Recent orders

Ponzi scheme Signs and Danger

Ponzi scheme Signs and Dangers

Introduction

A Ponzi scheme is a type of an investment fraud that contains processing of expected returns to current investors from the amount of funds collected from the new investors. Ponzi scheme regulators usually convince the potential investors by giving them an assurance of high returns depending on the amount of fund that they deepen into the scheme. This comes with a guarantee of high returns with minute or no risk. Ponzi scheme began in 1920s, it was started by an English man known as; Charles Ponzi. He convinced plenty of English citizens into believing that, by investing in the postage stamp they were assured of higher returns (Skousen 7).

This type of scheme can easily be identified by the mode and cope of its operations; it limits its services to soliciting money from willing investors; irrespective of the state of the economy, these investors are always assured of higher returns to the amount that they inject into the scheme. Another factor that is unique to this type of scheme is; the money that new investors invest into the scheme is used to pay the investors that had invested earlier in the scheme. This type of scheme is not registered with any respective authorizing bodies.

There are plenty of warning signs that are associated with this scheme; a guarantee for high investment with zero risk is nearly impossible. There is no type of investment that guarantees for higher returns from simply investing in a scheme, economic mishaps always counter this type of venture by either appreciating or depreciating of interest rates depending on the market forces. Secondly, lack of registration of the scheme is a reason enough to warn any potential investor of investing in this type of investment; registration guarantees for information concerning products, services and company’s management to the investors. Another factor that serves as a warning sign is; complexity in processing and receiving payments. A scheme that is loyal to its investors easily processes any type of payments to its clients at any time. A case of difficulty in processing for payments serves as a warning factor to any potential investor.

There are plenty of dangers that are associated with a Ponzi scheme; complexity and secretive information is one of the key factors that serve as a warning sign. Provision of information to any potential is a key factor to any scheme that seeks to expand its services. Absence of paperwork and lack of proper documentation is another possible warning sign. Paperwork is critical to any two parties that want to make deal. This guarantees for compensation in case one party defaults.

Works Cited;

Skousen, Mark. “After the $50 Billion Ponzi Scheme: Four Danger Signs of Financial Fraud.” Human Events 22 Dec. 2008: 7.

Future Workplace Essential Components of Workplace Citizenship

Future Workplace: Essential Components of Workplace Citizenship

Student’s Name:

Institution:

Future Workplace: Essential Components of Workplace Citizenship

The workplace is dynamically transforming owing to advancements in technology. The nature of dealings in working as well as constant changes makes it dynamic. It is, therefore, imperative that citizenship work-place values have to get embraced so as to cope with rising challenges. Education institutions of learning carry the role and act as touch bearers in guiding prospective employees.

The modern workplace dynamics are going to influence methods of workplace citizenship conduct in establishments and the potencies of dealings among citizenship conduct, its forebears and significances. It is, therefore, essential to investigate essentials values of the workplace-citizenship that are adequate for future workplaces, and this go to the objective of the investigation. New focuses of obligation have emerged; as an instance, the obligation to the superintendent and to the work-group.

The investigation is essential in that it is going to unearth values that learners ought to embrace in their learning so as to get prepared for future workplace that is getting dynamic all the time. Workplace citizenship values are the key to getting an all-round person. It is through attainment of these values that one is going to be capable of working well in a modern workplace. The modern workplace requires the ability to adopt changing work atmosphere. An individual ready to be part of a team, be able to communicate, and give back to the society in individual capacity and as part of the company-corporate social responsibility.

According to Shahin, Naftchali, and Pool (2014), communication is the act of transferring a message from one point to another. In order for messages to be effectual, it must pass through a means with no interferences. The facts have to be in a means understandable to the two parties involved. In an organization, communication can be in both ways-top to down or down to top. Information allows the organization to act on issues at hand thus saving the company of losses. Conversely, it gives the directive so that urgent matters get done in a proper manner (Shahin, Naftchali, & Pool, 2014).

In a working atmosphere where there is diversity in culture, professionalism, and background, communication ought to be open and honest. It implies that there is freedom of expression with no intimidation boost morale of the employees. It gives them a sense of belongingness. In the other hand employees’ assessment get carried out properly and allow the firm realizes the set objectives through uplifting employees’ morale (Zhao, Peng, & Chen, 2014).

According to Shen et al. (2104), communication brings a transformation in attitude. Kamil et al. (2014) asserts that when there are healthy communication people involved tend to change the perception of things. In matters if change in the organization, resistance is not going to be an obstacle. The attitude of employees gets twisted for the benefit of the organization and thus permitting them to embrace change in a positive manner. The advancement of technology gets to twist the manner in which business get executed. Social sites and socialization have taken center stage and businesses nowadays get done and promoted via social sites. Communication is thus a workplace citizenship value that cannot be done down in the business. Positive communication via the social sites gets to let the firm be famous in a short time. The company brand names that get famous get to attract clients-thus making the company’s sales volume rise (Shen et al., 2104).

