Recent orders

History of Mexico in LACMA

History of Mexico in LACMA

Name

Institution of Learning

History of Mexico in LACMA

Introduction

Mexico is located in the southern part of North America. According to historical records, the first inhabitants of this country migrated here approximately 13,000 years ago. They initially lived in the forest and depended on hunting and gathering as a chief source of their food. Later, they broke up into the present numerous ethnic groups. This paper gives a detailed analysis of Mexican socio-political and economic history presented in the Los Angeles County Museum of Art.

Socio-Cultural Factors

The indigenous Mexicans believed in the existence of a supernatural being. The Mesoamericans, such as the Maya, Mixtec and Aztec, had the concept of religion, which was different from Abrahamic religions. According to them, god could be deified in any natural phenomenon. It meant that the sun, stars, moon, earth, cosmos, mountains, water, animals or plants could be used to signify the presence of god in their midst. It was coupled with the concept of polytheism, according to which they used linear and angular elements of folk art to create symbols. Such decorations could be inscribed on walls, stones or pottery decorations.

Besides, the Mexican culture was characterized by class formation and intermarriages. Typically, it had a lot of ethnic groups, such as the Maya, Mixtec, Mixe, Pame, Totonac, Trique, Amuzgo, Chocho, Cora, Seri and Yaqui, just to mention, but a few. Each of these had a distinct cultural belief, religion and language. However, they freely interacted with each other through marriage, sporting activities and wars. It was a very significant component of their culture, because it made it possible for people to peacefully coexist, understand and appreciate their differences. This kind of interaction continued even after the colonization of this country by Spaniards, when they intermarried with these settlers to generate a hybrid group called Mestizo.

Last, but not least, the Mexican society was characterized by music and architectural masterpieces. Many scholars believe that the art of music has been practiced by such people as the Chocho, Pame and Cora for a very long time. There was the use of musical instruments, like flutes, drums and seashells. Artists used ranchera, banda and norteno traditional genres to thrill their dancing fans. It was a very important aspect of their life, because it entertained, educated, informed and brought people together. At the same time, the Mesoamericans produced aesthetic architectural designs, which were used as monuments and ceremonial centers to symbolize certain aspects of their tradition. It has continued up till nowadays, since Mexico is known to be generating internationally recognized artists.

However, most of these cultural aspects have faded away as a result of the colonial conquest of this country. For instance, when introducing Christianity, European missionaries did away with certain traditional practices, such as the offering of human beings as sacrifices and polytheism. Instead, they introduced a civilized culture, which advocated for equality. Similarly, the current Mexican music and architecture are greatly influenced by European and American designs.

Economic Factors

The indigenous inhabitants of Mexico had a diversified economy. It meant that they practiced a lot of economic activities depending on cultural traditions and ecological conditions in places they occupied. Therefore, each group had to identify an activity, which could suit their demands.

To begin with, there was a pastoralist activity among certain communities, such as the Pima Bajo. These people lived in ranches in semiarid areas, where they kept cattle. Such dry land could not support any other agricultural activity but pastoral farming. Hence, they took it upon themselves to breed livestock and move from one place to another in search of water and pasture. It was how they earned their livelihood, because they could not fail to acquire animal products, such as meat, blood, and milk. It became the most basic diet, to which they had to adapt.

Secondly, some indigenous Mexican tribes, such as the Kiliwa and Lacandon, practiced hunting and gathering as their main source of living. However, after the depletion of natural resources in forests, they resorted to agriculture. Hence, they shifted to the production of corn, beans, tomatoes, pumpkins, squash, pepper, cotton, cassava, tobacco and pinto beans. It came after they had been stricken by hunger. It was an experience, which compelled them to clear the forest to establish homes and farms. As a result, they established permanent homes and adopted sedentary lifestyles.

Lastly, there was a practice of weaving, pottery and basketry among the Maya, Kikapoo and Cora tribes. These people specialized in crafts to produce various products, such as pots, garments and baskets. These were later exchanged with neighbors for other products, which they did not have. These people participated in a barter trade, whereby they could get other agricultural commodities, such as meat, livestock, maize, fish, tobacco, cassava, and pumpkins, which they were not producing. They had practiced it for a long period of time. It was prominently done in the Qaxaca Valley between the 1800 BC and 1500 AD. Here, baskets and garments are believed to have been used as religious symbols.

Diverse economic activities in this place indicate its plural nature. Since each and every group occupied a different area, it was essential to scan their environment and come up with the best strategy of feeding the ever-expanding population. It was common knowledge that men had to start from depending on hunting and gathering before coming up with adaptive strategies. As the saying goes, necessity is the mother of invention. Hence, the depletion of wild animals and fruits compelled men to venture into fishing, pottery, basketry, trade, crop, and animal farming.

Political Factors

The indigenous Mexican population had a complex political structure. Just like any other primitive society, these people had a well-organized political system, which was designed to help them manage day-to-day affairs on the territory, instill discipline and maintain law and order. There were different empires with strong and able leaders, who could unite all subjects to promote security and understanding. Some of the prominent kingdoms in this land included the Aztec, Maya, Toltec, and Tikal.

