Recent orders
The Creation of Self-Worth in Paradise
The Creation of Self-Worth in Paradise
In order to determine whether Adam and Eve forfeit paradise, it must be determined whether Eden, as presented by John Milton in his epic work Paradise Lost, truly serves as a paradise for it occupants. Milton’s Paradise successfully serves as a paradise for Adam and Eve because it induces unqualified happiness in its inhabitants by engendering a sense of self-worth in Adam and Eve. Paradise is only worthy of its name if it is deemed so by its inhabitants. In order for Eden to serve as paradise for Adam and Eve, it must make them happy. Paradise elicits happiness from its inhabitants because it creates in them a feeling of self-worth, or rather a sense that their existence has value and importance. This sense of self-worth serves as the foundation of happiness because without it, Adam and Eve would quickly fall into despair.
Despite the many pleasures of Paradise, they would quickly determine, using their innate intellect and ability to reason, that they are of no consequence in the world—they would feel useless and unimportant. They would feel lowlier than the beasts, being of less use and having less of a defined role in Paradise, because they would be cursed with the ability to know of their own uselessness. In reading Book IV, this is clearly not the case because despair is not present. Adam and Eve are able to enjoy a happy life in Paradise because Paradise provides them with the three essential components of self-worth: security, mastery, and companionship.
These three components represent the structure of self-worth, from its fundamental base, security, to its culmination in companionship. Security provides the foundation for the creation of happiness for Adam and Eve because it serves as a prerequisite for the creation of a sense of self-worth. A strong and deep-seeded sense of value and importance in life cannot exist if the continuation of that life is subject to constant threat. If the threat to life is constant and pervasive, then the preservation of life becomes the only concern. The daily quest for survival would provide little time to reflect on life’s meaning and one’s place in the world. A feeling of safety is required to allow Adam and Eve’s thoughts to blossom into reflections on their lives, and only through these reflections can they come to know whether they feel valuable and important—whether they have a sense of self-worth.
A feeling of safety serves as a necessary component of contentment because it prevents feelings of anxiety and fear concerning the surroundings and the immediate future. The most obvious example of safety in Eden involves the role of the “verdurous wall” (l. 143). Traditionally, the presence of this wall has been a point of great contention among those who would debate whether Eden is a depiction of true paradise. Many argue that it inhibits freedom of movement for Adam and Eve: surely, Eden cannot be a paradise if it inhibits freedom. In response to the idea that the wall is intended for the protection and safety of Adam and Eve, many contend that it fails to keep out the most dangerous, and seemingly only threat to their well-being—Satan.
These are valid arguments if the lens through which Paradise is viewed is a personal one, subject to the likes and dislikes of the viewer. For some, total freedom may seem frightening, making the wall a welcome presence in their paradise. For many others, any inhibition is unwelcome, thus eliminating the wall from their personal paradise. In the context of this argument, however, the wall represents a sign of security and safety because the lens through which it is viewed belongs to Adam and Eve. Only if they feel it inhibits their freedom should it be considered inhibiting. No where in the text of Book IV do either Adam or Eve mention any constraints placed on them by the existence of the wall. The clearest evidence depicting the role of the wall comes from the narrator, who discusses it from an exterior as well as from an interior perspective. The exterior perspective is Satan’s. He perceives the wall as stately and presumably formidable because it may impede his passage into Paradise. Indeed, he cannot enter Paradise through it; he must go over it instead. In a later description of Paradise, the narrator describes it as a “happy rural seat of various view” (l. 246).
This line may imply that the seat of Paradise affords a view of its surroundings, or that Paradise contains within itself various views. If the former is true, then the purpose of the wall is to defend from without, but to allow for pleasant views from within, negating, at least in part, its potential role as an constrictor of freedom, since it is not perceived as ominous from within. Its purpose would then lie solely in providing security for Adam and Eve, since it is perceived as ominous from without. If the latter proves true, and Paradise merely contains various views, then this line does not serve as sufficient evidence for differing perceptions concerning the wall. The true test of purpose regarding the wall lies within the level of comfort it creates for the inhabitants within. Some modicum of security, and the comfort provided by that security is necessary to provide an environment in which reflection is feasible and not detrimental to survival.
