Recent orders
A Conversation on Black Feminist Thought and Trans Feminism
Name
Professor’s name
Course
Date
A Conversation on Black Feminist Thought and Trans Feminism
Kai Green and Marquis Bey, the authors of the article Where Black Feminist Thought and Trans* Feminism Meet: A Conversation, explain the Black Feminist Thought as a historical enterprise that pushes people to think about the limitations of gender binary. Black feminist thought brings in the perspective about the functioning of black cisgender women as a category. Additionally, the authors opine that the Black Feminist thought reveals the real material grievances and conditions affecting black cisgender. Black Feminist thought can help theorize liberation of intersecting forms of oppression in the sense that it criticizes the categorization of women(Green and Marquis 438). This school of thought results in pressure as regards the lack of ability to hold black women. Scholars invested in liberation must not always be women. Undoubtedly, if the category of “woman” would become more inclusive to include transgender, women, black and women of color, then the categorization would function usefully.
Just like the Black Feminist thought, trans feminism is an enterprise that has been historically imbricated. A transgender woman is a woman that is thought to be born male but lives in the current world as a woman. Similarly, transgender men are thought to be born female, but they live as male. Transfeminism is a movement that is vested in the notion that the rights of transgender women fall along the lines of the feminist movement, particularly the freedom to take on a gender identity that is different from the one assigned at birth. Transgender women are women too; it is not a question of if and buts because a woman’s concept of being female is their gender identity.
According to the text, the term “woman” must be prioritized because women have to deal with many issues that inform their problems. As if living in an unequal society where women are viewed as the lesser gender, women must deal with other additional problems brought about by race, class, etc. Women not only have to deal with being discriminated against along the lines of gender; these other factors of race only seem to exacerbate their negative experiences. Their skin color and social class only seem to overlap and cause an overlapping disadvantage.
In addition to being historically imbricated, the concepts of Black Feminism Thought and Transfeminism are similar in that they both name the refusal of trans antagonism, radicalized sexism, gender binary, antiblackness and a range of other sociohistorical and identificatory vectors linked to fatal hegemonic and hierarchical regimes. Both schools of thought call out these issues in different ways.
When using both Black Feminism and Transfeminism approaches, inclusivity is important as it brings in a new perspective on creative thinking. Incorporating all categories of women, including queer, transgender women, and black and women of color is critical to ensuring the participation of individuals that are keen to pay attention to the needs of groups that would otherwise be forgotten. Inclusivity makes it easy to ensure equality and non-discrimination.
Upon reading this text and reflecting upon it, I am convinced that there is hope for liberation from oppression. I believe that there is hope for attaining a gender-equal society. While the journey will not be easy and will take a lot of time to get there, we should take a day at a time. I cannot wait for the day when women’s categorization, whether queer, transgender, queer and black, will not be viewed as a hindrance to equality.
Works Cited
Green, Kai M., and Marquis Bey. “Where Black feminist thought and trans* feminism meet: A conversation.” Souls 19.4 (2017): 438-454.
A contemporary view of the family
Name:
Professor:
Course:
Date:
A contemporary view of the family
IntroductionThe family has been the primary unit of social relationship for many millennia. The traditional father, mother, and children dynamics have served as the fundamental basis of the definition of a family. However, sociologists have continued to rely on the direct relationship between the essential members of this nuclear unit of society until recent changes disrupted it. Modern “influences such as homosexuality and increased divorce have continued to redefine the family leading to the emergence of newer definitions that differentiate themselves from the traditional one completely” (Wooldridge 201). However, the main observation as this paper shall demonstrate is that the modern view of the family is slightly different from the traditional one.For many ages, the definition of family has been the relationship shared between the most basic units of the society. A typical couple would fall in love, get married, and then get children resulting in the formation of the family. The same definitions would extend to the members of the two families from where the father and mother came. Such views on the definition of the family led to the formation of tight bonds between these members, especially those in the nuclear family consisting of the father mother and the resulting children. Interestingly, the members of both families would extend kinship due to the union of the two members of their families. The new relations would lead to the formation of extended families, a characteristic of social bonding between different members of the society.However, recent pressures have changed these definitions resulting in the erosion of the principal bond that held the members of the family together. The factors that threaten the traditional definition of the family include manmade and natural incidents that often result in the destruction of the fundamental bond. The resulting fragments of the family are left to their own devices and due to the usual tendency of human being to desire the social and emotional relationship, seek out opportunities to form new families. Synthetic factors that destroy traditional familiesThe decay of morality in the modern society has led to many issues impacting on the family unit. Interestingly, this degradation, which has emanated from social development and evolution, has also led to the creation of new families that do not conform to the traditional definition of family. Infidelity is on the rise according to research as the principal constituents of the nuclear family, father, and mother, succumb to the increased pressures of adultery and philandering. Sociologists have tried to understand the increasingly high rate of family-related decay but other than the pressure from modernization and reduced consciousness of supporting factors such culture and religion, have come up short of answers.Issues related to polygamy have been fluctuating for millennia influenced by the development of legal constraints and religious factors. Long ago, men would marry as many wives as