Team-work being another value of workplace citizenship calls for in-depth scrutiny. It is getting involved in a team for a common achievement. According to Sarikwal and Gupta (2014), teamwork is conducts that enable an individual be active team-member relations, and the team comprises more than two people with a binding interest. In an organization, all workers have to work together as a group so as to get the objectives of the organization gets realized. When other people get to work against the set objectives, the organization vision as well as mission gets frustrated. It works best when all the team members have the same level of experience (Sarikwal & Gupta, 2014).

In solving hard tasks, team-work takes the role in that every member of the team gets to take a role so as to contribute. Diverse views and perspective of solving a problem get to get unveiled. In the end, quality solutions prevail that the organization is going to take for its benefits. In an instance where there are numerous tasks to get accomplished, it is easier and faster done when all group gets to do it together (Yun et al., 2007).

When there is cooperation in a team, tasks get tackled together, and hence efficiency of work gets attained. It lessens the amount of workload with sharing of ideas as well as responsibilities. The pressure of work on every employee get reduced this allowing one to get thorough work done on roles assigned. In this case specialization gets to be utilized properly in that every employee get to carry out a task that best suit him or her. It, therefore, calls for the team leader to consider the interest of the employees, speed and efficiency in order to avoid work overwhelming one person in the team (Yun et al., 2007).

In the investigation by Yun et al. (2007), they assert that the teamwork creates a unifying factor in the organization. There is interaction in the team and workers get to enhance their relationship with one another in the organization through creation of strong bonds. It creates improvement in the relationship, respect, and cohesion in the team. Furthermore, team-work gets to augment accountability. The members of the team get to command respect and self-esteem to the member of the group. There is a spirit of transparency since every member strives hard not to let down the members. They endeavor to work to their best so as to achieve success. To the establishment, it is going to be of beneficial since efficiency is going to go up and hence productivity (Yun et al., 2007).

It is as well a chance were the members of the group get to learn from one another. Members with little experience get to learn from members with experience. Additionally, members get to learn skills that are new. It is, therefore, through teamwork that employees get exposed to varied aspects of work through interaction with experienced members. It is an advantage to the organization in that it was going to get succession people in the management structure (Yun et al., 2007).

Corporate social responsibility is taking voluntary responsibility of the action in relation to the surrounding environment. It relates to the social, economic, as well as environmental. All these ought to be done in such a manner that it becomes sustainable for the good of the organization, the society, and the environment. It is essential in the success of the business via encouragement of social values that get shared. The management mitigates social and environmental factors and takes full use of the opportunities presented in a competitive global environment (Shen et al., 2104).

According to Kamil et al. (2014), the organization engages itself in numerous activities as one of the strategies in the endeavor of ensuring sustainable business, as well as the society and the environment. Corporate social responsibility looks at the environment. It is the surrounding within which the organization operates. It encompasses human beings, markets, regulatory sectors, governments, and the suppliers. It enforces demand in which the client’s preferences dictate the quality, and price that the firm can provide. Furthermore, constraints are imposed from available technology that is not adequate, regulations from the government, and the legal actions that might get encountered. On top of this, opportunities are provided as a result of new opportunities emerging in the market. The environment exhibits an essential role in the organization’s performance. It influences the establishment in a positive or a negative manner (Kamil et al., 2014).

The organization gets to have an interest and a concern with the health and safety of the people. It is essential to recognize the outstanding uniqueness of the firm’s accountability for a variety of responsibilities concerned in the major tasks, the understanding and role they play in the community. As a mode of yielding back to the society in terms of health, the firm in a number of occasions organizes heart disease awareness, breast cancer awareness, and new fire prevention strategy. The company is going to strive and offer the best products in the market with a top notch quality. The positioning on quality boosts trust and self-assurance in the market. It positions the company in a lime-light where clients still go for the products despite high prices (Sarikwal & Gupta, 2014).

In conclusion, workplace citizenship encompasses values that can concurrently acquire altogether by a potential employee so as to fit in a modern workplace. The dynamism of the workplace as a result of the changing work environment call for people who are dynamic and flexible to suit these constant changes for the benefit of the organization.

Corporate social responsibility allows people to take care of the concerns of the firm as well as these of the surrounding community as a way of giving back. Team-work allows workers to learn, enhance unity, and increase efficiency. In doing all these, communication prevailing ought to be healthy and honest for the free exchange of ideas. Learning these values is of great importance to the learners in preparation for a dynamic workplace. It gives learners an advantage of entering the job market well prepared for the dynamism. In the analysis, all the values of citizenship in work-place when accompanied together result in high organization’s throughput.

