Recent orders
Culture and Emotion
Culture and Emotion
Name
Course
Instructor’s Name
Date
There are cultural differences in the elicitation/ causes of emotions, the values placed on emotions, and the outward display of emotions. When different cultures are put under study, several issues within the cultures that affect expression of emotions in those cultures. Human emotions are cross-culturally different; some cultures tend to encourage people to be calm, friendly, and comical whereas other cultures encourage their people to be unresponsive, nervous, and easily humiliated. This essay explains my experience in the past years with variations of emotions in different cultures that include Colombian, Iranian and.
Cultural differences in emotion elicitors are the intensity in which emotions are experienced. Iran is an example of an emotionally sensitive culture where individuals more experience intense emotions than other cultures. Iranians would react to anger or threat more harshly than both Colombians and Americans. The reactions of Iranians are quicker, stronger and last longer than for a less emotionally sensitive culture. The Iranian culture promotes sensitivity to emotions such as shame, fear and guilt particularly because of the demand put on them to obey religious rules and older people. On the other hand, Colombians would react to threat in a slower manner by first analyzing the cause of the threat. Their reactions do not normally last as long as the Iranians’ do. Nevertheless, American culture is less sensitive to emotions compared to both the Iranian and the Colombian cultures. Americans usually seek for solution after investigating the cause of a threat or fear rather than taking a reactive response.
Cultural differences in the value of the emotion exist because cultural disparities exist in the modal, prevalent, as well as normative emotional responses. These differences may be expounded in terms of subjective feeling, antecedent events, behavior, and appraisals. In America, women tend to express their emotions more compared to men especially the black Americans. In contrast, in Iran and Columbia both sexes are taught to tightly control the expression of their emotions. Iranian culture greatly prompts women to control expression of their emotions especially if it is geared towards men. I have realized that in Iran one suppresses anger when the target is someone of high status. Iranian culture is a masculine culture characterized with higher gender differences. For men Iranian culture de-emphasize expression of weakness such as sadness but reinforce assertive emotions such as anger.
These three cultures express their emotion differently in their environment. Americans express their emotions in an independent manner. Americans are always feeling sorry for themselves because they normally feel that they are responsible for their own actions and destinies. Colombians express their emotions in terms of family perspective. Colombians’ families share both their emotions and feelings. Colombians are raised in an environment where relatives are put first thus making them worry more for the welfare of their families than themselves. There are family reunions that are regarded as very significant particularly during holidays and there is noticeable respect expected of children. The Colombians are always careful when expressing their emotions at times even faking them in order not to hurt their family members. Iranians express their emotions in a religious perspective because they normally consider obedience to religion as important. This therefore make them express unrealistic emotions just to show respect even when they are angry.
Some cultures are more emotionally sensitive than others meaning that they will exhibit more emotions compared to others. The Columbians’ sadness, fear, and hunger may not last for long when a target is someone of high status; the anger may be suppressed but not as much as it is applied in Iran. Americans are hard-hit by emotions such as fear, sadness and anger because their culture does not suppress the expression of their emotion. Iranians’ emotions are mostly instigated by their religious and cultural values. For instance, it would be a shameful for Iranian women not to cover their body in public particularly in the presence of men. Moreover, respect to others is greatly valued in Iran especially towards older people including parents. Obedience is regarded as significant and this largely contributes to emotions such as fear because they are only required to obey the rules but not allowed to disagree. Some cultures are more emotionally sensitive than others meaning that they will exhibit more emotions compared to others.
The outward display of emotion varies with culture. For example, the extent to which individuals experience emotions differs as a function of culturally normative behavior of their society. I think the reason there are cultural differences in the outward display of emotion is that some cultures value certain emotions more compared to others. American culture is individualistic while the Columbian and Iranian cultures are collectivist, meaning they emphasize doing things on behalf of others. For instance, Americans view happiness as attainable, infinite, and something that is experienced within, whereas Iranians and Colombians consider happiness as relational and involving many external and social factors, inherent in collective experiences among individuals. Columbians are friendly and always express their joy through happiness whenever they hang around with their families and friends. On the other hand, the Iranian culture suppresses display of emotion in public because they are taught to adopt what is right and drop unpleasant emotions. In this regard, emotions such as anger are suppressed in Iran whereas emotions that show respect to God, family members and the entire society are largely exposed.