The wall serves as a tool in Paradise to help create a sense of security and comfort, which will eventually allow for the growth of a felling of self-worth in Adam and Eve. Adam and Eve do not mention that the wall inhibits their freedom, or more importantly, that it in any way diminishes their happiness. In this case an absence of evidence can serve as evidence of absence because the wall makes so little impact on the lives of Adam and Eve in Book IV that they do not even bother to mention its presence. If it provided a source of discomfort or trepidation, some evidence of discontent over the general state of Paradise should be present in the text, especially in their dialogue. If Adam and Eve did feel that the wall inhibited their freedom, something presumably this important would force them to at least doubt the supposed ideal nature of paradise. They do not. Either they do not perceive it as an impediment to freedom, or they do not perceive an impediment to freedom as an impediment to happiness. In either case, happiness in their paradise is maintained in spite of, if not because of the presence of the verdurous wall, and a sensation of self-worth in Adam and Eve can now emerge.
Once this sense of security is established and the foundations of self-worth are in place, the construction of the edifice of self-worth can begin. Adam and Eve’s mastery over Paradise represents the initial formation of their sense of self-worth. Mastery allows them to feel important and valuable in their roles in Paradise: important in their dominion over all of Paradise and valuable in their duty as Paradise’s caretakers. Mastery forms the most basic sense of self-worth because it clearly defines Adam and Eve’s place and duty in Paradise; their job, their role, gives their daily life purpose and meaning. This basic sense of self-worth is primarily derived from the work they are assigned for their days in Paradise. This assigned work amounts to tending the growth of the garden to prevent overgrowth, and general maintenance of its appearance. By having a job to do for their Creator, Adam and Eve feel a sense of accomplishment at the end of each day, and in completing their assignment, they finish happy in their mutual help and mutual love, as evidenced by their prayer before retiring. Work allows them to spend time together, and it provides them with a sense that they have pleased God. Neither Adam nor Eve refer to the work as toilsome or burdensome; they only refer to it as pleasant and delightful. The strongest evidence that work affords them a sense of self-worth comes in Adam’s discussion of their need to rest. He states that “Man hath his daily work of body or mind / Appointed, which declares his Dignitie, / And the regard of Heav’n on all his waies” (ll. 618-620).
Not only do their labors link them to God, but they also provide Adam and Eve with dignity. Working in God’s garden allows them to find contentment in service, and through service, contentment in self-respect. Adam and Eve also derive a sense of importance from the dominion God has given them over their surroundings. Adam notes that they are “Among so many signes of power and rule / Conferrd upon us, and Dominion giv’n / Over all other Creatures that possess / Earth, Aire, and Sea” (ll. 429-432). With their role in Paradise clearly defined, Adam and Eve have no doubts as to their duties or their position among their surroundings. God has made their dominion and their duty clear. This clarity bring with it an understanding that without them, Paradise would lose its masters and would quickly fall to disarray. Throughout Book IV, Adam and Eve mention their comprehension of the fact that Paradise exists for them, given by God. In a discussion of mastery, this serves as the most compelling argument for the presence of peace of mind for Adam and Eve, which generates their sense of self-worth: they dwell in God’s garden and, more importantly, they dwell in God’s favor. Once mastery is established, the basic premise of self-worth is present: they know their role in life, and they are made happy in that knowledge.
Life in Paradise does not merely afford them with the rudiments of self-worth, however. Adam and Eve’s sense of self-worth grows in their relationship with each other. Adam and Eve’s companionship and love in Paradise represent the pinnacle of their sense of self-worth because in each other they find partnership and wholeness. Their relationship, as intended by God, begins on the level of companionship: God creates Eve as a companion for Adam. In their daily lives, they aid each other in work and they cure each other’s loneliness. While this serves as the foundation of their relationship, their companionship is transcended by love. In their love for each other, Adam and Eve create the most important meaning in their lives through their relationship with each other. In love, they find completion, not just companionship. In love they find wholeness, and they understand themselves most clearly in the context of that love.
This understanding allows for a further development of their sense of self-worth because, in the happiness of their love, and in the reflection of that love in each other, each sees value in their own self: if the other person loves them, there must be something worthy of love. Adam and Eve’s companionship relies on their need and desire for each other. It fulfills the need for partnership and it prevents loneliness, while establishing a base upon which the growth of self-worth in love can occur. Adam often express his desire for Eve’s presence and companionship because she is his “Sole partner and sole part of all these joyes” (l. 411). The possible puns on “soul” indicate the depth of their relationship: they are partners in spirit as well as in duty. Their suitability for one another is symbolized in the fact the Eve is made from Adam’s rib: she is an extension of him, and he is a part of her. Eve expresses similar desire for Adam’s companionship. She describes the hierarchy of law in Paradise, from God to Adam, and from Adam to her, and declares that “to know no more / Is womans happiest knowledge and her praise” (ll. 637-638). She desires Adam’s company because his role as her link to God brings her joy. Eve even goes so far as to declare that all of the splendor of Eden is lost to her without Adam.