References

Kamil, N. M., Sulaiman, M., Osman-Gani, A. M., & Ahmad, K. (2014). INVESTIGATING THE

DIMENSIONALITY OF ORGANISATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOUR FROM ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVE (OCBIP): EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF BUSINESS ORGANISATIONS IN SOUTHEAST ASIA.

Sarikwal, L., & Gupta, J. (2014). The Relationship between High Performance Work Practices

and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Role of Positive Psychological Capital. Available at SSRN 2391596.

Shahin, A., Naftchali, J. S., & Pool, J. K. (2014). Developing a model for the influence of

perceived organizational climate on organizational citizenship behaviour and organizational performance based on balanced score card.International Journal of

Productivity and Performance Management, 63(3), 290-307.

Shen, Y., Jackson, T., Ding, C., Yuan, D., Zhao, L., Dou, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2014). Linking

perceived organizational support with employee work outcomes in a Chinese context: Organizational identification as a mediator. European Management Journal, 32(3), 406-412.

Yun, S., Cox .J., Sims, H.B, Salam, J.,S., (2007). Leadership and Teamwork: The Effects of

Leadership and Job Satisfaction on Team Citizenship. International Journal of

Leadership Studies, Vol. 2 Iss. 3, 2007, pp. 171-193

Zhao, H., Peng, Z., & Chen, H. K. (2014). Compulsory Citizenship Behavior and Organizational

Citizenship Behavior: The Role of Organizational Identification and Perceived Interactional Justice. The Journal of psychology, 148(2), 177-196.

Pompeii is possibly the best-documented catastrophe in Antiquity

Pompeii

Pompeii is possibly the best-documented catastrophe in Antiquity. Because of it, we know now how the Pompeians lived because they left behind an extensive legacy of art, including monuments, sculptures and paintings. Pompeii lay on a plateau of ancient lava near the Bay of Naples in western Italy in a region called Campania, less than 1.6 kilometers from the foot of Mount Vesuvius. With the coast to the west and the Apennine Mountains to the East, Campania is a fertile plain, traversed by two major rivers and rich soil. However, in the early days, it was not a remarkable city. Scholars have not been able to identify Pompeii’s original inhabitants. The first people to settle in this region were probably prehistoric hunters and fishers. By at least the eight century B.C., a group of Italic people known as the Oscans occupied the region; they most likely established Pompeii, although the exact date of its origin is unknown. “The root of the word Pompeii would appear to be the Oscan word for the number five, pompe, which suggests that either the community consisted of five hamlets or, perhaps, was settled by a family group (gens Pompeia)”(Kraus 7).

In the course of the eight century B.C., Greek and Etruscan colonization stimulated the development of Pompeii as a city around the area of the Forum. A point for important trade routes, it became a place for trading towards the inland. Up until the middle of the 5th century B.C., the city was dominated politically by the Etruscans. In the course of the 6th century B.C., the influence of Greek culture is also documented by terracottas, ceramics and architecture. A group of warriors from Samnium, called Samnite, invaded the region in the 400’s B.C. Pompeii remained a relatively unimportant village until the 200’s B.C., when the town entered a prosperous period of building and expansion. The Romans defeated the Samnites, and Pompeii became part of the emerging Roman state. Pompeii joined the Italic revolt against Rome, the Social War of 91-87 B.C., and was crushed by Sulla. Although the city was not destroyed, it lost its autonomy, becoming a colony called Colonia Veernia Cornelia P, in honor of its conqueror L. Cornelius Sulla.

By 79 AD, Latin had replaced Oscan as the principal language, and the laws and culture of Imperial Rome were implanted. The “romanization” had began. Pompeii grew from a modest farming town to an important and sophisticated industrial and trading center. In 62 A.D., the first disaster, a terrible earthquake hit the city. As the city was being rebuilt the second disaster struck. In the summer of A.D. 79, Vesuvius suddenly erupted with violence. Hot ashes, lava and stones poured into Pompeii. The eruption caught Pompeians by surprise: “They heard the crash of falling roofs: an instant more and the mountain-cloud seemed to roll towards them, dark and rapid, like a torrent; at the same time, it cast forth from its bosom a showe of ashes mixed with vast fragments of burning stone! over the crushing vines- over the desolate streets- over the amphitheater itself- far and wide- with many a mighty splash in the agitated sea- fell that awful shower.”, (Bulwer-Lytton 1). The remains of about 2,000 victims out of a population of 20,000 have been found in excavations. Some of them were trapped and killed in their homes. Others died as they fled. Archaeologists have found the shells (molds) of the bodies preserved in the hardened ash. By pouring plaster into the shells, they can make copies of the victims, even to the expressions of agony on their faces. Pompeii was not forgotten. Peasants in the area searched for hidden treasure and they made tunnels. In the 1500’s workers digging a tunnel to change the course of the Sarno river discovered parts of a temple and the forum, but no one paid much attention. In 1748, a farmer discovered a wall and the authorities in Italy began a series of excavations. After 1860, Giuseppe Fiorelli served as director of the excavations. He directed the first uncovering of the whole city block by block. The Italian government has provided funding money for this project. After many years of work, we can now walk in Pompeii “as Pompeians did”.

