Recent orders
Does Canadas national health care system provide better patient satisfaction and access to health care than the United States
Does Canada’s national health care system provide better patient satisfaction and access to health care than the United States’ health care system?
Name
Affiliation
1
Introduction
In Canada, every individual has the access to medical care and discrimination is rare in the medical sector; discrimination based on an individual’s ability to pay, type of health insurance and socio economic status. Nonetheless, citizens in the country are faced with various restrictions on gaining access to better health care due to lack of hospital beds, shortage of health care providers, and longer waiting time to access a provider. Because of these challenges private health care is the best option for Canadians. Despite the inadequacies, the current literature states that only 40% of the Canadian population are unsatisfied with their health care and are not in favor of private health care compared to 54% of the United States population who support private health care stating that public medical care is unsatisfactory.
Despite the fact that the United States is the leading country in the world with respect to health care expenditure, more than 42 million Americans have not access to medical insurance. There are more individuals in America without insurance than the whole population of Canada, with others in the US underinsured. This means that vast population of Americans do not seek medical attention each year as they opted because they cannot afford to pay for the services from their “pockets”. The cost of medical treatment is the leading cause of America financial crisis. Over the years various plans have been proposed to change the health care system in the United States so that this problem can be solved. Some of these proposed changes include switching to private health care similar to the steps taken by Canada.
Background of study
The Canadian constitution, states that health care responsibilities rests with territorial and provincial governments. The system was developed by territorial and provincial authorities that have attained a national program composed of a series of interlocking health care plans which the Canadian government funds. Hospital services include inpatient care in the wards unless medical necessity warrants otherwise. Although the government has done its best in ensuring health care is provided in the best way possible, the best option was privatize public hospital in order to getter outstanding medical care for its vast population.
Purpose of study
The intention of this systematic review is to investigate whether Canadian private health care system yield a better patient satisfaction a well as the access to health care as compared to the United States’ health care systems. This will be undertaken by evaluating the data that compares access to health care and patient satisfaction among patients in United States and Canada. In this paper access to health will considered as having the ability to pay for health care or medical services, health insurance, the availability of hospital beds, and the availability of health care providers. On the contrary patient satisfaction means the perception of each countries adult’s population views over the quality of health care they obtained, the availability of the health facilities, and the cost of health care.
Statement of the problem
In order to ascertain the problem facing health care system in Canada and the United States, the knowledge regarding how the entire system is set is of much significance. Canada is a country with 10 provinces and 3 territories sparsely populated. The sparse nature of the population is they main cause of health care related problem in the country resulting to private health care as the best alternative that can reach the entire population. Generally, 60% of the Canadian health care expenses comes from public allocation placing it among the least publicly financed countries. Despite the fact that Canadian hospitals are known as public institutions they are privately owned by non-profit organizations. Thus, lacks socialized medicine as believed because of high number of privately owned hospitals.
Methodology
This study will be done by conducting a systematic literature review of books and articles found in well-known journal databases such as FirstSearch and PubMed. The key words used will include health care systems, Canada, patient satisfaction, and United States. Articles will be chosen on basis of peer-reviewed sources from trustworthy journals.
Research Question
How is private health care in Canada as compared to that of United States viewed by the citizens and other stakeholders? Good or bad?
What are the impacts if any of private health care in Canada as compared to that of United States
Research objective
To investigate if private health care in Canada akin United States of America is better trend.
To determine if any the impacts of private health care in Canada as compared to that of United States
Review of literature
Since the paper relies on systematic analysis of current literature, this section will briefly indicate the literal sections that the research will use in defining the real comparison of private health care system between Canada and United States.
Canada’s Health Care System
In order to understand the problems facing the health care systems in Canada and
the United States, one has to have knowledge regarding how each system is set up.