She makes her own happiness contingent on his presence and companionship. Because she has him, she can enjoy Paradise and live happily. Adam and Eve attain joy in the happiness that their companionship affords them. The narrator allows a glimpse into the feelings of both Adam and Eve, and the glimpse reveals a love which both share with one another. The narrative voice clearly depicts Adam’s attitude toward Eve when it states that “he in delight / Both of her Beauty and submissive Charms / Smil’d with superior Love…” (ll. 497-499). In the same passage, Eve’s love for Adam is implied by her actions toward him. She submissively leans into Adam and embraces him in “conjugal attraction.” While this does not necessarily suffice as direct evidence of love, it does provide circumstantial evidence because she acts in the manner of a lover toward her mate. Her love for him becomes clear later, in the stated mutuality of their love in their prayer to God.
Before retiring for the night, Adam and Eve declare “we in our appointed work imployd / Have finisht happie in our mutual help / And mutual love” (ll. 726-728). Not only does the prayer express the mutuality of their love, but it also reveals the importance of love in their lives. In Eve’s previous declaration that her happiness is contingent upon Adam, it becomes clear that Paradise loses its meaning and its worth without the presence of love. Adam and Eve’s life is meaningful because they love. The meaning and importance their relationship creates provides the highest expression of self-worth because, as evidenced throughout Book IV, Adam and Eve are images of each other. As each sees love reflected in the other, both Adam and Eve experience a self-love, which defines the height of self-worth. In Milton’s depiction of Paradise, Adam and Eve find true happiness because they understand and believe in the validity of their own self-worth.
Security supports the structure of self-worth, the beginnings of which can be found in the presence of Adam and Eve’s mastery. Self-worth finds its fullest expression, however, in the love shared by Adam and Eve, because it, more than anything else, makes them happy and allows them to truly experience paradise. Milton’s title, Paradise Lost, is appropriate because Adam and Eve deem Eden a paradise through their behavior and beliefs, and they truly lose a state of great worthiness and happiness when they lose Paradise. The Creation of Self-Worth in Paradise In order to determine whether Adam and Eve forfeit paradise, it must be determined whether Eden, as presented by John Milton in his epic work Paradise Lost, truly serves as a paradise for it occupants. Milton’s Paradise successfully serves as a paradise for Adam and Eve because it induces unqualified happiness in its inhabitants by engendering a sense of self-worth in Adam and Eve.
Paradise is only worthy of its name if it is deemed so by its inhabitants. In order for Eden to serve as paradise for Adam and Eve, it must make them happy. Paradise elicits happiness from its inhabitants because it creates in them a feeling of self-worth, or rather a sense that their existence has value and importance. This sense of self-worth serves as the foundation of happiness because without it, Adam and Eve would quickly fall into despair. Despite the many pleasures of Paradise, they would quickly determine, using their innate intellect and ability to reason, that they are of no consequence in the world—they would feel useless and unimportant. They would feel lowlier than the beasts, being of less use and having less of a defined role in Paradise, because they would be cursed with the ability to know of their own uselessness. In reading Book IV, this is clearly not the case because despair is not present. Adam and Eve are able to enjoy a happy life in Paradise because Paradise provides them with the three essential components of self-worth: security, mastery, and companionship. These three components represent the structure of self-worth, from its fundamental base, security, to its culmination in companionship.
Security provides the foundation for the creation of happiness for Adam and Eve because it serves as a prerequisite for the creation of a sense of self-worth. A strong and deep-seeded sense of value and importance in life cannot exist if the continuation of that life is subject to constant threat. If the threat to life is constant and pervasive, then the preservation of life becomes the only concern. The daily quest for survival would provide little time to reflect on life’s meaning and one’s place in the world. A feeling of safety is required to allow Adam and Eve’s thoughts to blossom into reflections on their lives, and only through these reflections can they come to know whether they feel valuable and important—whether they have a sense of self-worth. A feeling of safety serves as a necessary component of contentment because it prevents feelings of anxiety and fear concerning the surroundings and the immediate future. The most obvious example of safety in Eden involves the role of the “verdurous wall” (l. 143).