After standing in line for quite a while and paying for a ticket, the tourist experiences what are about to live are quite unique. When walking in Pompeii, you can close your eyes and feel the magic of the city, because it seems like the time has not gone by. Visitors can see the buildings as they stood 2,000 years ago. They can walk in and out of houses and up and down narrow streets, see the Temple of Jupiter, which was an ancient ruin at the time of the eruption, or sit in a tepidarium (part of a Roman public bath). Tourists can also visit the Antiquarium and see the casts of some of the bodies, houseware, the remains of food such as carbonized loaves of bread, eggs and other things that also date back to ancient Rome. The center of public life is called the Forum, and it played a fundamental role in the political, religious and economic life of the city. It had the Temple of Apollo, the Temple of Vespasian, the Sanctuary of the Lares Publici, Macellum, a Basilica, public buildings, etc. In Pompeii, there are two theaters, gladiators barracks, an amphitheater, private and public baths, temples, gates, houses and villas, and even a bakery. Pompeii attracted many wealthy Romans. They built great villas near the Mediterranean shore, where they could enjoy the mild, sunny climate. It is in the houses where wall paintings are founded, and, believe it or, not Pompeii owes its fame to the mural art preserved because they were “hermetically sealed by hardened lava and slime from all destructive atmospheric influences”(Kraus 156).

Because of that, the houses of Pompeii have given us a treasure of mural paintings, the most complete record of the changing fashions in interior decoration in the entire ancient world. The quantity of the paintings, tells us about both the prosperity and the taste of the times. In the early years of exploration, excavators were interested exclusively in the mural paintings, especially those about Greek heroes and famous myths. They were cut out of the walls and transferred to the Naples Archeological Museum. Later, archeologists stopped this practice and serious attention was given to the mural designs as a whole. At the end of the 19 century, August Mau, a German art historian, divided the paintings into four so-called pompeian styles. The technique used in these walls differed considerably from that used in Renaissance frescoes. Before the artist could begin his work, the rough wall had to be covered with three coats of fine lime mortar, followed by other three coats of a mortar using powdered marble. When the wall surface was ready, it was polished with mable dust and the colors laid on at the same time.

By doing that, the walls were protected against future cracking and had a brilliant surface like that on marble itself. “The mirror-like glaze over the surface involved not only polishing with marble dust, but also going over the surface with smaller rollers. The whole process, it is clear, was so elaborate and expensive that it was of necessity confined to the paintings in the “best” rooms of the house, the others being much more simply decorated.” ( Kraus 156) The First Style (or incrustation). It has also been called the masonry style because the decorator tried to imitate, using stucco relief, the appearance of expensive and costly marble panels. It appeared about 200 B.C., when it became fashionable to paint the inner walls of private houses as well as public and religious buildings. “This decorative mode was of Greek derivation, directly inspired by the isodomic masonry technique, and used polychrome stucco to reproduce the projecting elements such as the dado, the middle zone in large panels, the upper zone in smaller panels, the cornices, and sometimes the pilasters which articulate the walls vertically. The lively color contrast are no more than a translation into the pictorial idiom of the Hellenistic innovation of employing various types and colors of marble, in the realization of the single elements.” ( Giuntoli 6).

They give an illusion of actual marble panels. Roman paintings were true frescoes, the colors were applied while the plaster was still damp, but the brilliance of the surfaces was achieved by painstaking preparation of the wall. The plaster was combined with marble dust if the patron could afford it. Obviously incrustation was a process of decoration often beyond the reach of any but the most powerful and wealthiest. A good example of the First Style is The North wall of the tablinum, House of Sallust. (pic. 1). , of unknown artist, this painted wall in Pompeii is about 12’ x 8’. Despite some later alterations and additions, the nucleus of this house, the rooms around the atrium(The court of a roman house that is near the entrance and open to the sky), stayed as it was until the end of the Tufa period. The decoration of the tablinum has a band along the base of the wall (a dado), which is mounted by painted and stuccoed imitations of large stone blocks (orthostates). These blocks are outlined and give a good idea of the colorfulness typical of this style(red, yellow, orange and green). In this style there is no figuration or ornamental motifs. The wall is divided into three horizontal zones and the top area was a painted cornice. There is no hidden symbolism or religious meaning in this particular painting.

