Recent orders

Operant and Classical Conditioning

Name:

Professor:

Institution:

Course:

Operant and Classical Conditioning

Burrhuss Fredrick Skinner had this exceptional belief that individuals had a unique way of thinking, and found it reasonable to study behaviors that are easily observed rather than the actions that take place in the mind of an individual. Skinner thought that the greatest way to comprehend behavior is to find out the causes of an individual action, and the consequences. He termed this kind of ideology operant conditioning. He mainly based his work on Thorndike’s law of effect.  Skinner came up with a new expression into the Law of Effect which was reinforcement.  Behavior that is reinforced is likely to be repeated by an individual, as well as behavior that is not reinforced is weakened and discouraged (Weiten pg 125).

In the year 1948, Skinner studied operant conditioning by undertaking experiments that involved placing animals in boxes he termed as Skinner box that was the same as Thorndike’s puzzle box. This brought out the idea that operant conditioning was a method of learning that involved rewards and punishments to change a person behavior. One of the characteristic aspects of the theory is attempts to present behavioral explanations for a wide range of the daily behaviors of an individual. Skinner accomplished this by explaining the motivation in terms of depriving and reinforcing schedules.

In 1975, Skinner tried to justify oral learning and language in the operant conditioning model, even though this idea was discarded by linguists together with psycholinguists. Operant conditioning is used mostly in a clinical environment, classroom situation and instructional programmes. The major components of operant conditioning are reinforcement. This can either be positive or negative (Weiten pg324).

One significant type of learning termed, Classical Conditioning, was discovered by a Russian psychologist named Ivan Pavlov. He discovered this fact when doing a study on digestion. This was aimed to understand the digestive patterns in dogs clearly. During these experiments, he placed meat powder in the dog’s mouth that had long tubes inserted into a variety of organs to assess bodily responses. The discovery was, dogs started to salivate before they were presented with the meat powder as this started when the person feeding the dogs came into the room. He started gaining interest in this incident, and deserted his digestion study to look into the now well-known Classical Conditioning study (Nicholas pg 398).

In essence, the findings hold up the suggestion that people develop responses to stimuli that do not occur naturally. When an individual touches a burning stove, one reflex pulls the hand away from heat emanated by the stove. This action takes place instinctually, as there is no learning in the whole process. It is just a survival instinct. This is the main reason why people tend to pull their hands away after getting burnt, as much as the stove is switched off. Pavlov outlined that people make associations that lead to generalizations of responses to stimuli paired with neutral stimulus. The stimulus does not naturally draw out the already conditioned response (Nicholas pg289).

Pavlov started blending the sound of the bell with the meat powder, and realized that as much as the meat powder was not given to the dog, in time it started to salivate after the sound of the bell. This is because the meat powder resulted in salivation of the dogs. The two variables are termed as the unconditioned stimulus, as well as unconditioned response. The sound of the bell and salivation of the dogs do not occur naturally, as the dog is conditioned to respond to the bell. Consequently, the bell is well thought-out as the conditioned stimulus, and the salivation of the dogs to the bell as the conditioned response. Many of people’s behaviors today is shaped by the coupling of stimuli. Individuals make associations all the time, not realizing the influence that these connections impact on an individual. Basically, individual have all undergone classical conditioning.

Work cited

Nicholas, Lionel. Introduction to Psychology. London: Cengage Learning , 2009.

Weiten, Wayne. Psychology:Themes and Variations. New York: Juta and Company Ltd, 2009.

Reasons to visit Lanai

Name:

Professor:

Course:Date:

Reasons to visit Lanai

I have always enjoyed touring to new places during the summer break. This is the only way I get to enjoy other life besides the busy life in the city and the memory of school work. Last holiday I decided to visit Lanai in Hawaii. I wanted a quiet place where I would experience all the activities I had wished for while young. The place is so fresh and green for one to imagine there exists deserted places. I still have the memories of the place and I believe it will take longer for me to forget about the beautiful serene in Lanai. The island is also known as the Pineapple. It was developed in the 1920s by James Dortmund who built bungalows to house his workers (https://www.hawaii.com/lanai/info/about/). It was once considered as among the largest pineapple plantations in the world. Currently, more than three thousands of people reside in the Island and it is no longer known for its pineapple plantation but the beautiful nature that the place has.