Traditionally, the presence of this wall has been a point of great contention among those who would debate whether Eden is a depiction of true paradise. Many argue that it inhibits freedom of movement for Adam and Eve: surely, Eden cannot be a paradise if it inhibits freedom. In response to the idea that the wall is intended for the protection and safety of Adam and Eve, many contend that it fails to keep out the most dangerous, and seemingly only threat to their well-being—Satan. These are valid arguments if the lens through which Paradise is viewed is a personal one, subject to the likes and dislikes of the viewer. For some, total freedom may seem frightening, making the wall a welcome presence in their paradise. For many others, any inhibition is unwelcome, thus eliminating the wall from their personal paradise. In the context of this argument, however, the wall represents a sign of security and safety because the lens through which it is viewed belongs to Adam and Eve.
Only if they feel it inhibits their freedom should it be considered inhibiting. No where in the text of Book IV do either Adam or Eve mention any constraints placed on them by the existence of the wall. The clearest evidence depicting the role of the wall comes from the narrator, who discusses it from an exterior as well as from an interior perspective. The exterior perspective is Satan’s. He perceives the wall as stately and presumably formidable because it may impede his passage into Paradise. Indeed, he cannot enter Paradise through it; he must go over it instead. In a later description of Paradise, the narrator describes it as a “happy rural seat of various view” (l. 246). This line may imply that the seat of Paradise affords a view of its surroundings, or that Paradise contains within itself various views. If the former is true, then the purpose of the wall is to defend from without, but to allow for pleasant views from within, negating, at least in part, its potential role as an constrictor of freedom, since it is not perceived as ominous from within. Its purpose would then lie solely in providing security for Adam and Eve, since it is perceived as ominous from without.
If the latter proves true, and Paradise merely contains various views, then this line does not serve as sufficient evidence for differing perceptions concerning the wall. The true test of purpose regarding the wall lies within the level of comfort it creates for the inhabitants within. Some modicum of security, and the comfort provided by that security is necessary to provide an environment in which reflection is feasible and not detrimental to survival. The wall serves as a tool in Paradise to help create a sense of security and comfort, which will eventually allow for the growth of a felling of self-worth in Adam and Eve. Adam and Eve do not mention that the wall inhibits their freedom, or more importantly, that it in any way diminishes their happiness. In this case an absence of evidence can serve as evidence of absence because the wall makes so little impact on the lives of Adam and Eve in Book IV that they do not even bother to mention its presence. If it provided a source of discomfort or trepidation, some evidence of discontent over the general state of Paradise should be present in the text, especially in their dialogue.
If Adam and Eve did feel that the wall inhibited their freedom, something presumably this important would force them to at least doubt the supposed ideal nature of paradise. They do not. Either they do not perceive it as an impediment to freedom, or they do not perceive an impediment to freedom as an impediment to happiness. In either case, happiness in their paradise is maintained in spite of, if not because of the presence of the verdurous wall, and a sensation of self-worth in Adam and Eve can now emerge. Once this sense of security is established and the foundations of self-worth are in place, the construction of the edifice of self-worth can begin. Adam and Eve’s mastery over Paradise represents the initial formation of their sense of self-worth. Mastery allows them to feel important and valuable in their roles in Paradise: important in their dominion over all of Paradise and valuable in their duty as Paradise’s caretakers.
Mastery forms the most basic sense of self-worth because it clearly defines Adam and Eve’s place and duty in Paradise; their job, their role, gives their daily life purpose and meaning. This basic sense of self-worth is primarily derived from the work they are assigned for their days in Paradise. This assigned work amounts to tending the growth of the garden to prevent overgrowth, and general maintenance of its appearance. By having a job to do for their Creator, Adam and Eve feel a sense of accomplishment at the end of each day, and in completing their assignment, they finish happy in their mutual help and mutual love, as evidenced by their prayer before retiring. Work allows them to spend time together, and it provides them with a sense that they have pleased God. Neither Adam nor Eve refer to the work as toilsome or burdensome; they only refer to it as pleasant and delightful.
