Recent orders
Beowulf Upon reading the heroic epic poem,
Student’s Name
Instructor’s Name
Course Tittle
Date
Beowulf
Upon reading the heroic epic poem, Beowulf which is well thought out to be one of the most important masterworks of Anglo-Saxon writings, and watching the animated version of it, I have recognized some differences and similarities of interpretation. The Film Beowulf, directed by Robert Zemeckis, is an animated movie with the Anglo-Saxon poem version. The film director chose this kind of literary work as it has a piece of very significant information on the subject of controversies and relationships of the society and kingship in Old England. Additionally, the poem is tremendously thrilling and encompasses many amazing, brilliant characters and descriptions. There are a number of differences and similarities between the sections of Beowulf discussed in class, and the analog animated film screened during the three Beowulf lectures available on Canvas in terms of Grendel’s combat with Beowulf and how Grendel passes away, Beowulf’s characteristics, Hrothgar and his actions, Grendel’s mother and her fight with Beowulf, Beowulf’s realm and the combat with the dragon. The dissimilarities between Beowulf the movie and Beowulf the poem are very large. The characteristics of Beowulf seen on the screen are somehow dissimilar from the characteristics in the Anglo-Saxon poem.
Beowulf is roughly categorized into three parts, all of which focuses on Beowulf’s combat with a specific monster: first Grendel, then Grendel’s mother, lastly, the dragon. In both the film and the poem, the main themes mirror the motivations and the values of the personalities. One of the leading themes of Beowulf, personified by its designation character, is loyalty. To begin with, the animated film portrays Beowulf as a man of imperfection and flaws. Another thing is that the depiction of Unferth and Hrothdar is not similar to the representation in the poem. In the film, Hrothgar is portrayed as a degraded alcohol addict, while Unferth carries characteristics of a pietistic Christian. In the animated film, Grendel’s mother’s representation is slightly not accurate as she is demonstrated as an attractive, seductive woman, the dragon (Beowulf’s child), and mother of Grendel’s (Hrothgar’s offspring). Another thing is that Beowulf turns out to be the ruler of the land of the Danes rather than becoming the king of his native Geatland.
Grendel’s mother is regarded as a huge swamp-like monster who could not be pierced by a mere sword in the poem. According to Beowulf the poem, “it was then he saw the size of this water-hag, damned thing of the deep…He dashed out his weapon, not stinting the stroke, and with such strength and violence that the circled sword screamed on her head a strident battle-song. But the stranger saw his battle-flame refuse to bite or hurt her at all; the edge failed his lord in his need” (Ln.1517). On the other side, Grendel’s mother is seen in the film as a very seductive monster that seems to be very lovely and attractive; Beowulf’s sword pierces precisely through her body. They then involve themselves in sexual intercourse. In the animated film, Grendel’s mom murders Beowulf’s men before he contests the dragon. On the other hand, it never occurred because she had passed on.
One thing is that apart from being an animated adaptation of the Old English poem, Beowulf’s film does not disappoint in any way. The construction of the elementary plot and the animated film’s storyline follows that of the imaginative literary source. As seen in the poem, Hrothgar, the ruler of Denmark, is troubled by a ferocious monster known as Grendel. It was after Beowulf comes to Denmark to kill it. Following the poem, Beowulf cuts off the giant’s arm, which on the other hand, succeeds in running away but dies from the injuries. Not so long, Grendel’s mother alternatively revenges her killed son by murdering a lot of men, which results in Beowulf pursuing after Grendel’s mom and kill her too. He gets back with Grendel’s head and is abundantly remunerated by the Danes. One common thing is that in the poem, Beowulf does not have any familial relations with Grendel’s mother or the dragon, and Hrothgar, Grendel, and Grendel’s mom are not connected to one another as in the film.
To conclude, the film preciously bears a resemblance to the heroic poem in a way that there are some differences that the motion picture director did not take into consideration. The poem depicts Beowulf as the main hero who returns to Geatland to become the ruler of his uncle’s monarchy. On the other hand, in the film, Beowulf remains in the realm of the Danes and becomes the ruler of the Hrothgar’s kingdom. Additionally, in the poem, he murders Grendel’s mother, whereas, in the animated film, they engage in sexual intercourse, and after that, Grendel’s mother gives birth to a dragon-like child. In the poem, Beowulf has never involved in any sexual contact with Grendel’s mother. At the end of the film, the dragon which Beowulf endures is not his child. It is an unsystematic hovering monster that he combats when getting back home to Geatland to be present at the coronation and turn out to be a fair-minded king.
A personal Response Essay, Advice to my son, Peter Minekie
AuthorDateSubjectInstructor
A personal Response Essay, Advice to my son, Peter Minekie The poem” advice to my son” is one of the best examples of father’s advice to his son. Every father gives some advices to his young one, when he enters in his practical life. Every one seeks advice from his elders throughout his life especially in unique moments of life CITATION Pet08 l 1033 (Mienke).
“Advice to my son” is the perfect example that not always old sayings are correct and impact positively in today’s life. Every period has its own requirements, own demands, and not always old saying are correct such as when the author advises his son to choose a wife after he meets the wife’s mother CITATION Pet08 l 1033 (Mienke).
In line 17, he says” Marry a girl after seeing her mother”. There are a number of assumptions made by the author while advising to his son. After evaluating all of his assumptions, I realized none of them to be valid. I observe all these statements are general assumptions passing generation by generation. The author says if you want to know about a girl meet the mother first she will explain how the girl will be at her age since she gave birth to the girl CITATION Pet08 l 1033 (Mienke).