It is probably been done at the late phase of the style, “the individual field were once again enclosed in a real three-dimensional framework of stucco rather than relying only on illusionistic painting”. ( Kraus 165) The Second Style, also called architectural, became popular in the years when Sulla’s military colony was established, around 80 B.C. “The decoration on the walls proposed perspective views with architectural elements illusionistically articulated on different planes with foreshortenings and complex perspetive effects which culminated in breaking through the wall towards an imaginary open space. The immediate models were the illusionistic stage sets of the Hellenistic-Roman theater and the new “baroque” fashions of 2nd-1st cent. B.C. architecture.” (Giuntoli 6). Some scholars have argued that this style also has precedents in Greece, but most believe that is roman invention.

The aim of this style painter’s was not to create the appearance of elegant marble walls, but rather to dissolve the confining walls of a room and replace them with the illusion of a three dimensional world constructed in the artist’s imagination. It seems he is inviting us into his world. In the cubiculum 16, in the Villa of the Mysteries, we can see how this style is characterized by painted columns “breaking through the picture plane, architectural vistas teasing the eye with perspective recessions” (Pompeii 1). It seems that the aim of the artist is to make the room look larger, and also appears deeper than it really is. He uses bright colors to achieved these effects. There is an optical effect stronger than the one of the First Style. The Third Style, or ornamental, was a reaction to the illusionism of Style II, together with the preference for a more classic typical art of the Augustan period. Painters no longer wanted to replace the walls with three-dimensional worlds of their own creation. Instead they decorated the homes of rich Romans with delicate linear fantasies, “The walls are once more simple flat surfaces which mark the boundaries of an enclosed space are subdivided horizontally and vertically into monochrome areas articulated by slender architectural and decorative elements. The focal point is a painting in the center, generally of mythological, religious or idyllic subject, set inside an aedicule flanked by panels with small scenes suspended in the center which depict miniature figures and landscapes.” (Giuntoli 7).

In the North wall of the red cubiculum, from the Villa of Boscotrecase, in the Museo Nazionale, Naples, we have one of the best examples of the 3rd Style. The villa was owned by Agrippa Postumus and was decorated about 11 B.C. We can see here, a landscape, in the middle of the red wall, representing a sacred precint dominated by the statue of a seated goddess. It measures only 15’ by 17’9”, and it was appropriate to this hall of 19’8” by 29”, one of the largest in Pompeii. It does not fill the whole wall as in the Third Style, now is only a picture in every central wall. It is almost square and has smaller dimensions. The artist wanted to give us the impression of a picture hanging on the wall. The colors have changed from lively reds, greens and oranges to broken tones, combining soft browns, a green somewhat on the blue side and an unusual violet. Now, we begin to see a contour around the figures. The Fourth Style, became popular in the period of Claudius and Nero, when the earthquake struck in A.D. 72 and the Vesuvius erupted in 79 A.D. Returns once again to the architectural illusionism. It is inspired by the Second and Third styles.

It was originated in Rome. “The colors are more decided and tend to contrasting lively color effects, the decorative element multiply and crowd together, alternating with illusionistic architectural views and pictures of mythological subjects often painted in the impressionistic technique. A particular type is that of suspended carpets with small pictures and figures in the center, inspired by the Hellenistic fashion of hanging decorative tapestries on the walls”. ( Giuntoli 7). In the Large hall, House of Fabius Rufus, we have one of the best examples of the 4th Style. The house is situated on the southwest edge of the city and it has a splendid view of the sea, it is the largest room of the house. On a black-ground enlived by animals, vases, musical instruments and others, we can see the three-dimensional effects, enhanced, for example by the woman on the balcony on the left. Apollo, Bachus and Venus appear in the main picture, in the upper zone above them is Leda with her swan, and small personifications of muses stand alone in the sides. The decoration stands out because of the blackground. From personal experience, I can say that after touring Pompeii, I was glad that such a catastrophe preserved the city. If you enjoy art, it is a must see.