Americans promote happiness in their cultural setting hence prompting them to create and encourage many circumstances that stimulate happiness. However, Iranians’ culture promotes togetherness and seriousness. The fact that Americans promote happiness amongst themselves is really encouraging and thrilling. Americans proactively maintain a positive view of the self unlike Colombians where cultural models do not favor the positive and a self-critical approach. In Iran, the individuals are aligned with their group where they concentrate on their family’s positive image. The Colombian and Iranian cultures concentrate on receptivity to both positive and negative aspects whereas Americans tend to appraise emotional situations.
Living conditions in various cultures vary with different kinds of events promoted by specific cultural models that in turn generate events that stimulate culturally desirable emotions and subdue events leading to less desirable emotions. Americans love praising, complimenting, encouraging each other, and giving awards and trophies for different levels of achievements. Similarly, Iranians discourage being critical or inattentive and they largely promote an encouraging and enthusiastic view of themselves. Colombians devalue anger and they normally reduce the in-group contexts in which anger is likely to emerge. Additionally, the Iranian culture devalues anger and suppresses the acts of thwarting and in-group frustration that in turn avoids the experience of improper emotions that may lead to anger.
In sum, I think that there are cultural differences in the elicitation/causes, values, and regulation of emotion. It is apparent that cultural differences in emotions are evident in American, Colombian and Iranian cultures. The Colombians’ emotions towards their society and families reveal their love for each other and I feel it is what makes them feel for each other and even express sadness whenever one of them is hurt or depressed. Iranian culture is generally characterized by their religious beliefs that emphasize obedience and family values. This kind of culture has significant influence on the way they express their emotions. On the other hand, the individualistic nature of Americans who think of themselves as individuals rather than a group encourages them to pursue happiness and other self-motivating emotions. This kind of culture really touches me emotionally and I feel that it is one of a kind in the world.
Tea of Coffee; Which Drink
Name
Professor’s name
Course
Date
Tea of Coffee; Which Drink is better
Can you replace your regular cup of tea with coffee to start your day? Tea and coffee top the list of the most popular beverages in the world. Accounting for 78% of all team consumption and consumption, black tea is the most sought-after drink. While tea and coffee have similarities, they also have their fair share of differences. It is hard to tell the better beverage because both sides of the aisle show a lot of passion for their drinks. The purpose of this essay is to contrast between two drinks- coffee and tea, in terms of health benefits, taste, and caffeine content.
Health Benefits
To begin with, both tea and coffee consumers often claim their drink of choice to be the healthiest. According to recent studies, both tea and coffee have significant health benefits. Coffee is effective in boosting physical performance, preventing Type 2 diabetes, and contains essential nutrients. Taking a cup of coffee every day prevents type 2 diabetes, according to scientists. According to researchers, coffee takers are significantly less likely to suffer from diabetes because the caffeine helps curb insulin resistance. For every cup of coffee consumed, they have a 7% less likelihood of developing diabetes (Hayakawa, 4553). Caffeine also boosts one’s physical performance by raising the level of adrenaline in the blood. This boots one’s response in physical activities. Research has shown that, on average, caffeine boosts physical performance by 12%. Additionally, caffeine comprises naturally occurring vitamin B compounds such as potassium and manganese. On the other hand, tea prevents weight loss, cancer, heart disease and protects brain function. Taking green tea speeds fat loss and speeds up metabolism. According to studies, consuming four cups of tea a day reduces body weight and waist circumference. Tea also prevents cancer as it can kill specific cancer cells. Studies have established an association between tea and preventing oxidative damage, which causes cancer. Tea also reduces heart disease as it reduces cholesterol that leads to serious cardiovascular problems. Additionally, some teas improve blood circulation and reduce high blood pressure, reducing the likelihood of heart attacks and blood clots. Tea also protects brain function by reducing the threat of developing neurological diseases such as Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease.
