Recent orders
Employers offer a large variety of benefits
Employers offer a large variety of benefits. In recent years, we have seen some of those benefit offerings reduced. The benefit trends that we are seeing with employers are focused on decrease in fringe benefits and rise in ESOPs. It is bringing in better impact on motivation and will benefit the firm in the long term. Compensation also depends on the type of job as well as the kind of organization. The firm’s policies as well as the profit structure and division are a part of the components of compensation decision basis. The firm’s strategic objective as well as operations and extent of operations are also important determinants of compensation.. Moreover the economic conditions and competition also impact compensation to a great extent. Compensation many a times has to be adjusted as per the union demands or has to be negotiated upon (Carl L, 1994).
Reference
Carr L, 1994, The role of ethics in Executive compensation: Towards a contractarian interpretation of the neoclassical theory of managerial remuneration
http://www.springerlink.com/content/u13u608nh6k92220
Employers and employees have different expectations of each other both in terms of work generally and in terms of particular
Introduction
In an employment contract, both the employer and the employee hold certain perceptions or beliefs on the terms and conditions relating to a reciprocal exchange. These beliefs or perceptions are called expectations. Both parties share different understanding of the contract or in other words, they hold different expectations about what each owes the other. The employer’s expectations become employee’s responsibilities and employee’s expectations become employer’s responsibilities, but the expectations may not necessarily give rise to legal obligations, (Mathibe, 2011). There is likelihood of dissatisfaction where the expectations of either party are not fulfilled. The more each party feels that his/her expectations are responded to by the other, the more they interact and the relationship lasts longer. This paper discusses the different expectations that employers and employees have of each other, generally in terms of work and in terms of particular people and jobs. Specifically, it explores the expectations of employers in accordance with organizational strategy. On top of this, the paper examines the expectations of employees and the change in these expectations in the current labour market. Finally, it briefly examines how variations in these expectations may exist between business segments and communities.
Discussion
There are various expectations of employers from workers, usually in accordance with organizational strategy. One of these is effective communication. According to Dainty, Raiden and Neale (2004, p. 33), employers expect workers to have ability to organize thoughts and ideas effectively. They are employees to be able to express these ideas and thoughts effectively when speaking or in writing and to present these ideas in a persuasive way. Secondly, employees are expected to demonstrate self confidence when handling matters related to the organization, (Dainty, Raiden & Neale, 2004, p. 33). This includes demonstrating a sense of maturity which will enable one to deal with situations and people positively and effectively. Further, workers are expected to always be willing to accept responsibilities related to their work. This includes the ability to recognize what needs to be done and to be willing to do it.
Derr, (2002, p. 124), notes that workers are expected by their employers to have high energy levels by their employers when engaging with other people and while undertaking their assignments within an organization. They are expected to demonstrate forcefulness and capacity to make things within the organization move ahead. In addition, they are expected to maintain their work efforts and quality at an above average rate. According to Workers are also expected to have high levels of interpersonal skills. They are expected to be able to bring out their best efforts in groups and individually and to express enthusiasm when working as a team among other workers, workers are expected to have high levels of interpersonal skills. They are expected to be able to bring out their best efforts in groups and individually and to express enthusiasm when working as a team among other workers. In a study conducted by Dainty, Raiden and Neale (2004, p. 33) in India, most employers indicated that they expected their employees to show high levels of competitiveness while delivering their services within the organization. They expected the workers have capacity to compete with others and to be willing to be measured by their own performance on top of others.
According to Derr, (2002, p. 124), workers are expected by their bosses to have high power of creativity and for imagination. This implies an ability to confront and deal with problems that may not have obvious solutions. Problems creep up in organizations every day, especially those related to customer service. Such problems are likely to stagnate business performance and can lead to an organizational downturn. Bosses require workers to be able to think on their feet and to be able and willing to come up with and to try new approaches in solving those problems, (Walsh, 2009 p. 207).
As well, employers expect their workers to be flexible to changes in working condition in the organization. They are expected to be supportive to positive change by being receptive to new ideas and situations. They are expected to realistically asses their own responsibilities, to see themselves as others see them and to clearly recognize their strengths and weaknesses. This implies an ability to demonstrate high sense of self-knowledge.
Mathibe, (2011) noted that employers expect their workers are expected to focus on achievement of goals laid down by an organization during their tenure. They are expected to demonstrate ability and will to work towards achievement of the specific objectives of the organization, especially goals which challenge their abilities. Based on their organisational strategies, employers require their workers to be dependable, (Walsh, 2009 p. 207). They expect them to show up for work on time, to utilize all the time agreed in their work and to beat deadlines in completing their work. Employers always want to be assured that their employees take their work seriously and demonstrate professionalism in their delivery of services.