The strongest evidence that work affords them a sense of self-worth comes in Adam’s discussion of their need to rest. He states that “Man hath his daily work of body or mind / Appointed, which declares his Dignitie, / And the regard of Heav’n on all his waies” (ll. 618-620). Not only do their labors link them to God, but they also provide Adam and Eve with dignity. Working in God’s garden allows them to find contentment in service, and through service, contentment in self-respect. Adam and Eve also derive a sense of importance from the dominion God has given them over their surroundings. Adam notes that they are “Among so many signes of power and rule / Conferrd upon us, and Dominion giv’n / Over all other Creatures that possess / Earth, Aire, and Sea” (ll. 429-432). With their role in Paradise clearly defined, Adam and Eve have no doubts as to their duties or their position among their surroundings. God has made their dominion and their duty clear. This clarity bring with it an understanding that without them, Paradise would lose its masters and would quickly fall to disarray. Throughout Book IV, Adam and Eve mention their comprehension of the fact that Paradise exists for them, given by God.
In a discussion of mastery, this serves as the most compelling argument for the presence of peace of mind for Adam and Eve, which generates their sense of self-worth: they dwell in God’s garden and, more importantly, they dwell in God’s favor. Once mastery is established, the basic premise of self-worth is present: they know their role in life, and they are made happy in that knowledge. Life in Paradise does not merely afford them with the rudiments of self-worth, however. Adam and Eve’s sense of self-worth grows in their relationship with each other. Adam and Eve’s companionship and love in Paradise represent the pinnacle of their sense of self-worth because in each other they find partnership and wholeness. Their relationship, as intended by God, begins on the level of companionship: God creates Eve as a companion for Adam. In their daily lives, they aid each other in work and they cure each other’s loneliness.
While this serves as the foundation of their relationship, their companionship is transcended by love. In their love for each other, Adam and Eve create the most important meaning in their lives through their relationship with each other. In love, they find completion, not just companionship. In love they find wholeness, and they understand themselves most clearly in the context of that love. This understanding allows for a further development of their sense of self-worth because, in the happiness of their love, and in the reflection of that love in each other, each sees value in their own self: if the other person loves them, there must be something worthy of love. Adam and Eve’s companionship relies on their need and desire for each other. It fulfills the need for partnership and it prevents loneliness, while establishing a base upon which the growth of self-worth in love can occur. Adam often express his desire for Eve’s presence and companionship because she is his “Sole partner and sole part of all these joyes” (l. 411). The possible puns on “soul” indicate the depth of their relationship: they are partners in spirit as well as in duty.
Their suitability for one another is symbolized in the fact the Eve is made from Adam’s rib: she is an extension of him, and he is a part of her. Eve expresses similar desire for Adam’s companionship. She describes the hierarchy of law in Paradise, from God to Adam, and from Adam to her, and declares that “to know no more / Is womans happiest knowledge and her praise” (ll. 637-638). She desires Adam’s company because his role as her link to God brings her joy. Eve even goes so far as to declare that all of the splendor of Eden is lost to her without Adam. She makes her own happiness contingent on his presence and companionship. Because she has him, she can enjoy Paradise and live happily. Adam and Eve attain joy in the happiness that their companionship affords them. The narrator allows a glimpse into the feelings of both Adam and Eve, and the glimpse reveals a love which both share with one another. The narrative voice clearly depicts Adam’s attitude toward Eve when it states that “he in delight / Both of her Beauty and submissive Charms / Smil’d with superior Love…” (ll. 497-499). In the same passage, Eve’s love for Adam is implied by her actions toward him. She submissively leans into Adam and embraces him in “conjugal attraction.” While this does not necessarily suffice as direct evidence of love, it does provide circumstantial evidence because she acts in the manner of a lover toward her mate.
Her love for him becomes clear later, in the stated mutuality of their love in their prayer to God. Before retiring for the night, Adam and Eve declare “we in our appointed work imployd / Have finisht happie in our mutual help / And mutual love” (ll. 726-728). Not only does the prayer express the mutuality of their love, but it also reveals the importance of love in their lives. In Eve’s previous declaration that her happiness is contingent upon Adam, it becomes clear that Paradise loses its meaning and its worth without the presence of love. Adam and Eve’s life is meaningful because they love. The meaning and importance their relationship creates provides the highest expression of self-worth because, as evidenced throughout Book IV, Adam and Eve are images of each other.
