Recent orders

FREED AFRICAN AMERICANS

FREED AFRICAN AMERICANS

Name

Course

Date

How Freed Slaves Reacted to Their New Status after the Civil War and the Reality of Their Freedom

After the Civil War, more than 3.9 million African Americans gained their freedom. In this incredible transition period, the freed slaves reacted by first establishing their families. They also sought ways in which they could manage their working environment. Apart from that, they looked for ways in which they could establish their own churches and schools as well as unique ways to participate in public life not as slaves but as citizens. However, these objectives were not easy to attain at that point in time. Their transition from a life of slavery to that of freedom was as astonishing as it was multifaceted. The freed slaves experienced a mixture of joy and disappointment in their efforts to establish themselves as free people.

The former slaves encountered challenges in their efforts to ascertain themselves as free citizens and paid workers. Most of their owners refused to accept them as free people. They not only lacked places to call home but also could not support themselves or their families.

However, over 20,000 former slaves had joined the army during the war for freedom. This was evident when 40% of Tennessee’s union troops comprised African Americans. Most of these men initially worked as military laborers. They assisted in the completion of the Johnsonville and Nashville railroad before gallantly fighting in the 1864 Nashville battle. Most of the African American soldiers also had families that followed them to seek their freedom behind the union lines. The renegades, especially women and their children as well as the elderly, were perceived as a big burden by the union, thus they were not welcomed in the union jurisdictions. Most of these women attempted to look for work in union camps. Even though there were limited opportunities in the camps, some of them eventually succeeded to work as hospital workers, cooks, tailors, and laundresses.

The freedom during the war was disastrous for families that lived behind the union lines because of the unbearable conditions. By the end of the war, the hurriedly erected contraband camps that spread all over Tennessee became very poor asylums for the freed slaves. The fragile shelters in the union encampments offered little protection from hazardous elements and the congested conditions resulted in shocking rates of diseases and deaths. Apart from that, white soldiers sexually exploited women in those camps. Consequently, most slaves decided to stick with their former owners after they heard about the heart-rending conditions in the union camps. The slaves who had stuck with their owners in the entire war period began to experience some form of freedom. They obtained some leverage from their owners due to the potential threat they had of escaping. Some of the concessions they received from their masters included having quality time with their families and doing enough work for their own families.

Most of the landowners had fled after the war and the Union Army seized their land. The Union General, William Sherman, promised some of this land to the freed slaves. However, this was reverted when President Andrew Johnson pardoned the former landowners in 1865; hence, they repossessed their property. Most of the former slaves, pushed to the wall with no other way of fending for themselves or their families, decided to go back to their former owners. Even though they were at the time paid a monthly salary, some of them were made to sign contracts whose conditions were similar to slavery. For instance, they could be fined for foul mouth and could not leave the farms without seeking permission.

Since they were no more in slavery, a fundamental concern for a majority of the freed slaves in the south was to locate members of their families from whom they had been detached under bondage. Given that they had long been deprived of mobility while still in bondage, the freed African Americans took to their feet. They traveled across cities and towns as they searched for each other and sought any leads that could assist them to reunite. They took detailed adverts in newspapers in an attempt to find each other. The families that managed to reunite experienced both the delight of reconciliation as well as the tension of constructing the cut off relationships.

The desire to ensure that their families were established kept on motivating former slaves at the end of the war. However, several peripheral pressures curtailed their efforts to keep their families intact. Inadequate resources, miserable economic situations, and constant manipulation by their former owners, who were searching for cheap laborers, made some African Americans to franchise their children to the white employers. Most freed African Americans worked for their former owners on the farms but for very slight compensation. They often clashed with their white employers because they wanted their own independence and control of their time. Consequently, the effort to guarantee that freedom was indeed distinct from slavery was a daunting task in the reconstruction years.

Bibliography

A. Robert. Divine America: Past and Present, Volume 1 Brief Edition. Pearson: New York, 2009.

D. James, Anderson. The Education of Blacks in the South, 1860-1935. Chapel Hill, NC: Univ. of North Carolina Press, 2005.

Gavin, Michael T. Maury County African-American Heritage Tour Guide. Columbia, TN: Middle Tennessee Visitors Bureau, 2008.

LeForge, Bussell. “State Colored Conventions of Tennessee, 1865-1866” Tennessee Historical Quarterly 65, 231-235, 2006.

Lovett, Bobby L. The African-American History of Nashville, Tennessee, 1780-1930 Fayetteville, AR: Univ. of Arkansas Press, 2007.

Van West, Carroll. Tennessee History: The Land, the People, and the Culture Knoxville, TN: Univ. of Tennessee Press, 2010.