According to Walsh (2009 p. 207), workers are expected by their bosses to recognize the value of teamwork. Misunderstanding among employees can really hinder an organizational growth. In order to ensure that the goals set by an organization are efficiently and effectively achieved, employees need to work together as a team. Workers are expected by their bosses to have unity of vision with regard to the set organizational goals. Finally, employers expect their employees to respect them and to respect one another, though it is also important for the employers to respect them as well. This results in cohesiveness of workforce as well as increased job satisfaction and better job performance among the employees.
On their part, employees have different expectations of what their bosses owe them. First, they expect their bosses to give them opportunity to develop their skills and talents, (Stone, 2004, p. 83). They want to be given chance to work flexibly and in interesting and stimulating tasks which gives them chance to develop their talents and skills. Further, they also require to be given reasonable opportunity to use knowledge and skills that they already have. Thus, employers have additional responsibility which is to press the right buttons so as to create a culture that will inspire the work force, a culture in which achievement acknowledged and valued.
Secondly, employees expect to be given a description of their job and to be informed of what their bosses expect of them as workers, (Stone, 2004, p. 83). This includes explanations of the rules, policies of the organization and to be given explanation of changes in their duties. Further, according to Stone, (2004, p. 83), workers always want to know where they are going. Thus, they expect their employers to communicate the goals and mission of an organization orally and/or in writing. They also expect to be provided with the already laid plans of achieving these goals. To meet this requirement, employers are expected to provide a written job description and/or a verbal understanding of the job, describing the aforementioned details.
.
Broadbridge, Maxwell and Ogden, (2007, p. 523) conducted a study to find out the expectations of the employees from their employers inn United Kingdom. They found that workers require their bosses to treat them fairly and with respect. They expect to be treated as valuable assets of the organization and their efforts to be recognized. Further, the study found that workers want their bosses to reward them for top performance. They expect to be provided with competitive compensation, recognition for top performers and opportunities for increased skill development. They expect the employers to implement incentives such as promotion opportunities or bonus programs in recognition of good performance. Related to this, employees expect their employers to remunerate them satisfactorily. They want to feel that their efforts are well rewarded (Broadbridge, Maxwell and Ogden, 2007, p. 523).
Broadbridge, Maxwell and Ogden, (2007, p. 523) also found that workers require their bosses to be provided with information regarding their performance and to be told ways on how to improve. Usually, workers wonder on how they are doing and once in a while, they require information regarding their performance. This helps them to trace areas of weakness and find ways of improvement. Along with information on performance, the employees require to be guided on what they can do to enhance improvement on their performance.
Also, employees require to be given conducive environment on which to work, (Broadbridge, Maxwell & Ogden, 2007, p. 523). They require their employers to ensure that their work places are well lit, clean and safe for them. A safe working environment in this case refers to a working environment that is free from things such as punishments, harassments and unreasonable demands. Employees also don’t want to work with people who workplace uncomfortable. This includes those individuals who like to cause trouble to others. They expect their employers to take the necessary disciplinary action to such people, (Broadbridge, Maxwell & Ogden, 2007, p. 523).
According to Derr, (2002, p. 125), employees expect their employers to provide them with information relating to their work. They require the organization to have a strong internal communication network and expect to have easy access to information relating to their areas of responsibility. For instance, if a worker is in charge of cost control, he/she expects to have full access to information on current expenses. Also, to Derr, (2002, p. 125) notes that employees require to be given control over their own work lives and their time at work. They do not feel comfortable when they work under the watch of their employers. They expect their bosses to give them time to relax and to be allowed too make their own decisions as much as they can.
Employees expect their bosses to provide them with sympathetic assistance to their personal problems. The study conducted by Broadbridge, Maxwell and Ogden, (2007, p. 523) found that most workers consider this as an employer’s obligation. The aforementioned expectations of employees are found in the present labour market. As Mathis and Jackson, (2010, p. 87) point out, the expectations have been changing with time. About three decades ago, employers provided job security in exchange for employee hard work, loyalty and good performance. The employer-employee relationship was similar to parent-child relationship, as Mathis and Jackson, (2010, p. 87) describes. However, presently, employees are increasingly becoming responsible for their own career growth and development and the employers provide the necessary support and facilities. This has been brought about by the drastic changes in social and economic development leading to a rethinking of the implicit agreement between the employers and their employees. This has led to increased trends towards more temporary contracts and greater job insecurity. Employees can no longer expect job security in exchange for acceptable levels of job performance and loyalty (Mathis & Jackson, 2010, p. 87).
