Recent orders

Technology Integration in Early Childhood Education – Hong Kong teachers’ Perspectives

Technology Integration in Early Childhood Education – Hong Kong teachers’ Perspectives

Argumentative Essay divided into 4 main headings/ parts.
1. Introduction: Introduction of topic and presentation of the argument.
2. Literature Review: Support for and counter arguments against technology integration in ECE – literature review with global teachers’ perspectives, Hong Kong teachers’ perspectives, and cross-cultural perspectives.
3. International Key themes and Practical implications emerging from Literature review such as – trends, hot topics popular now, new developments in the field, online learning, hybrid learning, covid 19 pandemic impact on ECE.
4. Conclusion: Tentative ending with global views and then narrowing down the focus to Hong Kong teachers’ perspectives (not for or against technology integration in ECE, but somewhere in between)

Home

Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan

Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan

Home

Assessment 3 Instructions: Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan
PRINT
Write a 4-5 page population health improvement plan, based on your evaluation of the best available evidence from a minimum of 3-5 current scholarly or professional sources of demographic, environmental, and epidemiological data that focuses on your diagnosis of a widespread population health issue.
Part of effectively engaging in evidence-based practice is the ability to synthesize raw health data with research studies and other relevant information in the literature. This will enable you to develop sound interventions, initiatives, and outcomes to address health concerns that you find in data during the course of your practice.
In this assessment, you have an opportunity to evaluate community demographic, environmental, and epidemiological data to diagnose a widespread population health issue, which will be the focus of a health improvement plan that you develop.
Scenario
Your organization is undertaking a population health improvement initiative focused on one of the pervasive and chronic health concerns in the local community. Examples of health improvement initiatives include nationwide concerns, such as type 2 diabetes, HIV, obesity, insect bites, and Zika. However, your organization has asked you to determine which widespread health concern should be addressed in a population health improvement plan for your community and has entrusted you with gathering and evaluating the relevant data.
Your Role
You are a nurse in a community clinic or hospital and you have a good idea about the most common chronic health issues among its patients. You have been asked to prepare a presentation for the next staff meeting about the issue and the plan that you are proposing to help improve the community’s health.
Instructions
The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. In addition, you may want to review the performance-level descriiptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
Part 1: Data Evaluation
Evaluate the outcomes of a population health improvement initiative from community demographic, epidemiological, and environmental data.
Identify the relevant data or statistics. You may find government or professional websites to be helpful for this type of information. The MSN Program Library
Guide includes a page about Data, Reports, and Statistics that you may refer to for lists of resources.
Identify the level of evidence, validity, and reliability for each source.
Describe the major community health concerns suggested by the data.
Explain how environmental factors affect the health of community residents.
Part 2: Health Improvement Plan
Develop a health improvement plan that ethically and effectively addresses the population health concern that you identified in your evaluation of the relevant data.
Base your plan on the best available evidence from a minimum of 3-5 current scholarly or professional sources.
Apply correct APA formatting to all in-text citations and references.
Attach a reference list to your plan.
Ensure that your plan meets the cultural and environmental needs of your community and will likely lead to some improvement in the community’s health related to this concern.
Consider the environmental realities and challenges existing in the community.
Address potential barriers or misunderstandings related to the various cultures prevalent in the community.
Justify the value and relevance of the evidence you used as the basis of your plan.
Explain why the evidence is valuable and relevant to the community health concern you are addressing.
Explain why each piece of evidence is appropriate and informs the goal of improving the health of the community.
Propose relevant and measurable criteria for evaluating the outcomes of your plan.
Explain why your proposed criteria are appropriate and useful measures of success.
Explain how you will communicate with colleagues and members of the community, in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way, with regard to the development and implementation of your plan.
Develop a clear communications strategy mindful of the cultural and ethical expectations of colleagues and community members regarding data privacy.
Ensure that your strategy enables you to make complex medical terms and concepts understandable to members of the community, regardless of language, disabilities, or level of education.
The headings for your Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan should be the following:
Data Evaluation.
Meeting Community Needs.
Evidence.
Measuring Outcomes.
Communication Plan

