Recent orders
The world hears America as a land of immigrants because thousands of people flock into the country every year
Immigration History
Name:
Course:
Date:
The world hears America as a land of immigrants because thousands of people flock into the country every year. Immigration is dated way back during the triangular trade. Europeans and Africans migrated to the us to facilitate the trade. Currently immigrants come into America in different ways, some legally, as tourists, refugees, students and others illegally sneak into the country. Immigrants are guided by law and they have been evolving since foreigners entered America. U.S.A has the highest number of immigrants in the world.
Currently, immigrants in the United States are allowed to apply for citizenship after a period of living in the United Stated. Citizenship for immigrants is traced with the introduction of the Naturalization Act of 1790 allowed for any white person who has been living in America for two years or more to apply for citizenship. The first wave of immigrants were the Irish people which resulted to massive immigration with more than 1.3 million people migrating through the island. One of the major acts of immigration is the immigration act of 1986 was signed on November 6th 1986. It is also known as the Simpson Mazzoli act of immigration. The IRCAs provisions were, to help immigrants who had stayed in the U.S for more than five years gain legal status, to have a tough enforcement at the border and impose fines and penalties to employers who employed illegal immigrants.
Immigration is a process that will never stop thus laws will be amended from time to time. Currently illegal immigration is against the law but has positive effects on the us economy. Through the immigrants the welfare of the natives is enhanced, illegal immigrants contribute a lot to the tax revenue and they offer cheap labor unlike the U.S citizens who always charge expensive. Many immigrants gain citizenship every year. After staying in the country for five years one can apply for citizenship.
References
Ewing, W. A. (2012). Opportunity and exclusion: A brief history of US immigration policy. Immigration Policy Center, 1-7.
Hayes, Patrick J. 2012. The making of modern immigration: an encyclopedia of people and ideas. Santa Barbara, Calif: ABC-CLIO.
https://www.history.com/topics/immigration/immigration-united-states-timelineRubin, R. L., & Melnick, J. (2007). Immigration and American popular culture: An introduction. NYU Press.Vernez, Georges. 1994. The United States Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986: implementation and effects. Santa Monica, Calif: RAND.
Paper-A-Application-of-Decision-Making-Framework
IFSM 304 Paper A – Application of Decision Making Framework
Problem Statement:
Privacy in the Workplace: Monitoring Employee Web, E-Mail and phone Use. What is the best way that companies should deal with employee using company computer and phone equipment for personal uses during the workday?
Identify alternatives:
Create a zero tolerance policy.
Create an acceptable use policy.
Choose alternative
Create an acceptable use policy that all employees of the company most follow.
Implement the decision
Create the policy and create training for the new policy.
Evaluate results
Run test to see if employees are abusing the policy
As the culture and technology changes in the workplace different problems seem to arise. One of the most thought about problems is “Privacy in the work place.” Privacy in the work place includes but is not limited to monitoring employee web, Email and phone use at the workplace or on company equipment. This could be a huge problem for the company and a hindrance for the employees. The company is trying to get the most work out of each employee so spending time on the phone or surfing the Internet could seem non productive to the company. The employee might need to handle some quick personal business and not want to take off a full hour of PTO to go back home to send out an e mail to there family that only takes 5 minutes to write. During this paper I am going to use the common good approach when it comes to the decision to figure out a way to help both the company and employees come up with a way that privacy in the work place can work for both parties.
The next step in the decision making process is identifying alternatives to handling the privacy at the work place problem. One suggestion was to come up with a zero tolerance policy. This policy would state that under no circumstances could an employee use work time or work equipment to do any personal business. But this policy might offend good workers. “If fewer than 1% of employees, according to some reports, abuse their work day and employee trust, online, why make 100% of employees feel uncomfortable and distrusted? CITATION Hea l 1033 (Heathfield)” Another suggesting that was given was to develop a detailed acceptable use policy. This policy would clearly detail what is appropriate to do on work time and using work computers and phone equipment.
The next step in the decision making process is to evaluate and choose an alterative that works best. After looking into both suggestions and staying with the companies choice of the common good approach when it comes to decision making, research shows that creating a company wide acceptable uses policy would better benefit the company and it’s employees. This policy would allow users to handle some personal business on company time or on company equipment. But it will allow the company to monitor the activities that the employee is doing on there equipment. This policy should also detail what happens if the policy is abused. This statement should come up every time an employee logs onto a work computer.
