas-code-switching/
Diaz, Evelyne. Bernie Sanders Campaign Admits to Code Switching. His messaging changes when dealing with younger vs. older Black voters. 2016. https://www.bet.com/article/bfhx0v/bernie-sanders-campaign-admits-to-code-switching
Sweat” — Zora Neale Hurston & The Husband Stitch Carmen Maria Machado
Student’s name
Course
Instructor
Due Date
“Sweat” — Zora Neale Hurston & The Husband Stitch Carmen Maria Machado
Comparative Synthesis Essay
Zora Neale Hurston published “Sweat,” a book about influential people in her life, in 1926. Civil rights organizations such as the National Urban League (NUL) and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) gained significant power between 1924 and 1926. During a period of interracial association between sympathetic white Americans and the African American Talented Tenth, Zora Neale Hurston wrote “Sweat.”
Zora Hurston Symbolism abounds in “Sweat” by Neale Hurston, with some symbols being obvious and others necessitating further reflection. In Hurston’s story, the title “Sweat” serves as a major visual cue. Delia is shown to have a strong work ethic and to have faced difficulties in her relationship. Additionally, rattlesnakes are known for their reliability. The story revolves around the rattlesnake because of the way it links everything together. Hurston paints a picture of Delia as a hardworking woman who takes care of Sykes and herself throughout “Sweat. “Weeks pass, hot or cold, rain or shine,” Delia says (Hurston 532). Throughout her life, Delia has dedicated herself to her work and it shows in her sweat. By her work ethic, Delia demonstrated her pride in her job as a washwoman, no matter what the circumstances were. There is a symbol in Delia’s laundry room as well.
It was the whitest pile of items that he stomped on, kicking them all over the place haphazardly. ” Hurston Street, New York, New York 531 As if it were her own, she takes care of and protects it as if it were her own laundry. For this reason, Delia is portrayed as an African American during a difficult time in history because the laundry belongs to white people, not hers. While Delia is referred to as the “whitest pile of things,” Syke’s discoloration is a result of his evil intentions. The rattlesnake is the story’s most recognizable symbol (Hurston’s 530).
Sweat” is the story of Delia Jones, the protagonist of the novel by Zora Neale Hurston. Sykes Jones, Delia’s abusive husband, has been married to her for fifteen years. She appears to be an slender woman who has overworked herself because her shoulders appear to be drooping (Lowe 74). His wife’s snake phobia is exploited by Sykes, her husband
In ‘Sweat,’ she documents the circumstances that led to her husband’s death and the abuse he suffered at the hands of his mistresses. Many things make Delia a great example of a Black woman in the 1920s (Jones 85). Housemaids and laundry workers in predominantly white households were the most common jobs held by African American working-class women during this time period (Croft 21).
Delia was one of many African American women who had to work long hours and earn a pittance because of the prevailing conditions at the time (Miles 52). While it was common practice in the era, Sykes takes advantage of Delia and wastes her money because of it. To be a submissive wife was expected of African-American women who were often exploited even if they earned more than the men they were married to (Croft 21).
Racist publications of the time widely circulated white stereotypes about African Americans, such as Sykes’ fondness for curvy women and his penchant for excessive spending (Jones 84). Delia, on the other hand, is unique in that she is the sole breadwinner of her family, a role not shared by other black women at the time (Lowe 75).
Delia’s low self-esteem stemmed from Sykes’ verbal and physical abuse, so she ended up staying with him. This leaves Delia feeling as though she has no choice when it comes to trying to find a new love. After enduring the abuse for some time, she finally breaks down and confronts Sykes about it (Lowe 76).
The rattlesnake, like Syke, is regarded as evil from the beginning to the end of the story. In Syke’s mind, he had no remorse for scaring and threatening Delia. The snake symbolizes evil, and Syke’s demeanour and actions reflect this. Hurston used symbolism as a central theme throughout the story “Sweat.” When Syke becomes a victim of his own wrongdoing, the story reaches its climax. Syke was killed by the rattlesnake that was supposed to attack Delia. Syke’s violent behavior would no longer affect her. It represents a woman’s gender and skin color-related strengths and experiences.