Visiting the place, I had a different experience on the atmosphere. I am used to waking up to noises in the city with cars hooting, this was not the same in Lanai. In the Island, one wakes up to a silent and peaceful morning. The sight of the sun rising and the rays reflecting in the water is wat one can’t miss to see in the amazing island (https://www.gohawaii.com/islands/lanai). The night is what changes everything, one can hardly hear a pin drop, it is all quiet and peaceful. On can sit on the chairs for ours and watch the true nature without getting bored, since the place is so calm and one can assume that there are no thieves and gangsters who rob a night.

Since back in the city there is a lot of air pollution and industrial activities, in Lanai the experience is different. Breathing the air, one can feel that it is cleaner. Perhaps this can be attributed to the green plantations that are everywhere that aid in air circulation. The bamboo plantation in the area is also widespread and it makes the place look more attractive. The people of Hawaii have utilized this plantation and made seats out of it that one can relax on them while watching the environment.

It is hard to get a direct flight from the mainland, but once one gets to the place, there are a lot to enjoy. The surroundings which are tropical makes it ideal for various sporting activities such as scuba diving and snorkeling. One can also go for swimming in the Hoopoe Bay which is a marine preservation area. At the offshore and the land of the island there are other activities such as golfing, four wheeling, hiking, horseback riding and whale watching. One cannot miss to watch how the whales in the ocean move around. Also in Lanai one gets a chance to visit the garden of Gods where he or she get to explore the red spires (https://www.gohawaii.com/islands/lanai). Getting directions on where to get all these activities and places is not a problem since the locals in the area are friendly and welcoming thus will be kind enough to walk one around just like they did guide me on my visit to the place.

Besides the green nature that one will find at the resorts in Lanai, there also exist rocks which are as a result of volcanic eruption. Residing in the cool heights of Lanai, one is able to get a beautiful view of the rocks that are always termed as ‘red dirt field’ among the rocks we have the sweetheart rock visited by many.

Conclusively, Lanai is a beautiful place that I would advise anyone looking for next destination for vacation to visit Lanai. Adventure will make it up for all that one will miss in the clubs and night parties. The place is amazing and is associated with famous people like Bill Gates.

Work Cited

https://www.gohawaii.com/islands/lanaihttps://www.hawaii.com/lanai/info/about/

Trail of Tears

Name:

Professor:

Course:

Date

Trail of Tears

When European settlers came to America they found that the Native Americans who were Indians. The Europeans were looking for new lands to conquer and America had proved to a viable place where they could obtain raw materials for their industries due to the vast amount of lands that had not been exploited. A good example would be how most English settlers who were considered to be from the lower class were able to move and got land for themselves. Native Americans were very welcoming to the European settlers not knowing that they would be the cause of their problems that would last decade of years to come. European settlers would engage in frequent war with the Natives as they wanted to impose their rule on them. Although they were able to negotiate a few treaties and leaved in peace for a while, after the American Revolution thing took a turn as the white settlers were now completely in power.

The Trail of Tears is an historical term that is used to refer to the forceful relocation that were done on the Native American community who had settled in South Eastern region of the United States. The forceful eviction was a result of enactment of Indian Removal Act of the year 1830 that had been signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1930 (Thorton, pg. 289-300). The act gave powers to the president to give the unsettled lands that were located on west of Mississippi and in exchange of the Indian lands that were located on existing state borders. Some tribes were okay with this act and moved peaceful while others felt that the relocation was unfair and they wanted to resist. This paper looks at how some native tribes were forceful removed from their land and the effect that the Removal Act had in the long run.

Land policy had long been an issue between the Native Indians and the Cherokee nation. Wen settlers first arrived and started setting up settling point like Jamestown. At first, the Indians were friendly people who welcomed the settlers but soon they noticed the Europeans wanted control especially of the land which is one thing that the Indians valued. The Indians would not allow the Europeans to take possession of their land and that is where the disagreement between the two groups begun (Wood, pg. 1471). The settlers knew the land was useful resource because of its fertility, minerals found in certain location that Cherokee community claimed possession and owning large chunks of land would have also been a sign of wealth. The Indians however believed that the land was communal and everyone was entitled to the land. It is the privatization of land that would lead to disagreement between the Indians and Europeans even after America attained its independence becoming a sovereign nation.