Canada is a federation of 10 provinces and 3 sparsely populated northern territories.2
Under the Canadian Constitution, the responsibility for health care rests with the
provincial and territorial governments.5 Their system is the result of sustained federal,
provincial, and territorial efforts that have achieved a national program based on a series
of interlocking health insurance plans toward which the Canadian federal government
contributes substantial payments.5 The provinces and territories must meet established
criteria to qualify for their full share of federal payments for health care services. The
established criteria include public administration on a non-profit basis,
comprehensiveness of coverage, universality of eligibility, portability between provinces,
and accessibility achieved by prepayment through taxation.
The United States’ Health Care System
American contemporary health care system is a sophisticated mix of private and public services and insurance. The citizens get health insurance and services from a variety of private and public sources. Most of them get health insurance and care from their workplaces and pay for a subsidized monthly premiums for these services. At old age, all Americans are eligible to apply for Medicare, which is quality public funded health insurance. Public assistance recipients in United States are allowed to apply to get more restricted health care insurance from Medicaid program which covers vision and dental needs.
Health Care System Costs
In 1992, the United States Accounting office estimated that the country health administration costs was approaching Canadian level as it could be able to cover the uninsured population. In 2007 a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, by Woolhandler et al considered that the administration cost included health benefit programs, practitioners’ offices, nursing homes costs, home care agencies expenses, and other hospital costs. The result of the study indicated that United States spends $678 more per capita on health care as compared to Canada. The study was credible since it used recent comprehensive data for its estimates of administrative costs.
Patient Satisfaction
The commonwealth Fund International shows that 40% of Canadians were not satisfied with their health care system compared to 50% of United States citizens. The Americans cited high cost and inadequate medical coverage as the main reasons for their unsatisfaction while the Canadians cited shortage of health care professional and lack of hospital beds. It is evident from literature that both the United States and Canada share a common problem based on their lack of patient’s satisfaction midst its health care system. Pocket payment is one of the key concerns affecting both countries. It is a financial problem for all citizens to pay for medical care from their pockets hence increasing the mortality rate in both countries over the last five years.
Access to Health Care
The literature reviews shows that both countries have shortcomings in their medical or health care systems, with each state having a different problem. In the United States, dilemma regarding medical care rotates around underinsured and low-income citizens, whereby health care insurance does not cater for the needed services and patients’ cannot afford to pay by their own. As a result the country opted to used generalized health care system to cater for all the citizens such as the Obama health care act. Whereas in Canada, the problem is centralized with health care categorization to the territorial and provincial government that failed to address the concerns of its citizens opting to privatize health care to non-profit organizations.
References
Deber RB. Health care reform: Lessons from Canada. American Journal of
Public Health. 2003 Jan; 93(1):20-24.
Kardos Bettie, Allen Anne. Healthy neighbors: Exploring the health care
systems of the Unites States and Canada. Journal of Post Anesthesia Nursing.
1993 Feb; 8(1): 48-51.
Devereaux P.J., et al. Payments for care at private for-profit and private not-for-
profit hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2004 June;
170(12):1817-1824.
Woolhandler Steffie, Campbell Terry, Himmelstein David. Costs of health care
administration in the United States and Canada. The New England Journal of
Medicine. 2003 Aug; 349(8):768-76.
21
Armstrong Pat, Armstrong Hugh, Fegan Claudia. Universal Healthcare: What the
United States can learn from the Canadian Experience. New York, New York:
The New Press, 1998.
Gray Gwen. Access to medical care under strain: New pressures in Canada and
Australia. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law. 1998 Dec; 23(6):905-
947.
22
Does application of the professionally applied dentine bonding agents compared to desensitizing toothpastes provide greater r
Dentine hypersensitivity
By student’s name
Course code +name
Professor’s name
University name
City, state
Does application of the professionally applied dentine bonding agents compared to desensitizing toothpastes provide greater reduction in hypersensitivity?
Introduction
Dentine hypersensitivity refers to a short sharp pain that arises from exposed dentine retort to some stimuli, which is hard to ascribe to any other form of dental defect. The felling is also a response to stimuli typically thermal, evaporative, tactile, osmotic or chemical, which becomes hard to attribute to any other form of pathology. It is important to note that this kind of pain associated to hypersensitivity affects about 37 percent people in American; however, many of those who suffer from this disorder are not aware that the condition can be identified easily and treated.