: Giuntoli, Stefano, Art and History of Pompeii. (Erika Pauli for Studio Comunicare, trans.) Florence, Italy: Casa Editrice Bonechi, 1995. Kraus, Theodor, Pompeii and Herculaneum: The Living Cities of the Dead. ( Robert Erich Wolf, trans.) New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1975. “Pompeii”, World Book Online, http://www.worldbookonline.com/na/ar/fs/ar438760.htm, November 9, 1999. “Pompeii undercovered”, http://www.eliki.com/ancient/civilizations/pompeii/content.htm October 25, 1999. Pompeii is possibly the best-documented catastrophe in Antiquity. Because of it, we know now how the Pompeians lived because they left behind an extensive legacy of art, including monuments, sculptures and paintings. Pompeii lay on a plateau of ancient lava near the Bay of Naples in western Italy in a region called Campania, less than 1.6 kilometers from the foot of Mount Vesuvius. With the coast to the west and the Apennine Mountains to the East, Campania is a fertile plain, traversed by two major rivers and rich soil. However, in the early days, it was not a remarkable city. Scholars have not been able to identify Pompeii’s original inhabitants. The first people to settle in this region were probably prehistoric hunters and fishers. By at least the eight century B.C., a group of Italic people known as the Oscans occupied the region; they most likely established Pompeii, although the exact date of its origin is unknown. “The root of the word Pompeii would appear to be the Oscan word for the number five, pompe, which suggests that either the community consisted of five hamlets or, perhaps, was settled by a family group (gens Pompeia)”(Kraus 7). In the course of the eight century B.C., Greek and Etruscan colonization stimulated the development of Pompeii as a city around the area of the Forum. A point for important trade routes, it became a place for trading towards the inland. Up until the middle of the 5th century B.C., the city was dominated politically by the Etruscans. In the course of the 6th century B.C., the influence of Greek culture is also documented by terracottas, ceramics and architecture. A group of warriors from Samnium, called Samnite, invaded the region in the 400’s B.C. Pompeii remained a relatively unimportant village until the 200’s B.C., when the town entered a prosperous period of building and expansion. The Romans defeated the Samnites, and Pompeii became part of the emerging Roman state. Pompeii joined the Italic revolt against Rome, the Social War of 91-87 B.C., and was crushed by Sulla. Although the city was not destroyed, it lost its autonomy, becoming a colony called Colonia Veernia Cornelia P, in honor of its conqueror L. Cornelius Sulla. By 79 AD, Latin had replaced Oscan as the principal language, and the laws and culture of Imperial Rome were implanted. The “romanization” had began. Pompeii grew from a modest farming town to an important and sophisticated industrial and trading center. In 62 A.D., the first disaster, a terrible earthquake hit the city. As the city was being rebuilt the second disaster struck. In the summer of A.D. 79, Vesuvius suddenly erupted with violence. Hot ashes, lava and stones poured into Pompeii. The eruption caught Pompeians by surprise: “They heard the crash of falling roofs: an instant more and the mountain-cloud seemed to roll towards them, dark and rapid, like a torrent; at the same time, it cast forth from its bosom a showe of ashes mixed with vast fragments of burning stone! over the crushing vines- over the desolate streets- over the amphitheater itself- far and wide- with many a mighty splash in the agitated sea- fell that awful shower.”, (Bulwer-Lytton 1). The remains of about 2,000 victims out of a population of 20,000 have been found in excavations. Some of them were trapped and killed in their homes. Others died as they fled. Archaeologists have found the shells (molds) of the bodies preserved in the hardened ash. By pouring plaster into the shells, they can make copies of the victims, even to the expressions of agony on their faces. Pompeii was not forgotten. Peasants in the area searched for hidden treasure and they made tunnels. In the 1500’s workers digging a tunnel to change the course of the Sarno river discovered parts of a temple and the forum, but no one paid much attention. In 1748, a farmer discovered a wall and the authorities in Italy began a series of excavations. After 1860, Giuseppe Fiorelli served as director of the excavations. He directed the first uncovering of the whole city block by block. The Italian government has provided funding money for this project. After many years of work, we can now walk in Pompeii “as Pompeians did”. After standing in line for quite a while and paying for a ticket, the tourist experiences what are about to live are quite unique. When walking in Pompeii, you can close your eyes and feel the magic of the city, because it seems like the time has not gone by. Visitors can see the buildings as they stood 2,000 years ago. They can walk in and out of houses and up and down narrow streets, see the Temple of Jupiter, which was an ancient ruin at the time of the eruption, or sit in a tepidarium (part of a Roman public bath). Tourists can also visit the Antiquarium and see the casts of some of the bodies, houseware, the remains of food such as carbonized loaves of bread, eggs and other things that also date back to ancient Rome. The center of public life is called the Forum, and it played a fundamental role in the political, religious and economic life of the city. It had the Temple of Apollo, the Temple of Vespasian, the Sanctuary of the Lares Publici, Macellum, a Basilica, public buildings, etc. In Pompeii, there are two theaters, gladiators barracks, an amphitheater, private and public baths, temples, gates, houses and villas, and even a bakery. Pompeii attracted many wealthy Romans. They built great villas near the Mediterranean shore, where they could enjoy the mild, sunny climate. It is in the houses where wall paintings are founded, and, believe it or, not Pompeii owes its fame to the mural art preserved because they were “hermetically sealed by hardened lava and slime from all destructive atmospheric influences”(Kraus 156). Because of that, the houses of Pompeii have given us a treasure of mural paintings, the most complete record of the changing fashions in interior decoration in the entire ancient world. The quantity of the paintings, tells us about both the prosperity and the taste of the times. In the early years of exploration, excavators were interested exclusively in the mural paintings, especially those about Greek heroes and famous myths. They were cut out of the walls and transferred to the Naples Archeological Museum. Later, archeologists stopped this practice and serious attention was given to the mural designs as a whole. At the end of the 19 century, August Mau, a German art historian, divided the paintings into four so-called pompeian styles. The technique used in these walls differed considerably from that used in Renaissance frescoes. Before the artist could begin his work, the rough wall had to be covered with three coats of fine lime mortar, followed by other three coats of a mortar using powdered marble. When the wall surface was ready, it was polished with mable dust and the colors laid on at the same time. By doing that, the walls were protected against future cracking and had a brilliant surface