Trias Decision on Cable Ladder Production

Student’s name

Instructor

Course

Date

Trias Decision on Cable Ladder Production

Trias is a firm that mainly focuses on the making of cables. Therefore, it is considered a good and quality company offering good services to those people work with. This is one reason why the chief executive officer of the Trias company comes to the office, whereby the company’s leaders are seated. As he greets them, there is a joy in his face which can be depicted clearly through the writing. This was his best moment as he announced how the company had placed a bid and won. Therefore, upon this news, which is considered accurate and thoroughly reliable, the CEO decides to lead the whole group into making the best decision to develop a way to make sure that everything works out alright. In this case, the working out is whereby they have to decide how they can fulfill the bid won in the shortest time possible with the least amount of resources or rather the cheapest resources to make an excellent profit for the company.

Trias company is a company located in Indonesia, and it has been in operation since 1987. This period has been termed as one of the best companies offering quality cables and cable accessories and services (Chu & Hermanto, 1). As the company gets a new bid, there is a need for the company to also look for new ways to do its activities and run the business. For so long, the company has been relying on GI as a partner in running the business. However, this has always been a challenge as if it was to be used for this particular project; the profit margin would have been a mere 5 percent. This is very small compared to the use of the new method, which has been in development in japan and south Korea. Therefore, the CEO of the company recalls their conversation with several of his engineers about eh new material instead of using the GI method of welding, which needed more skill and thus translated into more input.

The new way involved galvanizing and not welding. Welding is seen as an insensitive process because of its need for particular skills. However, for the new material galvanizing is to be used. The material is also more expensive than the former material used. However, the expensive material is not a big challenge as it will lead to more production and therefore higher profits. The leadership is seen as ecstatic due to the happenings which take place and how things happen. In this, we can see how the engineers just approached the CEO with the new idea of getting a different material, and it acts as a coincidence to get to use the same material so fast after winning the bid. This serves as a positive impact on the company, and it is a crucial step for the use of the new material for production, which enables higher profits and productivity.

Welding, according to the case, takes around four steps. However, riveting only takes two steps. This is seen as a significant improvement because, first of all, the members of the rest of the two phases which were being used in welding are thus released from their jobs or assigned new duties of less pay. This makes sure that the company’s profit margin does not remain 5 percent as it would have been if the company used the welding method. However, with the new material being realized, it turns out that there are two companies to decide from; PSC from South Korea and NSH from japan. Therefore the characteristics of these two companies are discussed below.

Even though selected and seen as the best option for the company to go with, the new material also brings challenges as the first time to run such kind of business is always met with bureaucracies and other organizational issues. For example in this import there had to be payment of the customs office and additional costs like transport fee and insurance. However, even before this, we see a presentation of this material compared to hot-dip galvanization, a common practice, and the company had been practicing for a long (Chu & Hermanto, 2). The person assigned this duty was Gunawan, and therefore he talks of how this new method would eliminate two stages, thus leading to a reduction in expenditure on labor. He also states that the new process’s riveting required fewer skills compared to welding they have been using before. Welding could make it 5 percent profit. On the other hand, riveting, which is the new method, can make them 30% profit. This difference is so big, and therefore the decision was made to go for riveting.

One of the advantages of this material is that it is corrosion-free (Chu & Hermanto, 2). The company also has to apply for a clearance certificate from the Indonesian customs and excise department for this kind of importation to take place. PSC was a bit expensive due to the demand in its area of operation as compared to NSH. However, even though expensive, it provided a large volume, which made it much more costly due to the demand it faced. The two companies have also stated that their prices are fixed, and therefore the company buying has to buy the whole of the material from them to fulfill the tender won.

In conclusion, we can say that the company is likely to decide and go for PSC because of its capability to deliver better and with much higher quality compared to NSH.

Works cited

Chu & Hermanto, TRIAS: Decision on Cable Ladder Production, Harvard Business Publishing Education (2016), London, Hbsp.harvard.edu, hbsp.harvard.edu/product/W16068-PDF-ENG. Accessed 11 Mar. 2021.

