Recent orders
Narcissistic personality disorder and its association with suicide
Narcissistic personality disorder and its association with suicide
A narcissist is a person who can be described as being so much preoccupied with matters of their personal adequacy, prestige and power. In most cases, they are self centered, thinking more and highly about themselves and are less ‘mindful’ of others. Therefore, narcissistic disorder is a personality condition in which the affected individual is characterized by a high sense of self-relevance, inflated need for admiration, extreme cases of self-involvement, and lack of empathy for others. Most of the individuals who are very successful in life are in nearly all cases are considered as being narcissist. Not all however can be categorized as being in this category but if their behavior which reflects the characteristics of this group of people persists for a good period of time they automatically fall in this category.
This condition occurs to individual mainly in their later adulthood or adolescent ages most commonly due the low self esteem that result at such ages. The main problem encountered by those affected by this abnormal personality behavior is the existing gap between the ideal self and the real self. Since they work to maintain their ego, anxiety breeds up leading to development of self defensive mechanisms so that they can at least maintain the ego, which unfortunately turns out to be disastrous on their part. Vulnerability in self-esteem makes those with such a disorder too much sensitive to criticism and or defeat. Although sometimes they may never show it outwardly, criticism haunts these individuals leaving them with a feeling of humiliation, emptiness, hollowness, and degradation. In other circumstances, they react with rage or defiance as defensive mechanisms. Though the feeling of low self esteem sets in later in life, there some of the basic foundational causes, which happen mainly in the initial stages of human development that are not dealt with then, but are later on as a person grows to adulthood they manifested leading to the suicidal attempts.
Permissive parents who time and again keep on giving excessive praise to the child, makes most of such children to grow up with an unrealistic view of themselves. They think that they have the qualities that there parents said to them thy posses yet its untrue. As this persists, some may even relax in working hard in achieving their dreams in life because they grow up believing they are geniuses and need less effort to attain success. However, in life parents will not be there always. as the reality unfolds later in life, they can label themselves as failures since their ‘expectations’ have not been attained and some can be tempted to believe that death is their best place to grant them rest from the ridicule they might receive from their peers.
In addition, if a child is idealized, it can also lead to such personality disorder. An idealized child grows up in life with an undoubted expectation that such a pattern will never come to a stop. It may compel the child into ignoring their self-expression in the endeavor to meet the targets and expectations set by the parent so that they can win their love and approval and prioritization. This separates the child from the real self and unluckily the self has to come to manifestation one tome in life. Any departure from these states triggers pain which can lead to pro-gressive “giving up” (Joffe & Sandler, 1965). The later gap which exists between the ideal self–state and the contrasting unfolding true development of life can force an individual into a state powerlessness and worthlessness. This can be a major driving force to the condition of absolute giving up. Finally, an individual can make up their minds to terminate their lives so that they can do away with or avoid these embarrassing states of giving up and the thoughts of failure.
Due to their characteristics, these types of individuals tend to have very extreme expectations in life especially with the changes which come with the adolescent stage of development (Baumeister, 1990). However, when not attained, there is a psychological pain associated with the inability to meet such extreme self-expectation. At such an age, when one’s strength to work towards such dreams fades it can be manifested as a perceived inability to achieve previously achieved goals, responsibilities, or physical accomplishments. The feeling associated with such a state where someone is in a position to judge him as a useless chap is unbearable to more adults. A person views their life as a complete waste and no sort of encouragement can not help come out, in some extreme cases. This idle yet thoughtful mind with a lot of concentration of failure analysis is crisscrossed by thoughts of suicidal ‘solutions’, some which are executed.
Failure to impose adequate discipline by parents can also contribute adequately to narcissism. A child would think that most of the wrong things they do are actually right which not the case is. Normally a child at the age of six months has the capability to differentiate between good and wrong. Life however, has its own way of making some important principles osf living clear from experience. When such truths dawns at an individual later in life, there arises mixed feelings of neglect and absence of true love from the parents. This may lead an individual to indecent behavior such as drug and substance abuse. They turn to such activities in order to find solace which does not turn to be true. If all does not go well, they attempt suicide because they think that the world doe not love and need them.
