Recent orders
Alcohol advertising
Alcohol advertising
Alcohol drinking has remained a significant problem in the contemporary society. This is because it is attributable to inherent societal problems such as illnesses, negligence of families, and low productivity. In turn, the society becomes sensitive about the elements that influence alcohol consumption such as alcohol advertising. Considerable concerns occur about the possible effects of alcohol advertising on the level of alcohol consumption across various age groups. Radio, film, television, magazines, and popular music are identifiable as possible platforms upon which the population learns about alcohol. Since advertising is primarily an idea of enhancing sales, marketers study the population in establishing ideas that spur revenues. In this sense, alcohol advertising helps enhance the level of alcohol consumption thereby influencing notable related problems.
Alcohol advertisement influences people in believing that certain alcoholic products are safer than the cheaper ones. This happens, especially, in big brands that have amassed a sizeable market share. Marketing thrives on creating certain consistent impressions about products. This consistent impressions form the brand of a product. For instance, the Heineken Company has created a brand that heralds its products as sophisticated alcohol. This obstructs consumers from objectively evaluating the impact of alcoholic intake in their bodies (Babor, 2010). Most consumers partake of more quantities of such products to connote that they belong to desired social classes. In the end, the consumers believe that such high-end alcoholic products do not induce the same health impacts as the cheaper brands.
Alcohol advertisement induces young people into consuming alcohol. Empirical research shows that youths and children are significant users of television. For instance, a research in 1999 shows that teenagers averagely spend 27 hours viewing television in a week (Bonnie, 2004). This significantly exposes the youths to drinking portrayals in adverts. Alcohol advertisements usually target key television programs in engaging their adverts. Key programs that are, therefore, popular with the youth play a dangerous role in influencing alcohol consumption among teenagers (Bonnie, 2004). This is worse in the cases of alcohol advertisement that manifests alcohol consumption as a normal accompaniment to social situations. In the end, the youths attain a normalized version of alcoholic drinking that sets them on the pedestal for becoming potential alcoholics in the future.
Alcohol advertisement also espouses wrong cultural values. Alcohol advertisement usually uses good-looking individuals and well-dressed models in manifesting the value of their alcoholic drinks. Alcoholic advertisement entails flashiness that does not accurately represent the state of ordinary lives. The advertisements espouse material achievements as the ultimate goal of life. Alcohol advertisements also overemphasize on the value of leisure at the expense of work. While models in such advertisement may be good-looking, alcohol deteriorates the health of individuals.
Alcohol advertisements help enhance the level of alcohol consumption in societies thereby influencing notable problems. Alcohol advertisement leads people into believing that consuming certain products make them sophisticated. In turn, consumers herald such products as entailing less harm. The consumption of such alcoholic products occurs in higher quantities thereby deteriorating the health and productivity of individuals. Alcohol advertisement also influences teenagers into alcohol consumption. This is attributable to the youths’ considerable exposure to television viewing. Teenagers attain a normalized version of drinking that propels them into becoming potential alcoholics. Alcohol advertisement help espouse destructive cultural values. In spite of the serious health effects of drinking, alcohol advertisement usually uses healthy-looking models. The flashiness in such advertisement also heralds a materialistic culture that pays minimal attention to intrinsic values. In turn, the society should exert a greater focus on alcohol advertisements as poisonous elements for quality life.
References
Babor, T. (2010). Alcohol: no ordinary commodity: research and public policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Bonnie, R. J. (2004). Reducing underage drinking: A collective responsibility. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Gun Control.
Name
Professor
Course
Date
Gun Control.
Gun control is defined as any legal measure put in place with the intent to prevent and restrict the ownership as well as the utilization of firearms by civilians. Gun control may be defined as a set of regulation and strategies, and the implementation of the strategies will lead to a decrease in gun violence and in return promoting the safety in schools, homes as well as safety in the community (Lott, 106). Some of the gun control strategies include; the promotion of gun safety which revolves around the implementation of sensible gun laws. The sensible gun laws will certainly reduce the access to the lethal weapons and in return reduce the risk of crimes or even loss of life that are often associated with the possession of firearms. The cultivation of a culture of gun safety is another key and important gun control strategy. The gun safety culture can be established by; ensuring that the youth and other individuals who are at a higher risk of harming themselves as well as others have a reduced access to the fire arms. The government has the responsibility of holding the gun industry accountable and to also ensure that the marketing and the sales of guns is done in a transparent and deviation freeway (Jehan, 11). It is also paramount to seek the counsel of the responsible gun dealers and those that own in the guns in on the solutions that will ensure the communities run smoothly and that crime stays nowhere closer to the state. It is also necessary for the owners to undertake training as well as responsible licensing before they can have a gun with them. The last strategy on ensuring the establishment of gun safety is to ensure the guns are stored in a safe and secure place to prevent them from getting into wrong arms (Luca, 123).