The Maya kingdom is believed to have originated in 300 BC. As a strong territory, it had a king called Ahau, who was a political and religious leader. Hence, he made many important decisions in the kingdom. In fact, he was the final court of appeal, because his decisions were binding. He led them during wars, which were fought to defend or expand the empire. For instance, in 1428, he spearheaded the Aztec in the liberation war at Azcapotzalco against their former rulers. It became a turning point in the destiny of this community, because after winning, it joined the Texcoco, Tenochtitlan and Tlacopan kingdoms to form the Tripple Alliance, which it led.

Each of these kingdoms had a contingent of soldiers used in the expansion and defense of the territory against external aggressors. For them to succeed in these wars, they had to look for weapons. Thus, such kingdoms as the Aztec, had copper weapons. It explained why it managed to emerge victorious in all wars, in which it participated. After establishing a strong regime, leaders used resources acquired through taxation to construct well-secured palaces. For instance, in 1325, the Aztec built the city of Tenochtitlan. Later, after the formation of the Tripple Alliance, magnificent headquarters were constructed in Mexico-Tenochtitlan. Surprisingly, these became the largest cities in the world at that time.

This kind of political organization was inherited by the subsequent Mexican regimes. The spirit of solidarity was applied, whenever there was any kind of war to be fought. As a result, the Mexicans managed to unite to engage Spanish colonizers in a series of battles. Even if such agonies had lasted for 300 years, Mexico would have been eventually liberated, when it attained full independence on October 4, 824. Even contemporary regimes are successful because of the same spirit.

Conclusion

Mexico has a very rich history. This society is characterized by the plural nature, and each group described above has managed to assert its existence harmoniously. Indeed, the social-political and cultural structure of these people is quite admirable. More interestingly, there was a free space for exercising religious freedom. Since each of these indigenous groups had peculiar traditions, they solidified themselves and created unity in their locations. Besides, political and economic diversity allowed them to freely interact with each other through intermarriages and trade.

However, it would have been better to engage people in decision-making. The vesting of power on political leaders to propagate evils, such as land feudalism and human sacrifices, was ill-informed. Therefore, it would have been so important to shun away from such practices, because they were detrimental to human lives. Hence, the introduction of Spanish encomienda feudal systems and the synchronization of traditional pre-Hispanic cultural practices became a necessary turning point. These created a conducive environment, which could accommodate all sorts of people regardless of their background.

Surely, the project is important for understanding that Mexico is where it is today because of the past. Hence, it is an appeal to the political leadership and academicians of this country to carry out an extensive research to reconstruct the Mexican history. Despite modernity, people should not shy away from their culture. Instead, they should preserve it for the benefit of the future generation. When one is born in a place, he or she is obliged to inherit and identify with its culture. The future is a product of the present, which itself is a product of the past. A country, which does not know its history, is a blind nation. Such a project should be done by all scholars.

History of Medieval Philosophy

History of Medieval Philosophy

Introduction

Part one;

Boethius author, title, is ‘Conta Eutychen’, and date is CA; 500. The author expounds on the rationality nature of an individual; he explains that a person thinks and acts instantly depending on the type of the situation that one is facing. The author is interested on the personal judgment module that an individual uses in addressing the situation. The author is mainly concerned about the sovereignty of an individual in terms of reasoning capacity and the events afterwards of his chronology of events.

Augustine author, title, is, ‘On the Teacher’, date is CA; 390. The author of this book argues that, the art of speaking truth is determined by how an individual is close to God. They explain that intellectual reasoning is achieved by a person being true and sincere to one. This is a key tool of inner evaluation on whether one should continue doing or rather behaving on the way that he always behaves. Humans are prone to making errors, but the immediate reactions determine how one is prepared to handle the situation.

Anselm and Abailard, title, is, ‘Philosophy in the middle ages’, page 138; 2010. The authors of this mighty book bring into light the bare truth about intentions, they refer to the intention as an art of self-proclaiming and pre-determined tool of cross-checking. Not all the intentions are generated from the willingness of a person committing to something or someone. Sometimes, it comes from the attitude of an individual.

Part two;

Augustine and Boethius distinguish the ancient Christians from the mediaeval ones in three distinctive ways; the ancient Christians were true as compared to the present time christens; there’s an acute transformation of the church. The traditional way of serving God isn’t anymore; modern Christians are adopting technologically feasible way of serving God. These proofs to be one of the most significant transformations of the church of all times; Augustine believes that, by so doing then all the means and methods of searching for salvation are hampered. The church is seen as an entertainment one and not a place of worship. This creates a distinct difference of the ancient and medieval Christians. This further portrays the medieval churches as ones of entertainment rather than worship.

Ancient Christians compared to medieval Christian’s shows that; ancient Christians were loyal and honest to their subject’s and leaders depending on the level of status that the society define an individual. The modern-day Christian’s need this qualities of being true to everyone even the clergy. This shows that, plenty of truth reservation cultures is eroded; this can be attributed to the western civilization and rapid expansion of churches and religions.