Narcissism is partly a product of our present times and our current value system. This final state attained, where the individual victim becomes almost entirely separated from reality, can be a means of communicating with or getting closer to the spirit world believe can result in demonic possession and the final death. In addition, when one has this disorder, the constant feelings of shame, humiliation and self-criticism may be closely linked with social withdrawal, mood depression.
In conclusion, narcissism is a case that needs some therapeutically intervention before it worsens later on in a persons life. Such people if detected earlier in life need to be given adequate, consistent and relevant guidance and counseling sessions to ensure that they do not reach the suicidal states.
List of references;
Joffe, W.G., &Sandler,J.(1965). Notes on pain, depression, and individuation. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 20, 394–424.
Baumeister RF: Suicide as escape from self. Psychol Rev 1990; 97:90–11
Napoleon was born on August 15, 1769 in Ajaccio, Corsica, and was given the name Napoleon Buonaperte.
Napoleon
Napoleon was born on August 15, 1769 in Ajaccio, Corsica, and was given the name Napoleon Buonaperte. He was the second of eight children of Carlo and Letizia Buonaperte, both of the Corsican-Italian gentry. Before Napoleon, had ever been a professional soldier. His father Carlo, was a lawyer who had fought for Corsican independence. Napoleon, at the age of 16, and joined the artillery as a second lieutenant. I was then where Napoleon found his calling. The rest of his life would be based on the army. He had proven himself to be a great general. He is one of the most, if not the most, influential people of European History. Europe would not be the same today if it weren’t for him.
After the revolution began in France, he became a lieutenant colonel (1791) in the Corsican National Guard. However, when Corsica declared independence in 1793, Buonaperte, a Republican, and a French patriot fled to France with his family. He was assigned, as captain, to an army besieging Toulon, a naval base that was aided by a British fleet, while in revolt against the republic. It was here that Napoleon Buonaperte officially changed his name to Napoleon Bonaparte, feeling that it looked “more French”. It was here too that Napoleon replaced wounded artillery General and seized ground where his guns could drive the British fleet from the harbor and Toulon fell. As a result of his accomplishments, Bonapatre was promoted to brigadier general at the age of 24. In 1795, he saved the revolutionary government by dispersing an insurgent mob in Paris.
Latter in 1796, Napoleon became commander of the French army in Italy. He defeated four Austrian generals in succession, each at impossible odds, and forced Austria and its allies to make peace. The Treaty of Campo Formio provided that France keep most of its conquests. In northern Italy he founded the Cisalpine Republic, and straightened his position in France by sending millions of francs worth of treasure to the government. In 1798, to strike at British trade with the East, he led an expedition to Turkish-ruled Egypt, which he conquered. His fleet, however, was destroyed by the British admiral Horatio Nelson, leaving him stranded. Undaunted, he reformed the Egyptian government and law, abolishing serfdom and feudalism and guaranteeing basic rights. The French scholars he had brought with him began the scientific study of ancient Egyptian history. In 1799 he failed to capture Syria, but won a victory over the Turks at Abu Qir.
France, meanwhile, faced a new threat, the coalition of Austria, Russia, and the lesser powers allied with Britain. Bonaparte, decided to leave his army and return to save France. In Paris, he joined a conspiracy against the government. In the coup d’etat of November 1799, he and his colleagues seized power and established a new regime-the Consulate. Under its construction, Bonaparte, as his first consul, had almost dictatorial powers. The constitution was revised in 1802 to make Napoleon consul for life and in 1804, it made him emperor. Each of these changes received overwhelming assent of the electorate. In 1800, he assured his power by crossing the Alps and defeating the Austrians at Marengo. He also concluded an agreement with the pope, which contributed to French domestic tranquility and ended the quarrel with the Roman Catholic Church that had arisen during the Revolution. In France, the administration was reorganized, the court system was simplified, and all schools were put under centralized control. French law was standardized in the Code. Napoleon, (the civil code) and six other codes. They all guaranteed the rights and liberties won in the Revolution, which included equality before the law and Freedom of religion.