According to Walsh, (2009 p.207), the expectations between employers and workers can differ between business segments and communities. For instance, employees from United States have varying psychological contract expectations from the employees from China. This makes it a bit complicated for international organizations that have global operations and branches in different countries. Such firms have an additional concern to meet psychological contract concerns of individuals in different communities having different cultures, (Walsh, 2009 p.207). This reinforces the importance of making organizational expectations clear to the employees prior to making contract or prior to relocation to another country.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both the employers and employees have different expectations of each owes the other. The expectations of employers from workers, which are often based on organizational strategy, include effective communication and confidence while dealing with organizational matters. In addition, they expect the workers to demonstrate high sense of self-knowledge, to provide high level of efforts, to recognize the value of team-work, to be creative enough to deal with problems in the organization, to focus on organizational goals, to be flexible, to be dependable and honest and to give them respect. On the part of workers, they expect their bosses to provide them with opportunities to develop skills and talent, to give them a description of the rules, policies and goals of the organization and to treat them fairly with respect. Further, they require to be given fair compensation for, to be recognized and rewarded for good performance, to be given information about their performance, to be given conducive environment on which to work and to be allowed to control their work. As noted in the essay, the employee expectations have been changing and in the current labour market, employees cannot expect job security as it was the case in the past. The aforementioned expectations can differ between business segments and communities depending on the culture of community from which labour force is drawn. the more the each party to an employment contract feel that his/her expectations are responded to, the more they interact and the higher the possibility that the relationship will last for long.
References
Broadbridge, A. M., Maxwell, G. A. & Ogden, S. M., 2007, “13_2_30: Experiences, perceptions
and expectations of retail employment for Generation Y”, Career Development International, Vol. 12 Iss: 6, pp.523 – 544s
Dainty, A., R. J., Raiden, A. B. & Neale, R. H., 2004, “Psychological contract expectations of
construction project managers”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 11 Iss: 1, pp.33 – 44
Derr, C. D., 2002, Cross-cultural approaches to leadership development, Greenwood
Publishing Group, Westport
Mathibe, I. R., 2011, ‘the expectancy theory and its implications for employees motivation,
academic leadership online journal, Vol. 9 Issue. 2 viewed, 3 December 2011 from, HYPERLINK “http://www.academicleadership.org/article/expectancy-theory-and-its-implications-for-employee-motivation”http://www.academicleadership.org/article/expectancy-theory-and-its-implications-for-employee-motivation
Mathis, R. L. & Jackson, J. H., 2010, Human Resource Management, Cengage Learning, Mason
Robinson, S., L. & Rousseau, D. M., 1994, ‘Violating the psychological contract: not the
exception but the norm’ journal of organizational behavior, Vol. 15, 245-259 (1994)
Stone, K. V. W., 2004, From widgets to digits: employment regulation for the changing
workplace, Cambridge University Press
Walsh, D. J., 2009, Employment Law for Human Resource Practice, Cengage Learning,
Mason
EMPLOYER UNIONS
EMPLOYER UNIONS
Name:
Institution:
An employers’ organization is an HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interest_group” o “Interest group” interest group or HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advocacy_group” o “Advocacy group” advocacy group that tries to influence government policies through lobbying. A union is an association of workers established to improve economic and social conditions. In a non-union workplace:
Employer makes all rules, sets the wage rates and makes all decisions on things like discipline, promotions and hours of work. The worker has no voice.
In a Union workplace:
The Union bargains with the employer for a contract, makes sure the contract is carried out. Your Collective Agreement is a contract. Contracts are legal documents between you and your employer that spell out wages, benefits, and rules of employment.
The role and position of the organization for employers will differ from one country to another, primarily based on the HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_system” o “Economic system” economic system.
The union’s basic job is to bargain with employers to determine best wages and working conditions for its members. Most unions provide employment services, insurance, and other benefits.
Countries with HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Saxon_economy” o “Anglo-Saxon economy” anglo-saxon or pluralist economic systems ( HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_the_United_Kingdom” o “Economy of the United Kingdom” United Kingdom and the HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_the_United_States” o “Economy of the United States” United States), where they have no institutionalized relationships between employers’ organizations, trade unions and the government. Organizations tend to be weak, with many of their functions taken over by HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industry_trade_group” o “Industry trade group” industry trade groups, which are in most instances HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_relations” o “Public relations” public relations organizations.