This clinical question under review is relevant for a clinical review in regard to some factors. According to recent research conducted in this area it is clear that 88 percent of the dental professionals suppose that dentine hypersensitivity can interfere with the quality life of a patient. In addition, they also deem that the condition is on rise. In spite of this, most of these dental professionals fail to routinely monitor patients for the clause; as a result, they result in going undiagnosed regularly (Miglani. 2010 p 218-224). Consequently, what happen later is that patient’s alteration of their behavior to avoid the pain is interfered. Some of these behaviors include aspects like oral hygiene negligence, failure to abide to oral care directives and in other cases failing to visit dental checkups. All these factors affect, increase the risk, and chances of developing dental complications.
Methods
The predicament in this case is the dental hypersensitivity disorders, which remains one of the commonly dental complications that are mostly encountered. In general the prevalence of these dental complications is high in adults dentate population that ranges from 8- 30 percent. This complication does not only manifest as a physical discomfort, but also as an emotional uneasiness for the patient (Miglani. 2010 p 218-224)
Therefore, there is need to indentify the most effective method between application of desensitizing toothpastes and dentine bonding agents in the management of dental hypersensitivity. The most cost effective method of treatment is prevention option. The first recommendation that a patient with HD can receive from a dental experts should include termination of habits that are destructive, which may include; aggressive or dynamic cross coiffure (Rees. 2000 p 860-865). They should also advocate for a twice-daily application of a desensitizing dentifrice. This has been shown during the clinical trials aimed at improving hypersensitivity in order to increase its effectiveness eventually.
There are some cases after use of a desensitizing dentifrice where the hypersensitivity of patients persists, in such a case, clinicians are required to re-evaluate the discrepancy diagnosis where they should think about in-office treatments commencing with the appliance of topically practical desensitizing agents. However, the most frequent treatment line for DH is patients self treatment procedures in the appearance of desensitizing toothpaste. In this case the professional treatment which is in the fore front is the use of fluoride varnish, and thermal pain stimuli which is applied over the areas that are sensitive within the affected teeth (Pamir. 2005p 73-76). The desensitizing agents, non-desensitizing toothpaste, and dentine bonding agents come second in the treatment line to help in the preservative sensitive teeth management.
These DH management procedures raises the question on the most effective method between dentine bonding agents, professional desensitizing agent, non desensitizing toothpaste (NDT), and desensitizing toothpastes (DT) once they are applied from a professional point of view to persons with dentine hypersensitivity.
In order to analyze the data collected SPSS version was used where initial investigative analyses were done with an aim of ascertaining if the data met the set and expected assumptions of ANNOVA, which included variance homogeneity, sphericity and normality. The test for homogeneity variance was conducted with the use of Lenene’s equality and variance error test. According to the results variances were different at 3 moths (p<0.01) and (p<0.01) in 6 months. In the case, data of transformation functions well in order to transform data that goes against the assumption of the homogeneity variance. The successive Levene’s tests for homogeneity of variance showed that assuming of variances could be tacit equal in all groups that is ,3 months; p > 0.05,and in 6months;p > 0.05). The following table gives in a clear figure of how data was distributed across the groups that were involved in the study
In regard to the above study limitations it is clear that DA application to the teeth that is tested with hypersensitivity (DH) shows the greatest reduction in DH after 2 weeks and 6 months compared to the desensitizing toothpaste, as well as, normal fluoridated toothpaste.
Design RCT Implementation
Total time taken 6 months Country United Kingdom Participants 75 Age 18-75 scenery General Dental Practice Experimental intrusion Desensitizing toothpaste (DT), and Non-Desensitizing toothpaste (NDT),
contrast Pain Stimuli Professional Desensitizing Agent Thermal Exclusion Criteria Allergy, unpleasant reactions attributed to several used materials, sensitivity attributed to a lesion requiring restoration, poor oral hygiene, and failure to obey with trial procedure.