From reliable research it is stated that the Statistics on gun possession in the United States stands at 120.5 guns per 100 individuals which may be translated as 393,347,000guns and it is registered as the highest number in the world. From the statistics approximately 22% of the American population are in possession of firearms. Out of the percentage 35% are men and 12% are women. The gun culture in the United States is dated back to its colonial period, the activities of that early life as the country rose to supremacy and it led to the second Amendment (Manier). The terms of the amendment stated that; the security of a free state heavily relied on having a well-organized and equipped community and also ensuring it is well-regulated in that the arms are not misused and it that case people have the right to keep and bear Arms.
Certain individuals, advocating for gun control admit that the second Amendment was meant for the military and that if gun control is correctly implemented then there will be great reduction in gun violence and that restrictions on the guns have always existed and most of the gun owners are receptive to new gun regulations as most of them cooperate. The other key element of gun control is seen in the terms of the Second Amendment, where it is clear that the militia were given the right to bear firearms not to utilize them wrongly.
It is important to note how gun control will drastically reduce deaths related to the guns. Between the periods of 1999-2016 the authorities have reported the death of 572,537 individuals due to the gun, out of the cases a greater percentage is contributed by suicides homicides and other unintentional causes of death (Spitzier, 67). It is necessary to have some control on certain things, because the lack of gun control may result in other heinous mistakes and even the loss of innocent souls such as children, from articles it is clear that the when an individual purchase aa gun they may resort to negatively use it and in return they harm innocent people and hence the importance of having the strategies of gun control in place. During the purchase of the firearms it is the responsibility of those selling to do background checks so as to ensure the item is being sold to an individual who will be responsible enough and not harm other citizens. It is also projected that when background checks are effectively done then the deaths significantly drop by 80.7% (Jones, 164-174). Also the fire arms should be correctly identified as well as ensuring the individual using and purchasing the fire arm is licensed in a bid to decrease the number of homicides. Gun control has the advantage of ensuring the media channels that give wrong information are banned because of how they may employ exaggeration while reporting an issue such as mass shootings. The high-end magazines in particular have the tendency of exaggerating figures to skyrocketing limits, as the individuals who hold position of leadership in such organizations or magazine companies may tend to influence the information as they belong to particular gangs and they may want to get away with specific things and hence manipulate figures. Gun control strategies ensure there are stringent measures that will most definitely reduce gun violence.
One of the implications of gun control will be that the guns will be kept out of the wrong hands. The legislations on the gun controls have frameworks and strategies that are put in place to ensure that guns will be kept out of the wrong hands. These frameworks and strategies would ensure that there are an expansion and thorough checks done on the guns before sale and change of ownership to ensure that the illegal guns are kept out thus reducing gun and gun-related violence. Gun control ensures that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) are empowered and ensures that all dealers in gun both the public and private sellers obtain registration papers, licenses, allow for mandatory background checks on their warehouses and stores and to validate where there will be the possibility of managing and tracking of the firearms once they have been sold. Their flow and change of hands (Miah, 2018).
The gun control laws also aim at dealing with guns and gun-related violence by having effective control when managing mental health treatment. One of the reasons for the increase of guns and gun-related violence in the united states was the lack of proper mental treatments where the mentally retarded individuals owned guns illegally. This program is facilitated and made possible by the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) checks and follows up the background of offenders and validates them to ensure whether it is fair or not for them to own a gun. This information is relayed by the Bureau of Justice Statistics which shows that more two million guns have been prevented from possession by wrong hands through such measures.
