Recent orders

Clinical Decision Support Systems

Clinical Decision Support Systems

Purpose
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the discussions guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The ebb and flow of a discussion is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
Contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a discussion environment that models professional and social interaction
(CO4)
Actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty (CO5)
Due Date:
Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded discussion. The two posts in each individual discussion must be on separate days.
Posting twice on two different days meets the minimum requirement however for full credit, the student must post at least three substantive posts on three different days. The student must provide an initial post to each graded discussion topic posted by the course instructor, by
Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 5. Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur no later than the Sunday, 11:59
p.m. MT at the end of Week 5. Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Threaded discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.
A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0).
Total Points Possible: 150 Points

Requirements:
Post a written response in the discussion forum to EACH threaded discussion topic:
This week we learned about the potential benefits and drawbacks to clinical decision support systems (CDSSs). Create a “Pros” versus “Cons” table with a column for “Pro” and a separate column for “Con”. Include at least 3 items for each column. Next to each item, provide a brief rationale as to why you included it on the respective list.
The primary goal of a CDSS is to leverage data and the scientific evidence to help guide appropriate decision making. CDSSs directly assist the clinician in making decisions about specific patients. For this discussion thread post, you are to assume your future role as an APN and create a clinical patient and scenario to illustrate an exemplary depiction of how a CDSS might influence your decision. This post is an opportunity for
you to be innovative, so have fun!
Adhere to the following guidelines regarding quality for the threaded discussions in Canvas:
Application of Course Knowledge: Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings.
Scholarliness and Scholarly Sources: Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions using valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly source to contribute to the discussion thread.
Writing Mechanics: Grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation are accurate. In-text and reference citations should be formatted using correct
APA guidelines.
Direct Quotes: Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the grammar, syntax, APA category.
For each threaded discussion per week, the student will select no less than TWO scholarly sources to support the initial discussion post.
Scholarly Sources: Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside
scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to
use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These websites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example, the American
Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any
.com site.

Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published with the last 5 years. Instructor permission must be obtained
BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years

Nursing Theory for NP Family Nurse Practitioner FNP

Nursing Theory for NP Family Nurse Practitioner FNP

Purpose
The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in organizing, integrating, applying, and critically appraising knowledge regarding advanced nursing practice. Scholarly information obtained from credible sources as well as professional communication are required. Application of information to professional experiences promotes the analysis and use of principles, knowledge, and information learned and related to real-life professional situations. Meaningful dialogue among
faculty and students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO 2 and 5) Weeks 2, 6
Examine broad theoretical concepts as foundational to advanced nursing practice roles. (PO 1 and 2) Weeks 1, 2, 4
Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to the components, relationship among the components, and application to
advanced nursing practice. (PO 1) Weeks 4, 6
Due Date: Sunday, 11:59pm MT
A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0). Week 8 discussion closes on Saturday at 11:59pm MT.
Total Points Possible: 75
Requirements:
Discussion Criteria
Application of Course Knowledge: The student post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from the healthcare field. The student must accurately and fully  discuss the topic for the week in addition to providing personal or professional

Reflective essay social impact and personal expreince Reflection on thesis

Reflective essay social impact and personal expreince Reflection on thesis

The final essay is an opportunity to reflect upon your experience of working in a team to develop an
entrepreneurial business proposal for social impact.
• This assessment carries 50% of the assessment weight on this course.
• Length: no more than 5000 words (including appendix; excluding reference list/bibliography).
Overview
This assignment is distinct from the academic essays that you have written so far during the programme. It
challenges you to provide analytic reflections, including self-reflection, on the process and experience of
the Altruistic Entrepreneur Project. There is therefore no single question to be answered, and your
challenge is to identify the most interesting issues and questions.
The essay should address your entrepreneurial project from a personal perspective and should cover:
how you assessed the opportunity how you tested and reiterated your idea how your team worked and the roles/working practices you developed how your project related to your academic courses and to the literature that you have read – and what you think you’ve learnt from the experience
any problems you encountered, including any particular dilemmas or tensions in bringing together
business approaches and social goals, and how these were managed.
Where possible you should relate your reflections to:
Your own professional experience (as relevant). If some experience, situation or issue in the AEP resonates with your professional experience, then please do explore this.
Your aspirations. Looking to the future, how might you use your learning from these experiences
to inform your future plans? Has the AEP changed anything for you in how you intend to create
social impact, or the processes and approaches that you might use?
Make sure that you move beyond description. Strong essays will move beyond a descriptive report of
what happened to reflection and critical analysis of the situations or processes encountered. Some
description of your project must be included, so that the reader knows the baseline facts of the proposed
enterprise and the process that you went through. But think of these different levels of presentation and
analysis:
What you did – a simple description of process and project. For example: the identification of
the social problem; design of the enterprise and intervention; moments of group tension or group