Recent orders
Peer Group additional questions
Peer Group Additional Questions
I believe that fear is only one of the factors leading to the deployment of the “fag” slur to defend masculinity. I feel that it is more of a male cultural phase. In this phase, teenage boys feel the need to protect what they deem masculine through insulting others that seem different. Fear is definitely an important dynamic to consider because it could explain the philosophy of one teenage boy insulting the other first, in order to seem more masculine. However, according to Pascoe’s research, the values that the term fag express include symptoms of fear for what is not considered masculine. Insulting other boys because of their physical appearance and other characteristics may seem improper for adults, but for the teenagers, it is a way of creating an identity. They become bullies as a way of beating anxious behavior. Insulting others is a way of reassuring themselves that they fit their own descriptions of what masculinity is all about.
Peer Evaluation
Peer Evaluation
By: Student’s Name
Details of Paper Evaluated
“Marriott International Looks to Reduce Environmental Footprint.”
Author: Student’s Name
General Overview
The paper is very well organized. It provides a visual of the problem the author intends to research and objectives to support it. I would suggest a more detailed analysis using charts and tables to expand the discussion.
Formatting and Style
The paper is very well formatted using a consistent style all through. It is easy to follow up on the style from beginning to end.
Introduction section
The section begins by providing a hook statement that introduces the reader to the topic. It then provides several questions that set the tone for what is to be expected. The introduction is very well written including a purpose statement that points to the general direction of the paper.
Body/Support Section
The section has very good support information including previous studies and data to support the argument. However, the sections are too long and would need to be subdivided into sections.
Support Section
Use of data and relevant support is very impressive. As expressed before, the sections could further be subdivided.
References – Depth, range, and selection
The references used are diverse and from a range of sources including government websites, non-governmental organizations, and journal articles. They have helped to provide range and depth to the discussion.
PEER 2
PEER 2
Chronic pain tends to interfere with an individual’s day-to-day activities. Treatment of chronic pain can be daunting for the patient and the healthcare provider. As documented by Peppin et al. (2015), the increasing number of chronic-pain patients and the scarcity of qualified pain practitioners necessitate a new and effective strategy that values the complicated nature of chronic pain and provides an effective blueprint to solve these challenges. Holtrop et al. (2019) hold that knowledge about how people with chronic pain have flourishingly managed their pain is essential as it helps care providers treat other individuals with chronic pain. The authors argue that, with the patient at the centre and the provider implementing a holistic approach to finding practical ways suitable to each person, this method tends to foster patient-centred care.
References
Holtrop, J. S., Fisher, M., Martinez, D. E., Simpson, M., Awadallah, N. S., Nease, D. E., Zittleman, L., & Westfall, J. M. (2019). What works for managing chronic pain: An appreciative inquiry qualitative analysis. Journal of Primary Care Community Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150132719885286 Links to an external site.
Peppin, J. F., Cheatle, M. D., Kirsh, K. L., & McCarberg, B. H. (2015). The complexity model: a novel approach to improve chronic pain care. Pain Medicine, 16(4), 653-666. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/article/16/4/653/2460532