their ability to care for them would allow resulting in huge families consisting of co-wives and half-brothers and half-sisters. However, the spread of Christianity and Western lifestyles through exploration and colonization forced the society to drop the practices that contravened the Bible and Western lifestyle. Therefore, the cultural forces that Western culture and religion introduced into the traditional family destroyed it and reduced the same to newer forms that conform to the civilized definition, which conforms to religious laws.The industrialization of Britain led to a massive migration of laborers from the rural regions to the urban ones due to labor demands. These laborers had to leave their families in the rural areas in order to go earn a living in these areas. Unfortunately, the extended periods away from home eroded the emotional bond between the members of the family in the rural area and those working in the urban factories. Such economic factors have continued to undermine the definition of the modern family up to date as the roles of the family heads shift under the pressures absence from home causes (Prasad 81). The emotional burden and separation imposes tension on the family members where some result to alternative forms of respite such as adultery and alcoholism. With the adoption of such destructive alternatives, the family stands little chances of survival. Natural factors that destroy the traditional familyThe death of any of the two main pillars of the family; the mother or father, results in huge changes in the structure of the family. The parent who remains with children has to compensate for the absent spouse that is a tough job especially with young children. Many of these single parents choose to remarry to regain the companionship and support of the life mate in addition to obtaining assistance with the family. Therefore, death usually deals a huge blow to the traditional definition of family.Some of the diseases that modern human being has to face have a profound effect on the traditional definition of the family. While they do not necessarily pluck the affected member of the family as death does, the level of incapacitation has somewhat similar consequences to the family life. Strokes and brain diseases such as Alzheimer’s Syndrome affect the victim’s ability to coordinate their activities and interaction with even the most important member of their families resulting in strained relationships that sometimes collapse altogether. The contemporary familyThe society’s view of the family has changed from a functionalist one to a descriptive one. The traditional family was more about the functions and roles in society that related members could play, however, the contemporary one has other functions. With the pressures of divorce, death, and separation, the remaining fragments of the initial family have learned to cope by forming new bonds. These bonds are formed with existing families or other fragmented ones resulting to new families with new characteristics (Schwartz 429).There are new types of families that have evolved from these contemporary views of family. Based on biological, psychological, and legal factors, these families do not conform to the traditional characteristics of the family but do continue to offer an almost similar environment. Issues such as remarriage, divorce, separation, polygamy, and homosexuality have led to the emergence of new forms of families whose role of more descriptive that it is functional. Homosexuality has had the most profound effect on the family due to the radical changes it introduces to the components. When two men or women decide to marry, adopt children, and call it a family, the ramifications of the traditional definitions of marriage are profound. However, in the spirit of tolerance and equality, the modern society has nothing it can do other than watch as the definition of the family continues to evolve.
Works Cited
Prasad, Narendra. “Women Entrepreneurship Development in India.” Women and Development. New Delhi: A P H Publishing Corp, 2007. 81. Print.
Schwartz, Lita L. “What is a family? a contemporary view.” Springer Link 15.6 (1993): 429. Web. 21 Apr. 2015.
Wooldridge, Jeffrey. “Regression Analysis with Cross-sectional Data.” Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach Upper Level Economics Titles Series. San Diego: Cengage Learning,, 2012. 201. Print.
Lessons from Lehman Brothers
Lessons from Lehman Brothers
Name:
Institution:
Course:
Tutor:
Date:
Lessons from Lehman Brothers
The unethical culture that that was practiced by the top executive of Lehman Brothers Company that contributed to its downfall, is still being practiced by several organizations globally. The company encouraged risk oriented culture for financial gain and questionable characters were overlooked. The professional ethics came behind profit with the employees who made questionable deals hailed. This affected the morale of the employees and eventually bred misconduct. The Lehman brothers are reported to have used excessive accounting manipulations (Dillian, 2011). Just like Lehman’s CEO’s negligence or simply willful blindness, the top management of the several organizations globally has increasingly encouraged the filing of financial reports that are very misleading and thereby abusing the accounting procedures.
In the context of Lehman Brothers Company, it is significant to note that the unethical culture is still rampant since the management of several organizations is corrupt and the driving force is the appetite for money (Shirkhedkar, 2007). Just like the company in this case study, organizations have become greedy and this has subsequently motivated them to falsify the information that provides the true financial health of the organizations. Indeed, organizations are increasingly concerned with their image to the stakeholders and are willing to engage in riskier and bigger deals to maintain this. In a nutshell, the unethical practices such as the one seen in the company in this case study continues due to unrealistic plans of the company management and subsequently making money the ideal objective.
Businesses are expected to act ethically and there is nothing unreasonable with this school of thought. The organizational culture should be that which encourage responsibility, accountability and good behaviors. The companies should not just be concerned with the profits or financial gains but rather there must be social responsibility and adherence to ethical standards. It can be seen that the unethical practices within Lehman Brothers Company led to its collapse. Therefore, it is realistic for the organizations to act ethically not just for the sake of stakeholders but also the company.
References
Dillian, J. (September 13, 2011). Street Freak: Money and Madness at Lehman Brothers: A Memoir, New York: Simon and Schuster.
Shirkhedkar, J. (2007). Saving Lehman, One person at a time. McGraw-Hill,