In line 11-18, the author advises his son to keep the beautiful things good food, wife, and job in his life and to sustain those more than his life, as, a balanced life will keep him happy and alive. The author has given excellent advice to her son, by keeping beautiful and good things in his life and to take care of them wisely, however, the assumption he has made for marrying a girl that meet her mother before getting married is totally wrong as he says if the mother is beautiful in that age, the girl will be the same as her.
I disagree with the assumption as every human being has its own physical and internal strength. There is no guarantee that if the father has lived till age 90 yet firm, the son will also get the same age. The same formula applies to the girl that it is not necessary that if the mother still looks lively and beautiful at the age of 60, the girl will also get the same.
The author uses lots of practical and imaginary assumption while making the advice to his son for the better life. There is a very small distinction between spending lives to its maximum potential, yet crapulent CITATION Pet08 l 1033 (Mienke).
At the same time, one must keep a good balance between spending a good life, and executing long range.
The author advised the son to “show your soul to one man.” The father tries to convince his son to ‘open up’ to someone. The author referred a best-friend. The author is stressing the significance of a good and healthy relationship with your Creator, i.e. God. The author best advice has been saved for the later stages. The author says, to “always serve bread with your wine” and to “always serve wine.
Peter Meinke’s poem has chosen a very clear way of comprising advice to his son, in a very professional and beautiful, well-written poem, lined collectively imagery to modify the poem and entertain the reader. Meinke declares “beauty is nectar // and nectar, in a desert, saves” CITATION Pet08 l 1033 (Mienke). As per him, beauty holds lots of strength in it and can do many things in just few seconds. He has made a very good advice to his son with relation to God, relation to his best friends, his beloved wife and to spend a healthy and balanced life.
Conclusion
The author has used beautiful ways to advice his son about spending his life in a better way. He has used examples of various things to explain his point. He has explained the importance of good and healthy relationship in life, that how one person can spend healthy balanced life by keeping all necessary things in a line. The author also focuses on the relationship with God; he made wonderful advice to his son for keeping the best relationship with his creator.
I agree and appreciate his saying and advices except only one “marrying a girl after meeting her mother” CITATION Pet08 l 1033 (Mienke).The basis of this statement is on several assumptions of the old generation and been passed generation to generation however, I do not agree with the author, as I believe a man/woman has his own nature, physical and mental strength, no one can guarantee the future of his own. If the mother is beautiful we cannot guarantee the daughter will be beautiful also, if the father is sound, no one can guarantee the strength of son.
Overall, the piece of advice is good and guides toward the best part of life. The author has professionally and beautifully aligned the poem. This piece is one of the best writings of the author. The poem has inspires a number of people and also adds a good and healthy contribution in literature.Work cited
BIBLIOGRAPHY l 1033 Mienke, Peter. http://percececil.wordpress.com/advice-to-my-son-by-j-peter-meinke/>. 19 09 2008. 16 10 2013.
Benjamin Franklin on George Whitefield 1777
Student’s Name
Supervisor’s Name
Course Name
Due date
Benjamin Franklin on George Whitefield 1777
Arnold A. Dallimore spent three decades trying to right the wrongs that had been done to Whitefield. He published the first book of George Whitefield: The Life and Times of the Great Eighteenth-Century Evangelist in 1970. Arnold A. Dallimore was born in Canada to British parents in 1911 and died in 1998. For nearly twenty-four years, he served as pastor of the Baptist Church in Cottam, Ontario. He developed a life-long interest in the great evangelist George Whitefield, whose biography he was to write while studying at Central Baptist Seminary in Toronto (2 volumes, published by the Trust). He also authored biographies of Edward Irving, the charismatic movement’s precursor, Susannah Wesley, and C. H. Spurgeon, whose preaching at the Metropolitan Tabernacle was frequently attended by his maternal grandfather and mother (as a small child).
The book was published on October 1, 1970. The date that material was published or produced indicates how current it is about the topic you’re studying. The date that material was published or produced indicates how current it is about the topic you’re studying. Use sources that have been published within the last five years as a general rule. When evaluating your sources, the date of publication is a vital factor to consider. The information in the article may be outdated and inaccurate. In the source, there is a symbol of transformation that is represented by how the Americans were motivated by the changes that they perceived that religion could bring to them. This document can be used to trace the views of Americans on religion. It is clear that during the colonial period, scientists such as Benjamin Franklin did not approve of religion. The majority of them were influenced by the realization that religion has the power to transform people’s lives. For example, despite being a scientist, Benjamin Franklin was touched by a preacher who collected cash for a worthy cause, according to the paper. Furthermore, the record can be utilized to examine how religion influenced Native Americans during the colonial period.
The article was written for believers; Christians are the majority of those who read it, and the piece may persuade them to follow the character’s footsteps. The source is primarily attempting to provide information regarding Benjamin Franklin and George Whitefield’s friendship. They were close, even personal friends, but they were two quite different people. The article contains an excerpt from his autobiography that discusses George Whitefield, a revivalist preacher who raised finances to create an orphanage in Georgia’s colony. According to the excerpt, Mr. Whitefield proposed to George the notion of establishing an orphan community in the new colony. Mr. Whitefield lectured to the people about compassion and collected significant sums of money to help the poor. As a result, the paper includes an autobiography of George Whitefield, as well as his ability to demonstrate how religion may aid in the transformation of the people he led.
References
A. Dallimore, (1970). Benjamin Franklin on George Whitefield 1777.