Evaluation of Outcome VAS ( 1-10)
The Gibson in 2013 study was an RCT that incorporated 75 adult participants, and was conducted in General Practice by a single dental practitioner. In this case, the dentist put three modalities comprising of: desensitizing toothpaste (DT), Professional Desensitizing Agent, and Non-Desensitizing toothpaste (NDT). A thermal pain stimulus was used by the dentist to aid in the evaluation of sensitivity by means of Vascale. The table below shows the allocation of materials used in the study.
Allocation of materials
participants
Group 1 (NDT) Colgate Cavity Protection Regular, Colgate Palmolive, USA) Group 1 (NDT)
Group 2 (DT) Colgate Sensitive Fresh Stripe, Colgate Palmolive, USA) 25
Group 3 (DA) Seal and Protect, DENTSPLY, USA) 25
Stimuli Thermal: 14-26 C, at 40-65 psi air-blast directed to the buccal cervical root surfaces at a distance 1-3 mm. 25
In the examination process, the participants in the RCT were expected to record the sensitivity severity in a VAS within a span of 2, 3 and 6 weeks. The sensitivity level was later assed using the patient VAS questionnaires (Gibson. 2013 p 668-674 ). The assessment methods used clearly revealed that the sensitivity data slightly deviated from the normal distribution in all the groups that were being treated. The deviations were predominantly slight in all groups apart from the DA group.
The Search methods used to identify studies included the following:
After the protocol development there were article citations that were obtained through electronic search within the databases. There was also hand searching process on published primary and bibliographic referencing list, as well as review studies. Ovid MEDLINE® included terms such as dentin sensitivity” OR “dentin hypersensitivity”. One thing to note is that during the search there were no language limits or restrictions that were functional. This was done to enable and facilitate the process of counting all the potential clinical trials. Some other features that were applied in the electronic search process included the following:
Time limitations Period: 1946 to Present
Boolean operators used (OR, AND, NOT)
Keywords: dentin hypersensitivity [Mesh terms]
restrictions and boundaries [ ]
Text word search
The Inclusion and Exclusion criteria comprised of the following aspects;
The sextants that had 0 scores were selected. The age limit accepted ranged from 18 to 75 years. In addition, the participants selected had to contain at least 1 tooth ache, which according to least VAS score participants were required to assent to and at the same time be in a position to abide by the test regime.
Medical contraindications were used in the exclusion process for all other 9 search results .This specifically was due to allergy or adverse reactions to whichever materials applied in the study, material receipt or dental treatment that had a likelihood interfering with the parameters of the study, sensitivity resulting from a greatly restored tooth, that is resulting from pulpitis or attributed sensitivity to a laceration requiring restoration (Mostafa, 1985 p 256). Underprivileged oral sanitation and failure to fulfill with trial procedure also led to the exclusion of these search aspects.
Study selection
The electronic search used from all available sources managed to retrieve 10 unique citation sources. In order to screen the content titles and abstracts were used and managed to exclude 9 papers because they had no connection to DH studies in humans. Another reason was because those sources were review or opinion papers. The agreement between the paper reviewers was good and the remaining citation full evaluation on the article content in respect to the provided information was done. The actions were taken in correspondence to the needed author. Another thing to note is that 7 of the excluded papers did not meet the inclusion criteria and 3 were previous reports of included studies. The remaining paper report was subjected to detailed analysis.
Results
It is clear that trial in randomized controlled clinical are rare in dental practice setting. In addition, there are also RCT designed specifically for testing the DH effectiveness in comparison to desensitizing toothpaste (Gibson. 2013 p 668-674). The following table clearly shows the randomization aspects in Gibson, 2013 study.