Napoleon, being the greatest general of his time, with the intentions of France in mind it is clear how the French people respected him, held him in high regard, and even praised him. With that same clarity that we can see how those “enemies of the state”, and others not living in France feared Napoleon, and saw him as a power hungry mad man. Opposing generals fueled by hate attempted on many occasions to stop the momentum that Bonaparte and his French Empire was gaining. The view by others that he was a ruthless and sadistic leader, who created war for his personal gain. Another feeling of resentment towards Bonaparte was that he was unorganized, sloppy, and basically lucky. Finally, many people felt that Napoleon was only interested in his own image and power, and essentially used France and its resources as an outlet to achieve this. Napoleon himself would prove all this wrong. By taking the position which France was in at the time, revamping the entire political system, and giving equality and freedom to all of France he quickly showed his loyalties. As for being unorganized, sloppy and very lucky, time after time, Napoleon would prove his military superiority in all aspects. Lastly, if Napoleon had used France to gain his personal goals he would not have taken the time to change the politics, to protect the rights of the citizens, or to make sure France was a good place to live, “France has more need for Napoleon, then he for France”
In April 1803 Britain, provoked by Napoleon’s aggressive behavior, resumed war with France on the seas. Two years after this Russia and Austria joined the British in a second coalition. Napoleon then abandoned plans to invade England and turned his armies against the Austro-Russian forces, defeating them at the battle of Austerlitz on December 2nd, 1805. In 1806 he seized the kingdom of Naples and made his elder brother Joseph king, converted the Dutch Republic into the kingdom of Holland for his brother Louis, and established the Confederation of the Rhine of which he was the protector. Prussia then allied itself with Russia and attacked the confederation. Napoleon destroyed the Prussian army at Jena and Auerstadt (1806) and the Russian army at Friedland. At Tilsit in July of 1807, Napoleon made an ally of Czar Alexander I and greatly reduced the size of Prussia. He also added new states to the empire: the kingdom of Westphalia, under his brother Jerome, the duchy of Warsaw, and others. Outside of his military life Napoleon characterized his regime above all with a strong executive under the control of a single charismatic figure who appointed and dismissed ministers, generals, prefects, and bishops, commanded armies, directed foreign policy, saw to the codification of laws, and reorganized the systems of education, worship, and administration. Meanwhile Napoleon had established the Continental System (a French-imposed blockade of Europe against British goods, designed to force bankruptcy what he called “the nation of shopkeepers”). In 1807, Bonaparte seized Portugal. In 1808, he made his brother Joseph, the king of Spain. Napoleon then awarded Naples to his brother-in-law, Joachim Murat. Joseph’s arrival in Spain touched off a rebellion there, which became known as the Peninsular War. Napoleon appeared briefly and scored victories, but after his departure the fighting continued for five years, with the British backing the Spanish armies and guerrillas. The Peninsular War cost France 300,000 casualties and incredible sums of money and contributed to the eventual weakening of the Napoleonic Empire. In 1809, Napoleon defeated the Austrians again at Wagram, annexed the Illyrian Provinces and abolished the Papal States. By this linking his dynasty with the oldest ruling house in Europe, he hoped that his son, born in 1811, would be the more readily accepted by established monarchs. Also in 1810, the empire reached its widest extension with the annexation of Bremen, Lubeck, and other parts of north Germany, together with the entire kingdom of Holland, followed the forced abdication of Louis Bonaparte. The impact of Napoleon on the political and social structure of Europe was not everywhere the same. It was greater in territories that were annexed than in satellite states, and greater in satellite states than in those which were occupied only with difficulty and by force of arms. Where French Revolutionary armies had passed before, overturning feudal and ecclesiastical institutions, there Napoleonic rule had a firmer grip. French military support for local rulers enabled them to undertake by ‘revolution from above’ what as minor enlightened despots in the eighteenth century they had failed to achieve. But Napoleon was above all a dynasties and conqueror: what he required from subject territories was men and money. If they could be provided without administrative reforms, so much the better. Some states which remained sovereign imitated Napoleon’s methods in order to weaken traditional elite or to strengthen state-power. Far more common however was resistance to Napoleon, whether blind peasant hostility to taxes and conscription, the defense of aristocratic, ecclesiastical, and corporative privileges, or liberal opposition to arbitrary, bureaucratic, and foreign rule. In all the new kingdoms created by the emperor, the Code Napoleon was established as law. Feudalism and serfdom were abolished, and freedom of religion established (excluding Spain). Each state was granted a constitution, providing for universal male-suffrage and a parliament and containing a bill of rights. French-style administration and free public schools were envisioned. Higher education was opened to all that qualified, regardless of class or religion. Every state had an academy or institute for the promotion of the arts and sciences. Incomes were provided for eminent scholars, specifically scientists. Constitutional government remained only a promise, but progress and increased efficiency were widely realized. Not until after Napoleon’s fall did the common people of Europe, alienated from his governments by war taxes and military conscription, fully appreciate the benefits that he had given them. It was evident through these actions of Napoleon that he not only wanted the land for France but he wanted to spread a common lifestyle throughout Europe.