When Delia and her husband fell out of love, her only desire was to stay at the house she had worked for and attend church on Sundays. This means she may have no desire for other men and prefers being alone if Sykes and she cannot work out their differences” (Lowe 77). As a result, black authors during the Harlem Renaissance were forbidden from depicting negative traits like alcoholism and promiscuity in their works. At the end of the story, the author depicts Delia as a completely different character.
If she’s afraid of the snake, or if she’s willingly allowing her husband to die, it’s possible. As a result of her actions, Delia’s husband died, and the author appears to emphasize that Delia lacks a viable alternative to her situation. Thus, the author believes Delia’s demeanor reflects a sense of liberation and a rejection of traditional values, which are reflected in her attitude.
Carmen Maria Machado’s The Husband Stitch’s unnamed narrator, a self-proclaimed “teller of stories,” wears a green ribbon around her neck. Despite his insistence that his wife “should have no secrets,” she conceals a secret from him behind this ribbon. To keep herself from losing her head (literally), she repeatedly establishes that he and their son “can’t touch it,” but her fate is already predetermined because “brides never fare well in stories.” This essay argues that intertextuality – the relationship between literary texts – and literary referentiality in general serve as structural elements that encourage readers to draw parallels between the text’s references and the narrator’s life events. Various urban legends, myths, and retellings shape the story into a cautionary tale.
The first of these elements is the story’s resemblance to a classic coming-of-age novel. The 17-year-old narrator initiates the first contact by kissing her future husband and soon exclaims that she “know[s] that [they] are going to marry,” evoking Romeo and Juliet’s young and reckless love, which did not end happily. She admits that “teaching her boy” and initiating contact as a woman “aren’t how things are done,” but “this is how [she] will do them.” She is violating biblical gender roles by doing so: ” Everything that a woman does should be done in the service of her husband” (New International Version, Ephesians 5:24). This establishes a male figure as the dominant figure and a female figure as the submissive wife. Because of a disruption in the established order, her story ends tragically. The narrator is aware that her sexual curiosity, as well as her embrace of desire and attraction for her future husband, are potentially dangerous. She recalls a story about a woman who was punished for openly expressing her sexuality. The “magical thing” that caused that woman to be placed in “a sanitarium” piques the narrator’s interest. This “deviant pleasure” recalls the forbidden fruit from the biblical story of humanity’s fall, effectively transforming the narrator’s story into a cautionary tale about female desire.
In both stories we see the narrator is expected to love her husband despite his flaws and to love their son simply because she is his mother because she is his wife. She employs intertextuality directly in her retelling of a story about a “husband and wife killed by wolves”: their daughter was raised feral and was seen breastfeeding “two wolf cubs” that “bloodied her breasts.” She was still concerned about them because they were ostensibly her children. The narrator relates this story to her childbirth experience; she feels her baby clawing inside her stomach, and after delivering their son, an unmarked baby without a ribbon, the doctor performs the husband stitch, an unnecessary extra suture that is performed after a woman has given birth, sewing her up “nice and tight” to increase the husband’s sexual pleasure. Despite her son’s “poor tenant” status, which prevents her from “housing another” child, the narrator loves him despite all the pain inflicted on her, just as the feral woman loved her “children.” Apart from that, the narrator assures her that she loves him “more than [he] can possibly know,” even after he makes the perilous mistake of undoing her ribbon, revealing the fantastical truth about it: together. She recognizes that his goodness “is the source of [her] pain.” Condemning him would be easier if his positive values did not outweigh his obstinacy from time to time. Her ability to bear pain and forgive terrible mistakes elevates her to the status of a martyr, willing to sacrifice everything for her family.
Similar to the “Sweat” the narrator cautions us about the veracity of her stories; there are a few deceptive ones among the many cautionary tales, but ” Like raindrops in a pond, stories tend to blend into one another.” There is no way to tell them apart when they are alone because they are each as tall as a cloud post. She admits that it is impossible to pinpoint where the wrong morals are by emphasizing how some stories appear to seep into each other. This is how she pulls herself out of the story and warns us to read the text critically. Machado wants us to discover the morals for ourselves, transforming us into active readers who create their own interpretations and connections by attempting to understand the references she makes.