Gold deposits had been discovered in the land that the tribal Indians occupied in the 18000s. Most of these land approximately seven million acres had already been acquired in eastern Tennessee, northwest Georgia and southwest North Carolina. In 1819, Georgia would appeal to the government to remove the Indians from the tribal lands and when these appeals failed they decided to purchase the land. Cherokee which was among the largest tribal native Indian group had established their own government system which was quite similar to the United States system (Ehle, pg. 126). It was made up of a principal chief who was elected, a senate, and they also had a house of representative. They were considered as a threat by the U.S government and were among the tribes that would be moved from their land. There were states that were coming up with laws in order to drive away the Native Americans for example Worcester v. Georgia of 1832. These laws were passed in order to limit the sovereign rights of the Indians. In 1832, a ruling was made by the supreme court ruling the legislation by Georgia was unconstitutional but the federal authorities under the orders of Jackson ignored the order.

The year 1838 during the fall and winter the forceful eviction of the Native Indians begun. The Cherokees were forced to surrender their land on east of Mississippi River to the government and had to move to the west which is the present day Oklahoma. The eviction was not really smooth as a lot of force was being applied that led to injuries as well as deaths of several people. It is approximated that 4000 Cherokees died and this came to be famously known as Trial of Tears. The journey to the new land was not an easy journey as the migrants underwent devastating challenges. Some of these challenges included diseases, hunger, extreme weather conditions and exhaustion as they were required to match for longer journeys. Trial of Tears has been classified as one of the most tragic eras in the united states history (Strickland, pg. 292-309). Native Indians who were the original occupants of United States before even the British, French and Spanish were feeling the effect of people they had welcomed into their land.

Trails of Tears and the forceful eviction marked the sorrows that would follow the Indians. It was seen as the beginning of extermination of the Native Indians by the U.S government. After the American revolution had taken place and the government had been created, Indians were not seen as part of the nation as they were regarded a separate nation within a sovereign country. The Indians were committed to living peaceful with the white settlers but once the settlers had their powers, they wanted to take control of everything as America had proved to be quite a rich and resourceful country. The U.S government in a bid to control these resources that the Indians too had access began a campaign that was characterized by false promises, a lot of treaties were signed that were not honored, racist attitudes as Indians were people of color, and threats by the military that they would remove them forcefully from their native territory. Indians felt unsafe and while some resisted the government intentions, most understood that the resistance would not bare any fruits and that is why some moved intentionally.

When the Indians moved to the West, it gave the settlers an opportunity to continue growing and prospering in the new country that they had created. The most prominent tribes that were affected by the forceful movement included Choctaw, Seminole, Creek, Cherokee and Chickasaw. These tribes had the majority of people driven out of their land which was approximately 60,000 Indians (Perdue, pg. 89). These groups were particularly targeted because they were the majority, were civilized and had good leadership organizational structure. Their way of life and functional system was well organized and defined as they had laws on ownership of property, government offices, had built their own schools which were quite similar to Europe. The white settlers saw them as a threat and if not squashed they would create a revolution that may have an effect on the American government. The leaders from these tribes were often open to negotiating peace talks but most time U.S government wanted everything done their way or would trick them into signing treaties which would not eventually be honored.

One of the effects that the forceful relocation had was broken trusts between the Indians and the white settlers. The Indians were now being treated with utmost disrespect to a land that they first were occupants, it damaged their spirit as a nation. The relocation resulted in immeasurable misery that led to despair. In order for the government to ensure that the Indians relocate swiftly, they were prearranged and wretched to various travelling caravans that would allow ease of management by the military. During the trail they experienced the worst of conditions. They did not have anywhere to sleep when it was dawn and had to sleep in the cold on mad or plain ground that had crawling insects. The caravan included children who also had to undergo such terrible conditions. They did not have enough food and some died due to starvation. There were sever disease outbreaks including pneumonia, dysentery, whooping cough, tuberculosis and pellagra. These diseases contributed to the high number of deaths that were experienced during the movement of the caravan.