like that on marble itself. “The mirror-like glaze over the surface involved not only polishing with marble dust, but also going over the surface with smaller rollers. The whole process, it is clear, was so elaborate and expensive that it was of necessity confined to the paintings in the “best” rooms of the house, the others being much more simply decorated.” ( Kraus 156) The First Style (or incrustation). It has also been called the masonry style because the decorator tried to imitate, using stucco relief, the appearance of expensive and costly marble panels. It appeared about 200 B.C., when it became fashionable to paint the inner walls of private houses as well as public and religious buildings. “This decorative mode was of Greek derivation, directly inspired by the isodomic masonry technique, and used polychrome stucco to reproduce the projecting elements such as the dado, the middle zone in large panels, the upper zone in smaller panels, the cornices, and sometimes the pilasters which articulate the walls vertically. The lively color contrast are no more than a translation into the pictorial idiom of the Hellenistic innovation of employing various types and colors of marble, in the realization of the single elements.” ( Giuntoli 6). They give an illusion of actual marble panels. Roman paintings were true frescoes, the colors were applied while the plaster was still damp, but the brilliance of the surfaces was achieved by painstaking preparation of the wall. The plaster was combined with marble dust if the patron could afford it. Obviously incrustation was a process of decoration often beyond the reach of any but the most powerful and wealthiest. A good example of the First Style is The North wall of the tablinum, House of Sallust. (pic. 1). , of unknown artist, this painted wall in Pompeii is about 12’ x 8’. Despite some later alterations and additions, the nucleus of this house, the rooms around the atrium(The court of a roman house that is near the entrance and open to the sky), stayed as it was until the end of the Tufa period. The decoration of the tablinum has a band along the base of the wall (a dado), which is mounted by painted and stuccoed imitations of large stone blocks (orthostates). These blocks are outlined and give a good idea of the colorfulness typical of this style(red, yellow, orange and green). In this style there is no figuration or ornamental motifs. The wall is divided into three horizontal zones and the top area was a painted cornice. There is no hidden symbolism or religious meaning in this particular painting. It is probably been done at the late phase of the style, “the individual field were once again enclosed in a real three-dimensional framework of stucco rather than relying only on illusionistic painting”. ( Kraus 165) The Second Style, also called architectural, became popular in the years when Sulla’s military colony was established, around 80 B.C. “The decoration on the walls proposed perspective views with architectural elements illusionistically articulated on different planes with foreshortenings and complex perspetive effects which culminated in breaking through the wall towards an imaginary open space. The immediate models were the illusionistic stage sets of the Hellenistic-Roman theater and the new “baroque” fashions of 2nd-1st cent. B.C. architecture.” (Giuntoli 6). Some scholars have argued that this style also has precedents in Greece, but most believe that is roman invention. The aim of this style painter’s was not to create the appearance of elegant marble walls, but rather to dissolve the confining walls of a room and replace them with the illusion of a three dimensional world constructed in the artist’s imagination. It seems he is inviting us into his world. In the cubiculum 16, in the Villa of the Mysteries, we can see how this style is characterized by painted columns “breaking through the picture plane, architectural vistas teasing the eye with perspective recessions” (Pompeii 1). It seems that the aim of the artist is to make the room look larger, and also appears deeper than it really is. He uses bright colors to achieved these effects. There is an optical effect stronger than the one of the First Style. The Third Style, or ornamental, was a reaction to the illusionism of Style II, together with the preference for a more classic typical art of the Augustan period. Painters no longer wanted to replace the walls with three-dimensional worlds of their own creation. Instead they decorated the homes of rich Romans with delicate linear fantasies, “The walls are once more simple flat surfaces which mark the boundaries of an enclosed space are subdivided horizontally and vertically into monochrome areas articulated by slender architectural and decorative elements. The focal point is a painting in the center, generally of mythological, religious or idyllic subject, set inside an aedicule flanked by panels with small scenes suspended in the center which depict miniature figures and landscapes.” (Giuntoli 7). In the North wall of the red cubiculum, from the Villa of Boscotrecase, in the Museo Nazionale, Naples, we have one of the best examples of the 3rd Style. The villa was owned by Agrippa Postumus and was decorated about 11 B.C. We can see here, a landscape, in the middle of the red wall, representing a sacred precint dominated by the statue of a seated goddess. It measures only 15’ by 17’9”, and it was appropriate to this hall of 19’8” by 29”, one of the largest in Pompeii. It does not fill the whole wall as in the Third Style, now is only a picture in every central wall. It is almost square and has smaller dimensions. The artist wanted to give us the impression of a picture hanging on the wall. The colors have changed from lively reds, greens and oranges to broken tones, combining soft browns, a green somewhat on the blue side and an unusual violet. Now, we begin to see a contour around the figures. The Fourth Style, became popular in the period of Claudius and Nero, when the earthquake struck in A.D. 72 and the Vesuvius erupted in 79 A.D. Returns once again to the architectural illusionism. It is inspired by the Second and Third styles. It was originated in Rome. “The colors are more decided and tend to contrasting lively color effects, the decorative element multiply and crowd together, alternating with illusionistic architectural views and pictures of mythological subjects often painted in the impressionistic technique. A particular type is that of suspended carpets with small pictures and figures in the center, inspired by the Hellenistic fashion of hanging decorative tapestries on the walls”. ( Giuntoli 7). In the Large hall, House of Fabius Rufus, we have one of the best examples of the 4th Style. The house is situated on the southwest edge of the city and it has a splendid view of the sea, it is the largest room of the house. On a black-ground enlived by animals, vases, musical instruments and others, we can see the three-dimensional effects, enhanced, for example by the woman on the balcony on the left. Apollo, Bachus and Venus appear in the main picture, in the upper zone above them is Leda with her swan, and small personifications of muses stand alone in the sides. The decoration stands out because of the blackground. From personal experience, I can say that after touring Pompeii, I was glad that such a catastrophe preserved the city. If you enjoy art, it is a must see.