Gun control will also lead to the formation of a gun safety technology that will need to be adopted by the states and the federal executive. This gun and safety technology is required to prevent any occurrence of gun violence in the future. The limitation or reduction of gun ammunitions that can be possessed by citizens is an effective idea that will help in minimizing the number of guns and gun-related violence. A decrease in the number say from 100 round ammunition to 10 round ammunition is effective in reducing the number of causalities in case of any gun or gun related attacks. This technology to be embraced by the states and the federal executive will ensure these measures are implemented further adding to the safety of the people.
Guns control will also have a significant impact on the way law enforcement is done. Guns control laws mandate that there be an effective and efficient background system for checkups and follow-ups. This is mandatory to ensure that guns are poses by genuine people and that the guns do not land on the hands of criminals who can take the opportunity to harm innocent lives. The implication, therefore, is an additional funding and an effective system that ensures that these laws are implemented. There is also the need for political goodwill to support the enforcement since the background routine checks require additional support to achieving the required results.
Gun control will be effective and have a significant role in helping reduce gun violence in the united states (Santhanam). However, for this to be effective there is a need for the national and federal authorities to strictly and effectively implement Gun control would lead to a significant reduction in the gun-related violence in the United States. This would require the federal and national authorities to strictly implement the existing gun control laws as well as a formulation of additional comprehensive legislation that would control guns in the United States and make the nation safe. Having tough law on the ownership of guns as the gun control stipulates will ensure that guns and gun-related violence are reduced in three main ways. The first steps involve the intensive background checks by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) will ensure that all guns are licensed and can be tracked to the owner and this reduces the number of guns that fall into the wrong hands such as criminals who can use it to carry out violence. The second way is that gun control facilitates the development of effective law enforcement by the local authorities who follow up on the gun sales and registration on the local levels in efforts to ensure that the guns do not land into unlawful hands and hence reducing gun-related violence. The third way involves the limitations of the number of ammunitions available to gun holders. This will, in turn, reduce the number of victims say in case of gun violence (Pros & Cons org).
Gun control laws protect women and the less privileged group of individuals from domestic violence. There are several underlying reasons that may lead to domestic violence to the extent of presenting the gun. It is the responsibility of the government to protect its citizen from such calamities by ensuring the gun control laws are adhered to. It is also important to view gun violence as critical but preventable public health concern. Women in the United States are 11.4 times more like to be victims of gun homicides as most of the shootings that occur revolve around domestic violence. CITATION DHe15 l 1033 (Richardson).
The Gun control policies are also made in the basis of the following terms. The terms have mostly been discussed in the paper above and they include: there is a minimum age for the purchase of firearms. Individuals that are 18 and above can purchase the shotguns and ammunition while the handgun is sold to individuals above the age of 21. Mentally unstable individuals are never permitted to purchase a firearm as they may use it to harm other individuals. It is also important to understand that the background check is required before one gets the firearms. Gun control has certainly played a critical by ensuring law and order is maintained, as people may use their guns within their jurisdiction and may not threaten the lives of other individuals or harm them in any particular way. Individuals that possess firearms are also given the mandate to take care of the arms and not harm other people in any way.
Throughout the article, there have been many components of the gun control discussed. It is evident that the article majorly focuses on gun control and everything that revolves around gun control. Gun control is mentioned to have created a safer environment for individuals living in that very state. Gun control prevent homicide and suicide from occurring and hence life is protected and individuals may comfortably live without being worried. Gun control has also backed up the security of the state as it helps firearm bears to act responsibly and to also protect themselves from so many dangers from individual who might want to harm them. When effectively implemented gun control measures, there will be a limited number of guns which are in illegal hands such as the criminals and extremists through proper monitoring, background checks help to ensure instances of a gun and gun-related violence such as mass shootings are minimized or reduced and the country is safe.
Works Cited
Connors, Kelly, et al. “State Gun Laws That Actually Reduce Gun Deaths.” Boston University, Boston University, 6 Aug. 2019, http://www.bu.edu/articles/2019/state-gun-laws-that-reduce-gun-deaths/. Accessed 23 October 2019
Jehan, Faisal, et al. “The burden of firearm violence in the United States: stricter laws result in safer states.” Journal of injury and violence research 10.1 (2018): 11.