Work cited
Croft, Robert Wayne. A Zora Neale Hurston Companion. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2002. https://biblioklept.org/2013/01/21/sweat-zora-neale-hurston/
Machado, Carmen Maria. “The husband stitch.” Her Body and Other Parties (2017): 3-31. https://webservices.macmillan.com/macmillan-us/maccatalog/assets/previous/GRW_Fall-2017_11_2016.pdf
Jones, Sharon Lynette. Rereading the Harlem renaissance: Race, class, and gender in the fiction of Jessie Fauset, Zora Neale Hurston, and Dorothy West. No. 207. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2002. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/36818/summary
Lillios, Anna. “Lowe, John.” Jump at the Sun: Zora Neale Hurston’s Cosmic Comedy”(Book Review).” Southern Quarterly 34.1 (1995): 153. https://search.proquest.com/openview/8f4cae6c8c1ea2ad1b920643d1971ae9/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2029886
Miles, Diana Frances. Women violence and testimony in the works of Zora Neale Hurston. Emory University, 2000. https://search.proquest.com/openview/30878c11f7a3bd39bb3014df73f84ed5/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Hurston, Zora Neale. Sweat. Rutgers University Press, 1997. https://ejournal.upbatam.ac.id/index.php/basis/article/download/1425/870
The 1991 INBio-Merck Deal
Student’s Name
Affiliation
Course
Date
The 1991 INBio-Merck Deal
The deal raises ethical issues of introducing an economic value on natural resources as well as the claim by INBio that this new recognition about the value of biodiversity shall offer incentives for biodiversity protection. The INBio-Merck contract, with careful planning and consideration, has the prospective to be a valuable tool for justifiable expansion and conservation of resources. The National Museum had withdrawn its offer to no longer locate the national plant collection at INBio. Hence the INBio was to develop its own plant reference which put the INBio-Merck at a discrete deal. The INBio was known for its success in biodiversity hence when it signed contracts it would receive 10% the amount while it did the most work of conservation, training and transferring of technology. This agreement means the fauna species and vast flora existing helps pay for the project as well as help safeguard the biodiversity of the rich rainforest region (Aylward, Bruce A., & Jaime Echeverria, 1993).
The procedure to keep this precious species has much work at the effort to educate and promote INBio from the demand of the bio diverse countries and science institutions. In addition, the government taxes highly the company and this increases the cost to the importing company Merck. The government makes more profit than the company. Hence when the company realized this it decided to avoid the need for political approval by the government with regards to donate and thereby leaves Costa Rica to make a discrete transaction so that the whole amount can go to INBio and also to the Conservation. The species are nature own properties and can be in a place for a short duration depending on the favorability of a habitat. It is an added advantage to any country that conserve this species. Therefore the country should conserve and provide a favorable condition for the species to exist (Curci, 2010). This deal favors the organization and its developing country when it captures the whole amount without having a centralized administrative that divide the fund to other competing countries taking time to decide on how to spend the amount. National institute of Biodiversity INBio is a non-profitable research organization created by scientist from Costa Rica. INBio signed a 2year bio prospecting agreement with US major pharmaceuticals Merck in 1991 worth 1milllion in exchange for samples that had been screened. This brought about interest to the developing countries who wanted finance from biodiversity conservation. Since the company is non- profit making organization, the government was to distribute this money to the upcoming countries.
Work cited
Aylward, Bruce A., & Jaime Echeverria. The Economic Value of Species Information and Its Role in Biodiversity Conservation: Costa Rica’s National Biodiversity Institute. International Institute for Environment and Development, 1993. Print.
Curci, Jonathan. The Protection of Biodiversity and Traditional Knowledge in International Law of Intellectual Property. Cambridge [U.K.: Cambridge UP, 2010. Print.