Randomization Yes
Allocation camouflage Yes
Participants blinding or concern provider/result assessors Yes/No/Unclear
Trial dropouts reported Yes
Other bias sources prohibition/Eligibility criterion précised Yes
Age of the participants précised Yes
assortment of the desensitizing formulations used standardized Yes
Groups alike at baseline Yes
This study is reliable to appraisal overall. The study is a well planned and organized, however, from the analysis got it is clear that, there are some issues with the study that have the potential of causing problems in terms of applicability and ggeneralizability to the entire general populace with DH. One important mania to note is that it the study was a performed single blindly by only one dental professional within a single surgery. The other thing is that the number off participants used was not large enough in accordance with the calculations made (Brunton. 2000 p 351-5). There was no well controlled environment for the data collection especially where the patients were recommended to use tooth paste at home. That is, it was hard to tell whether they used the toothpaste prescribed or other things while brushing their teeth. In other words, the pts technique, adherence and frequency to the protocol of tooth paste are prone to a lot of questions. In addition, the manuscripts in the study did not provide any information in regard to the protocol of the toothpaste at all.
In the case of the desensitizing agents’ application, again the study has portrayed some tribulations in the referencing sections. This is despite the fact that the study looks perfect. The question of how randomization was achieved is very important as it forms the basis of how the participants were selected from the large population. In this case, in order to achieve a balance in the baseline the study subjects were allocated to respective group through the use of random number tables, and a block randomization process with an aim of ensuring that there were a balanced number of participants in each group (Al-Mullahi, 2011 p 234).
The difference between the study by Gibson is that, the follow up length of six months is applied so that it can be able to support the benefits arising from DAS as shown by Tavares. The DAS efficacy in this case would result from its ability to be able to include tubules of the patent dental fairly than the surface coating provision parse that is easily lost during the tooth brushing and an abrasive diet.
Conclusion
The process of answering the clinical question on the most effective method between dentine bonding agents and desensitizing toothpastes once they are applied from a professional point of view to persons with dentine hypersensitivity is crowded by some difficulties especially in coming up with a conclusive decision that is based on only one single RCT(Andy. 1990 p 503-513 ). However, there are RTC’s required and which contains a great increased patient number, and outcome measures that are improved. Nevertheless, dentists may consider applying dentine bonding agents instead of prescribing desensitizing toothpastes for administration of dentine hypersensitivity.
In the case of desensitizing toothpastes, Cochrane review which was last updated in the year 2006, comprised of potassium nitrate pastes. This was another systematic professional review that was recently conducted on the application of desensitizing agents. It established out that these agents are effective; however, there was no comparison to desensitizing toothpastes that was made in the review. As a result, it is not possible to umpire whether any or all the dentinal hypersensitivity management processes were effective, the ones that are comparatively more effectual, and worth using.
Finally, it is also important to mention on the placebo group, which was incorporated in the study. In any study where a measurement of pain is involved, placebo group is true in the control of DH clinical trials (Andy, 1992 p 410-412). Therefore, this clinical trial has a negative control group which applied standard fluoridated toothpaste in order to have a baseline against making the measurement of the two other treatments measurable. The most note able thing with these DH trials is that there is failure to include a placebo cluster such that the interpretation of the outcome reported must be done with some caution. These clinical trials have also shown that management interventions for DH contains or have indicated that the effects of placebo shows something other than lack of effects and dissimilarities from the groups that are not treatable. The possible reason to this is due to alliterations both physiologic and psychological which occurs as a result of medical intervention.
In accordance to the author, this group was incorporated to the measurement of the pain value although it deemed not necessary. The reason behind this fact is that most of the pt would still use non-desensitizing toothpaste. This can be proved by Odontogenic pain transmission which is primarily mediated by peripheral sensory neurons of the trigeminal nerve (Andy, 1992 p 407-408,.). These nerve peripheral terminals innervates the dental pulp and other oral tissues, On the other hand, the central terminals nerves releases neurotransmitters that are concerned in the pain initiation where there are nerve fibers that are myelinated and unmyelinated and contained in the nerve bundles. The fibers that are myelinated are referred to as A-fibers, and are grouped in regard to their diameter and transmission velocities. A-Fibers mainly innervate the dentine. The unmyelinated fiber, also known as C-fibers, innervates the body of the soft tissue. The trigeminal nerve cell bodies are situated in the Gasserian ganglion. This is the main neuron synapses that have the second-order neuron in the sub nucleus caudal area of the trigeminal spinal tract nucleus.