In 1812, Napoleon, whose alliance with Alexander I had begin to disintegrate, launched an invasion of Russia that ended in a disastrous retreat from Moscow. (Thereafter all of Europe united against him, although he fought on brilliantly, the odds were impossible.) In April 1814, his marshals refused to continue the struggle. They had felt Napoleon disrespected his army, and said they were not given the privileges they desired. Napoleon, although he lived his life with one theory regarding his men, (“When soldiers have been baptized in the fire of the battlefield, they have all one rank in my eyes…”) (IV pg.15) therefore felt that his marshals shall be given no special treatment.] Latter allies had rejected his stepping down in favor of his son, Napoleon was abdicated unconditionally and was exiled to the Mediterranean island of Elba. Marie Louise and his son were put into custody of her father, the emperor of Austria. Napoleon never was to see either one of them again, but he himself soon made a dramatic comeback.
In March 1815, he escaped from Elba, reached France, and marched on Paris winning over the troops sent to capture him. In Paris, he promulgated a new and more democratic constitution, and veterans of his old campaigns flocked to his support. Napoleon asked peace of the allies, but they outlawed him, and he decided to strike first. The result was a campaign into Belgium, which ended in a defeat in the Battle of Waterloo on June 8th, 1815. In Paris crowds begged him to fight on, but the politicians withdrew their support. Napoleon then fled to Rochefort, where he surrendered to the captain of the British battleship Bellerophon. He was then exiled to Saint Helena, a remote island in the south Atlantic Ocean, where he remained until he died from stomach cancer on May 5th, 1821.
The cult of Napoleon as the “man of destiny” began during his lifetime. In fact, he has begun to cultivate it during his first Italian campaign by systematically publicizing his victories. As first consul and emperor, he had engaged the best writers and artists of France and Europe to glorify his deeds and had contributed to the cult himself by the elaborate ceremonies with which he celebrated his rule, picturing himself as the architect of France’s greatest glory. He maintained that he had preserved the achievements of the Revolution in France and offered their benefits to Europe. His goal, he said, was to found a European state- a “federation of free peoples” (V pg. 15). Whatever the truth of this, he became the arch-hero of the French and a martyr to the world. In 1840 his remains were returned to Paris at the request of King Louis-Philippe and interred with great pomp and ceremony on the Invalids, where they still lie. Napoleon’s influence is evident even in France today. Reminders of him dot Paris-the most obvious being the Arc de Triomphe, the centerpiece of the city, which was built to commemorate his victories. His spirit pervades the constitution of the Fifth Republic; the country’s basic law is still the Code Napoleon, and the administrative and judicial systems are essentially Napoleonic. A uniform state-regulated system of education persists. Napoleon’s radical reforms in all parts of Europe cultivated the ground for the revolutions of the 19th century. Today, the impact of the Code Napoleon is apparent in the law of all European countries. Napoleon was a driven man, never secure, never satisfied. “Power is my mistress” (VI pg. 176), he said. His life was work-centered; even his social activities had a purpose. He could bear amusements or vacations only briefly. His tastes were for coarse food, bad wine, and for cheap tobacco. He could be hypnotically charming for a needed purpose of course. He had intense loyalties to his family and old associates. Even so, nothing or nobody, were allowed to interfere with his work.
