Recent orders
living with children
Living with children
Name
Institution
One of the few situations whereby virtue is rewarded is living with children. However, much it may sound weird, all parents who, usually, thinks the best for their children before anything else have an easy life compared to others. Many researchers agree that consistent, loving care, as well as a high level of stimulation, is essential ingredients that are required in optimal child development.
There are parents, especially mothers who are oppressed by the repetitive task of taking care of their young ones, and the constant chat of toddlers. This way, they get less pleasure in the present moment though it will be compensated in the future when the child grows. Anyone with a young child is aware of the fact that it is not a displeasure bringing the child up as after a while the child will be a grown up.
Self-Introduction Based on a Personal Object
ASSIGNMENT INFORMATION
Due Date
Sunday, September 6, 202011:59 PM
Points Possible
75
Self-Introduction Based on a Personal Object: In the academic environment, you are often required to introduce yourself to a body of people. The purpose for an introduction may vary; you might be required to introduce yourself to network with other students, or share your experience about a particular subject/topic. Introduction speeches can be formal or informal.Your self-introduction speech should include:
An effective, overarching theme with logical main points (which includes a personal object as a visual aid)
An interesting “hook” that provides a preview of specific main points
Smooth transitions between sections of your speech (“First,” “Second,” “In conclusion,” etc.)
A summary of your key points at the end
What should you talk about?
Talk about a particular aspect of your life or personality that describes something about who you are. Examples include a hobby, the ways you like to spend your free time, your career goals, your favorite subject, or your family.
Choose only one topic to discuss. For instance, your speech could be about your hobby as a marathon runner.
Stick to your chosen topic and do not introduce additional topics into your speech. Then choose two or three supporting points and a personal object as a visual aid that allow you to go into more detail about that aspect of who you are.
Remember this rule of public speaking. Every speech, including this one, should have:
An introduction: “Hi my name is ______. Marathon running is a lot like being in school. It’s an endurance race.”
A body (with two or three main points): training for marathons (what it entails, how far do you run, how often), marathons you have run (locations, your time)
A conclusion: “Think of school as a marathon sport and keep up the pace. And if you ever want to go for a run, let me know!”
Delivery: You may extemporaneously glance at your notes or speaking outline, but do not read.
Time: 3 to 5 minutes
Your speech should be between 3 and 5 minutes long.
Practice your speech to ensure it meets the time guidelines.
Due: Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)Points Possible: 75
Negotiable instrument
Negotiable instrument
Student’s name
Affiliations
Course
Date
A negotiable instrument is a financial document that guarantees direct payment of a detailed amount of money, either on demand with the payers name on it. It is a document that consists of contract promising money payment without any condition that may be paid on a certain date or anytime. This document could be meaning differently depending on which ever law it is being applied for instance bills of exchange, promissory notes, bank checks/notes, certificate of deposits and cheques (Cocker, 2001).
In this article a single party promises the other to give money or goods to another party who is named as the bearer. For instance a check that has been written under a person’s bank account is a negotiable instrument. They are used by business and are therefore known as commercial papers. When an instrument is being negotiated it means the possession can be transferred either voluntarily or involuntarily by the issuer to another person who will then become the holder. When the instrument is to be paid to the identified person, then the negotiation will require a transfer of possession as well as its endorsement by that current holder. On the other hand, when it is payable to the bearer, it can only be negotiated through the transfer of possession.
This paper studies a journal article case of a negotiable instrument being transferred to a third party. The case involves (Swift v. Tyson) where Swift has a legal dispute of negotiable instruments over the law. The issue was whether the bearer could have assigned the bill of exchange to a third party who would have later collected on the obligation. This bill of exchange was drawn in New York and a third party thus the assignee presented it for payment and it was denied. The third party was not a New York resident but he sued in New York for payment. The law held that the bill of exchange was not to be assigned and the judge ruled consequently. The rulings caused implications to the national economy. When on appeal the Supreme Court over tuned the ruling through interpretation of the federal rules decision act section 34 of the judiciary act of 1789 (1 Stat. 73). Initially the law provided that laws from several states could be regarded as rules of decision in trials at common law in United States courts where they applied.
The doctrine of Swift v. Tyson contributes to the development of national economy and encouraged multistate transactions. Businesses were now able to assign commercial papers without fear that a state would nullify their assignment. Most got furious about the overturning of the ruling by the federal common law. The doctrine of Swift led to situations which the substantive laws were useful to litigants and was determined by the fortuity of their residence. The two cases had differed in legal rights since the plaintiff and the defendant were not from the same states. During a drastic shift from Swift, the federal district courts occasionally pass on questions to state supreme courts, to ask for a ruling on what the state law is on a particular subject (Swift v. Tyson).
.
References
Coker, C. (2001). Steamfitters Local Union No. 420 Welfare Fund v. Philip Morris: Is Swift v.
Tyson Dead?” American Journal of Trial Advocacy, 420 (25).
“Swift v. Tyson.” West’s Encyclopedia of American Law. 2005. Encyclopedia.com. 3 Dec. 2014 <http://www.encyclopedia.com>.