As each sees love reflected in the other, both Adam and Eve experience a self-love, which defines the height of self-worth. In Milton’s depiction of Paradise, Adam and Eve find true happiness because they understand and believe in the validity of their own self-worth. Security supports the structure of self-worth, the beginnings of which can be found in the presence of Adam and Eve’s mastery. Self-worth finds its fullest expression, however, in the love shared by Adam and Eve, because it, more than anything else, makes them happy and allows them to truly experience paradise. Milton’s title, Paradise Lost, is appropriate because Adam and Eve deem Eden a paradise through their behavior and beliefs, and they truly lose a state of great worthiness and happiness when they lose Paradise.
The Creation Of A LLC Type Of Business For Taxation Purpose Over Other Forms Of Businesses
The Creation Of A LLC Type Of Business For Taxation Purpose Over Other Forms Of Businesses
I was pleased to review the advice one of my employees gave one of our clients on the creation of a LLC type of business for taxation purpose over other forms of businesses. I agree with all of the advice he offered the clients, though I want to add a little bit on the information he availed to them on LLC’s. My advice will still be based on the follow up interviews my firm had with them, and I want to make sure that they understand completely of what constitutes of LLC businesses.
As business owners, I am sure they were faced with numerous critical decisions, including what types of business structures were open to them and their business. While there are numerous structures allowed in the country of partnership, sole- proprietorship or corporation for ownership of businesses, the most appropriate structure for their company was found to be a limited liability company. I want to clarify further on what this is.
A limited liability company, or a LLC, is a type of business ownership that combines a number of features of structures or corporation and partnership. It is, therefore, not a partnership or a corporation. It might be referred to as a limited liability corporation. Members in such partnerships are referred to as shareholders or partners. In this case, the number of members is unlimited and might be corporations, individuals or other LLCs, therefore, with time if they want they can incorporate such members (Keatinge et al., 1992).
This form or structure of companies has numerous advantages. For instance, owners of a LLC posses the liability protection of corporations. A LLC occurs as an entity, which is separate just like a corporation. Therefore, members of such a company cannot be held responsible for company debts unless they have agreed to in a written agreement. Another advantage is that it imposes on the company a flexible manner of sharing profits. These companies can select different kinds of distribution of gains. Unless other forms of companies that only allow half- half-splitting of profits, these companies allow a more flexible distribution of profits (Keatinge et al., 1992).
While numerous corporations are required to keep minutes that are formal, record resolutions and hold formal meeting, the LLC structure does not, and, therefore, it is easier to run. It also allows all the losses, expenses and profits of the company to flow through the company to individual company members. Generally, this imposes on the company a tax advantage because it makes it possible to avoid double taxation (LLC history).
I also want to bring to the attention of the clients some of the crucial limitations associated with LLCs, which to me are insignificant to their business when compared to the number of advantages they will obtain from this business structure. One of the essential limitations of a LLC is that it has a shorter life when compared to corporations. Another limitation is that it limits the owners from making the business public (Ribstein, 1995).
For the purposes of tax, I want to advise them further on how they will be treated by the IRS. A LLC like theirs with multiple owners is not required by LLC tax law to file federal tax returns. This is because each member is supposed to pay taxes according to their share of profits from the company. The initial company agreement they will draw, therefore, will set forth the distribution share each member will get, and their shares and loses will be distributed accordingly (Ribstein, 1995).
I hope that this will be of more use to the clients as they decide on which structure of company they will file for. You are welcome anytime to our offices for more information if you so wish.
References
Keatinge et al. (1992). The Limited Liability Company: A Study of the Emerging Entity. Business Lawyer 375: 383-384.
LLC history. Historical Background of the Limited Liability Company. Retrieved from http://www.llc-reporter.com/16.htm
Ribstein, L. E. (1995). A Critique of the Uniform Limited Liability Company Act. Stetson Law Review 312: 322 28.
Political Socialization Analysis (2)
Students Name
Institution of Affiliation
Course Title
Date
Political Socialization Analysis
Question #1) Explain what (if any) trends you noticed about the media consumption habits of your respondents[including which specific news sources they consult, their stated confidence in their sources, and how much they keep up with the news] and the political habits/ views of your respondents [including whether they are registered to vote, whether they voted recently and their views on the significance of voting, and their political party identification]. Both media consumption habits AND political habits/ views must be addressed for your response to earn full credit.