Napoleon was sometimes a tyrant and always an authoritarian. But one who believed, however in ruling by mandate of the people, expressed on plebiscites. He was also a great-enlightened monarch-a civil executive of enormous capacity who changed French institutions and tried to reform the intuitions of Europe and give the Continent a common law. Few historians deny that he was a military genius. For his enlightened government, but surely the latter must be counted if he is justly to be called “Napoleon the Great”. .
Napoleon Bonaparte A Life
Napoleon Bonaparte: A Life
Napoleon Bonaparte is a book written by Alan Schom and published by HarperCollins in 26th august 1998. Schom seeks to give details of Bonaparte from the day of his birth in Corsica to his death while away in exile in St. Helena. The book has been controversial. The International Napoleonic Society did state that it is the most hostile book documenting the life history of the French Emperor. Despite numerous claims that the book is erroneous, the review by the institution did not support its claims using any scholarly materials. Contrary to claims of error, Schom did properly annotate the book and in the Epilogue does state that he tried to give the emperor his rightful dues. The writing of this book is exemplary, has sufficient evidence or annotation and the subject pursued by the book are fascinating.
Napoleon Bonaparte has been the most dominating and powerful figures in the history of France. Many people have been indicating interest in understanding this acclaimed French Emperor. He has been providing a fascinating subject of observation from his time as French ruler up to date. There exist many books probably thousands detailing on the life of the French Emperor. Some give accounts of his unending victories on the battle field while others concentrate on his personal life. Despite the number of books written about the French ruler, there is no one such book that gives comprehensive details of the life of Napoleon Bonaparte. The book Napoleon Bonaparte: A life by Alan Schom fills the gap giving details of Bonaparte that other biographers avoided. Schom divorces himself from the obvious praise of Bonaparte and instead gives candid description of both the strengths and weaknesses of Napoleon. The reason I chose this book is that it gives accounts about Napoleon that do not exist in other biographies.
Napoleon Bonaparte: A life written by Alan Schom is an ambitious and readable account of the life of Bonaparte. It includes all the available facets of his life from his birth and childhood at Corsica to the time of his death on the island of St. Helena. The major concentrations of the book are the military career of Bonaparte. It gives details into his military campaigns and details all the battles that he did win and also those that he won. These wars include those fought in Italy, Egypt, Austria, Russia, Poland, Prussia and Spain. There are also details of the organization of the military, internal conflicts, and the factors that contributed to either success or failure of these wars.
Schom in this book gives an illumination of the structural and political organization of the French government. This is possible through napoleon who rose to become the ruler of French from 1799 when he took power through a coup. On his political career, the books also describe key officers, aides, generals, and commanders that were pivotal to Napoleon. They included Admiral Villeneuve, police minister Fouche, and naval commander Talleyrand. There are international rivalries and their in inclusion of settlements of these conflicts in the book. Schom finalizes accounts about Napoleon by writing about his enemies. Napoleon had many enemies, but the book gives details of the most notable enemies of the first consul of France. They included Emperor Franz I from Austria, Duke of Wellington, Field Marshal Kutukoz, Czar Alexander of Russia, and Friendrich Wilhelm III from Prussia.
Schom also gives an account of the personal life of Bonaparte. Bonaparte was a polygamist and despite having a wife he had numerous mistresses. In his earlier life, Bonaparte married Josephine de Beauharmis but would later divorce her because of her affairs with his officers and the lack of children in their wedlock. He then marries Marie Louise, and they have a son Napoleon Francis Joseph Charles. During his marriages, Napoleon has mistresses such as Pauline Bellisle Foures of Egypt during the Egyptian campaigns. Schom also gives a vivid description of the Napoleon acknowledgement of his illegitimate children. He did acknowledge two of his illegitimate sons. That is Charles Leon whose mother was Eleonere Denuelle and Count Alexandre Walewski born to Marie Walewska. Despite previous biographies detailing on the promiscuity of Napoleon, there is none that gives vivid details of the accounts than this book.