Caffeine Content
Secondly, it is common knowledge that although both drinks have caffeine as an ingredient, coffee contains more caffeine than tea. The health benefits of caffeine are primarily in its ability to help a person stay alert and focused. Many people will pick coffee to jump-start their day or get through a lazy afternoon when making choices. On a chemical level, caffeine functions by blocking adenosine which is a transmitter responsible for triggering relation. Coffee is a strongly brewed at high temperatures allowing the coffee beans to release more caffeine molecules (Samoggia and Bettina 653). As a result, coffee contains high levels of caffeine than tea. An eight-ounce cup of coffee contains between 90 and 100 milligrams of caffeine. Tea, on the other hand, does not contain as much caffeine as coffee. However, tea leaves have more naturally occurring caffeine than coffee beans. In essence, tea is an infusion that is generally weaker than coffee. Tea is brewed at relatively lower temperatures than coffee which ensures that not all the caffeine is extracted from the tea leaves. The tea leaves are discarded alongside a considerable amount of naturally occurring caffeine. Noteworthy, tea contains other chemical contents that boost focus and attention. The strongest teas contain about 70-90 milligrams of caffeine.
Taste
Thirdly, it is important to assess the taste of coffee and tea in deciding which drink is better. This is because if the taste is not appealing, one might not want to consume it. Coffee tends to have a more strong flavor and bitter taste than tea. Coffee is rather acidic, which explains its bold and astringent flavors. The strong chemical profiles and taste mean that coffee tends to be harsh on the stomach, especially if taken in high amounts. Tea also occurs in various flavors depending on where it is grown. Real tea consists of white tea, oolong tea, green tea, and black tea. The rest are deemed herbal tisanes as they do not emanate from Camellia sinensis, the actual plant tea. Oolong and black tea are the strongest flavors, with citrusy, fruity, earthy, and nutty options.
Conclusion
Tea and coffee are the most famous drinks across the world. Although they have some similarities, they also have remarkable differences pertaining to the taste, caffeine content, and health benefits. Tea is beneficial in preventing heart disease, weight loss, cancer, and boosting brain function. Coffee contains essential nutrients that boost physical performance and prevent diabetes. Coffee contains more caffeine than tea, although tea has more naturally occurring caffeine than coffee. As regards taste, both drinks have distinct tastes and preference depends on the individual. If one needs help figuring out the drink that works best for them, they should consult a qualified dietitian to help evaluate their needs.
References
Hayakawa, Sumio, et al. “Anti-Cancer Effects of Green Tea Epigallocatchin-3-Gallate and Coffee Chlorogenic Acid.” Molecules, vol. 25, no. 19, 2020, p. 4553. Crossref, doi:10.3390/molecules25194553.
Samoggia, Antonella, and Bettina Riedel. “Consumers’ Perceptions of Coffee Health Benefits and Motives for Coffee Consumption and Purchasing.” Nutrients, vol. 11, no. 3, 2019, p. 653. Crossref, doi:10.3390/nu11030653.
Culture and discipline
Culture and discipline
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Date of Submission
Culture and Discipline
Culture can be described as the underlying characteristic of a certain group of individuals, defined by their language, race, religion, ethnicity and social behavior. Researchers conducted by various institutions show parenting styles are greatly influenced by cultural differences. According to Brooks (2010) discipline, communication, and expectations appear to be connected to cultural influences. It is through these differences that a child’s development is shaped. When children misbehave, how a parent chooses to discipline their child is closely linked to the society. Disciplinary method applied by a parent differs significantly across cultures. In eastern cultures, parents give much emphasis on discipline; they are very strict and consider western style of parenting as negligent. Depending on their culture, parents socialize and communicate to their children differently. Societal values and norms influence how parents will raise their children. In reference to how I was raised, it is evident that the prevailing societal culture influenced the parenting style that I was subjected to. For instance, in western culture it is the norm to communicate with children in a soft and understanding manner as opposed to the eastern culture where children are scold.
Discipline is making a child aware of the difference between right and wrong, as well as acceptable and unacceptable behavior (Grote, 2006). The major goal of disciplining a child is to help them change from an impulsive behavior and become disciplined individuals with controlled and purposeful mannerism. On the other hand, punishment is a disciplinary technique. It can either be physical; a slap or psychological which may involve isolating a child or withdrawing certain privileges. Both involve preventing unacceptable behavior. Punishment is efficient in stopping the behavior at that particular moment but it may not manage to eliminate the misbehavior ultimately. In my opinion, intense punishment does not result into long-term effect on behavior while discipline is a continuing process, which can be used by parents to help their children turn into self-directed individuals.
References
Brooks J., (2010). The Process of Parenting. McGraw-Hill Publishing. New York: Cengage.
Grote, R. C. (2006). Discipline without punishment: The proven strategy that turns problem employees into superior performers. New York: Amacom-American Management Association.