Jones, Michael A., and George W. Stone. “The US gun-control paradox: Gun buyer response to congressional gun-control initiatives.” Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER) 13.4 (2015): 167-174.
Lott, John R. More guns, less crime: Understanding crime and gun control laws. University of Chicago Press, 2013.
Luca, Michael, Deepak Malhotra, and Christopher Palanquin. The impact of mass shootings on gun policy. No. w26187. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2019.
Manier, Lauren. “Does Gun Control Really Work?” National Center for Health Research, 12 Apr. 2018, http://www.center4research.org/does-gun-control-really-work/.
Morrall, Andrew. “The science of gun policy: a critical synthesis of research evidence on the effects of gun policies in the United States.” Rand health quarterly 8.1 (2018).
“Pros & Cons ProCon.org.” Gun Control, https://gun-control.procon.org/.
Santhanam, Laura. “Most Americans Support These 4 Types of Gun Legislation, Poll Says.” PBS, Public Broadcasting Service, 10 Sept. 2019, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/most-americans-support-stricter-gun-laws-new-poll-says.
Spitzer, Robert J. Politics of gun control. Routledge, 2015
Alcohol abuse
Alcohol abuse
Name:
Instructor:
Task:
Date:
Alcohol abuse
Alcohol is an element that has short term and long term detrimental effects on individuals. It is crucial to highlight that alcohol is a depressant drug that constrains the coordination, vision, multi-tasking ability and the decision making ability of an individual. These alcohol effects constrain intensive activities, such as driving, because driving involves multiple actions and proper mental functioning. In this regard, it is arguable that lowering the drinking age will encourage more accidents and death.
It is crucial to highlight that alcohol has a multiplier effect in terms of influence to engage in drinking. When the authorities lower the drinking age, the teenagers who meet the threshold age will easily influence the younger teenagers towards consuming alcohol (Black, 2010). When the minimum drinking age is 19 years, the 18 and 17 year old teenagers are highly likely to obtain alcohol from their older counterparts. It is vital to stress that minimal age differences means that involved individuals perform similar activities. In this regard, they will engage in both constructive and destructive behavior patterns. The higher number of teenagers who drink suggests that they will be high likelihood of accidents in the roads.
Lowering the drinking age is a disastrous strategy because it targets a population of individuals who are highly likely to be immature. Responsibility is an idea that improves in an individual as one grows. In turn, an individual should possess the responsibilities that are in tandem with one’s age. At a young age, a person cannot handle a significant number of responsibilities because one does not possess the maturity to control the factors that involve the particular responsibilities. Lowering the drinking age means that the society endows younger people with the task of self control. Self-control is not an easy concept for young people because they mostly employ their intuition to make critical decisions. On the other hand, a mature person will exploit one’s rationality in making critical decisions. This concept explains why younger individuals are highly likely to drink excess alcohol than their body can contain. In the end, more accidents and death aces become frequent since more individuals consume alcohol in levels that easily deter their judgment.
Early alcohol use possesses long term effects on the development of teenagers’ brains (Heather & Stockwell, 2004). Research on brain development proves that early alcohol use may deter brain development in younger individuals. Recent research proves that the brain is one of the rare organs that physiologically changes beyond childhood. During adolescence, brain development shifts from the creation of cells to the establishment of proper neural pathways. These developments enhance the ability to examine consequences and improve stress management in individuals. When alcohol deters these developments, the society braces for more deaths because individuals cannot adequately examine the consequences of particular actions.
It is discernible that lowering the drinking age will increase more accidents and death in terms of drunk driving. Consumption of alcohol has a multiplier effect on the lower ages. When the authorities lower the drinking age, the teenagers who meet the threshold age for drinking are highly likely to influence younger peers towards abusing alcohol. Lowering the drinking age is an act that accords more responsibilities to immature individuals. At a young age, a teenager cannot majorly make rational decisions. This aggravates the problem of drinking which further spurs the rate of accidents on the roads. Alcohol also deters the development of teenagers’ brains. Such individuals grow up as people who cannot examine consequences and make proper choices.
References
Black, R. (2010). Alcohol in popular culture: An encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood.
Heather, N., & Stockwell, T. (2004). The essential handbook of treatment and prevention of alcohol problems. Chichester, UK: Wiley.