Reference List
Al-Mullahi, A. 2011. A cross-sectional study of dentine hypersensitivity in Omani dental patients. Thesis (M.Med.Sc.) –NUI, 2006 at Department of Restorative Dentistry, UCC.
Andy, U. 1992. Dentine hypersensitivity: its prevalence, etiology and clinical management. Dental Update , 407-408, 410-412.
Andy. 1990. Etiology and clinical implications of dentine hypersensitivity. Dental Clinics of North America , 503-513.
Brunton. 2000. Resistance of two bonding agents and dentine desensitizer to acid erosion in vitro. Dental Material, 351-5
Gibson. 2013. A practice-based randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of three interventions to reduce dentinal hypersensitivity. Journal of Dentistry , 668-674.
International dental federation, world dental congress, & FDI world dental congress. 2002. Dentine hypersensitivity: general practice considerations for successful management : proceedings of a symposium held at the FDI World Dental Congress, Vienna 2002. London, FDI World Dental Press.
Miglani. 2010. Dentine Hypersensitivity: recent trends in management. Journal of Conservative Dentistry, 218-24
Mostafa, P. A. S. 1985. Dentine hypersensitivity Clinical and laboratory investigations. Cardiff, University College.
Pamir. 2005. The efficacy of three desensitizing gents in treatment of dentine hypersensitivity. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics , 73-76.
Rees. 2000. The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in general dental practice. Journal of Clinical Periodontology , 860-865.
Does Age Matter in A Relationship
Does Age Matter in A Relationship?
Introduction
Relationships rely on age and sex to make useful contributions in the life of an individual. In marriage and love relationships, age factors determine the level of life satisfaction which in turn affects self-esteem and self-worth. From a human development perspective, children will find out that difference in the ages of their acquaintances translates to trust and confidence perspectives that the individual develops from an early age (Buhrmester and Furman, pp104-103). It therefore follows that the age of a friend and a partner in a relationship matters in the general life perceptions that the individual has for the rest of their lives. According to the authors, people will engage in relationships that they feel respected, appreciated, protected and comfortable to carry on. Psychological satisfaction is the basic importance that relationships such as marriage ought to achieve in an individual’s life. The importance of social satisfaction inside the marriage must always come from the individual, with personal life playing the important part. In this discourse, various perspectives of age gaps in a relationship are discussed to illustrate the importance of psychological interpretations in a relationship among various social settings and perspectives.
Age in Relationships
Relationships have several considerations that ought to be made when individuals are planning to look for partner, probably to end up with in a marriage. There are differences of interpretation of the importance of age difference between compatible partners with regard to cultural and social settings. While there is a general observation that the majority of cultural settings prefer a relationship in which the male partner is expected to be slightly older than the female partner, there are more important psychological issues involved than the age consideration. To a large extent, age consideration can be categorized as an incidental factor that almost always compliments the other considerations that an intimate relationship needs. Social changes continue to be experienced across the human society at an unprecedented rate, paving way for a more liberal approach to relationship issues. For instance, it was a difficult consideration to make in earlier days on racial differences when choosing a marriage partner but with the numerous changes on social fronts, it has become easier for people to date and marry anyone from any race (Buhrmester and Furman, pp104-103). The human community is getting integrated and old order of perceptions is experiencing a huge departure to a more accommodating society. Age factor is perhaps one of the other factors and that carries a controversial debate across the cultures.