Pompeii is possibly the best-documented catastrophe in Antiquity. Because of it, we know now how the Pompeians lived because they left behind an extensive legacy of art, including monuments, sculptures and paintings. Pompeii lay on a plateau of ancient lava near the Bay of Naples in western Italy in a region called Campania, less than 1.6 kilometers from the foot of Mount Vesuvius. With the coast to the west and the Apennine Mountains to the East, Campania is a fertile plain, traversed by two major rivers and rich soil. However, in the early days, it was not a remarkable city. Scholars have not been able to identify Pompeii’s original inhabitants. The first people to settle in this region were probably prehistoric hunters and fishers. By at least the eight century B.C., a group of Italic people known as the Oscans occupied the region; they most likely established Pompeii, although the exact date of its origin is unknown. “The root of the word Pompeii would appear to be the Oscan word for the number five, pompe, which suggests that either the community consisted of five hamlets or, perhaps, was settled by a family group (gens Pompeia)”(Kraus 7). In the course of the eight century B.C., Greek and Etruscan colonization stimulated the development of Pompeii as a city around the area of the Forum. A point for important trade routes, it became a place for trading towards the inland. Up until the middle of the 5th century B.C., the city was dominated politically by the Etruscans. In the course of the 6th century B.C., the influence of Greek culture is also documented by terracottas, ceramics and architecture. A group of warriors from Samnium, called Samnite, invaded the region in the 400’s B.C. Pompeii remained a relatively unimportant village until the 200’s B.C., when the town entered a prosperous period of building and expansion. The Romans defeated the Samnites, and Pompeii became part of the emerging Roman state. Pompeii joined the Italic revolt against Rome, the Social War of 91-87 B.C., and was crushed by Sulla. Although the city was not destroyed, it lost its autonomy, becoming a colony called Colonia Veernia Cornelia P, in honor of its conqueror L. Cornelius Sulla. By 79 AD, Latin had replaced Oscan as the principal language, and the laws and culture of Imperial Rome were implanted. The “romanization” had began. Pompeii grew from a modest farming town to an important and sophisticated industrial and trading center. In 62 A.D., the first disaster, a terrible earthquake hit the city. As the city was being rebuilt the second disaster struck. In the summer of A.D. 79, Vesuvius suddenly erupted with violence. Hot ashes, lava and stones poured into Pompeii. The eruption caught Pompeians by surprise: “They heard the crash of falling roofs: an instant more and the mountain-cloud seemed to roll towards them, dark and rapid, like a torrent; at the same time, it cast forth from its bosom a showe of ashes mixed with vast fragments of burning stone! over the