Home

Mental Health Policy

Mental Health Policy

Home

  • Traditional research paper
    1. Pick a policy topic, review the literature and write a paper (approximately 14-20 pages double-spaced) that includes the following:
      1. Origins of the policy issue (ie historical problems and factors contributing to it; history of policy making about it)
      2. Current state of the policy issue in question, including
        1. Problems
        2. Benefits
        3. And differential impacts on minoritized subgroups (LGBTQ, racial/ethnic, refugees and immigrants, etc.)
  • Relationship between the policy issue and social work/social workers
    1. Any relevant NASW policy statements
    2. Ways in which social work/social workers are involved
  1. Broader impacts of the policy (as applicable)
    1. For example, 1996 welfare reforms were meant to limit access to benefits among working age adults otherwise able to work but ultimately led to a substantial increase in working age adults instead seeking benefits on the basis of disability
  2. Where you fall/your reflections and perspective
  3. Conclusion
  • Policy Paper Option: Advocacy Campaign and Toolbox (approximately 12-18 pages total, double-spaced) The goals of the toolbox are to introduce your policy and explain its significance, to articulate an advocacy goal relevant to the policy and strategy for achieving that goal (i.e., advocacy plan), and to provide materials that can be used to enact your strategy (i.e., tools). Each toolbox must contain the following:
    1. An introduction and background section that addresses the following questions (4-6 pages):
      1. What is the problem the policy seeks to address?
      2. What is the policy? What are its aims? How does it achieve those aims (i.e., what does it do?)?
  • What existing policy does the policy build on? What is the policy’s history and where does it currently stand?
  1. Who are the policy’s stakeholders? What are their interests? Who supports the policy and why do they support it? Who is against the policy and why are they against it?
  2. Is the policy likely to enhance mental health and wellbeing? Why or why not (describe the research bases)? Does it align with social work values and ethics (speak specifically to the Code of Ethics)? Why or why not?
  3. What legislative decision(s) should be made about this policy in order to enhance mental health and wellbeing, and align with social work values and ethics?
  1. An advocacy plan that includes the following (1-3 pages):
    1. A statement of the policy advocacy goal (outcome) and objectives (process) the campaign will meet to achieve that goal
    2. A step-by-step plan for meeting objectives and achieving the goal (i.e., your strategy), including an overview of the tools that your campaign uses to achieve this aim
  • A description of how you will assess the effectiveness of your campaign, measuring both objectives and goal achievement
  1. Tools (pick at least two of the following):
    1. A fact sheet about the policy and the problem it addresses
    2. A power map
  • A template letter to legislators
  1. A sample script/dialogue for discussing the policy with constituents
  2. Any other policy advocacy tools that you think would advance your campaign

Activist Project Option

    1. Pick a policy topic for which it would be possible for you to undertake a small-scale policy-change project. This could be within the School of Social Work, at Pitt, or in your field placement, workplace, a volunteer site or the Pittsburgh community.
    2. Execute the project. Some examples include the following:
      1. Survey or interview Pitt students about their perspectives on disability accommodations [or another mental health related issue] and then synthesize or analyze this data to present to administrative leadership. (Document their response.)
      2. Organize a lecture or event to raise awareness of or challenge status quo thinking relevant to a particular issue. (And survey those who attend to gain some insight into its impact.)
  • Develop a presentation on a particular area for your employer—eg changing policy related to police involvement in crisis response or transport. Present to agency leadership or supervisor(s).  Document their response.
  1. Write a well-developed open letter (to Pitt, to an employer, etc.) that expresses concerns about a particular issue, gather signatures, and present to the target decision maker(s). Document any response.
  2. Be creative! This is not an exhaustive list, just some possibilities.
  1. Write up the project, including the following (approximately 8-14 pages double-spaced)
    1. Motivation and rationale (drawing on personal experiences, peer experiences, observation and/or academic or published sources): why did you pick the issue you chose, what are the current problems, why do things need to change
    2. Describe what you did and why (the approach—specific activity—you undertook and why that made the most sense)
  • Describe the response (this could include administrators not responding, or not responding in a meaningful way)
  1. Describe any possible next steps
  2. Describe what you learned by doing the project

Home