Recent orders
Non Hodgkins Lympoma and Hodgkins Lymphoma
Non-Hodgkins Lympoma and Hodgkins Lymphoma
Objectives:
– Discuss the global capstone topic in terms of a pathophysiologic condition or health state/event
that arises as a result.
– Examine the condition utilizing the concepts of the natural history of disease.
– Compare and contrast principles of epidemiology for the condition in the United States versus
globally.
Guidelines:
– Each student will use the topic initiated in the Fall 2019 semester in the Foundations of Nursing
course.
– From that topic, students will identify a pathophysiologic condition or health state/event that is a
direct outcome of the topic.
– Students will write a research-based paper on: 1) how this condition connects to the global
topic, 2) the history of the condition and 3) epidemiological characteristics of distribution,
determinants and specific populations.
– This paper requires the utilization of at least 4 quality research articles from reliable sources.
APA formatting is critical in terms of proper in-text citation and a reference page. Paper should
be between 5 and 7 pages (not counting reference page).
– This project will continue next year to a community perspective in NURS 425 with an
experiential component and from a global perspective in NURS 445.
Section 1: Introduction to the Health State/Event (20%)
– Introduce the disease/health state/event in terms of the global topic selected in semester one.
– Clearly state the selected disease and where it is found globally: Explain why this was chosen,
How does it connect to the global issue
– Use scholarly articles to support your ideas
Section 2: Natural History of Disease (30%)
– Discuss the course of disease from susceptibility to recovery/disability/death
– Susceptibility: who is at risk, precipitating events
Subclinical stage: what is happening at the cellular level, pathogenicity
– Clinical stage: manifestations of disease, sequela
– Recovery, disability or death: discuss prognosis and the most common end point
– use the CDC guidelines for this
Section 3: Epidemiological Characteristics (40%)
– Discuss the epidemiologic data about the disease/health state/event. Present findings on
distribution, determinants and specialized populations.
– Compare and contrast the U.S. data to that of either another country or worldwide. Include the
following:
– Distribution: include incidence, prevalence, morbidity and mortality rates. What is the level of
disease (endemic, epidemic, pandemic, sporadic)
– Determinants: discuss etiological sources
– Specialized populations: who are the people reflected in the data? Be as specific as possible.
– Remember to compare and contrast to another area of the world
– Use scholarly, reputable resources to support your work- either CDC or WHO
Section 4: APA Usage and grammar and selected articles (10%)
– Use APA (6th ed.) formatting throughout this paper,
– At least 4 scholarly articles will be used
– APA Checklist- make sure to include the following, which will affect your grade (see APA book):
– Title page with running head
– Appropriate pagination
– Paraphrasing with in-text citation (you are limited to 2 direct quotes in the entire paper with
appropriate citation)
– Properly formatted reference (works cited) page
PWR Nuclear Reactor vs PB-HTGR Nuclear Reactor
Instructions
In 3-4 pages, compare and contrast PWR Nuclear Reactor and PB-HTGR Nuclear Reactor
Decision Making Processes (Reflection Paper)
Think of recent decisions you have had to make.
They could be something big, for example, related to your education or career, or something simpler, like finding a place to eat.
Select two decisions that you have made using different processes, and describe those decisions using
terms from this week’s readings.
For example, did you use heuristics for one decision and deductive reasoning for another?
Address the strengths and weaknesses of your decisionmaking process and the outcomes of your decisions in terms of what theories of cognitive psychology tell us about how humans make decisions.
If you were to apply foundational theories of decision making to your process, how would it help or hinder your ability to make decisions?