Countries with HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_market_economy” o “Social market economy” social market economies have the organizations being part of a system of institutionalized deliberation in conjunction with government and the trade unions. In tri-partite bargaining, HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_partners” o “Social partners” social partners strike agreements on issues like HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price_level” o “Price level” price levels, wage increments, HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_rate” o “Tax rate” tax rates and HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pension” o “Pension” pension entitlements.
A union organizer refers to a specific type of HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_union” o “Trade union” trade union member (normally elected) or an appointed union official. A majority of unions appoint rather than elect their organizers.
During organizing campaigns, management’s role is to recruit groups of workers under the HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organizing_model” o “Organizing model” organizing model. Organizer’s role is largely that of servicing members and enforcing work rules. They may equally take on industrial/legal roles like making representations before tribunals or HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court” o “Court” courts.
The differences between unionized and union-free environments include:
Complicated communication routes – Communication is one of HR Solutions’ Power Dimensions. Good communication between management and employees is important and aids in building Employee Engagement and contention. Introduction of a union however complicates usual communication routes given particular messages must go through the union to get to and from employees. This acts as a filter and delays, clouds, or gets rid messages that could lead to confusion and frustration among employees.
Focus on union – Union formation will lead to immediate focus on contract negotiations, pay, organization’s benefits and workplace policies. Much as the elements are important, they are not the key drivers of Employee Engagement or Overall Job Satisfaction. Unions would have to focus on issues like Recognition, Career Development, Relationship Supervisor has with Employees (see Us-Vs.-Them Mentality discussed below), and the organization’s Strategy and Mission in a bid to raise satisfaction levels.
Negotiated Pay Increases – Compensation is regulated by contract in unionized environments. They allow employees receive fair wages. However, they remove connection between merit and compensation leading to sharp decrease in Engagement levels. When a union is present, employees must hand over a portion of their paycheck each month as HYPERLINK “http://www.hrsolutionsinc.com/enews_0311/Unionized_0311.html” o “Click to Continue > by InstantSavings” member contributions. Dues could lead to feelings of dissatisfaction, especially when employees do not see results expected from unionization.
Union control – In unionized environments, unions determine to a greater extent the organization’s working conditions. Unions have to approve the purchase of equipment or any work before its completion thereby causing interference and entire process delay.
Us-Vs.-Them Mentality – Presence of a union leads to heightened tension between groups of employees and between employees and management due to the us-vs.-them mentality. Employees belonging to different departments can feel the divide when they believe their departments’ needs are not being treated with the same care as other departments’ needs. Union’s may also make employees feel even further separated from management making management seem like the “enemy,” as a result of a lack of trust in management thereby lowering engagement and satisfaction.
Unionized organizations do not have satisfied or engaged employees, they should make sure their employees do not feel the need to organize
Unionization should just be used as a final attempt by organizations with extremely low Employee Engagement, satisfaction and morale. Option is for them to minimize possibility that employees will want to unionize. Smart organizations that want to remain non-union listen to their employees through formal and confidential surveying, making their union vulnerability risk non-existent. Through staying ahead and caring about employees, organizations can minimize their risk of unionization.
Management representatives employ various methods to secure recognition with the ultimate goal being a HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_bargaining_agreement” o “Collective bargaining agreement” collective bargaining agreement. The methods can be classified as being either top-down organizing or bottom-up organizing.
Top-down organizing focuses on persuading HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Management” o “Management” management HYPERLINK “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_organizer” o “Click to Continue > by InstantSavings” through salesmanship or pressure tactics. Management will be allowed to talk on any issues it will have addressed for the unionized workers. Say for instance, if there’s a decision that there be a pay rise, management must come forward as part of confirmation on what will have been agreed with the union.
Here are some laws or regulations that relate to labor unions:
Employees Democratically Choose to Organize Into UnionsA Union Must Represent Its Members and Non-Members Equally and Without Preference or Discrimination in Dealing With Their Employer.
Non-Members May Choose to Pay Only For a Union’s Actual Bargaining and Workplace Representation, Not Political Activity, Lobbying and Other Programs
References
HYPERLINK “http://www.hrsolutionsinc.com/enews_0311/Unionized_0311.html” http://www.hrsolutionsinc.com/enews_0311/Unionized_0311.html
Hall-Jones, P., 2010. Unionism and Economic Performance. Internet article & statistics.
Kelber, Harry. My 70 Years in the Labor Movement. New York: Labor Educator, 2006.
Pleasure, Robert J. and Cohen, David. Construction Organizing: An Organizing and Contract Enforcement Guide. Silver Spring, Mary: Labor’s Heritage Press, 1997.
Poole, M., 1986. Industrial Relations: Origins and Patterns of National Diversity. London UK: Routledge.