Argumentative Essay on Lowering the Drinking Age from Twenty-one to Eighteen

Name:

Professor:

Course:

Date:

Argumentative Essay on Lowering the Drinking Age from Twenty-one to Eighteen

Does the widely-believed perception that the minimum legal drinking age of twenty-one really hold true? Does it save lives by reducing traffic fatalities and accidents among underage drivers? According to a research by the Pew Research Institute, every day in the nation, over 8500 kids under the age of sixteen have their first full drink of alcohol CITATION Dre14 l 1033 (Desilver). Although most Americans perceive the MLDA of twenty-one to be efficient, it only serves to heighten the thrill of alcohol and breaking the law, lure young adults into drinking in unregulated environments, infringe on their right to make their own decisions since 18 is the age of adulthood in the nation, and this policy seems highly inefficient since teens consume alcohol regardless. The MLDA 21 should, therefore, be reduced to 18, to avoid infringing on the rights of people aged eighteen to twenty, to reduce the thrill of alcohol and curb risky behavior associated with drinking in unregulated areas.

The MLDA 21 infringes on the rights of over 18s to make their own decisions. In the US the age of adulthood is eighteen and hence they should be given the right to make their own decisions on alcohol consumption. According to the Amethyst Initiative, the current minimum legal drinking age of 21 years is ineffective in preventing youths from drinking alcohol and experiencing the negative effects of alcohol. The Amethyst Initiative is an advocacy group that encourages public debate about lowering the minimum drinking age from 21. This group partners with another group, Choose Responsibility CITATION San11 l 1033 (Jones and Lachman). These two groups argue that the observed decline in drinking and traffic fatalities since the minimum legal drinking age was set at twenty-one years is not due to the MLDA, but due to factors such as improvement in traffic laws and motor vehicle safety. Moreover, they argue, that eighteen is the legal adult age in the nation, and drinking should be an activity that should be determined by all adults. The two groups advocate for public discussions and debates on lowering the drinking age to avoid infringing on people’s rights

The MLDA 21 only heightens the thrill of alcohol and breaking the law and should, therefore, be reduced to eighteen years. According to an article by Forbes, Mark Kleiman, a UCLA professor of Public Policy stated that the current age restrictions “make drinking a badge of adulthood and therefore build in the minds of young adults, a romantic sense of the transgressive danger of alcohol. This hence results in the abuse of alcohol. CITATION Wil08 l 1033 (Wilkinson)” If alcohol consumption was normalized and people taught that it should be done moderately and responsibly, then the taboo surrounding alcohol would be eradicated and it would not be thrilling anymore. Despite heavy drinking reducing among older adolescents since the enactment of the MLDA 21, no such progress has been marked for college students. Studies reveal that approximately 75% of college students aged 18-20 years participate in binge drinking. This proves that lowering the age limit to 18 will lessen the connotative lure of alcohol.

The MLDA 21 lures young adults into drinking in unregulated environments. Prohibiting young adults from drinking in bars or in other licensed locations only makes them drink in unsupervised areas such as house parties and here, they may binge drink and expose themselves to risky behavior. According to a journal article published by the NCBI, recent trends have proved that young adults mainly partake in alcohol consumption without any regulation or surveillance CITATION Tob10 l 1033 (Nelson and Wechsler). This results in worse outcomes than if they had their drinks in unlicensed establishments. As a group, college students are heavy drinkers partly because college environments have easy access to cheap alcohol and have few and stringent policies in place that restrict access to alcohol. Despite the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act requiring college administrators to enforce the MLDA 21, the enforcement of this act is limited since most higher learning institutions tend to focus on programs such as education and security. Therefore, the MLDA 21 should be reduced to eighteen years to avoid the lure of drinking in unregulated environments.

In conclusion, many Americans perceive the MLDA 21 to be effective but in reality, it is not. The nation, especially, in American college campuses, is characterized by a unanimous drinking culture that involves dangerous, determinative, and heavy drinking. The current decline in traffic fatalities is not due to the MLDA 21 but due to factors such as improvement in motor vehicle safety and more stringent traffic rules. Moreover, the age group 18-20 does not drink as heavily as those aged 21-24, especially those in university. The MLDA 21 should, therefore, be reduced to 18, to reduce the thrill of alcohol and curb risky behavior associated with drinking in unregulated areas.

Works Cited

BIBLIOGRAPHY Desilver, Drew. Chart of the Week: Who really drinks the most? 16 May 2014. <http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/05/16/chart-of-the-week-who-really-drinks-the-most/>.

Jones, Sandra and Vicki Lachman. “Continuing the Dialogue: Reducing Minimum Legal Drinking Age Laws from 21 to 18.” Journal of Addictions Nursing (2011): 138-143.

Nelson, Toben and Henry Wechsler. “Will Increasing Alcohol Availability By Lowering the Minimum Legal Drinking Age Decrease Drinking and Related Consequences Among Youths?” American Journal of Public Health (2010): 986-992.

Wilkinson, Will. “Bottoms Up!” Forbes 11 September 2008. <https://www.forbes.com/forbes/2008/0929/028.html#774328e37192>.