As mentioned above, there is a higher preference for younger females than males across most human societies. The other possibilities of age combination between partners, younger males and equal ages, have fewer occurrences due to certain reasons beat explained by cultural and social perceptions. Psychological reasons of the commonest age combination have been sought through various studies using an interdisciplinary approach to solve the phenomenon. According to Cornelius et al (1499), human evolutionary patterns have been relied to point at a preference of younger females than males in a relationship across the evolutionary tree. According to the authors, it is apparent that besides other incidental explanations to why males prefer younger females across the generations, there is a natural force that drives the phenomenon. It is explained that the reason for this preference is a genetic driven force where fertility aspects of desired traits within the human species is protected from old age which is detrimental to evolution. It therefore follows that natural instincts driving preference for younger female partners for marriage is aimed at child bearing. Using a biological and ecological explanation, fitness test for evolutionary contribution is attached to genetic capacity of the individuals taking part in child bearing. In younger females, the males naturally find a matching partner in a young female due to fitness factors as evolution explains. This phenomenon is explained in psychology using the evolutionary life model which attaches fertility and child bearing factors to relationship partners.
Maturity is an important element that many individuals consider when determining how old their ideal partner would be. Despite a general perception that maturity goes with age, there is another line of thought that gives credit to how an individual is brought up and in which environment. While maturity would act as a factor of the past life experiences and the environment in which one is brought up in, there is a high possibility that age could make a contribution on the status of ones understanding of life. Debate of age difference merely comes in with maturity as one of the elements and features that should depict responsibility. Definition of maturity therefore falls under two important factors which include numbers and experiences, depending on different personalities. In light of the intricate issues involved in determining maturity which comes in handy in responsibility capacity and understating of life, partners need to make their choice depending on the ability of the individual without side interpretations. But the contribution of these elements might be used to indicate how capable an individual would be expected to be, from the already known patterns of number years and personal life experience.
Women develop and mature earlier than males, according to major biological and psychological studies. It therefore follows that older males could easily find it easy to go along with a younger female in a relationship than it would work for a younger male. According to Anisman-Reiner (1), maturity is an important factor that parties to a relationship place a lot of consideration on when looking for an ideal partner.
According to psychology, there are advantages and disadvantages of age gaps in love relationships which can be interpreted by the various reasons why social bonds are created in such relationships, other than looking fro possible marriage mates. According to Anisman-Reiner (1), people enter into relationships for different psychological reasons. It is therefore important for an individual to balance the needs that a particular relationship is expected to satisfy, without being biased on certain grounds. One of the psychological needs that love relationships may be sought to satisfy by different individuals is a parent figure in a partner (Fingerman and Hay, 415). A female individual may engage a male partner to satisfy her quest for a father figure, which would end up short of expectations if the relationship does not solve this need. On the other hand, the male individual may seek a relationship that serves too satisfy the need for a mother figure, which also relies on the satisfaction of the same to determine its success. Anisman-Reiner (1), explains that the relationships seeking for these aspects of satisfaction almost always tend to consider age difference where an older partner might always fit in the satisfaction of the need.
Among the most important and influential factors that cause certain age gaps to be experienced in a particular society is the ideology propagated by the family and friends of an individual. It happens that the two forces are localized in an individual’s life and they play an important part in life of the individual. While making a choice of an ideal partner to end up with in a long term love relationship, the family values as well as the friends’ influence could cause a certain pattern of age choice in a relationship to be predominantly common. According to Anisman-Reiner (1), while it is important for an individual to allow the family and friends’ roles to contribute towards the development of an individual’s life, their influence should not be binding and limiting to an extent that they dictate their values against ones wishes. It always important to let them aware of ones choice and allow them enough time to come to terms of a conflicting decision. The author reckons that it is the duty of the partners to allow the relationship to go on as they wish since it directly affects their lives than it does on the family and friends. A good relationship must however be maintained with creation of understanding between these important elements of the partners.
While a lot of debate has been taking part about age gaps regarding who ought to be older than the other in a relationship, some basic features should guide partners in the establishment of their relationship. According to Tan (1), age issues in the modern society should be approached from a different approach. While the evolutionary life-history model that explains the reason for predominant older men relationships appears sensible, a different social order in the modern world has new ideas. Human beings no longer place issues of population and continuity at the mercy of environment uncertainty due to developments achieved over the decades. Life expectancy is currently in safer hands and more comfortable lives present a promising future for the human race. Age gaps therefore face more challenging realities than it did several centuries ago and the realization of the current social challenges has and will continue to bring new perspectives in the social front. Personal interests and other social factors will continually determine the role of age in a relationship than ever before. Gender perspectives will continue to facilitate changes in the social scenes and the debate will fade away in the new life which has information at the helm of social decisions. The author points at some intricate age issues that must be addressed with a brave face, in order to eliminate breaking relationships that accommodate both directions of age difference.