Anselm and Abailard differ from Augustine and Boethius, through the aspect of consistency. Medieval Christian’s aren’t consistent in their faith; this shows that a significant level of their trust in a super being that is God is absent. This can be attributed to the fact that, over time, emergence of cults and plenty of religions is eroding the art of being true to your master. Medieval Christian’s aren’t that consistent in keeping values set for the betterment of the societal values, this portrays them as hypocrites. Anselm and Abailard believe that; a consistent Christian ought to stay true to the religion as well as the master that he is serving.sss

history of leukemia

History of leukemia

Name

Institution

Course

Date

The first-time leukemia was mentioned was in 1847 by Dr. Rudolf Virchow, a German politician whose extensive interests in cell biology, anthropology and pathology led to various important discoveries. Even though Dr. Rudolf’s name is recorded in the NEW York Times, and featured in late 19th Century, his discovery of the disease (Leukemia) was not mentioned until 22nd February 1970 when Dr. Lawrence K. Altman mentioned him in an article. However, that was not the first-time Leukemia was stated in writing. That took place on 6th December 1899, when Major Samuel Armstrong, a surgeon of the 32nd Infantry passed away. The cause of the death was terms as leukemia (Bakalar, 2014).

By the year 1913, different types of the disease were discovered, although no treatment had been found for any. On 2nd December 1913, the New York Times paper stated the disease in a report when a Cornell student died and described it as a “suffering from a grave blood disease described by physicians as acute lymphatic leukemia”. At the same time came the first mention of attempts to treat leukemia, where a blood transfusion was carried out from the patient’s brother. This treatment failed.

The next treatment that did not succeed was a radium conducted on 3rd May, 1915, where The New York Times reported that although the method had had been successful, but patients could succumb to the poisons released into the system. Still, this was the first-time radio therapy as a treatment method was mentioned, and radio therapy remains one of the treatments for Leukemia. There are two possible ways in which radiation therapy can be administered (Bakalar, 2014). For some patients, the physician may aim the radiation at one specific area of the body where leukemia cells are believed to have collected, for instance testicles or spleen. In other cases, as stated by Bakalar (2014), patients may receive radiation directed to entire body and this second method is usually administered before a bone marrow transplant.

The disease started gaining significance by getting public recognition in the late 1920s. for instance the New York Times paper on their 5th March 1927 writing mentioned a Dutch gentleman who had offered a lot of money for anyone who could discover the treatment for Leukemia. On 3rd April 1934, the disease was mentioned in another article, the article stated the death of 4-year old girl from a disease described as “an overabundance of white corpuscle in the blood”. The article furthered the description by stating that the disease was had infrequent cure.

Throughout the year 1930s, the disease become more rampant and started killing many people and without a cure, it was inevitable death. The disease was often in relation to heroic blood donations and transfusions in ultimately fruitless efforts to cure it. Currently, more than a century later, The New York Times reported that Leukemia treatment is complex, entailing the skills of various specialists. The many types of the disease can be effectively treated, and at times fully healed, with chemotherapy, stem cell transplants and biological treatments that improve the body’s immune system (Bakalar, 2014).

One of the cure, historically, as mentioned by Bakalar (2014) among the former treatments of the disease was arsenic. According to Waxman and Anderson (2001), this treatment method was mentioned in ancient Ramayana of India which was used by Hippocrates who named leukemia as ‘carcinos’ for crab. Later in the 18th century, Thomas Fowler formed what was called “Fowler’s Solution’ in which he combined arsenic trioxide with potassium bicarbonate. This by then was considered the standard procedure for treating leukemia and the method was used until 20th century. However, Waxman and Anderson (2001) mention that with the introduction of radiation therapy, arsenic method was dropped. In 1865, Lissauer (German physician) used “Fowler’s Solution” to cure chronic myelocytic leukemia.

The other treatment for leukemia discovered in the 20th century was radiation therapy. In 20th century the disease was considered incurable and chronic. The radiation therapy in 1897 showed that x-rays could decrease the tumor size. It was discovered by when radiation therapy could be administered every day for several weeks, this would significantly enhance therapeutic response.

The other traditional cure introduced in the Second world war was chemotherapy (Bakalar, 2014). This later become one of the significant treatment methods. Chemotherapy was developed from an agent chemical warfare used by the Germans during second world war, mustard gas, which attacks quickly and divides white blood cells. Later, the other treatment method which has been introduced in by the use of DNA. This was introduced in later 20th century and was discovered by James Watson and Francis Crick. DNA gave a better understating of how leukemia spread and answered some concerns of others.

References

Waxman S, and Anderson KC (2001) History of the Development of Arsenic Derivatives in

Cancer Therapy. The Oncologist 6:3-10.

BAKALAR, N., (2014). Leukemia, 1899. History of battle against leukemia. New York

Times, published JUNE 4, 2012.