A life by Alan Schom also gives details a friendship of Bonaparte with mathematician. There is little knowledge of the mathematician who was a savant. Schom also gives details concerning his death while in exile on the island of St. Helena. Helena. Napoleon has a myriad of flaws, and despite this knowledge, there is little documentation of these facts. It is Schom’s book that entails the destruction and misery caused by the emperor in Europe. Such misery emanates from his unending and at times needless wars that would to the wreckage of the European mankind. Other flaws of Bonaparte included his indifference on the medical needs of his soldiers and lack of appropriate planning and information gathering. It is such flaws that eventually lead to the end of his rule and his subsequent demise while in St. Helena.
This book describes the period between 1769 and 1821, which is the lifetime of Napoleon Bonaparte. Evident from the book this was a period of constant conflicts between nations and kingdoms. There were fights In various parts of Europe whose concerns were expanding territories. During this time, the French had feuds with the English and the strategic position of Egypt made it the epicenter of the battle. France captured Egypt in an attempt to stage an offensive against the English army but failed. Austria was the other enemy of France. The two fought on many fronts with both sides either winning or losing. Conflicts with Austria were in most cases about territory with Napoleon’s brother being the person with the responsibility of negotiating with Austria. In accordance to this, this book indicates that this time of history was a time of constant wars and temporary peace in Europe.
Schom’s give indicates that the past during the time of napoleon was not peaceful. Empires valued expansion of their territories as any expense. France for instant engaged their neighbors in endless wars so that it could expand its territories. It was not until during the rule of Napoleon in 1811 that France would reach its peak. The French empire at the time was vast there were many satellites and allied states. Other empire fought back leading to the decline of Napoleon’s rule and his death in 1821. The past described in the book is that of constant struggles to expand empires, and it is such events that are dominant in the life of Napoleon.
The author of the book believes that this is the book that finally the truthful story of Napoleon. That is most authors did not detail numerous flaws of the emperor during his needless wars. Schom views the entire career of Napoleon as a failure, and he indicates so in the book. In fact, he describes both Trafalgar and Waterloo confrontations and the fatal mistakes of Napoleon. According to Schom, Napoleon was the cause of not only the disaster in his personal life but also in France and Europe. Schom seems to be responding to the mixed reactions of Europeans on the issue of Napoleon. Despite the fact that he does mention key strengths of Napoleon during his conquest, there is sufficient evidence in the book that he concentrates more on the weakness of Bonaparte. This has been the reason that many individuals that admire Napoleon indicate that Schom had the aim of spreading anti-Napoleon ideologies.
Schom uses a number of sources to support his views. Some of his sources include memoirs of Bourrine, Madame Junot, and Thiebault. Bourinne was a school friend of Napoleon at the military academy and would later become his private secretary. Despite that many other biographers choose not to use the memoirs, they become a vast resource to Schom. It is perhaps the refusal by biographers to acknowledge such significant historical facts that lead to lack of informative description of Napoleon’s dark sides. International Napoleonic Society states that the resources that Schom uses are dubious and historically inapplicable, but they do not provide scholarly evidence.
Before reading the book, I had I belief that Napoleon was one of the most influential historical figures in the history of Europe. Many historical books describe him as a man dedicated to his work and his country. In fact, the expression that I had prior to reading the book was that Napoleon was a brilliant ruler. Schom’s book is enlightening as it provides information that facilitates the analyses of Napoleon from both aspects. It gives accounts of how the thirst for power and expansion of territories in Europe lead to Napoleon recruiting boys to fight in his unending wars with other empires. This book opened my eyes into the implications of Napoleon’s conquest for newer territories. It not only had negative implications on France but to the entire continent of Europe and parts of Africa and India.
From history classes, Napoleon description is of a great ruler. History books in most cases detail on the political and military facts leaving out personal details. This book facilitated my confirmation of the issues learnt from history class and advanced that knowledge. The book gives a vivid account of Napoleons personal life, which is insightful. In addition, Schom gives accounts of issues that led to failures and victories during the time of Napoleon as the Ruler of France. While confirming that Napoleon did succeed in capturing various territories, Schom does discredit the notion of historical books that Napoleon was an ardent planner. According to Schom, Napoleon was not an expert planner and he had no successful way of collecting data. This made him vulnerable and was part of the reasons that his enemies used against him. Napoleon Bonaparte: A life confirms things that I did learn earlier while adding to that knowledge.
References
Schom, A. Napoleon Bonaparte. New York: HarperCollins, 1997.