The 1830 Removal Act although it gave President Jackson the power to relocate the Indians as they had given their consent, they had to be compensated. However, this proved to be an empty promise as the relocation was not implemented as per the policy. Choctaw Indians who were the first group to be migrated in 1831 had served as a reference to successful relocation. The group was followed by Seminole in 1832, Creek would later follow in 1834, Chickasaw 1837 and last was the largest group Cherokee 1837. By 1837, it is approximated 46000 Native Indians had been moved from the southern states forcefully. Their relocation opened up 25 million of acres of land that were given to white settlement. The settlers used this lands to grow cotton that was a high selling commodity during the 19th century especially as an export product. This was a clear indication that the government wanted to completely eliminate the Indians. How can a government in place trick people who had owned land legally for years to relocate through false promises of compensation and forcefully removing those who did not abide by the law, only to award the land to white Europeans for personal gain (Minges, pg. 453-479). If the promises in the treaty had been honored and the relocations conducted in a more humane manner, then it would have been a little bit better.

Aside from death and diseases, removal of the natives from their land broke families apart. While some Indians did not want to move to the west some escaped and began a life in North of Mississippi. A system that was already organized was also destroyed. The Indians had to restart their civilization again in a different location including having to build new schools, hospitals and social amenities. This took them back to a phase they had already crossed and evolved (Young, pg. 502-524). The Cherokee tribe which had very fertile land were forced to the dry plains which were not good agricultural land. A tribe that was once mighty to be reckoned with had been turned into nothing. There was a split in the group as some agreed others refused who were the majority and were being led by Chief John Ross who was negotiating so that they could not lose their land. Their culture was also lost as they started adopting European culture and over the years a tribe that was the majority is now among the most minority groups in America. The westward expansion by the European was a sign that they could do anything in order to stay in power.

More than a decade later issues of land and resources still persist between the U.S government and the Indians. In 2016, the U.S Government was required to pay $492 Million to 17 American Indian Tribes for the mismanagement of the resources. There have been more than 100 lawsuits that have been brought to court by American Indians as well as the tribal government against the federal government most citing the injustices they underwent including failed promises from the treaties. Tribal lawsuits have proved quite difficult to settle as most are often based on payments that should have been made by the government over the course of the decades (Berutti, pg. 291-308). Because of an error that was made by the Jacksonian administration, Trail of Tears may continue to haunt the United States for a very long time.

In conclusion, Trail of Tears perfectly illustrates the inhumanity that Native Indians had to undergo in a country they were the first inhabitants. The white settlers who moved to America were hell bet on creating a perfect life and freedom for themselves and were greedy that they wanted to possess everything including the rich land. Trail of Tears had quite a devastating effect to the Indians as they suffered from diseases, lacked food and shelter, suffered harsh climatic conditions which resulted in death of thousands of people including the children. Trials of Tears shows the white supremacy that existed among the European nations who believed they were better than all the other races and thus they had to exert their rule upon them.

Works Cited

Berutti, Ronald A. “The Cherokee Cases: The Fight to Save the Supreme Court and the Cherokee Indians.” American Indian Law Review 17.1 (2016): 291-308.

Ehle, John. Trail of tears: The rise and fall of the Cherokee Nation. Anchor, 2011.

Minges, Patrick. “Beneath the underdog: Race, religion, and the trail of tears.” The American Indian Quarterly 25.3 (2001): 453-479.

Perdue, Theda, and Michael D. Green. “The Cherokee Removal.” A Brief History with Documents. New York-Bedford (1995).

Strickland, William M. “The rhetoric of removal and the trail of tears: Cherokee speaking against Jackson’s Indian removal policy, 1828–1832.” Southern Journal of Communication 47.3 (1982): 292-309.

Thornton, Russell. “Cherokee population losses during the Trail of Tears: A new perspective and a new estimate.” Ethnohistory (1984): 289-300.

Wood, Mary Christina. “Indian land and the promise of native sovereignty: The trust doctrine revisited.” Utah L. Rev. (1994): 1471.

Young, Mary. “The Cherokee Nation: Mirror of the Republic.” American Quarterly 33.5 (1981): 502-524.