The next step in the decision-making process is implementing the new acceptable uses policy. First the policy needs to get the approval of upper management. Then a team of employees should come up with training for all the other employees. Than all the other employees should have to do training on the new policy. “Create a plan for announcing your Internet usage policy throughout the organization to ensure that employee communication is well managed, the policy is understood and the restrictions imposed are fully justified. This could include denying access to Internet resources until users agree to accept the new policy.CITATION Hug l 1033 (Hughes)” Also this new policy should be advertised to the employees via e-mails and conference calls with the employee. There should be mandatory yearly training on the new policy.
The last step in the decision making progress is to evaluate the results of the acceptable use policy. This can be done with random check to see how long employees are on website that don’t have anything to do with company work. Also you can intercept a few emails and read them and make sure that the majority of the emails are work related. You can also randomly pick up the phone and make sure employees are talking about company business. After random check are done then the company should document what they have discovered and warn employees that they are watching and maybe do a briefing to all the employees about what they discovered.
Bibliography
BIBLIOGRAPHY Heathfield, S. (n.d.). Alternatives to Employee internet monitoring. Retrieved from Human Resources : www.humanresources.about.com
Hughes, J. (n.d.). Ten tips for implementing an acceptable internet use policy. Retrieved from Computerworld: http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/94231/ten_tips_for_implementing_an_acceptable_internet_use_policy
Paper-B1-Matrix-for-IT-Related-Ethical-Issue
IFSM 304
Ethical dilemma: Installing adobe pro on users PC’s knowing that the company is out of licenses for the software.
Stakeholders Publicity Respect for persons Veracity
The tech The tech has the duty to take actions based on ethical standards that must be known and recognized by all who are involved. The Tech has the duty to honor others, their rights, and their responsibilities. Showing respect others implies that we do not treat them as a mere means to our end. The tech has the duty to tell the truth
The org. that is purchasing the software. The org. that is purchasing the software has the duty to take actions based on ethical standards that must be known and recognized by all who are involved. The org. that is purchasing the software has the duty to honor others, their rights, and their responsibilities. Showing respect others implies that we do not treat them as a mere means to our end. They assume the tech that they hire is going to tell the truth.
The company that made the software. The company that made the software should be notified and confiscated for the illegal uses of their software. The company that made the software should be honored by others, their rights, and their responsibilities. Showing respect others implies that we do not treat them as a mere means to our end. They assume the company will tell the truth and not break their licenses agreement
4
I chose to write about this dilemma because I worked at a helpdesk where techs where told to install software on computers but they didn’t have any more available licenses for the software. When the configuration management group found out about this they made the techs uninstall the programs and put the users on a list to get licenses for the software. I was told that” Many employees don’t realize that corporations are bound by the copyright laws, just like everyone else. Such conduct exposes the company (and possibly the persons involved) to liability for copyright infringement. CITATION Ant14 l 1033 (Anti-Piracy, 2014)”
I chose the three principles that I used because I thought that each principle had a connection to the dilemma at hand. I chose Publicity because I felt that all parties involved should know about what was going on. I chose respect for persons because this was incident and it could be fixed as long as each party had respect for each other. I also chose veracity because telling the truth is always the best choice made. “The philosopher Immanuel Kant said that lying was always morally wrong. CITATION Maz l 1033 (Mazur, n.d.)”
While researching this ethical dilemma, I have come to find that Software piracy is a major problem and could come with major penalties. The penalties for a company having more software programs loaded onto a company’s computer than the company has licenses to use. “Although software usage is governed by a contractual license, the software industry generally relies on the stronger protections afforded by the federal Copyright Act of 1976. The act provides stiff penalties for copyright infringement—up to $150,000 per violation if the infringement is willful CITATION Sco14 l 1033 (Scott, 2014)” To prevent this from happening companies need to keep track of all the licenses and prepare work and routinely have audits and paper work for all the software.
Works Cited
BIBLIOGRAPHY Anti-Piracy. (2014). Retrieved from SIIA SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION: https://www.siia.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=171:faq&catid=162:anti-piracy-articles&Itemid=129
Mazur, T. (n.d.). Lying . Retrieved from Santa Clara University: http://www.scu.edu/ethics/publications/iie/v6n1/lying.html
Scott, R. (2014). Surviving Software Audits. Retrieved from law firms.