According to a new study reported by the Huffington Post (1), there is an indication that preference of older males by females in a relationship is a natural phenomenon that is going to persist in the human society for a little longer. The report states that while there were general beliefs that men were increasingly looking for older women in relationships, the exact opposite is true. However, a same age relationship score has considerably increased. The research was conducted at the University of Wales Institute to reveal a more stable existence of older-male relationships as well as an increased same age preference. According to the research, it is not sustainable to state that women nowadays prefer younger men or that men prefer older women in modern relationships hence making a prediction of the future trends is equally uncertain. It is however evident that same age relationships have gained an improved rating since more couples don’t have problems engaging in relationships with their age-mates. However, the debate continues since there are considerable numbers of critics who would like to have a hearing to dispel these findings. Generally, social issues that the older generation has about relationships remain unchanged and debate is expected to continue.
One of the criticisms that such perspective continually has to contend with is as reported by the BBC (1) to the effect that observed patterns of over 25 years showed that more younger men than before married older women in England and Wales. According to the report, individual interests and goals fit in well for the reasons why women found younger men referable in their marriages. With changes in economic status for women, there was a huge interest shift in marrying an older and financially stable man. Relationships and marriages are therefore subjected to the element of socioeconomic and political changes that promote women to different statuses. As observed in the report, lifestyle changes have brought other marriage changes such as the initial marriage age increases from an average of 23 and 22 to 28 and 27 for men and women respectively. These changes are occasioned by the need to delay marriage due to academic and other changes in marriage roles which increasingly shift to accommodate liberal needs such as companionship.
In conclusion, the debate continues regarding the role of age gap between relationship partners. It however emerges that the most important feature that ought to determine the importance of the age gap must come from an individual’s measure of satisfaction and comfort inside the relationship. In a marriage, for instance, a couple must feel satisfied with the input that each of the partners contributes to the relationship. In light of the extent to which age matters in a relationship, it should therefore be left to the determination of the partners on the level of psychological satisfaction and trust established. Works Cited
“More Women Marrying Younger Men,” bbcnews.com Last Updated 12 December 2003. Web. HYPERLINK “http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3312377.stm” http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3312377.stm (Accessed 9 June 2011)
“New Study Claims No Cougar Trend, Dating Websites Attempt to Show Otherwise,” Hffingtonpost.com Last Updated 22 August 2010. Web. HYPERLINK “http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/22/cougar-life_n_690366.html” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/22/cougar-life_n_690366.html (Accessed 9 June 2011)
Anisman-Reiner, Victoria “Age Gap Relationships,” 2008. Web. HYPERLINK “http://www.suite101.com/content/age-gap-relationships-a60394” http://www.suite101.com/content/age-gap-relationships-a60394 (Accessed 9 June 2011)
Buhrmester, Duane & Furman, Wyndol “Age and Sex differences in Perceptions of Networks of Personal Relationships,” Child development, 63(1992):103-115
Cornelius, Jeffrey S., Gabrielidis Christina, Keefe, Richard C., Kenrick, Douglas T. “Adolescents’ Age Preferences for Dating Partners: Support for an Evolutionary Model of Life-History Strategies,” Child Development, 67.4(1996):1499-1511
Fingerman, Karen L., & Hay, Elizabeth L. “Searching Under the Streetlight?: Age Biases in the Personal and Family Literature,” Personal Relationships, 9.4(2002):415-433
Tan, Shei “Understanding Age-Gap Relationships,” 2005. Web. HYPERLINK “http://ezinearticles.com/?Understanding-Age-Gap-Relationships&id=94787” http://ezinearticles.com/?Understanding-Age-Gap-Relationships&id=94787 (Accessed 9 June 2011)