(Be VERY specific about the exact number of responses you receive about a particular topic. For example, you would write “1 out of 3 people told me ….”) If you do not notice any trends, demonstrate that this is the case using specific numbers from your respondents. (For example, you would write “0 out of 3 people thought … , but 1 out of 3 people said…”)
The trends on media consumption habit varied with different respondents based on their occupations and preferences. One out of three respondents told me that they only keep up with the news at a low rate of 4 out of 10. This is because most of the news are presented when the respondents are busy carrying out their day to day activities in their workplaces and also the belief that the news will be provided for them through other people. For example, one of the respondents said that they don’t keep up with the news because he would hear about them from his wife. The regular source of the news consulted by the respondents are mainly newspapers and television. Two out of three respondents talked of watching the news from the internet through twitter. Two of the three respondents said that they like to watch the Fox News in the mornings when they are together with their families so as to follow on the current news. According to one of them, the habit of watching the news at the morning is because their spouse loves it but not because they are motivated to do so by other factors. Majority of the interviewed respondents feel confident of their sources of news whereas a smaller number of them are not. For instance, one out of the three respondents confirmed that they are confident on their sources of news since they watch them on a daily basis. On the other side, one of the three respondents thought that the sources of news could even tell lies so as to remain relevant because it’s just business. On the issue of keeping up with the news, two of the three respondents keep up with the news at a rate of seven to ten. One out of the three does not keep up with the news regularly as they believe they will hear of the same news from either other people or from the media.
The political views of the respondent on voting were mostly positive as three out of three respondents confirmed that they are already registered voters. Two of the interviewed candidates told me that they had voted in the last election while one out of three had not voted. The trend observed here based on the responses is that most citizens take part in elections. The respondent’s views on the importance of voting varies in that two out of the three thought that voting is an important exercise. One of the three respondents told me that voting is not necessarily important since at the end of it, the elected politician is the one favored by those in authority. Out of the three respondents, two of them identifies themselves with the Republican political party while one out of three identifies himself with the Democrat party.
Question #2) What might explain the similarities or differences you identified between the results of your own survey and the results of your respondents? What do these results say about your “political socialization?” As you answer the question, be sure to include all of the following content, in this order:
Begin your response by stating the complete and fully quoted definition of political socialization from our textbook.
Explain the similarities and/or differences between your responses and those of your respondents
Name each of the seven “agents of socialization” noted in the textbook. Then select which of the seven “agents of socialization” most contributes to those similarities or differences (between your responses and those of your respondents). Conclude by explaining why they do. (Be sure that your analysis is clear and thorough.)
According to the book ‘American Democracy Now’, Political socialization refers to the process by which people develop their political values and opinions throughout their lives. There are various similarities between my responses and those of the respondents. One of the similarities is that we all think that voting is important and that is why elections campaigns are taken seriously, with people trying to identify themselves to certain political parties. Another similarity is that most of them don’t keep up with the news as they have a rating of less than 5.
On the other hand, several differences can be deduced from survey. One of the differences is that all the respondents are registered as voters and have participated in elections but on the other side, I am not a registered voter nor have I percolated in any voting in an election. Another difference is that I don’t identify with any political party because am not a registered voter but the rest of the respondents belong to a registered political party. Another difference is that we get our news from different sources. On my side, I get most of my news from the social media that is Twitter, watch ABC 30 news or at times GMA. Others stated that they obtained their news from different sources that include CNN, Fox News and BBC. Every channel provides different news and this makes the perception to be different.
Another difference is that I believe that most of the news, 75% comes from social media while the respondents claimed that some of the news comes from the social media with others saying that none comes from social media. In regards to keeping up with political events in the news, some variations do result, on my side, only a small percentage of the political news that I probably keep up with since I feel like they keep on repeating the same issue and arguing about what people don’t want to hear all day. In regards to the news accuracy, there are also variations that do exist between my response and that of the respondents. Basing in my experience, I don’t think that the news sources are accurate as people do always lie in an attempt to protect most people’s feelings. Some found the news sources moderately accurate while others found the sources to be accurate providing a rating of 7 out of 10.
The seven agents of socialization include, mass media, school, peer group, family, religion, government and work place. Among the seven agents of socialization, mass media and government most contributed to the similarities and differences in opinions. The reason behind is that the questions asked in the survey were political which directly refers to the government and also the social media as a news source. The differences came in through identifying to a political party and the belief that social media contributes to most news. Work Place can also be said to influence the differences as there were differences between a student and a police officer respondent.
